One-armed artificial receptors for the binding of polar tetrapeptides in water: Probing the substrate selectivity of a combinatorial receptor library

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1339-1348

  Schmuck, Carsten ^a   Heil, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Combinatorial chemistry; Guanidinium cations; Molecular recognition; Peptides; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; FLUORESCENCE; RECEPTION QUALITY; STATISTICAL METHODS; SUBSTRATES; TITRATION; ULTRAVIOLET DETECTORS;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS; GUANIDINIUM CATIONS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PEPTIDES;

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

N AC D ALA D ALA L LYS D GLU OH; N-AC-D-ALA-D-ALA-L-LYS-D-GLU-OH; OLIGOPEPTIDE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; RECEPTOR; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; SOLUTIONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 32044435364     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200501062     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. a) H.-J. Böhm, G. Klebe, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2750-2778;
2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2588-2614;
3. b) E. A. Meyer, R. K. Castellano, F. Diederich, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1244-1287;
4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1210-1250.
5. For some recent examples of the use of artificial receptors as sensors, see: a) M. Maue, T. Schrader, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 2305-2310;
6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2265-2270;
7. b) W. L. Wong, K.-H. Huang, P.-F. Tei, C.-S. Lee, H.-L. Kwong, Chem. Commun. 2005, 384-385;
8. c) Z. Zhong, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9014-9015;
9. d) S. E. Schneider, S. N. O'Neil, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 542-543;
10. e) K. Niikura, A. Metzger, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8533-8534.
11. A recent example can be found in: a) H. Yin, A. D. Hamilton, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4200-4235;
12. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4130-4163;
13. b) for another interesting example also involving a combinatorial library approach, see: D. L. Dong, R. Liu, R. Sherlock, M. H. Wigler, H. P. Nestler, Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 133-141.
14. For selected examples of artificial peptide receptors, see: a) P. Krattiger, H. Wennemers. Synlett 2005, 706-708;
15. b) C. Schmuck, L. Geiger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8898-8899;
16. c) C. Chamorro, J.-W. Hofman, R. M. J. Liskamp, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8691-8697;
17. d) H. Wennemers, M. C. Nold, M. M. Conza, K. J. Kulicke, M. Neuburger, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 442-448;
18. e) C. Schmuck, M. Heil, ChemBioChem 2003, 4, 1232-1238;
19. f) S. Rensing, T. Schrader, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2161-2164;
20. g) K. Jensen, T. M. Braxmeier, M. Demarcus, J. G. Frey, J. D. Kilburn, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1300-1309;
21. h) M. Conza, H. Wennemers, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2696-2698;
22. i) H. Wennemers, M. Conza, M. Nold, P. Krattiger, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3342-3347;
23. j) R. Xuo, G. Greiveldinger, L. E. Marenus, A. Cooper, J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4898-4899;
24. k) T. Fessmann, J. D. Kilburn, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2170-2174;
25. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1993-1996;
26. M. Sirish, H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Commun. 1999, 10, 907-908;
27. m) M. Davies, M. Bonnat, F. Guillier, J. D. Kilburn, M. Bradley, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8696-8703;
28. n) A. Hossain, H. J. Schneider, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 208-11 209;
29. o) R. Breslow, Z. Yang, R. Ching, G. Trojandt, F. Odobel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3536-3537;
30. p) J. S. Albert, M. W. Peczuh, A. D. Hamilton, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1997, 5, 1455-1467.
31. For review articles on artificial peptide receptors, see: a) M. W. Peczuh, A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2479-2494;
32. b) H.-J. Schneider, Adv. Supramol. Chem. 2000, 7, 185-216;
33. c) H.-J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 890-892;
34. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 848-850;
35. d) T. H. Webb, C. S. Wilcox, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 383-395.
36. a) M. Meot-Ner, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 213-284;
37. b) G. A. Jeffrey, An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997;
38. c) J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, 1992.
39. In contrast to coulombic interactions between two point charges, which are of course non-directional, charge interactions with organic molecules such as guanidinium cations are directional. This may be due to the formation of H-bond-enforced ion pairs and/or the anisotropic solvation of such ions: P. E. Mason, G. W. Neilson, J. E. Enderby, M.-L. Saboungi, C. E. Dempsey, A. D. MacKerell Jr., J. W. Brady, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11 462-11 471.
40. For a general discussion of the directionality of non-covalent interactions, see: J. P. Glusker, Top. Curr. Chem. 1998, 198, 1-56.
41. L.-J. Prins, D. N. Reinhoudt, P. Timmerman, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2446-2492;
42. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2383-2426.
43. For reviews on hydrophobic interactions, see : a) B. Widom, P. Bhimalapuram, K. Koga, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 3085-3093;
44. b) L. R. Pratt, A. Pohorille, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2671-2691;
45. c) N. T. Southall, K. A. Dill, A. D. J. Haymet, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521-533.
46. A. M. Davis, S. J. Teague, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 778-792;
47. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 736-749.
48. S. Kumar, R. Nussinov, ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 604-617.
49. For example, Fersht has estimated that charge interactions within proteins are much stronger than those in free solution: a) A. R. Fersht, Trends Biochem. Sci. 1987, 12, 301-304;
50. b) A. R. Fersht, J. P. Shi, J. Knill-Jones, D. M. Lowe, A. J. Wilkinson, D. M. Blow, P. Brick, P. Carter, M. M. Waye, G. Winter, Nature 1985, 314, 235-238.
