Computationally mapping sequence space to understand evolutionary protein engineering

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 62-73

  Armstrong, Kathryn A ^a,b   Tidor, Bruce ^a,b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING AFFINITY; EVOLUTIONARY PROTEIN ENGINEERING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

PROTEINS;

APROTININ; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; IGG FC BINDING PROTEIN, STREPTOCOCCUS; IGG FC-BINDING PROTEIN, STREPTOCOCCUS; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; CATTLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; APROTININ; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 38949187931     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bp070134h     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Bloom, J. D.; Meyer, M. M.; Meinhold, P.; Otey, C. R.; MacMillan, D.; Arnold, F. H. Evolving strategies for enzyme engineering. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005, 15, 447-452.
2. Reetz, M. T. Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: Practical and theoretical ramifications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5716-5722.
3. Levin, A. M.; Weiss, G. A. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. Mol. Biosyst. 2006, 2, 49-57.
4. Baker, D. Prediction and design of macromolecular structures and interactions. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B. 2006, 361, 459-463.
5. Butterfoss, G. L.; Kuhlman, B. Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol Struct. 2006, 35, 49-65.
6. Vizcarra, C. L.; Mayo, S. L. Electrostatics in computational protein design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 622-626.
7. Dwyer, M. A.; Looger, L. L.; Hellinga, H. W. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 2004, 304, 1967-1971.
8. Li, H.; Helling, R.; Tang, C.; Wingreen, N. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 1996, 273, 666-669.
9. Koehl, P.; Levitt, M. Protein topology and stability define the space of allowed sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 1280-1285.
10. Bogarad, L. D.; Deem, M. W. A hierarchical approach to protein molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 2591-2595.
11. Moore, G. L.; Maranas, C. D. Modeling DNA mutation and recombination for directed evolution experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 205, 483-503.
12. Maheshri, N.; Schaffer, D. V. Computational and experimental analysis of DNA shuffling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3071-3076.
13. Olsen, M.; Iverson, B.; Georgiou, G. High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 331-337.
14. Amstutz, P.; Forrer, P.; Zahnd, C.; Pluckthun, A. In vitro display technologies: Novel developments and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 400-405.
15. Boder, E. T.; Wittrup, K. D. Yeast surface display for directed evolution of protein expression, affinity, and stability. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 328, 430-444.
16. Daugherty, P. S.; Chen, G.; Olsen, M. J.; Iverson, B. L.; Georgiou, G. Antibody affinity maturation using bacterial surface display. Protein Eng. 1998, 11, 825-832.
17. Samuelson, P.; Gunneriusson, E.; Nygren, P.; Stahl, S. Display of proteins on bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 96, 129-154.
18. Smith, G. P.; Petrenko, V. A. Phage display. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 391-410.
19. Seed, B. Purification of genomic sequences from bacteriophage libraries by recombination and selection in vivo. Nucl. Acids. Res. 1983, 11, 2427-2445.
20. Roberts, R. W.; Szostak, J. W. RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 12297-12302.
21. Hanes, J.; Plückthun, A. In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 4937-4942.
22. Tawfik, D. S.; Griffiths, A. D. Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 652-656.
23. Stemmer, W. P. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 1994, 370, 389-391.
24. Hayes, R. I.; Bentzien, I.; Ary, M. L.; Hwang, M. Y.; Jacinto, J. M.; Vielmetter, J.; Kundu, A.; Dahiyat, B. I. Combining computational and experimental screening for rapid optimization of protein properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 15926-15931.
25. Wahler, D.; Reymond, J. Novel methods for biocatalyst screening. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 152-158.
26. Campbell, R. E.; Tour, O.; Palmer, A. E.; Steinbach, P. A.; Baird, G. S.; Zacharias, D. A.; Tsien, R. Y. A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 7877-7882.
27. Bevis, B. J.; Glick, B. S. Rapidly maturing variants of the Discosoma red fluorescent protein (DsRed). Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 83-87.
28. Voigt, C. A.; Mayo, S. L.; Arnold, F. H.; Wang, Z. Computationally focusing the directed evolution of proteins. J. Cell Biochem. Suppl. 2001, 37, 58-63.
29. Zhao, H.; Arnold, F. H. Directed evolution converts subtilisin E into a functional equicalent of thermitase. Prot. Eng. 1999, 12, 47-53.
30. Arnold, F. H. Design by directed evolution. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 125-131.
31. Neylon, C. Chemical and biochemical strategies for the randomization of protein encoding DNA sequences: library construction methods for directed evolution. Nucl. Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1448-1459.
32. Daugherty, P. S.; Chen, G.; Iverson, B. L.; Georgiou, G. Quantitative analysis of the effect of the mutation frequency on the affinity maturation of single chain Fv antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2029-2034.
33. Zaccolo, M.; Gherardi, E. The effect of high-frequency random mutagenesis on in vitro protein evolution: A study on TEM-1 beta-lactamase. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 775-783.
34. Coco, W. M.; Levinson, W. E.; Crist, M. J.; Hektor, H. J.; Darzins, A.; Pienkos, P. T.; Squires, C. H.; Monticello, D. J. DNA shuffling method for generating highly recombined genes and evolved enzymes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 354-359.
35. Zhao, H. M.; Giver, L.; Shao, Z. X.; Affholter, J. A.; Arnold, F. H. Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 258-261.
