The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 30-42

  Salgado, Jesús F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EMPLOYMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; EXTRAVERSION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST;

AFFECT; EMPLOYMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; EXTRAVERSION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY;

EID: 0031068718     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.82.1.30     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. *Alonso Arenal, F., & Fernandez Pereira, P. (1979). Validez de los exámenes psicotécnicos para la prevención de los accidentes de trabajo [Validity of psychotechnic exams to the prevention of work accidents]. Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada, 34, 711-720.
2. Altink, W. M., Roe, R. A., & Greuter, M. A. (1991). Recruitment and selection in The Netherlands. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 35-45.
3. *Appel, C. P., Blomkvist, A. C., Persson, C. O., & Sjoberg, L. (1980). Mood and achievement in a difficult driving task. Ergonomics, 20, 605-612.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
7. Bartram, D. (1993a). ICES-PREVUE Assessments Technical Manual. Richmond, B.C.: PREVUE Assessments International.
8. *Bartram, D. (1993b). Validation of the ICES personality inventory. European Review of Applied Psychology, 43, 207-218.
9. *Bartram, D. (1995). Validity of the ICES. Internal Report. Department of Psychology, University of Hull, U.K.
10. *Berg, P. T. van der, & Feij, J. A. (1993). Personality traits and job characteristics as predictor of job experiences. European Journal of Personality, 7, 337-357.
11. *Blanco, M., & Salgado, J. F. (1992). Diseño de un modelo de intervención de la psicología en la selección de conductorec profesionales (factores humanos y conducción) [Design of a model of psychological intervention in the selection of professional drivers (human factors and driving)]. Mapfre Seguridad, 12, 37-48.
12. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-213.
13. *Borkowski, T. (1989). Validation review. London: SHL Occupational Psychologists.
14. *Borkowski, T. (1995). Validation review (Vol. 2). London: SHL Occupational Psychologists.
15. Briggs, S. R. (1992). Assessing the five-factor model of personality description. Journal of Personality, 60, 253-293.
16. Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., & Ferrieux, D. (1991). Une enquête sur le recrutement en France. [A survey on the recruitment in France]. European Review of Applied Psychology 41, 9-17.
17. *Burbeck, E., & Furnham, A. (1984). Personality and police selection: Trait differences in successful and non-successful applicants to the metropolitan police. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 257-263.
18. Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. (1970). Handbook for the 16 PF. Champaign, IL: JPAT.
19. Cortina, J. M., Doherty, M. L., Schmitt, N., Kaufman, G., & Smith, R. G. (1992). The "Big Five" personality factors in the IPI and MMPI: Predictors of police performance. Personnel Psychology, 45, 119-140.
20. Costa, P. T., Busch, C. M., Zonderman, A. B., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Correlations of MMPI factor scales with measures of the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 640-650.
21. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO-PI Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The NEO-PI Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
23. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 216-220.
24. Costa, P. T., Zonderman, A. B., McCrae, R. R., & Williams, R. B. (1985). Content and comprehensiveness in the MMPI: An item factor analysis in a normal adult sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 925-933.
25. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.). Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
26. Dollinger, S. J., & Orf, L. A. (1991). Personality and performance in "personality." Conscientiousness and Openness. Journal of Research in Personality 25, 276-284.
27. *Dominguez, J. D. (1994). Factores psicosociales de la accidentabilidad laboral en el sector de la construcción en Galicia. [Psychosocial factors of labor accidentability in the construction sector in Galicia]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
28. Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 667-673.
29. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.
30. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire manual. London: Hoddor and Soughton.
31. Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., & Selg, H. (1984). Das Freiburgor Persönlichkeitsinventar. Revijdierte Fassung FPI-R und teilweise geänderte Fassung FPI-R [Freiburger Personality Inventory: Revised manual for the FPI-R and manual for FPI-R1]. Göttingen, Germany: Hograta.
32. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
33. *Furnham, A. (1991). Personality and Occupational Success: 16PF correlates of cabin crow performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 87-90.
34. *Furnham, A. (1994). The validity of the SHL Customer Service Questionnaire (CSQ). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 157-165.
35. Ghiselli, E. E. (1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 20, 461-477.
36. *Gibbons, P. J., Baron, H., Nyfield, G., & Robertson, I. T. (1995a). The Big Five of personality, managerial performance and competencies. Paper presented at the BPS Occupational Psychology Conference, Warwick, England, January 1995.
37. *Gibbons, P. J., Baron, H., Nyfield, G., & Robertson, I. T. (1995b). Hypothesis testing in personality questionnaire validation research. Paper presented at the 4th European Congress of Psychology, Athens, Greece, July 1995.
