Enantioselective Molecular Recognition between β-Sheets

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 3062-3063

  Chung, De Michael ^a   Nowick, James S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; BINDING KINETICS; CHIRALITY; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MOLECULAR SIZE; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ALANINE; DIPEPTIDES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; STEREOISOMERISM; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1642388486     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja031632z     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Maitra, S.; Nowick, J. S. In The Amide Linkage: Structural Significance in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Materials Science; Greenberg, A., Breneman C. M., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 2000; Chapter 15.
2. Fuhrhop, J.-H.; Krull, M.; Büldt, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 699-700.
3. Esler, W. P.; Stimson, E. R.; Fishman, J. B.; Ghilaridi, J. R.; Vinters, H. V.; Mantyh, P. W.; Maggio, J. E. Biopolymers 1999, 49, 505-514.
4. Chalifour, R. J.; McLaughlin, R. W.; Lavoie, L.; Morissette, C.; Tremblay, N.; Boulé, M.; Sarazin, P.; Stéa, D.; Lacombe, D.; Tremblay, P.; Gervais, F. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 34874-34881.
5. Milton, R. C. L.; Milton, S. C. F.; Kent, S. B. H. Science 1992, 256, 1445-1448.
6. (a) Petsko, G. A. Science 1992, 256, 1403-1404.
7. (b) Jung, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1457-1459.
8. (c) Haack, T.; González, M. J.; Sánchez, Y.; Giralt, E. Lett. Pept. Sci. 1997, 4, 377-386.
9. (a) Nowick, J. S.; Lam, K. S.; Khasanova, T. V.; Kemnitzer, W. E.; Maitra, S.; Mee, H. T.; Liu, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4972-4973.
10. (b) Nowick, J. S.; Chung, D. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1765-1768.
11. Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 935-967.
12. Although the low concentration of heterochiral dimer precludes rigorously establishing the precise mode of heterochiral interaction (e.g., through NOE studies), it is difficult to envision a mode of dimerization other than antiparallel β-sheet formation that would be sufficiently strong to provide slow exchange on the NMR time scale under the conditions of these experiments. Because alternative modes of heterochiral interaction cannot be precluded rigorously, the value of 0.6-0.8 kcal/mol per interacting residue should be taken as a lower limit for the preference of antiparallel homochiral β-sheet formation over antiparallel heterochiral β-sheet formation.
13. Webb, T. H.; Wilcox, C. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 383-395.