Learning versus performance in short-term project teams

Small Group Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 328-353

  Druskat, Vanessa Urch ^a   Kayes, D Christopher ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BUTLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034194968     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640003100304     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 334-365
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665
3. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1999). Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix (Series Eds.), & R. Wageman (Vol. Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Context (Vol. 2, pp. 33-48). Stamford, CT: JAI.
4. Argote, L. (1989). Agreement about norms and work-unit effectiveness: Evidence from the field. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 131-140
5. Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 251-280.
6. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Benne, K., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 42-47.
8. Bowen, D. D. (1998). Team frames: The multiple realities of the team. Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 95-103
9. Bowen, D. D., & Jackson, C. N. (1985-1986). Curing those "ol' ohmigod-not-another-group-class" blues. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 10(4), 21-31.
10. Braaten, L. J. (1974). Developmental phases of encounter groups: A critical review of models and a new proposal. Interpersonal Development, 75, 112-129.
11. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
12. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Blickensderfer, E. L. (1998, April). Making fine distinctions among team constructs: Worthy endeavor or "Crewel" and unusual punishment? In R. Klimoski (Chair), When is a work team a crew and does it matter? Symposium presented at the 13th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
13. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Capelli, P., & Rogovsky, N. (1994). New work systems and skill requirements. International Labour Review, 133(2), 205-220.
15. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
16. Denison, D. R., Hart, S. G., & Kahn, J. A. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1005-1023.
17. Dowd, K. O., & Liedtka, J. (1994, Winter). What corporations seek in MBA hires: A survey. The Magazine of the Graduate Management Admission Council, 2.
18. Druskat, V. U. (1996, August). Team-level competencies in superior performing self-managing work teams. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
19. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (1999). The antecedents of team competence: Toward a fine-grained model of self-managing team effectiveness. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix (Series Eds.), & R. Wageman (Vol. Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Context (Vol. 2, pp. 201-231). Stamford, CT: JAI.
20. Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (1999). Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 58-74.
21. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
22. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
23. Freeman, K. A. (1996). Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors of academic performance. Small Group Research, 27(2), 265-282.
24. Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 4-41.
25. Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
26. Goodman, P. S. (1986). Impact of task and technology on group performance. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective workgroups (pp. 120-167). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Goodman, P. S., & Leyden, D. P. (1991). Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 578-586.
28. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Shaw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 121-173). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29. Gordon, J. (1992, October). Work teams: How far have they come? Training, 29(10), 59-65.
30. Janis, I. L. (1968). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
32. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586.
34. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Langer, E. J. (1997). The power of mindful learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
36. Mann, R. D. (1975). Winners, losers and the search for equality in groups. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes. New York: John Wiley.
37. McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Lessons from complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., Craigin, J., & Fink, D. (1982). Team learning: A potential solution to the problem of large classes. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 7(1), 21-33.
39. Murnighan, J. L., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165-186.
40. Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 309-338.
41. Pearce, J. A., & Ravlin, E. C. (1987). The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 40(11), 751-782.
42. Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 361-376.
43. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
44. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
45. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(1), 105-115.
46. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
47. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
48. Sundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1989). Physical environments and workgroup effectiveness. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 175-209). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
49. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.
50. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Development sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
51. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: McGraw Hill.
52. Watkins, V. J., & Marsick, K. E. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
54. Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21(2), 236-250.