38. Goldberg, L. R., & Saucier, G. (1995). So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to Block. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 214-216.
39. *Guerrero, M. (1986). Prevención de accidentes de tráfico [Prevention of traffic accidents]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 41, 181-188.
40. Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1976). The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey manual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan.
41. Guion, R. M., & Cottier, R. F. (1965). Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.
42. Hermans, H. J. M. (1976). Prestatie Motivatie Testharcleiting [Prestatie Motivatie Test manual]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
43. Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page (Ed.), Personality: Current theory and research. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 56-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
44. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273-279.
45. Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Busch, C. (1984). How to measure service orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 157-163.
46. Hough, L. M. (1989). Development of personality measures to supplement selection decisions. In B. J. Fallon, H. P. Pfister, & J. Brebner (Eds.), Advances in industrial-organizational psychology (pp. 365-375). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "Big Five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
48. Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effects of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
49. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. *Idzikowsky, C., & Baddeley, A. (1987). Fear and performance in novice parachutists. Ergonomics, 30, 1463-1471.
51. Inwald, R., Knatz, H., & Shusman, E. (1983). Inwald Personality Inventory manual. New York: Hilson Research.
52. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
53. Johnson, J. B., Butcher, J. N., Null, C., & Johnson, K. N. (1984). Replicated item level factor analysis of the full MMPI. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 105-114.
54. Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994a). Nonlinearity of range corrections in meta-analysis: Test of an improved procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 425-438.
55. Law, K. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994b). A test of two refinements in procedures for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 978-986.
56. Levy-Loboyer, C. (1994). Selection and assessment in Europe. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4., pp. 173-190). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
57. *Matthews, G. (1989). The factor structure of the 16 PF: Twelve primary and three secondary factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 931-940.
58. *Matthews, G., Stanton, N., Graham, N. C., & Brimelow, C. (1990). A factor analysis of the scales of the occupational personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 501-586.
59. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
60. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Yik, M. S. M. (in press). Universal aspects of the Chinese personality structure. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese personality. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
61. *McKenna, F., Duncan, J., & Brown, I. (1986). Cognitive abilities and safety on the road: A re-examination of individual differences in dichotic listening and search for embedded figures. Ergonomics, 29, 649-663.
62. Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In K. M. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 13, pp. 153-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
63. *Muñoz-Adanez, A., & Forteza, J. A. (1989). Personalidad y rendimiento en personal comerciai de empresas aseguradoras [Personality and performance in sales personnel of assurance companies]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 4, 165-178.
64. Noller, P., Law, H., & Comrey, A. L. (1987). Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck personality factors compared: More evidence for the five robust factors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 775-782.
65. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
66. *Nyfield, C., Gibbons, P. J., Baron, H., & Robertson, I. T. (1995, May). The cross-cultural validity of management assessment methods. Paper presented at the 10th Annual STOP Conference, Orlando, FL.
67. Ones, D.S. (1993). The construct validity of integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Iowa, Iowa City.
68. Ones, D. S., Schmidt, F. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (1994). Examination of construct validity with linear composites and generalizability coefficient corrected correlations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
69. Pelechano, V. (1975). Manual del Questionario MAE [MAE Questionnaire manual]. Madrid: Fraser Española.
70. Piedmont, R. L., & Weinstein, H. P. (1994). Predicting supervisor ratings of job performance using the NEO-Peisonality Inventory. Journal of Psychology, 128, 255-265.
71. Pinillos, J. L. (1962). Manual del Questionario CEP. [CEP Questionnaire manual]. Madrid: TEA.
72. Prieto, J. M., Blasco, R. D., & Quintanilla, I. (1991). Recrutement et selection du personnel en Espagne [Recruitment and personnel selection in Spain]. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 47-62.
73. Robertson, I. T. (1993). Personality and personnel selection. European Review of Applied Psychology, 43, 187-194.
74. Robertson, I. T (1994). Personality and personnel selection. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.). Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 75-89). London: Wiley.
75. Robertson, I. T., & Kinder, A. (1993). Personality and job competencies: The criterion-related validity of some personality variables. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 226-244.
76. Robertson, I. T., & Markin, P. J. (1986). Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 45-57.
77. *Rodriguez, A. (1984). Aproximacion psicosociológica a la accidentabilidad laboral [Psychosociological approach to the labor accidentability]. Madrid: Servicio de Reprografia de la Universidad Complutense, Spain.
78. *Rodriguez, D. (1989). Características individuales y conducta de negociación [Individual characteristics and negotiation behavior]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
79. Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). A survey of individual assessment practices by I/O psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 40, 455-488.