36. Rowe, L. A.; Geddie, M. L.; Alexander, O. B.; Matsumura, I. A comparison of directed evolution approaches using the β-glucuronidase model system. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 851-860.
37. Ostermeier, M.; Shim, J. H.; Benkovic, S. J. A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 1205-1209.
38. Zha, D. X.; Eipper, A.; Reetz, M. T. Assembly of designed oligonucleotides as an efficient method for gene recombination: A new tool in directed evolution. ChemBioChem 2003, 4, 34-39.
39. Mena, M. A.; Treynor, T. P.; Mayo, S. L.; Daugherty, P. S. Blue fluorescent proteins with enhanced brightness and photostability from a structurally targeted library. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1569-1571.
40. Silberg, J. J.; Endelman, J. B.; Arnold, F. H. SCHEMA-guided protein recombination. Methods Enzymol. 2004, 388, 35-42.
41. Saraf, M. C.; Horswill, A. R.; Benkovic, S. J.; Maranas, C. D. FamClash: A method for ranking the activity of engineered enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 4142-4147.
42. Voigt, C. A.; Mayo, S. L.; Arnold, F. H.; Wang, Z. Computational method to reduce the search space for directed protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 3778-3783.
43. Saraf, M. C.; Moore, G. L.; Goodey, N. M.; Cao, V. Y.; Benkovic, S. J.; Maranas, C. D. IPRO: An iterative computational protein library redesign and optimization procedure. Biophys. J. 2006, 90, 4167-4180.
44. Bloom, J. D.; Labthavikul, S. T.; Otey, C. R.; Arnold, F. H. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 5869-5874.
45. Parkin, S.; Rupp, B.; Hope, H. The structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at 125 K: Definition of carboxyl-terminal residues Gly57 and Ala58. Acta. Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 1996, 52, 18-29.
46. Verdecia, M. A.; Bowman, M. E.; Lu, K. P.; Hunter, T.; Noel, J. P. Structural basis for the phosphoserine-proline recognition by group IV WW domains. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 639-643.
47. Derrick, J. P.; Wigley, D. B. The third IgG-binding domain from streptococcal protein G: An analysis by x-ray crystallography of the structure alone and in complex with FAB. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 243, 906-918.
48. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
49. Lau, K. F.; Dill, K. A. Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 638-642.
50. Lim, W. A.; Sauer, R. T. Alternative packing arrangements in the hydrophobic core of λ repressor. Nature 1989, 339, 31-36.
51. Kamtekar, S.; Schiffer, J. M.; Xiong, H.; Babik, J. M.; Hecht, M. H. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science 1993, 262, 1680-1685.
52. Bloom, J. D.; Wilke, C. O.; Arnold, F. H.; Adami, C. Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 2758-2764.
53. Reetz, M. T.; Carballeira, J. D.; Vogel, A. Iterative saturation mutagenesis on the basis of B factors as a strategy for increasing protein thermostability. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7745-7751.
54. Wong, A.; Albright, S. N.; Wolfner, M. F. Evidence for structural constraint on ovulin, a rapidly evolving Drosophila melanogaster seminal protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 2006, 103, 18644-18649.
55. Hill, C. M.; Li, W. S.; Thoden, J. B.; Holden, H. M.; Raushel, F. M. Enhanced degradation of chemical warfare agents through molecular engineering of the phosphotriesterase active site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8990-8991.
56. Green, D. F.; Dennis, A. T.; Fam, P. S.; Tidor, B.; Jasanoff, A. Rational design of new binding specificity by simultaneous mutagenesis of calmodulin and a target peptide. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 12547-12559.
57. Altschul, S. F.; Madden, T. L.; Schaffer, A. A.; Zhang, J.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389-3402.
58. Helling, R.; Li, H.; Mélin, R.; Miller, J.; Wingreen, N.; Zeng, C.; Tang, C. The designability of protein structures. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2001, 19, 157-167.
59. Bornberg-Bauer, E.; Chan, H. S. Modeling evolutionary landscapes: Mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 10689-10694.
60. Xia, Y.; Levitt, M. Funnel-like organization in sequence space determines the distributions of protein stability and folding rate preferred by evolution. Proteins 2004, 55, 107-114.
61. Kuhlman, B.; Baker, D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 10383-10388.
62. Larson, S. M.; England, J. L.; Desjarlais, J. R.; Pande, V. S. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: Large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 2804-2813.
63. Stemmer, W. P. C. DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: In vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 10747-10751.
64. Desmet, J.; de Maeyer, M.; Hazes, B.; Lasters, I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 1992, 356, 539-542.
65. Leach, A. R.; Lemon, A. P. Exploring the conformational space of protein side chains using dead-end elimination and the A* algorithm. Proteins. 1998, 33, 227-239.
66. Sitkoff, D.; Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. Accurate calculation of hydration free-energies using macroscopic solvent models. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1978-1988.
67. Dunbrack, R. L.; Karplus, M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins: Application to side-chain prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 543-574.
68. Dunbrack, R. L.; Cohen, F. E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein sidechain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1661-1681.
69. Dunbrack, R. L.; Karplus, M. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 431-440.
70. Malakauskas, S. M.; Mayo, S. L. Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998, 5, 470-475.
71. O'Madadhain, J.; Fisher, D.; White, S. JUNG: Java Universal Network/Graph Framework, http://jung.sourceforge.net.
72. Corman, T. H.; Leiserson, C. E.; Rivest, R. L.; Stein, C. Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, 2001.