Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 991-997

  Bader, Gary D ^a   Hogue, Christopher W V ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; COMPLEXATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS;

PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

YEAST;

FUNGAL PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PUBLISHING; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOME, FUNGAL; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES; TRIXIS;

EID: 0036789265     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1002-991     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fields, S. Proteomics. Proteomics in genomeland. Science 291, 1221-1224 (2001).
2. Pawson, T., Gish, G.D. & Nash, P. SH2 domains, interaction modules and cellular wiring. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 504-511 (2001).
3. Marcotte, E.M. et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285, 751-753 (1999).
4. Gavin, A.C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
5. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
6. Pandey, A. & Mann, M. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature 405, 837-846 (2000).
7. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of proteinprotein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
8. Bader, G.D. et al. BIND-The biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 242-245 (2001).
9. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
10. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
11. Tong, A.H. et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-324 (2002).
12. Drees, B.L. et al. A protein interaction map for cell polarity development. J. Cell Biol. 154, 549-571 (2001).
13. Fromont-Facine, M. et al. Genome-wide protein interaction screens reveal functional networks involving Sm-like proteins. Yeast 17, 95-110 (2000).
14. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
15. Mewes, H.W. et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 37-40 (2000).
16. Costanzo, M.C. et al. YPD, PombePD and WormPD: model organism volumes of the BioKnowledge library, an integrated resource for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 75-79 (2001).
17. Andersen, J.S. et al. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr. Biol. 12, 1-11 (2002).
18. Harnpicharnchai, P. et al. Composition and functional characterization of yeast 66S ribosome assembly intermediates. Mol. Cell 8, 505-515 (2001).
19. Schwikowski, B., Uetz, P. & Fields, S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1257-1261 (2000).
20. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z.N. & Barabasi, A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651-654 (2000).
21. Jeong, H., Mason, S.P., Barabasi, A.L. & Oltvai, Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42 (2001).
22. Pruitt, K.D. & Maglott, D.R. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 137-140 (2001).
23. Chervitz, S.A. et al. Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) for analysis of protein similarities and structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 74-78 (1999).
24. Norris, V. et al. Hypothesis: hyperstructures regulate bacterial structure and the cell cycle. Biochimie 81, 915-920 (1999).
25. Xenarios, I. et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 303-305 (2002).
26. Ge, H., Liu, Z., Church, G.M. & Vidal, M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 29, 482-486 (2001).
27. Olson, M.O., Dundr, M. & Szebeni, A. The nucleolus: an old factory with unexpected capabilities. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 189-196 (2000).
28. Visintin, R. & Amon, A. The nucleolus: the magician's hat for cell cycle tricks. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 12, 752 (2000).