Enhanced peptide β-sheet affinity by metal to ligand coordination

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 5305-5308

  Kruppa, Michael ^a   Bonauer, Christoph ^a   Michlová, Veronika ^a   König, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; COMPLEXATION; CONFORMATIONS; COORDINATION REACTIONS; POLYPYRROLES; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS;

Β-SHEET CONFORMATIONS; HISTIDINE; METHOXYPYRROLE AMINO ACIDS; PEPTIDES;

POLYPEPTIDES;

METHOXYPYRROLE AMINO ACID; NITRILOTRIACETIC ACID; PEPTIDE; PYRROLE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; BINDING AFFINITY; CONFORMATION; COVALENT BOND; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; SPECTROSCOPY; SUBSTITUTION REACTION; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 20844432379     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo0502908     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Typical examples are cycloadditions or cyclization reactions and intramolecular folding.
2. One important motivation to develop synthetic binding sites for peptide β-sheets is the interception of prion protein aggregation. (a) Kirsten, C. N.; Schrader, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12061-12068.
3. (b) Wehner, M.; Schrader, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1751-1754.
4. Cernovska, K.; Kemter, M.; Gallmeier, H.-C.; Rzepecki, P.; Schrader, T. H.; König, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1603-1611.
5. (a) Nowick, J. S.; Chung, D. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1765-1768.
6. (b) Chung, D. M.; Nowick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3062-3063.
7. Nowick, J. S.; Lam, S. K.; Khasanova, T. V.; Kemnitzer, W. E.; Maitra, S.; Mee, H. T.; Liu, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4972-4973.
8. Chung, D. M.; Nowick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3062-3063.
9. (a) Woll, M. G.; Lai, J. R.; Guzei, I. A.; Taylor, S. J. C.; Smith, M. E. B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11077-11078.
10. (b) Fisk, J. D.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 343-344.
11. Huck, B. R.; Fisk, J. D.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2607-2610.
12. Bonauer, C.; Zabel, M.; Koenig, B. Org. Lett. 2004, 9, 1349-1352.
13. Many examples of intermolecular β-sheet binders based on complementary hydrogen bonding patterns have been reported, but their use is mostly restricted to nonpolar solvents, which do not intercept the hydrogen bonds.
14. Nowick, J. S.; Brower, J. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 876-877.
15. Such ionic interactions provide much higher affinity than hydrogen bonds and allow peptide binding in polar solvents. Examples of carboxyl group binding: (a) Peczuh, M. W.; Hamilton, A. D.; Sánchez-Quesada, J.; de Mendoza, J.; Haack, T.; Giralt, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9327-9328. Example of phosphate-binding:
16. (b) Ojida, A.; Mito-oka, Y.; Sada, K.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2454-2463. Examples of ammonium group binding:
17. Hossain, M. A.; Schneider, H.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11208-11209.
18. Herm, M.; Molt, O.; Schrader, T. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1485-1499. Examples of binding to hydrophobic groups or areas:
19. (e) Breslow, R.; Yang, Z.; Ching, R.; Trojandt, G.; Odobel, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3536-3537.
20. (f) Baldini, L.; Wilson, A. J.; Hong, J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5656-5657.
21. (g) Jain, R. K.; Hamilton, A. D. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1721-1723.
22. (h) Ernst, J. T.; Kutzki, O.; Debnath, A. K.; Jiang, S.; Lu, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 117-119.
23. Jasper, C.; Schrader, T.; Panitzky, J.; Klärner, F.-G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1355-1358.
24. (j) Malinovski, V.; Tumir, L.; Piantanida, I.; Zinic, M.; Schneider, H.-J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3785-3795.
25. Schmuck, C.; Geiger, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8898-8899.
26. Other examples of combined use of different reversible interaction: Ligand to metal coordination and ionic interaction: (a) Wright, A. T.; Anslyn, E. V. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1341-1344. Ligand to metal coordination and hydrogen bonding:
27. (b) Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14807-14815. Guanidinium ion and boronic acid:
28. Wiskur, S. L.; Lavigne, J. J.; Metzger, A.; Tobey, S. L.; Lynch, V.; Anslyn, E. V. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3792-3804.
29. Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14807-14815.
30. (e) Shirin, Z.; Hammes, B. S.; Young, V. G.; Borovik, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1836-1837.
31. (f) MacBeth, E. C.; Hammes, B. S.; Young, V. G.; Borovik, A. S. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 4733-4741.
32. (a) Beauchamp, A. L.; Israeli, J.; Saulnier, H. Can. J. Chem. 1969, 47, 1269-1273.
33. (b) Hopgood, D.; Angelici, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 2508-2513.
34. Hart, B. R.; Shea, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2072-2073.
35. 3L/mol with our apparatus.
36. Methyl ester was used to avoid any additional ionic interactions of the carboxylate group.
37. This concept of using intramolecular hydrogen bonds to planarize a β-sheet mimic was extensively used by Nowick in methoxy-substituted hydrazine benzoic acids.
38. Overlap of resonance signals restricts the number of detectable cross-peaks.
39. NHHα coupling constants of the nonbound pentapeptide are given in Supporting Information.
40. Importance of comparing modeling results with primary derived data was recently described. Glättli, A.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6472-6476.
41. Absence of intermolecular contacts shows that no aggregates are formed between peptides or peptide and MOPAS under the experimental conditions.
42. (a) Banerjee, A. L.; Swanson, M.; Roy, B. C.; Jia, X.; Haldar, M. K.; Mallik, S.; Srivastava, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10875-10883.
43. (b) Roy, B. C.; Banerjee, A. L.; Swanson, M.; Jia, X. G.; Haldar, M. K.; Mallik, S.; Srivastava, D. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13206-13207.
44. Affinity was determined by microcalorimetry. Paramagnetism of the copper complex and substantial line broadening in the nickel complex so far have prevented a detailed investigation of the structure-inducing effect of the receptor on the pentapeptide in water.
45. Ojida, A.; Miyahara, Y.; Kohira, T.; Hamachi, I. Biopolymers 2004, 76, 177.