The model organism as a system: Integrating 'omics' data sets

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 198-210

  Joyce, Andrew R ^a   Palsson, Bernhard Ø ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEOPROTEIN; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGY; BRUCELLA MELITENSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL STRUCTURE; DECOMPOSITION; DNA INTEGRATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE CONTROL; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TARGETING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; ORGANISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA TRANSCRIPTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; CELL PHYSIOLOGY; DNA; GENOME; GENOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEINS; PROTEOME; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

ARABIDOPSIS; BRUCELLA MELITENSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33644527950     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm1857     Document Type: Review

References (129)

1. Fleischmann, R. D. et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269, 496-512 (1995).
2. 12 bytes of data, technology tries to clear up its own complex mess. Mechanical Engineering-CIME 127, 26 (2005).
3. Hays, C. L. What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits. New York Times (14 Nov 2004).
4. Hand, D. J., Blunt, G., Kelly, M. G. & Adams, N. M. Data mining for fun and profit. Stat. Sci. 15, 111-131 (2000).
5. Kluger, Y., Yu, H., Qian, J. & Gerstein, M. Relationship between gene co-expression and probe localization on microarray slides. BMC Genomics 4, 49 (2003).
6. Quackenbush, J. Data standards for 'omic' science. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 613-614 (2004). A short, incisive report that introduces some of the problems that the omics sciences face with regards to data quality and representation standards.
7. Bader, G. D. & Hogue, C. W. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 991-997 (2002).
8. Ge, H., Walhout, A. J. & Vidal, M. Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet. 19, 551-560 (2003).
9. Liolios, K., Tavernarakis, N., Hugenholtz, P. & Kyrpides, N. C. The genomes on line database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D332-D334 (2006).
10. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241-254 (2003).
11. Chimpanzee Sequencing And Analysis Consortium. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437, 69-87 (2005).
12. Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 361-375 (2005).
13. Tompa, M. et al. Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 137-144 (2005).
14. Brasch, M. A., Hartley, J. L. & Vidal, M. ORFeome cloning and systems biology: standardized mass production of the parts from the parts-list. Genome Res. 14, 2001-2009 (2004).
15. Hardiman, G. Microarray platforms - comparisons and contrasts. Pharmacogenomics 5, 487-502 (2004).
16. Harbers, M. & Carninci, P. Tag-based approaches for transcriptome research and genome annotation. Nature Methods 2, 495-502 (2005).
17. Li, L. & Akashi, K. Unraveling the molecular components and genetic blueprints of stem cells. Biotechniques 35, 1233-1239 (2003).
18. Rhodes, D. R. & Chinnaiyan, A. M. Integrative analysis of the cancer transcriptome. Nature Genet. 37, S31-S37 (2005).
19. Jenner, R. G. & Young, R. A. Insights into host responses against pathogens from transcriptional profiling. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 3, 281-294 (2005).
20. Mata, J., Marguerat, S. & Bahler, J. Post-transcriptional control of gene expression: a genome-wide perspective. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 506-514 (2005).
21. Patterson, S. D. & Aebersold, R. H. Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nature Genet. 33 (Suppl.), 311-323 (2003).
22. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
23. Yates, J. R. 3rd, Gilchrist, A., Howell, K. E. & Bergeron, J. J. Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 702-714 (2005).
24. Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & Aebersold, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 577-583 (2005).
25. Griffin, J. L. & Bollard, M. E. Metabonomics: its potential as a tool in toxicology for safety assessment and data integration. Curr. Drug Metab. 5, 389-398 (2004).
26. Nielsen, J. & Oliver, S. The next wave in metabolome analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 23, 544-546 (2005).
27. Dunn, W. B., Bailey, N. J. & Johnson, H. E. Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst 130, 606-625 (2005).
28. Fridman, E. & Pichersky, E. Metabolomics, genomics, proteomics, and the identification of enzymes and their substrates and products. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 242-248 (2005).
29. Markuszewski, M. J., Szczykowska, M., Siluk, D. & Kaliszan, R. Human red blood cells targeted metabolome analysis of glycolysis cycle metabolites by capillary electrophoresis using an indirect photometric detection method. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 39, 636-642 (2005).
30. 13C-labeled cell extracts as internal standards. Anal. Biochem. 336, 164-171 (2005).
