Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 182-199

  Koyutürk, Mehmet ^a,d   Kim, Yohan ^b   Topkara, Umut ^a   Subramaniam, Shankar ^b,c   Szpankowski, Wojciech ^a   Grama, Ananth ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary models; Network alignment; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DNA; JANUS KINASE; PROTEIN; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; STAT PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

ALGORITHM; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CYTOKINESIS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENDOCYTOSIS; ERROR; EVOLUTION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33645985807     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.182     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 25(17), 3389-3402.
2. Ashtana, S., King, O.D., Gibbons, F.D., and Roth, F.P. 2004. Predicting protein complex membership using probabilistic network reliability. Genome Res. 14, 1170-1175.
3. Bader, G.D., Donalson, I., Wolting, C., Quellette, B.F., Pawson, T., and Hogure, C.W. 2001. BIND-The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucl. Acids Res. 29(1), 242-245.
4. Bader, G.D., and Hogue, C.W.V. 2003. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4(2).
5. Bader, J.S. 2003. Greedily building protein networks with confidence. Bioinformatics 19, 1869-1874.
6. Barabási A., and Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509-512.
7. Berg, J., Lässig, M., and Wagner, A. 2004. Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: A statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. BMC Evol. Biol. 5(51).
8. Chung, F., Lu, L., Dewey, T.G., and Galas, D.J. 2003. Duplication models for biological networks. J. Comp. Biol. 10(5), 677-687.
9. Chung, F., Lu, L., and Vu, V. 2003. Spectra of random graphs with given expected degrees. PNAS 100(11), 6313-6318.
10. Cyert, M.S. et al. 2001. Genetic analysis of calmodulin and its targets in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ann. Rev. Genet. 35, 647-672.
11. Dandekar, T., Schuster, S., Snel, B., Huynen, M., and Bork, P. 1999. Pathway alignment: Application to the comparative analysis of glycolytic enzymes. Biochem. J. 343, 115-124.
12. Eisenberg, E., and Levanon, Y. 2003. Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution. Phys. Rev. Let. 91(13), 138701.
13. Feige, U., Peleg, D., and Kortsarz, G. 2001. The dense k-subgraph problem. Algorithmica 29(3), 410-421.
14. Fraser, H.B., Hirsh, A.E., Steinmetz, L.M., Scharfe, C., and Feldman, M.W. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296(5568), 750-752.
15. Fu, H. et al. 2001. Subunit interaction maps for the regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome and the COP9 signalosome. EMBO J. 20(24), 7096-7107.
16. Gavin, A.C. et al. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415(6868), 141-147.
17. Gilchrist, M.A., Salter, L.A., and Wagner, A. 2003. A statistical framework for combining and interpreting proteomic datasets. Bioinformatics 20(5), 689-700.
18. Groll, M. et al. 1997. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature 386(6624), 463-471.
19. Hartwell, L.H., Hopfield, J.J., Leibler, S., and Murray, A.W. 1999. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402, C47-C51.
20. Hassin, R., Rubinstein, S., and Tamir, A. 1997. Approximation algorithms for maximum dispersion. Oper. Res. Let. 21, 133-137.
21. Ho, Y. et al. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183.
22. Hu, H., Yan, X., Huang, Y., Han, J., and Zhou, X.J. 2005. Mining coherent dense subgraphs across massive biological networks for functional discovery. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl. 1), i213-i221.
23. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., and Sakaki, Y. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. PNAS 98(8), 4569-4574.
24. Jansen, R., Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., et al. 2003. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449-453.
25. Kelley, B.P., Sharan, R., Karp, R.M., Sittler, T., Root, D.E., Stockwell, B.R., and Ideker, T. 2003. Conserved pathways withing bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. PNAS 100(20), 11394-11399.
26. Kelley, B.P., Yuan, B., Lewitter, F., Sharan, R., Stockwell, B.R., and Ideker, T. 2004. PathBLAST: A tool for augment of protein interaction networks. Nucl. Acids Res. 32, W83-W88.