80. Sackett, P. R., & Oslgaard, D. J. (1994). Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: Implications for range restriction corrections in validation research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 680-684.
81. *Salgado, J. F. (1993). Validación sintética y utilidad de pruebas de habilidades cognitivas por ordenador [Synthetic validity of cognitive ability test by computer]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 11, 79-92.
82. Salgado, J. F. (1996). Personality and job competences: A comment on the Robertson and Kinder (1993) study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69, 373-375.
83. *Salgado, J. F., & Rumbo, A. (in press). Personality and job performance in financial managers. International Journal of Assessment and Selection.
84. *Salgado, J. F., Rumbo, A., Santamaria, G., & Losada, M. R. (1995). El 16PF, el modelo de cinco factores y el rendimiento en el trabajo [16 PF. five factor model, and job performance]. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 5, 81-94.
85. Salgado, J. F., & Santamaria, G. (1995). Rendimiento en estudios universitarios y personalidad [Personality and performance studies]. Departamento de Psicología Social y Básica, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Unpublished manuscript.
86. *Sánchez, J. (1969). Validación de tests con monitores de formación [Validity of tests with training monitors]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 24, 301-313.
87. Saville, P., & Holdsworth, J. (1984). Occupational Personality Questionnaire manual. Escher, Surrey, England: Saville and Holdsworth.
88. Saville, P., & Holdsworth, J. (1994). Customer Service Questionnaire. Surrey, England: Saville and Holdsworth.
89. Saville, P., & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 210-238.
90. Schmidt, F. L. (1994). Programs of meta-analysis. Department of Organizations and Management. University of Iowa.
91. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 27 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1, 199-223.
92. Schmidt, F. L., Law, K. S., Hunter, J. E., Rothstein, H. R., Pearlman, K., & McDaniel, M. (1993). Refinements in validity generalization methods: Implications for the situational specificity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 3-12.
93. Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 627-670). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
94. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. D., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
95. *Schuler, H., Fruhner, K., Karkoschka, U., & Moser, K. (1994). Prädiktive validät eines experimentellen interviews [Predictive validity of experimental interviews]. University of Hohenheim. Germany. Unpublished manuscript.
96. Shackleton, V., & Newell, B. (1991). Management selection: A comparative survey of methods used in top British and French companies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 23-36.
97. Smith, M. (1991). Recruitment and selection in the UK with some data on Norway. European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 27-34.
98. Smith, M., & Abrahamsen, M. (1992). Patterns of selection in six countries. The Psychologists: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 5, 205-207.
99. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1995). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In S. R. Briggs & J. M. Cheek (Eds.), Personality measures, development and evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 23-42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
100. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
101. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., Rothstein, M., & Reddon, J. R. (1994). Meta-analysis of personality-job performance relations. Personnel Psychology, 46, 157-172.
102. Tuppes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1963). Recurrent personality-factors based on trait ratings. (U.S. Air Force ASD Tech. Rep. 61-97) Lackland Air Force Base, TX.
103. *Van Leest, P. F., & Olsder, H. E. (1991). Psychologisch selectiondenoek en praktijkbeoordelingen [Psychological selection in the practice] (Research report). Zoetemeer, The Netherlands: RPD Advies.
104. *Van Leest, P. F., & van Notenboom, C. C. M. (1993). Psychologische selectie werkt! [The psychological selection works]. Tijdschrift woor de Politie, 3, 65-67.
105. *Van der Maesen de Sombreff, P. E. A. M., & Olsder, H. E. (1986a). RPD Personlijkheidsvragenlijst (RPDV). [RPD Personality Questionnaire]. Zoetemeer, The Netherlands: RPD Advies.
106. *Van der Maesen de Sombreff, P. E. A. M., & Olsder, H. E. (1986b). Het mut van de psychologische selectie van de gemeentepolitie van Amsterdam [Psychological selection of local police of Amsterdam] (RPD Advies Research Report). Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
107. *Van der Maesen de Sombreff, P. E. A. M., & Zaal, J. N. (1986). Incremental utility of personality questionnaires in selection by the Dutch government. (RPD Advies Research Report). Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
108. Warr, P., & Conner, M. (1992). Job competence and cognition. In L. Cummings, & A. Staub, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 91-127). New York: JAI Press.
109. Wilde, G. J. S. (1976). Neurotische Labiliteit Gemeten volgens de Vragenlijsmethode [Neurotic lability measured by way of a questionnaire]. Amsterdam: Van Rose.
110. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Manual of the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.