Kernel methods for predicting protein-protein interactions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages

  Ben Hur, Asa ^a   Noble, William Stafford ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ACCURATE PREDICTION; DATA SOURCE; FALSE POSITIVE; FALSE POSITIVE RATES; GENE ONTOLOGY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT METHOD; INTERACTION DATABASE; INTERACTION NETWORKS; KERNEL METHODS; LOCAL PROPERTY; MODEL ORGANISMS; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; PROTEIN SEQUENCES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

FORECASTING; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

PROTEINS;

EID: 24744435534     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bader,G.D. Donaldson,I., Wolting,C. Ouellette,B.F., Pawson,T. and Hogue,C.W. (2001) BIND-the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 242-245.
2. Ben-hur,A. and Brutlag,D. (2003) Remote homology detection: A motif based approach. Bioinformatics, 19 (Suppl 1), i26-i33.
3. Deane,C. Salwinski,L., Xenarios,I. and Eisenberg,D. (2002) Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 1, 349-356.
4. Deng,M., Mehta,S., Sun,F. and Chen,T. (2002) Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Res., 12, 1540-1548.
5. Gene Ontology Consortium (2000) Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Natl Genet., 25, 25-29.
6. Goldberg,D. and Roth,F. (2003) Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 4372-4376.
7. Gomez,S.M., Noble,W.S. and Rzhetsky,A. (2003) Learning to predict protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics, 19, 1875-1881.
8. Jansen,R., Yu,H., Greenbaum,D., Kluger,Y., Krogan,N.J., Chung,S., Emili,A., Snyder,M., Greenblatt,J.F. and Gerstein,M. (2003) A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science, 302, 449-453.
9. Lanckriet,G.R.G., Deng,M., Cristianini,N., Jordan,M.I. and Noble,W.S. (2004) Kernel-based data fusion and its application to protein function prediction in yeast. In Altman,R.B., Dunker,A.K., Hunter,L., Jung,T.A. and Klein,T.E. (eds), Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing,World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 300-311.
10. Leslie,C., Eskin,E. and Noble,W.S. (2002) The spectrum kernel: A string kernel for SVM protein classification. In Altman,R.B., Dunker,A.K., Hunter,L., Lauderdale,K. and Klein,T.E. (eds), Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, New Jersey. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 564-575.
11. Lin,N., Wu,B., Jansen,R., Gerstein,M. and Zhao,H. (2004) Information assessment on predicting protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 154.
12. Marcotte,E.M., Pellegrini,M., Ng,H.-L., Rice,D.W., Yeates,T.O. and Eisenberg,D. (1999) Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 285, 751-753.
13. Martin,S., Roe,D. and Faulon J.-L. (2005) Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics, 21, 218-226.
14. Mewes,H.W., Frishman,D., Gruber,C., Geier,B., Haase,D., Kaps,A., Lemcke,K., Mannhaupt,G., Pfeiffer,F., Schüller,C., Stocker,S. and Weil,B. (2000) MIPS: A database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 37-40.
15. Nevill-Manning,C.G., Sethi,K.S., Wu,T.D. and Brutlag,D.L. (1997) Enumerating and ranking discrete motifs. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp. 202-209.
16. Noble,W.S. (2004) Support vector machine applications in computational biology. In Schoelkopf,B., Tsuda,K. and Vert,J.-P. (eds), Kernel Methods in Computational Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 71-92.
17. Pazos,F. and Valencia,A. (2002) In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins, 47, 219-227.
18. Ramani,A. and Marcotte,E. (2003) Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 327, 273-284.
19. Schölkopf,B. and Smola,A. (2002) Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Sonnhammer,E., Eddy,S. and Durbin,R. (1997) Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins, 28, 405-420.
21. Sprinzak,E. and Margalit,H. (2001) Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 311, 681-692.
22. Sprinzak,E., Sattath,S. and Margalit,H. (2003) How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J. Mol. Biol., 327, 919-923.
23. von Mering,C., Krause,R., Snel,B., Cornell,M., Olivier,S.G., Fields,S. and Bork,P. (2002) Comparative assessment of largescale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417, 399-403.
24. Wang,H., Segal,E., Ben-Hur,A., Koller,D. and Brutlag,D.L. (2005) Identifying protein-protein interaction sites on a genome-wide scale. In Lawrence K. Saul, Yair Weiss and Léon Bottou (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1465-1472.
25. Xenarios,I., Salwinski,L., Duan,X.Q.J., Higney,P., Kim,S.M. and Eisenberg,D. (2002) DIP: The DatAbase of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 303-305.
26. Yu,H., Luscombe,N., Lu,H., Zhu,X., Xia,Y., Han,J., Bertin,N., Chung,S., Vidal,M. and Gerstein,M. (2004) Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interlogs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res., 14, 1107-1118.
27. Zhang,L., Wong,S., King,O. and Roth,F. (2004) Predicting co-complexed protein pairs using genomic and proteomic data integration. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 38-53.