27. Kernighan, B.W., and Lin, S. 1970. An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs. The Bell System Tech. J. 49(2), 291-307.
28. Koyutürk, M., Grama, A., and Szpankowski, W. 2004. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks. Bioinformatics Suppl. 12th Int. Conf. Intel. Sys. Mol. Bio. (ISMB '04), i200-i207.
29. Koyutürk, M., Grama, A., and Szpankowski, W. 2005. Pairwise local alignment of protein interaction networks guided by models of evolution. RECOMB 2005, Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, 3500, 48-65.
30. Koyutürk, M., Grama, A., and Szpankowski, W. 2006. Assessing significance of connectivity and conservation in protein interaction networks. RECOMB 2006, Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, 3909, 45-59.
31. Kunin, V., Pereira-Leal, J.B., and Ouzounis, C.A. 2004. Functional evolution of the yeast protein interaction network. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7), 1171-1176.
32. Lotem, E.Y., Sattath, S., Kashtan, N., Itzkovitz, S., Milo, R., Pinter, R.Y., Alon, U., and Margalit, H. 2004. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. PNAS 101(16), 5934-5939.
33. Pastor-Satorras, R., Smith, E., and Sole, R.V. 2003. Evolving protein interaction networks through gene duplication. J. Theor. Biol. 222, 199-210.
34. Pinter, R.Y., Rokhlenko, O., Yeger-Lotem, E., and Ziv-Ukelson, M. 2005. Alignment of metabolic pathways. Bioinformatics. In press.
35. Qin, H., Lu, H.H.S., Wu, W.B., and Li, W. 2003. Evolution of the yeast protein interaction network. PNAS 100(22), 12820-12824.
36. Remm, M., Storm, C.E.V., and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. 2001. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041-1052.
37. Scholtens, D., Vidal, M., and Gentleman, R. 2005. Local modeling of global interactome networks. Bioinformatics 21(17), 3548-3557.
38. Sharan, R., Ideker, T., Kelley, B.P., Shamir, R., and Karp, R.M. 2004. Identification of protein complexes by comparative analysis of yeast and bacterial protein interaction data. 8th Intl. Conf. Res. Comp. Mol. Biol. (RECOMB '04), 282-289.
39. Sharan, R., Suthram, S., Kelley, R.M., Kuhn, T., McCuine, S., Uetz, P., Sittler, T., Karp, R.M., and Ideker, T. 2005. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. PNAS 102(6), 1974-1979.
40. Smith, T.F., and Waterman, M.S. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147(1), 195-197.
41. Tatusov, R.L., Galperin, M.Y., Natale, D.A., and Koonin, E.V. 2000. The COG database: A tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 33-36.
42. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL-W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
43. Titz, B., Schlesner, M., and Uetz, P. 2004. What do we learn from high-throughput protein interaction data? Exp. Rev. Prot. 1(1), 111-121.
44. Tohsato, Y., Matsuda, H., and Hashimoto, A. 2000. A multiple alignment algorithm for metabolic pathway analysis using enzyme hierarchy. 8th Int. Conf. Intel. Sys. Mol. Biol. (ISMB '00), 376-383.
45. Tornow, S., and Mewes, H.W. 2003. Functional modules by relating protein interaction networks and gene expression. Nucl. Acids Res. 31(21), 6283-6289.
46. Vázquez, A., Flammini, A., Maritan, A., and Vespignani, A. 2003. Modeling of protein interaction networks. ComPlexUs 1, 38-44.
47. Wagner, A. 2001. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18(7), 1283-1292.
48. Wagner, A. 2003. How the global structure of protein interaction networks evolves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 270(1514), 457-466.
49. Wuchty, S. 2004. Evolution and topology in the yeast protein interaction network. Genome Res. 14, 1310-1314.
50. Wuchty, S., Oltvai, Z.N., and Barabási, A.L. 2003. Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network. Nature Genet. 35(2), 176-179.
51. Xenarios, I., Salwinski, L., Duan, X.J., Higney, P., Kim, S., and Eisenberg, D. 2002. DIP: The Database of Interacting Proteins. A research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucl. Acids Res. 30, 303-305.