Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 803-806

  Hahn, Matthew W ^a,b   Kern, Andrew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint; Natural selection; Networks; Pleiotry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPARATIVE GENOMICS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; FLY; GENE MUTATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SURVIVAL RATE; WORM; YEAST;

EUKARYOTIC CELLS; EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; PROTEINS;

EID: 16344381521     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi072     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Almaas, E., B. Kovacs, T. Vicsek, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabasi. 2004. Global organization of metabolic fluxes in the bacterium Escherichia coli. Nature 427:839-843.
2. Barton, N. H., and P. D. Keightley. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:11-21.
3. Bloom, J. D., and C. Adami. 2003. Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:21.
4. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
5. Fraser, H. B., A. E. Hirsh, L. M. Steinmetz, C. Scharfe, and M. W. Feldman. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750-752.
6. Giaever, G., A. M. Chu, L. Ni et al. (63 co-authors). 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.
7. Giot, L., J. S. Bader, C. Brouwer et al. (39 co-authors). 2003. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302:1727-1736.
8. Hahn, M. W., G. C. Conant, and A. Wagner. 2004. Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: Does connectivity equal constraint? J. Mol. Evol. 58:203-211.
9. Hirsh, A. E., and H. B. Fraser. 2001. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411:1046-1049.
10. Hurst, L. D., and N. G. C. Smith. 1999. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9:747-750.
11. Jeong, H., S. P. Mason, A.-L. Barabasi, and Z. N. Oltvai. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
12. Jeong, H., B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabasi. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407:651-654.
13. Jordan, I. K., I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin. 2002. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. Genome Res. 12:962-968.
14. Kamath, R. S., A. G. Fraser, Y. Dong et al (13 co-authors). 2003. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421:231-237.
15. Krylov, D. M., Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin. 2003. Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res. 13:2229-2235.
16. Li, S. M., C. M. Armstrong, N. Bertin et al. (38 co-authors). 2004. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303:540-543.
17. Maeda, I., Y. Kohara, M. Yamamoto, and A. Sugimoto. 2001. Large-scale analysis of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans by high-throughput RNAi. Curr. Biol. 11:171-176.
18. Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
19. Promislow, D. E. L. 2004. Protein networks, pleiotropy and the evolution of senescence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 271:1225-1234.
20. Rausher, M. D., R. E. Miller, and P. Tiffin. 1999. Patterns of evolutionary rate variation among genes of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:266-274.
21. Ravasz, E., A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabasi. 2002. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297:1551-1555.
22. Stein, L. D., Z. R. Bao, D. Blasiar et al. (26 co-authors). 2003. The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A platform for comparative genomics. PLoS Biol. 1:166-192.
23. Wagner, A. 2001. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1283-1292.
24. Wagner, A., and D. Fell. 2001. The small world inside large metabolic networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 280:1803-1810.
25. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Waxman, D., and J. R. Peck. 1998. Pleiotropy and the preservation of perfection. Science 279:1210-1213.
27. Yang, J., Z. L. Gu, and W. H. Li. 2003. Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:772-774.