31. Memelink, J. Tailoring the plant metabolome without a loose stitch. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 305-307 (2005).
32. Robertson, D. G. Metabonomics in toxicology: a review. Toxicol. Sci. 85, 809-822 (2005).
33. Gibney, M. J. et al. Metabolomics in human nutrition: opportunities and challenges. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82, 497-503 (2005).
34. Arita, M., Robert, M. & Tomita, M. All systems go: launching cell simulation fueled by integrated experimental biology data. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 344-349 (2005).
35. Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686-691 (2003).
36. Dupuy, D. et al. A first version of the Caenorhabditis elegans promoterome. Genome Res. 14, 2169-2175 (2004).
37. Guda, C. & Subramaniam, S. pTARGET: a new method for predicting protein subcellular localization in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics 21, 3963-3969 (2005).
38. Coulton, G. Are histochemistry and cytochemistry 'Omics'? J. Mol. Histol. 35, 603-613 (2004).
39. Wenk, M. R. The emerging field of lipidomics. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 594-610 (2005).
40. Shriver, Z., Raguram, S. & Sasisekharan, R. Glycomics: a pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 863-873 (2004).
41. Levine, M. & Davidson, E. H. Gene regulatory networks for development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4936-4942 (2005).
42. Mockler, T. C. et al. Applications of DNA tiling arrays for whole-genome analysis. Genomics 85, 1-15 (2005).
43. Buck, M. J. & Lieb, J. D. ChIP-chip: considerations for the design, analysis, and application of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Genomics 83, 349-360 (2004).
44. Herring, C. D. et al. Immobilization of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and location of binding sites by use of chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 187, 6166-6174 (2005).
45. Pokholok, D. K., Hannett, N. M. & Young, R. A. Exchange of RNA polymerase II initiation and elongation factors during gene expression in vivo. Mol. Cell 9, 799-809 (2002).
46. Kim, T. H. et al. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436, 876-880 (2005).
47. Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99-104 (2004).
48. Li, Z. et al. A global transcriptional regulatory role for c-Myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8164-8169 (2003).
49. Martone, R. et al. Distribution of NF-κB-binding sites across human chromosome 22. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12247-12252 (2003).
50. Cawley, S. et al. Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs. Cell 116, 499-509 (2004).
51. Zhang, X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of cAMP-response element binding protein occupancy, phosphorylation, and target gene activation in human tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4459-4464 (2005).
52. Pokholok, D. K. et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517-527 (2005).
53. Cusick, M., Klitgord, N., Vidal, M. & Hill, D. E. Interactome: gateway into systems biology. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R171-R181 (2005).
54. Fields, S. High-throughput two-hybrid analysis. The promise and the peril. FEBS J. 272, 5391-5399 (2005).
55. Ben-Hur, A. & Noble, W. S. Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics 21 (Suppl. 1), i38-i46 (2005).
56. Pazos, F., Ranea, J. A., Juan, D. & Sternberg, M. J. Assessing protein co-evolution in the context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol. 352, 1002-1015 (2005).
57. Droit, A., Poirier, G. G. & Hunter, J. M. Experimental and bioinformatic approaches for interrogating protein-protein interactions to determine protein function. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 34, 263-280 (2005).
58. Butland, G. et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531-537 (2005).
59. Rain, J. C. et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 409, 211-215 (2001).
60. Lacount, D. J. et al. A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 438, 103-107 (2005).
61. Ito, T. et al. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1, 561-566 (2002).
62. Formstecher, E. et al. Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res. 15, 376-384 (2005).
63. Li, S. et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303, 540-543 (2004).
64. Stelzl, U. et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122, 957-968 (2005).
65. Scholtens, D., Vidal, M. & Gentleman, R. Local modeling of global interactome networks. Bioinformatics 21, 3548-3557 (2005).
66. Hahn, M. W., Conant, G. C. & Wagner, A. Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J. Mol. Evol. 58, 203-211 (2004).
67. Sprinzak, E., Sattath, S. & Margalit, H. How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J. Mol. Biol. 327, 919-923 (2003).
68. Roehrl, M. H., Wang, J. Y. & Wagner, G. A general framework for development and data analysis of competitive high-through put screens for small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions by fluorescence polarization. Biochemistry 43, 16056-16066 (2004).
69. Bochner, B. R. New technologies to assess genotype-phenotype relationships. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 309-314 (2003).
