Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 554-571

  Bono, Joyce E ^a   Judge, Timothy A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348217941     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/30040649     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
2. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. 1999. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72: 441-462.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
4. Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
5. Bass, B. M. 1999. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8: 9-32.
6. Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. 1951. An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35: 307-311.
8. Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Carless, S. A. 1998. Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behavior as measured by the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71: 353-358.
10. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. 1994. Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62:119142.
11. Eden, D. 1992. Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 3: 271-305.
12. Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. 1993. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1577-1613.
13. Fiol, C. M., Harris, D., & House, R. 1999. Charismatic leadership: Strategies for effecting social change. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 449-482.
14. Fuller, J. B., Patterson, C. E., Hester, K., & Stringer, D. Y. 1996. A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership. Psychological Reports, 78: 271-287.
15. Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. House, R. J. 1977. A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larsen (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Southern Illinois University Press.
17. House, R. J., & Shamir, B. 1993. Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions: 81-107. Academic Press.
18. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. 1999. The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 680-694.
19. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. 1993. LISBEL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
22. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. 2000. Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 237-249.
23. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 36-51.
24. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 3-90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7: 385-425.
26. O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. 1986. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 492-499.
27. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. 1989. Perceived locus of causality and Internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 749-761.
28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55: 68-78.
29. Shamir, B. 1999. Taming charisma for better understanding and greater usefulness: A response to Beyer. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 555-562.
30. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. 1993. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4: 577-594.
31. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. 1998. Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 387-409.
32. Sheldon, K. M., Elliott, A. J. 1998. Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 546-557.
33. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliott, A. J. 1999. Goal striving, need satisfaction and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 482-497.
34. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. 1998. Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 1319-1331.
35. Spreitzer, G. M. 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 483-504.
36. Stewart, G. L., Carson, K. P., & Cardy, R. L. 1996. The joint effects of conscientiousness and self-leadership training on employee self-directed behavior in a service setting. Personnel Psychology, 49: 143-164.
37. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 666-681.
38. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. 1998. The Role-Based Performance Scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 540-555.