Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 795-814

  Mohammed, Susan ^a   Mathieu, John E ^b   Bartlett, A L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036389973     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.169     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Argots, L., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Group processes in organizations: continuity and change. In C. I. Cooper, & T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 333-389). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
4. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
5. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
6. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). Sam Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, et al. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
9. Campbell, J. P. (1990). An overview of the army selection and classification project (Project A). Personnel Psychology, 43, 231-239.
10. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo, & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
13. Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: the influence of demographic similarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
14. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Conway, J. M. (1996). Additional construct validity evidence for the task/contextual performance distinction. Human Performance, 9, 309-329.
16. Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3-13.
17. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual (pp. 1-65). Florida: Psychological Assessment Resource, Inc.
18. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., & Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 91-112). Newbury Park: Sage.
19. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: a group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
20. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of personality. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
21. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Work teams in organizations: an orienting framework. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Hattrup, K., O'Connell, M. S., & Wingate, P. H. (1998). Prediction of multidimensional criteria: distinguishing task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 11, 305-319.
23. Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowidlo, S. J., & Borman, W. C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 77(2/3), 189-207.
24. Hollenbeck, J. R., Illgen, D. R., & Sego, D. J. (1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3-23.
25. Hough, L. M. (1984). Development and evaluation of the 'accomplishment record' method of selecting and promoting professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 135-146.
26. Hough, L. (1992). The 'Big Five' predictors: construct confusion: description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
27. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo, & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
28. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
29. Kozlowski, S. W. J, & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
30. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.
31. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Illgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
32. LePine, J. A., Hanson, M. A., Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Contextual performance and teamwork: implications for staffing. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9, 53-90.
33. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990), Progress in small-group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
34. Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877-889.
35. Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241-270.
36. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins' circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586-595.
37. McManus, M. A., & Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137-148.
38. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
39. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
40. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.
41. Mount, M. K. (1984). Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance. Personnel Psychology, 37, 687-702.
42. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 153-200.
43. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
44. Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376-389.
45. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
46. Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: it's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97.
48. Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.
49. Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-270.
50. Quinones, M. A., Ford, J. K., & Teachout, M. S. (1995). The relationship between work experience and performance: a conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 887-910.
51. Rentsch, J. R., Heffner, T. S., & Duffy, L. T. (1994). What you know is what you get from experience. Group and Organization Management, 14, 450-474.
52. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
53. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
54. Stewart, G. L. (1996). Reward structure as a moderator of the relationship between extraversion and sales performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 619-627.
55. Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
56. Tesluk, P. E., & Jacobs, R. J. (1998). Toward an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 321-355.
57. Tesluk, P. E., Zaccaro, S., Marks, M., & Mathieu, J. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. Brannick, & E. Salas (Eds.), Assessment and measurement of team performance: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 197-226). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
58. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59. Tziner, A., & Eden, D. (1985). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85-93.
60. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
61. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.