Integrating 'omic' information: A bridge between genomics and systems biology

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 551-560

  Ge, Hui ^a   Walhout, Albertha J M ^a,b   Vidal, Marc ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE III;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENOMICS; LETHALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0141561891     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Hartwell L.H., et al. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature. 402:1999;C47-C52.
2. Blattner F.R., et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 277:1997;1453-1474.
3. Goffeau A., et al. The yeast genome directory. Nature. 387:(6632 suppl.):1997;5.
4. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science. 282:1998;2012-2018.
5. Adams M.D., et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 287:2000;2185-2195.
6. Lander E.S., et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:2001;860-921.
7. Mathe C., et al. Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;4103-4117.
8. Lockhart D.J., Winzeler E.A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature. 405:2000;827-835.
9. Pandey A., Mann M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature. 405:2000;837-846.
10. Walhout A.J.M., Vidal M. Protein interaction maps for model organisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:2001;55-62.
11. Sternberg P.W. Working in the post-genomic C. elegans world. Cell. 105:2001;173-176.
12. Hope I.A. Broadcast interference - functional genomics. Trends Genet. 17:2001;297-299.
13. Zhu H., Snyder M. 'Omic' approaches for unraveling signaling networks. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:2002;173-179.
14. Eisen M.B., et al. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;14863-14868.
15. Tamayo P., et al. Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;2907-2912.
16. Brown M.P., et al. Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;262-267.
17. Boulton S.J., et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science. 295:2002;127-131.
18. Piano F., et al. Gene clustering based on RNAi phenotypes of ovary-enriched genes in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1959-1964.
19. Vidal M. A biological atlas of functional maps. Cell. 104:2001;333-339.
20. Ge H., et al. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 29:2001;482-486.
21. Mrowka R., et al. Does mapping reveal correlation between gene expression and protein-protein interaction? Nat. Genet. 33:2003;15-16.
22. Ge H., et al. Reply to 'Does mapping reveal correlation between gene expression and protein-protein interaction?'. Nat. Genet. 33:2003;16-17.
23. Walhout A.J.M., et al. A model of elegance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:1998;955-961.
24. Schena M., et al. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 270:1995;467-470.
25. Lockhart D.J., et al. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1996;1675-1680.
26. Velculescu V.E., et al. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science. 270:1995;484-487.
27. Chu S., et al. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science. 282:1998;699-705.
28. Primig M., et al. The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts. Nat. Genet. 26:2000;415-423.
29. Hughes T.R., et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell. 102:2000;109-126.
30. Kim S.K., et al. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 293:2001;2087-2092.
31. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 340:1989;245-246.
32. Fromont-Racine M., et al. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat. Genet. 16:1997;277-282.
33. Flores A., et al. A protein-protein interaction map of yeast RNA polymerase III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;7815-7820.
34. Fromont-Racine M., et al. Genome-wide protein interaction screens reveal functional networks involving Sm-like proteins. Yeast. 17:2000;95-110.
35. Walhout A.J.M., et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science. 287:2000;116-122.
36. Davy A., et al. A protein-protein interaction map of the Caenorhabditis elegans 26S proteasome. EMBO Rep. 2:2001;821-828.
37. Uetz P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
38. Ito T., et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;4569-4574.
39. Gavin A.C., et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 415:2002;141-147.
40. Ho Y., et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 415:2002;180-183.
41. Grunenfelder B., Winzeler E.A. Treasures and traps in genome-wide data sets: case examples from yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:2002;653-661.
42. Winzeler E.A., et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science. 285:1999;901-906.
43. Giaever G., et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 418:2002;387-391.
44. Ooi S.L., et al. A DNA microarray-based genetic screen for nonhomologous end-joining mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 294:2001;2552-2556.
45. Deutschbauer A.M., et al. Parallel phenotypic analysis of sporulation and postgermination growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;15530-15535.
46. Begley T.J., et al. Damage recovery pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic phenotyping and interactome mapping. Mol. Cancer Res. 1:2002;103-112.
47. Fire A., et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 391:1998;806-811.
48. Fraser A.G., et al. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature. 408:2000;325-330.
49. Gonczy P., et al. Functional genomic analysis of cell division in C. elegans using RNAi of genes on chromosome III. Nature. 408:2000;331-336.
50. Maeda I., et al. Large-scale analysis of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans by high-throughput RNAi. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;171-176.
51. Kamath R.S., et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 421:2003;231-237.
52. Grigoriev A. A relationship between gene expression and protein interactions on the proteome scale: analysis of the bacteriophage T7 and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;3513-3519.
53. Mrowka R., et al. Is there a bias in proteome research? Genome Res. 11:2001;1971-1973.
54. Jansen R., et al. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12:2002;37-46.
55. Kemmeren P., et al. Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;1133-1143.
56. Mewes H.W., et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;31-34.
57. Costanzo M.C., et al. YPD, PombePD and WormPD: model organism volumes of the BioKnowledge library, an integrated resource for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;75-79.
58. Deane C.M., et al. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 1:2002;349-356.
59. Walhout A.J.M., et al. Integrating interactome, phenome, and transcriptome mapping data for the C. elegans germline. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1952-1958.
60. Jeong H., et al. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 411:2001;41-42.
61. Oltvai Z.N., Barabasi A.L. Systems biology. Life's complexity pyramid. Science. 298:2002;763-764.
62. Padilla P.A., et al. The highly conserved, coregulated Sno and Snz gene families in Saccharomyces cerevisiae respond to nutrient limitation. J. Bacteriol. 180:1998;5718-5726.
63. Ideker T., et al. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2:2001;343-372.
64. Kumar A., et al. Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev. 16:2002;707-719.