Peptide Binding by One-Armed Receptors in Water: Screening of a Combinatorial Library for the Binding of Val-Val-lle-Ala

ChemBioChem

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1232-1238

  Schmuck, Carsten ^a   Hei, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Combinatorial chemistry; Guanidinium cations; Molecular recognition; Peptides; Receptors

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; RECOMBINANT RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VALYLVALYLISOLEUCYLALANINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RECEPTOR BINDING; TITRIMETRY;

AMYLOID BETA-PROTEIN; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; WATER;

EID: 0344012530     PISSN: 14394227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200300613     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. For review articles on artificial peptide receptors see: a) M. W. Peczuh, A. D. Hamilton, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2479-2494;
2. b) H. J. Schneider, Adv. Supramol. Chem. 2000, 6, 185-216;
3. c) H. J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 890-892; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 848-850;
4. c) H. J. Schneider, Angew. Chem. 1993, 105, 890-892; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 848-850;
5. d) T. H. Webb, C. S. Wilcox, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 383-395.
6. For examples see: a) T. Mizutani, K. Wada, S. Kitagawa, S. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1626-1627;
7. b) S. Rensing, T. Schrader, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2161-2164;
8. c) K. Jensen, T. M. Braxmeier, M. Demarcus, J. G. Frey, J. D. Kilburn, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1300-1309;
9. d) R. Xuo, G. Greiveldinger, L. E. Marenus, A. Cooper, J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4898-4899;
10. e) A. Hossain, H. J. Schneider, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11208-11209;
11. f) R. Breslow, Z. Yang, R. Ching, G. Trojandt, F. Odobel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3536-3537;
12. g) M. W. Peczuh, A. D. Hamilton, J. Sanchez-Qesada, J. de Mendoza, T. Haak, E. Giralt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9327-9328;
13. h) S. R. LaBrenz, J. W. Kelly, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1655-1656.
14. a) G.A. Jeffrey, An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997;
15. b) J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, 1992.
16. The importance of the interplay between hydrophobic interactions and H-bonds ("hydrophobic cluster formation") has been demonstrated, for example, by Kelly in his work on β-sheet nucleators: a) P. Chitnumsub, W. R. Fiori, H. A. Lashuel, H. Diaz, J. W. Kelly, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 39-59;
17. b) K. Y. Tsang, H. Diaz, N. Graciana, J. W. Kelly, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3988-4005;
18. c) J. P. Schneider, J. W. Kelly, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2169-2187.
19. a) E. Zerovnik, Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 3362-3371;
20. b) J. Hardy, D. J. Selkoe, Science 2002, 297, 353-356;
21. c) P. T. Lansbury, Jr., Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 317-321;
22. d) B. A. Yankner, Neuron 1996, 16, 921-932.
23. J. T. Jarret, E. P. Berger, P. T. Lansbury, Jr., Biochemistry 1993, 32, 4693-4697.
24. a) J. J. Lavigne, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3212-3225; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3118-3130;
25. a) J. J. Lavigne, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3212-3225; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3118-3130;
26. b) W. C. Still, Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 155-163.
27. a) C. Schmuck, W. Wienand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 452-459;
28. b) C. Schmuck, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 709-718;
29. c) C. Schmuck, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2397-2403;
30. d) C. Schmuck, Chem. Commun. 1999, 843-844;
31. e) P. A. Gale, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191-221.
32. Review articles on the binding of carboxylates by artificial hosts including guanidinium-based systems: a) R. J. Fitzmaurice, G. M. Kyne, D. Douheret, J. D. Kilburn, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 841-864;
33. b) F. P. Schmidtchen, M. Berger, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609-1646;
34. c) "Artificial Anion Hosts: Concepts for Structure and Guest Binding" F. P. Schmidtchen in Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions (Eds.: A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James, E. García-España), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997, pp. 79-146;
35. d) "Structural and Topological Aspects of Anion Coordination" J. L. Atwood, J. W. Steed in Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions (Eds.: A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James, E. García-España), Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997, pp. 147-216.
36. We were recently able to show that one-armed cationic receptors of this general type attached to a solid support are capable of binding an anionic tetrapeptide, at least in organic solvents (DMSO, methanol): C. Schmuck, M. Heil, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 633-636.
37. K. S. Lam, M. Lebl, V. Krchnak, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 411-448.
38. A. W. Czarnik, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 60-66.
39. The successful synthesis of the receptors on the solid support was monitored for selected examples by solid-state MAS-NMR and ESI-MS experiments and their respective cleavage from the solid support and subsequent isolation; see also Experimental Section.
40. a) P.W. Smith, G. Chang, W.C. Still, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1587-1590
41. b) S. S. Yoon, W. C. Still, Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 567-578;
42. c) Y. Cheng, T. Suenaga, W. C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1813-1814;
43. d) R. Arienzo, J. D. Kilburn, Tetrahedron 2002, 711-719.
44. ass for each receptor was calculated.
45. P. T. Lansbury, Jr., P. R. Costa, J. M. Griffiths, E. J. Simon, M. Auger, K. J. Halverson, K. J. Kocisko, Z. S. Hendsch, T. T. Ashbury, R. G. S. Spencer, B. Tidor, R. G. Griffin, Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 990-998.
46. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, Wiley, New York, 1987.
47. For a typical UV titration, aliquots of the substrate 10 (0.58 mM) were added to a solution of the receptor (0.0546 mM) in bis-tris buffer (0.78 mM, pH 6.1). The UV spectra were recorded after each addition. Analysis of the data was performed with the Specfit/32 software program from Spectrum Software Associates.
48. -1), did not give any reasonable data. The binding constant was too low to be measured accurately in free solution by UV titration, which is again in good agreement with the rather poor binding affinity of this specific receptor observed in the on-bead assay.
49. M. Conza, H. Wennmers, Chem. Commun. 2002, 866-867.
50. F. Mohamadi, N. G. J. Richards, W. C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufield, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson, W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
51. Because of the limited solubilities both of the free peptide and of the receptors at concentrations > 10mM in aqueous solvents, the NMR studies had to be performed in DMSO. Although the relative importance of H-bonds/ ion-pairing versus hydrophobic interactions should be shifted towards the hydrophobic interactions in water, the observation of the H-bonded pattern required for a β sheet in DMSO is also a necessary prerequisite for its occurrence in water.