The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy

Language Learning Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 87-102

  Ruegg, Rachael ^a  

^a AKITA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

feedback; self efficacy; writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908592786     PISSN: 09571736     EISSN: 17532167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2014.958190     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aida, Y. 1994. Examination of Horowitz, Horowitz and Cope's construct of foreign language anxiety: the case of students of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal 78, no. 2: 155–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02026.x
2. Andrade, M., and N., Evans. 2013. Principles and Practices for Response in Second Language Writing: Developing Self-Regulated Learners. New York: Routledge.
3. Bandura, A., 1981. Self-referent thought: a developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and possible futures, ed. J., Flavell and L., Ross, 200–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bandura, A., 1989. Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology, ed. L., Pervin, 19–38. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.
6. Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28, no. 2: 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
7. Bandura, A., 2006. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/effguide.html
8. Beason, L. 1993. Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum classes. Research in the Teaching of English 27, no. 4: 395–422.
9. Bitchener, J., and D., Ferris. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge.
10. Bong, M. 2001. Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrolment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 26: 553–570. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1048
11. Bown, J., and C., White. 2010. A social and cognitive approach to SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics 48: 331–353. doi: 10.1515/iral.2010.014
12. Cleary, L. 1990. The fragile inclination to write: praise and criticism in the classroom. English Journal 79, no. 2: 22–28. doi: 10.2307/819094
13. Chaudron, C. 1984. Evaluating writing: effects of feedback on revision. RELC Journal 15, no. 2: 1–14. doi: 10.1177/003368828401500201
14. Cohen, A., 1987. Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In Learner Strategies in Language Learning, ed. A., Wenden and J., Rubin, 31–40. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Daly, J. 1978. Writing apprehension and writing competency. Journal of Educational Research 72: 10–14. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1978.10885110
16. Daly, J., and W., Shamo. 1978. Academic decisions as a function of writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English 12: 119–126.
17. Eysenck, M. 1979. Anxiety, learning and memory: a reconceptualisation. Journal of Research in Personality 13: 363–385. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(79)90001-1
18. Ferris, D. 1995. Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29, no. 1: 33–53. doi: 10.2307/3587804
19. Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20. Ferris, D. 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Ferris, D., 2006. Does error feedback help student writers?. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, ed. K., Hyland and F., Hyland, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ferris, D., and J., Hedgcock. 2005. Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Ferris, D., H., Liu, A., Sinha and M., Senna. 2013. Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 307–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
24. Ferris, D., S., Pezone, C., Tade and S., Tinti. 1997. Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, no. 2: 155–182. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90032-1
25. Finn, K., and M., Frone. 2004. Academic performance and cheating: moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Research 97: 115–121. doi: 10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121
26. Fox, R. 1980. Treatment of writing apprehension and its effects on composition. Research in the Teaching of English 14, no. 1: 39–49.
27. Gardner, R., 1997. Individual differences and second language learning. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Education: Second Language Education, ed. R., Tucker and D., Corson, 33–42. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer Academic.
28. Gardner, R., P., Tremblay and A., Masgoret. 1997. Towards a full model of second language learning: an empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal 81, no. 3: 344–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05495.x
29. Goldstein, L. 2004. Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing 13, no. 1: 63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.006
30. Grabe, W., and R., Kaplan. 1996. Theory and Practice of Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
31. Graham, S. 2007. Learner strategies and self-efficacy: making the connection. The Language Learning Journal 35, no. 1: 81–93. doi: 10.1080/09571730701315832
32. Graham, S., C., MacArthur, S., Schwartz and V., Page-Voth. 1992. Improving the compositions of students with learning disabilities using a strategy involving product and process goal setting. Exceptional Children 58, no. 4: 322–335. doi: 10.1177/001440299205800405
33. Gungle, B., and V., Taylor. 1989. Writing apprehension and second language writers. In Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL students, ed. D., Johnson and D., Roen, 235–148. New York: Longman.
34. Hyland, F. 1998. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 255–286. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
35. Hyland, F., and K., Hyland. 2001. Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 185–212. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
36. Hyland, K. 1996. Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge.
37. Hyland, K., and F., Hyland. 2006. Interpersonal aspects of response: constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, ed. K., Hyland, and F., Hyland, 206–224. New York: Cambridge.
38. Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
39. Leki, I. 1990. Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal 3: 5–19.
40. Martinez, C., N., Kock and J., Cass. 2011. Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 54, no. 5: 351–360. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.54.5.5
41. McCarthy, P., S., Meier and R., Rinderer. 1985. Self-efficacy and writing: a different view of self-evaluation. College Composition and Communication 36, no. 4: 465–471. doi: 10.2307/357865
42. Mittan, R., 1989. The peer review process: harnessing students’ communicative power. In Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL Students, ed. D., Johnson and D., Roen, 207–219. New York: Longman.
43. Pajares, F. 1996. Assessing Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Academic Outcomes: The case for specificity and correspondence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
44. Pajares, F., 1997. Current directions in self-efficacy research. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement, ed. M., Maehr and P., Pintrich, 1–49. Greenwich: JAI Press.
45. Pajares, F. 2003. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation and achievement in writing: a review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 139–158. doi: 10.1080/10573560308222
46. Pajares, F., and M., Johnson. 1994. Confidence and competence in writing: the role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English 28, no. 3: 313–331.
47. Prat-Sala, M., and P., Redford. 2010. The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to study. British Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 283–305. doi: 10.1348/000709909X480563
48. Robbins, S., K., Lauver, H., Le, D., Davis and R., Langley. 2004. Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes?. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 130, no. 2: 261–288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
49. Ruegg, R. 2010. Aspects affecting confidence in writing. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching 21: 123–135.
50. Ruegg, R., and D., Koyama. 2010. Confidence in writing: the effect of feedback. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching 21: 137–166.
51. Saito, Y., and K., Samimy. 1996. Foreign language anxiety and language performance: a study of learner anxiety in beginning, intermediate and advanced-level college students of Japanese. Foreign Language Annals 29, no. 2: 239–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb02330.x
52. Scharzer, R., 1986. Self-related cognition in anxiety and motivation: an introduction. In Self-Related Cognition in Anxiety and Motivation, ed. R., Scharzer, 1–17. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Schunk, D. 1983. Developing children's self-efficacy and skills: the roles of social comparative information and goal setting. Contemporary Educational Psychology 8: 76–86. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(83)90036-X
54. Schunk, D. 1985. Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools 22: 208–223. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7
55. Schunk, D. 1991. Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26, no. 3&4: 207–231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
56. Schunk, D.H., and C.W., Swartz. 1993. Goals and progressive feedback: effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18: 337–354. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1024
57. Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction. Language Learning 46, no. 2: 327–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
58. Tsui, A., and M., Ng. 2000. Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 147–170. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
59. Yashima, T., L., Zenuk-Nishide and K., Shimizu. 2004. The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning 54, no. 1: 119–152.
60. Zacharias, N. 2007. Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal 38, no. 1: 38–52. doi: 10.1177/0033688206076157
61. Zhang, S. 1995. Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, no. 3: 209–222. doi: 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
62. Zimmerman, B., A., Bandura and M., Martinez-Pons. 1992. Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal 29, no. 3: 663–676. doi: 10.3102/00028312029003663