70. Bredel, M. & Jacoby, E. Chemogenomics: an emerging strategy for rapid target and drug discovery. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 262-275 (2004).
71. Dykxhoorn, D. M. & Lieberman, J. The silent revolution: RNA interference as basic biology, research tool, and therapeutic. Annu. Rev. Med. 56, 401-423 (2005).
72. Tong, A. H. et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808-813 (2004).
73. Sauer, U. High-throughput phenomics: experimental methods for mapping fluxomes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 58-63 (2004).
74. Li, H. & Wang, W. Dissecting the transcription networks of a cell using computational genomics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 611-616 (2003).
75. Wang, W. et al. Inference of combinatorial regulation in yeast transcriptional networks: a case study of sporulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1998-2003 (2005).
76. Bar-Joseph, Z. et al. Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1337-1342 (2003). Introduces the GRAM algorithm that can be used to identify gene modules or groups of co-expressed genes that share a common transcriptional regulator. This approach is useful for inferring transcriptional-regulatory networks from omics data sets.
77. Gat-Viks, I., Tanay, A. & Shamir, R. Modeling and analysis of heterogeneous regulation in biological networks. J. Comput. Biol. 11, 1034-1049 (2004).
78. Yeang, C. H. et al. Validation and refinement of gene-regulatory pathways on a network of physical interactions. Genome Biol. 6, R62 (2005).
79. Jansen, R. et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449-453 (2003).
80. Rhodes, D. R. et al. Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 951-959 (2005). This study illustrates the use of a Bayesian classification strategy to predict the structure of molecular networks - orthologous protein-protein interactions, transcriptomics and genomics data were integrated to develop a Bayesian model that predicts 40,000 human protein-protein interactions.
81. Yeger-Lotem, E. et al. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5934-5939 (2004). This work presents a methodology to decompose cellular networks into their constituent basic building blocks, or network motifs. Although the technique can be applied to networks of any type, this study focuses on the analysis of a S. cerevisiae network derived from genome-scale protein-protein- and protein-DNA-interaction data sets.
82. Yeger-Lotem, E. & Margalit, H. Detection of regulatory circuits by integrating the cellular networks of protein-protein interactions and transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6053-6061 (2003).
83. Zhang, L. V. et al. Motifs, themes and thematic maps of an integrated Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction network. J. Biol. 4, 6 (2005).
84. Luscombe, N. M. et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 431, 308-312 (2004).
85. Han, J. D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88-93 (2004).
86. Tanay, A., Sharan, R., Kupiec, M. & Shamir, R. Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genomewide data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2981-2986 (2004).
87. Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B. & Siegel, A. F. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S233-S240 (2002).
88. Wong, S. L. et al. Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15682-15687 (2004).
89. Kelley, R. & Ideker, T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 561-566 (2005).
90. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., Okuno, Y. & Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D277-D280 (2004).
91. Price, N. D., Reed, J. L. & Palsson, B. O. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 886-897 (2004). This review discusses the COBRA approach to modelling genome-scale molecular networks by integrating genome-scale data sets with a specific emphasis on the many recent analytical methods that are associated with these models for studying characteristics and capabilities of microorganisms.
92. Reed, J. L., Famili, I., Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. O. Towards multidimensional genome annotation. Nature Rev. Genet 7, 130-141 (2006).
93. Palsson, B. Two-dimensional annotation of genomes. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 1218-1219 (2004).
94. Patil, K. R., Akesson, M. & Nielsen, J. Use of genome-scale microbial models for metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 64-69 (2004).
95. Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2685-2689 (2005).
96. Covert, M. W., Knight, E. M., Reed, J. L., Herrgard, M. J. & Palsson, B. O. Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks. Nature 429, 92-96 (2004).
97. Papin, J. A. & Palsson, B. O. The JAK-STAT signaling network in the human B-cell: an extreme signaling pathway analysis. Biophys. J. 87, 37-46 (2004).
98. Longabaugh, W. J., Davidson, E. H. & Bolouri, H. Computational representation of developmental genetic regulatory networks. Dev. Biol. 283, 1-16 (2005). The reconstruction and modelling of developmental gene-regulatory networks is detailed by integrating various data types using the BioTapestry modelling software.
99. Saghatelian, A. & Cravatt, B. F. Global strategies to integrate the proteome and metabolome. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9, 62-68 (2005).