51. The importance of hydrophobic interactions for peptide-peptide interactions within model systems ("hydrophobic cluster formation") was, for example, demonstrated by Kelly in his work on β-sheet nucleators: a) P. Chitnumsub, W. R. Fiori, H. A. Lashuel, H. Diaz, J. W. Kelly, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 39-59;
52. b) K. Y. Tsang, H. Diaz, N. Graciana, J. W. Kelly, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3988-4005;
53. c) J. P. Schneider, J. W. Kelly, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2169-2187.
54. For reviews on aromatic interactions within peptides and in supramolecular model systems, see: a) M. L. Waters, Biopolymers 2004, 76, 435-445;
55. b) M. L. Waters, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 736-741;
56. c) C. A. Hunter, K. R. Lawson, J. Perkins, C. J. Urch, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 651-669;
57. d) S. K. Burley, G. A. Petsko, Science 1985, 229, 23-28;
58. e) for a critical comment, see: D. M. Chung, Y. Dou, P. Baldi, J. S. Nowick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9998-9999.
59. Some recent examples of metal-based peptide binding: a) A. Buryak, K. Severin, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 4875-4878;
60. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4771-4774;
61. b) H. Imai, H. Munakata, Y. Uemori, N. Sakura, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 1211-1213;
62. c) A. T. Wright, E. V. Anslyn, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1341-1344;
63. d) M. Sirish, V. Chertkov, H.-J. Schneider, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1181-1188;
64. e) H. Ogoshi, T. Mizutani, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 81-89.
65. C. Schmuck, M. Heil, K. Baumann, J. Scheiber, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, DOI: 10.1002/ange.200501812;
66. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200501812.
67. a) R. D. Süssmuth, ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 295-298;
68. b) K. C. Nicolaou, C. N. Boddy, S. Bräse, N. Wissinger, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2230-2287;
69. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2096-2152;
70. c) D. H. Williams, B. Bardsley. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1264-1286;
71. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1173-1193;
72. d) C. T. Walsh, S. L. Fisher, I.-S. Park, M. Prahalad, Z. Wu. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 21-28.
73. a) C. Schmuck, V. Bickert, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4579-4581;
74. b) C. Schmuck, L. Geiger, Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1485-1502;
75. c) C. Schmuck, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 709-718.
76. For comprehensive reviews of anion recognition, see the following: a) K. A. Schug, W. Lindner, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 67-113;
77. b) M. D. Best, S. L. Tobey, E. V. Anslyn, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 3-15;
78. c) P. A. Gale, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191-221;
79. d) R. J. Fitzmaurice, G. M. Kyne, D. Douheret, J. D. Kilburn, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 841-864;
80. e) T. S. Snowden, E. V. Anslyn, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 740-746;
81. f) P. D. Beer, P. Schmitt, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 475-482;
82. g) A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James, E. Garcia-España, Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997;
83. h) F. P. Schmidtchen, M. Berger, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609-1646;
84. i) C. Seel, A. Galán, J. de Mendoza. Top. Curr. Chem. 1995, 175, 101-132.
85. For examples of supramolecular interactions within artificial β-sheets. see: a) M. Kruppa, C. Bonauer, V. Michlova, B. Koenig, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5305-5308;
86. b) D. M. Chung, J. S. Nowick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3062-3063;
87. c) H. Zeng, X. Yang, A. L. Brown, S. Martinovic, R. D. Smith, B. Gong, Chem. Commun. 2003, 1556-1557;
88. d) H. Zeng, X. Yang, R. A. Flowers, B. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2903-2910;
89. e) J. S. Nowick, Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 287-296;
90. f) J. S. Nowick, E. M. Smith, M. Pairish, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25 401-415.
91. Examples of combinatorial libraries based on peptidic structures: a) R. Boyce, G. Li, H. P. Nestler, T. Suenaga, W. C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7955-7956;
92. b) E. J. Iorio, Y. Shao, C.-T. Chen, H. Wagner, W. C. Still, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1635-1638;
93. c) R. Arienzo, J. D. Kilburn, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 711-719;
94. d) M. R. Carrasco, W. C. Still, Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 205-212.
95. For review articles on the use of combinatorial receptor libraries, see: a) N. Srinivasan, J. D. Kilburn, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 305-310;
96. b) B. Linton, A. D. Hamilton, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 307-312;
97. c) Y. R. DeMiguel, J. M. K. Sanders, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 417-421;
98. d) W. C. Still, Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 155-163.
99. K. S. Lam, M. Lebl, V. Krchnak, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 411-448.
100. A. W. Czarnik, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 60-66.
101. a) S. S. Yoon, W. C. Still, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 567-578;
102. b) Y. Cheng, T. Suenaga, W. C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1813-1814;
103. c) P. W. Smith, G. Chang, W. C. Still, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1587-1590.
104. a) C. S. Wilcox, in Frontiers in Supramolecular Chemistry and Photochemistry (Eds.: H.-J. Schneider, H. Dürr), VCH, Weinheim, 1990, pp. 123-144;
105. b) K. Hirose, J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2001, 39, 193-209;
106. c) K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, Wiley, New York, 1987;
107. d) L. Fielding, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170.
108. For the influence of the solid support and the microenvironment on weak interactions, see, for example: a) M. Conza, H. Wennemers, Chem. Commun. 2003, 866-867;
109. b) K. Ariga, T. Kunitake, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 371-378.
110. F. Mohamadi, N. G. J. Richards, W. C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufield, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson, W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.