Physical network models

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 243-262

  Yeang, Chen Hsiang ^a   Ideker, Trey ^b   Jaakkola, Tommi ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Data integration; Gene regulation; Physical network

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATION; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOLOGY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DELETION MUTANT; DOWN REGULATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE CONTROL; GENE DELETION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; KNOCKOUT GENE; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UPREGULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROBABILITY; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; YEASTS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 3142550630     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/1066527041410382     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Andrews, N., Fleming, M., and Gunshin, H. 1999. Iron transport across biologic membranes. Nutrition Rev. 57(4), 114-123.
2. Cohen, B., Pilpel, Y., Mitra, R., and Church, G. 2002. Discrimination between paralogs using microarray analysis: Application to the yap1p and yap2p transcriptional networks. Mol. Biol. Cell 13(5), 1608-1614.
3. Deane, C., Salwinski, L., Xenarios, I., and Eisenberg, D. 2002. Protein interactions: Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1(5), 349-356.
4. Hartemink A., Gifford, D., Jaakkola, T., and Young, R. 2002. Combining location and expression data for principled discovery of genetic regulatory network models. Pacific Symposium of Biocomputing, 437-449.
5. Hughes, T., Marton, M., Jones, A., Roberts, C., Stoughton, R., Armour, C., Bennett, H., Coffey, E., Dai, H., He, Y., Kidd, M., King, A., Meyer, M., Slade, D., Lum, P., Stepaniants, S., Shoemaker, D., Gachotte, D., Chakraburtty, K., Simon, J., Bard, M., and Friend, S. 2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109-126.
6. Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B., and Siegel, A. 2002. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular integration networks. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl. 1, S233-S240.
7. Ideker, T., Thorsson, V., Ranish, J., Chirstmas, R., Buhler, J., Eng, J., Bumgarner, R., Goodlett, D., Aebersold, R., and Hood, L. 2001. Integrated genomic and proteomic analysis of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292, 929-934.
8. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., and Sakaki, Y. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(8), 4569-4574.
9. Kschischang, F., Frey, B., and Loeliger, H. 2001. Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47(2), 498-519.
10. Lee, T., Rinaldi, N., Robert, F. Odom, D., Bar-Joseph, Z., Gerber, G., Hannett, N., Harbison, C., Thimpson, C., Simon, I., Zeitlinger, J., Jennings, E., Murray, H., Gordon, B., Ren, B., Wyrick, J., Tagne, J., Volkert, T., Franekel, E., Gifford, D., and Young, R. 2002. A transcriptional regulatory network map for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799-804.
11. Natarajan, K., Meyer, M., Jakson, B., Slade, D., Roberts, C., Hinnebusch, A., and Marton, M. 2001. Transcriptional profiling shows that gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 21(13), 4347-4368.
12. Park S., Koh, S., Chun, J., Hwang, H., and Kang, H. 1999. Nrg1 is a transcriptional repressor for glucose repression of sta1 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 19(3), 2044-2050.
13. Rijcke, D., Seneca, S., Punyammalee, B, Glansdorff, N, and Crabeel, M. 1992. Characterization of the DNA target site for the yeast ARGR regulatory complex, a sequence able to mediate repression or induction by arginine. Mol. Cell Biol. 12(1), 68-81.
14. Schrick, K., Garvik, B., and Hartwell, L. 1997. Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The role of the pheromone signal transduction pathway in the chemotropic response to pheromone. Genetics 147(1), 19-32.
15. Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2), 461-464.
16. Segal, E., Barash, Y., Simon, I., Friedman, N., and Koller, D. 2002. From promoter sequence to expression: A probabilistic framework. 6th Int. Conf. Research In Computational Molecular Biology.
17. Simon, I., Barnett, J., Hannett, N., Harbison, C., Rinaldi, N., Volkert, T., Wyrick, J., Zeitlinger, J., Gifford, D., Jaakkola, T., and Young, R. 2001. Serial regulation of transcriptional regulators in the yeast cell cycle. Cell 106, 697-708.
18. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T., Judson, R., Knight, J., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., Qureshi-Emili, A., Li, Y., Godwin, B., Conover, D., Kalbfleisch, T., Vijayadamodar, G., Yang, M., Johnston, M., Fields, S., and Rothberg, J. 2000. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627.
19. Wainwright, M., Jaakkola, T., and Willsky, A. 2002. Exact map estimates by (hyper)tree agreement. Adv. Neur. Inf. Proc. Syst.
20. Weiss, Y., and Freeman, W. 2001. On the optimality solutions of the max-product belief propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 736-744.
21. Yeang, C., Ideker, T., and Jaakkola, T. 2003. Supplementary website, www.ai.mit.edu/people/tommi/suppl/jcb03/.
22. Yeang, C., and Jaakkola, T. 2003. Physical network models and multi-source data integration. 7th Int. Conf. Research in Computational Molecular Biology.