100. Begley, T. J., Rosenbach, A. S., Ideker, T. & Samson, L. D. Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping. Mol. Cell 16, 117-125 (2004).
101. Lee, W. et al. Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet. 1, e24 (2005).
102. Haugen, A. C. et al. Integrating phenotypic and expression profiles to map arsenic-response networks. Genome Biol. 5, R95 (2004).
103. Kim, J. K. et al. Functional genomic analysis of RNA interference in C. elegans. Science 308, 1164-1167 (2005).
104. Tewari, M. et al. Systematic interactome mapping and genetic perturbation analysis of a C. elegans TGF-β signaling network. Mol. Cell 13, 469-482 (2004).
105. Boulton, S. J. et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295, 127-131 (2002).
106. Gunsalus, K. C. et al. Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 436, 861-865 (2005). This study integrated transcriptomics, protein-protein interactions and RNAi-based phenomics to map the molecular network topology of genes associated with early embryogenesis in C. elegans. The resulting structure is used to infer potential network organizational and functional properties such as interacting molecular complexes and cellular-process crosstalk.
107. Oksman-Caldentey, K. M. & Saito, K. Integrating genomics and metabolomics for engineering plant metabolic pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 174-179 (2005).
108. Kristensen, C. et al. Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1779-1784 (2005). This study used omics data integration to diagnose unexpected impacts of genomic manipulations on the phenotype of the organism. Metabolomic and transcriptomic data were integrated to assess the systems-wide impact of introducing exogenous high-flux pathways to A. thaliana.
109. Hirai, M. Y. et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10205-10210 (2004).
110. Ippolito, J. E. et al. An integrated functional genomics and metabolomics approach for defining poor prognosis in human neuroendocrine cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9901-9906 (2005). The utility of integrating omics data to identify biomarkers is shown in this work, which integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics data to determine a molecular signature that is associated with poor-prognosis human neuroendocrine cancers.
111. Yan, W. et al. System-based proteomic analysis of the interferon response in human liver cells. Genome Biol. 5, R54 (2004).
112. Enard, W. et al. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science 296, 340-343 (2002).
113. Khaitovich, P. et al. Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309, 1850-1854 (2005).
114. Khaitovich, P. et al. Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains. Genome Res. 14, 1462-1473 (2004).
115. Ihmels, J. et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309, 938-940 (2005). Genomics and transcriptomics data are integrated to identify a cis-regulatory element associated with the evolutionary emergence of rapid anaerobic growth capacity in certain yeast species. This study highlights the potential of integrating omics data sets to address fundamental evolutionary questions.
116. Tanay, A., Regev, A. & Shamir, R. Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7203-7208 (2005).
117. Shields, R. MIAME, we have a problem. Trends Genet. 22, 65-66 (2006).
118. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003). One of the most widely used and broadly accessible software packages designed to facilitate omics data integration and analysis, known as Cytoscape, is detailed in this report.
119. Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19, 524-531 (2003).
120. Novere, N. L. et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nature Biotechnol. 23, 1509-1515 (2005).
121. Stierum, R., Heijne, W., Kienhuis, A., van Ommen, B. & Groten, J. Toxicogenomics concepts and applications to study hepatic effects of food additives and chemicals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 207, 179-188 (2005).
122. Corthesy-Theulaz, I. et al. Nutrigenomics: the impact of biomics technology on nutrition research. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 49, 355-365 (2005).
123. Desiere, F. Towards a systems biology understanding of human health: interplay between genotype, environment and nutrition. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 10, 51-84 (2004).
124. Roche, H. M., Phillips, C. & Gibney, M. J. The metabolic syndrome: the crossroads of diet and genetics. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 64, 371-377 (2005).
125. Ibrahim, S. M. & Gold, R. Genomics, prateomics, metabolomics: what is in a word for multiple sclerosis? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 18, 231-235 (2005).
126. Khalil, I. G. & Hill, C. Systems biology for cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 17, 44-48 (2005).
127. Nikolsky, Y., Nikolskaya, T. & Bugrim, A. Biological networks and analysis of experimental data in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 10, 653-662 (2005).
128. Billings, P. R. et al. Ready for genomic medicine? Perspectives of health care decision makers. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1917-1919 (2005).
129. Deeds, E. J., Ashenberg, O. & Shakhnovich, E. I. A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 311-316 (2006).