Local modeling of global interactome networks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 17, 2005, Pages 3548-3557

  Scholtens, Denise ^a,d   Vidal, Marc ^b   Gentleman, Robert ^c  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 24144486554     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti567     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alberts,B. (1998) The cell as a collection of protein machines: Preparing the next generation of molecular biologists, Cell, 92 291-294.
2. Archambault,J. and Friesen,J.D. (1993) Genetics of eukaryotic RNA polymerase I, II, and III, Microbiol. Rev., 57, 703-724.
3. Bader,G. and Hogue,C.W. (2002) Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources, Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 991-997.
4. Bader,G. and Hogue,C.W. (2003) An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks, BMC Bioinformatics 4, 2.
5. Dwight,S.S. et al. (2002) Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the Gene Ontology (GO), Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 69-72.
6. Gavin,A.-C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes, Nature, 415, 141-147.
7. Ge,H. et al. (2001) Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nat. Genet., 29, 482-486.
8. Giot,L. et al. (2003) A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 302, 1727-1736.
9. Grigoriev,A. (2001) A relationship between gene expression and protein interactions on the proteome scale: Analysis of bacteriophase T7 and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 3513-3519.
10. Gross,S. and Moore,C. (2001) Five subunits are required for reconstitution of the cleavage and polyadenylation activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cleavage factor I, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 6080-6085.
11. Hartwell,L. et al. (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology, Nature, 402, C47-C52.
12. Hirano,T. (1999) SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: A conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates?, Genes Devel., 13, 11-19.
13. Ho,Y. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry, Nature, 415, 180-183.
14. Ihaka,R. and Gentleman,R. (1996) R: A language for data analysis and graphics, J. Comp. Graph. Stat., 5, 299-314.
15. Ito,T. et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
16. Jeong,H. et al. (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks, Nature, 411, 41-42.
17. Jiang,Y. and Broach,J. (1999) Tor proteins and protein phosphatase 2A reciprocally regulate Tap42 in controlling cell growth in yeast, EMBO J, 18, 2782-2792.
18. Kemmeren,P. et al. (2002) Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data, Mol. Cell, 9, 1133-1143.
19. Krause,R. et al. (2003) A comprehensive set of protein complexes in yeast: Mining large scale protein-protein interaction screens, Bioinformatics, 19, 1901-1908.
20. Li,S. et al. (2004) A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans, Science, 303, 540-543.
21. Phan,L. et al. (1998) Identification of a translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) core complex, conserved in yeast and mammals, that interacts with eIF5, Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 4935-4946.
22. met, EMBO J., 20, 2954-2965.
23. Regelmann,J. et al. (2003) Catabolite degradation of fructose-1,6-biphosphatase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide screen idenitifes eight nodel GID genes and indicates the existence of two degradation pathways, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 1652-1663.
24. Salwinski,L. and Eisenberg,D. (2003) Computational methods of analysis of protein-protein interactions, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13 377-382.
25. Scholtens,D. and Gentleman,R. (2004) Making sense of high-throughput protein-protein interaction data. Stat. App. in Genetics and Mol. Biol. 3, Article 39.
26. Tavazoie,S. et al. (1999) Systematic determination of genetic network architecture, Nat. Genet., 22, 281-285.
27. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature, 403, 623-627.
28. Vidal,M. (2001) A biological atlas of functional maps, Cell, 104, 333-339.
29. von Mering,C. et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions, Nature, 417, 399-403.
30. Winter,D. et al. (1997) The complex containing actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 is required for the motility and integrity of yeast actin patches, Curr. Biol., 7, 519-529.