Effects of Feedback on Self-Evaluations and Self-Regulation in Elementary School

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 508-519

  van Loon, Mariëtte H ^a   Roebers, Claudia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ELEMENTARY STUDENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION;

EID: 85027530781     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3347     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Baars, M., Vink, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 33, 92–107.
2. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201.
3. Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Gunn, D. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (2003). The complexities of complex span: explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.71.
4. Bjorklund, D. F., & Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist, 47(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.46.
5. Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2001). A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970109600653.
6. Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., O'Shea, P., & Allen, D. (2005). The influence of overt practice, achievement level, and explanatory style on calibration accuracy and performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.3200/jexe.73.4.269-290.
7. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.
8. Callender, A. A., Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Roberts, A. S. (2015). Improving metacognition in the classroom through instruction, training, and feedback. Metacognition and Learning, 11(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9142-6.
9. Cao, L., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2007). College students' metacognitive awareness of difficulties in learning the class content does not automatically lead to adjustment of study strategies. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 31–46.
10. Case, R., & Griffin, S. (1990). Child cognitive development: the role of central conceptual structures in the development of scientific and social thought. Advances in Psychology, 64, 193–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60099-0.
11. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6.
12. Chatzistamatiou, M., Dermitzaki, I., Efklides, A., & Leondari, A. (2015). Motivational and affective determinants of self-regulatory strategy use in elementary school mathematics. Educational Psychology, 35(7), 835–850.
13. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
14. Destan, N., Hembacher, E., Ghetti, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Early metacognitive abilities: the interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5-to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.04.001.
15. Destan, N., Spiess, M. A., de Bruin, A., van Loon, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2017). 6-and 8-year-olds' performance evaluations: do they differ between self and unknown others? Metacognition and Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9170-5.
16. Dunlosky, J., Hartwig, M. K., Rawson, K. A., & Lipko, A. R. (2010). Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.502239.
17. Dunlosky, J., Mueller, M. L., & Thiede, K. W. (2016). Methodology for investigating human metamemory. In J. Dunlosky, & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metamemory, (pp. 23 – 38). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students' learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003.
19. Dunlosky, J., Serra, M. J., Matvey, G., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Second-order judgments about judgments of learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.3200/genp.132.4.335-346.
20. Finn, B., & Tauber, S. K. (2015). When confidence is not a signal of knowing: how students' experiences and beliefs about processing fluency can lead to miscalibrated confidence. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9313-7.
21. Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G., & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1(4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(70)90019-8.
22. Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00051-X.
23. Hacker, D. J. (1997). Comprehension monitoring of written discourse across early-to-middle adolescence. Reading and Writing, 9(3), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007989901667.
24. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160.
25. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
26. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189.
27. Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: the influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9000-7.
28. Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004.
29. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know—the accesibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.609.
30. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X485719.
31. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children's metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9079-3.
32. Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students' self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2.
33. Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Working memory capacity and categorization: individual differences and modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(3), 720. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022639.
34. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., Hartwig, M. K., Rawson, K. A., Swan, K., & Cook, D. (2009). Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017599.
35. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers' recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.002.
36. Lipko-Speed, A., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2014). Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.002.
37. Lipowski, S. L., Merriman, W. E., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Preschoolers can make highly accurate judgments of learning. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030614.
38. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002). Developmental trends in children's feeling-of-knowing judgements. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(4), 327–333.
39. Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, (pp. 117 – 144). New York: Routeledge.
40. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.1.174.
41. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2013). Metacognition and control of study choice in children. Metacognition and learning, 8(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9094-7.
42. Miller, T. M., & Geraci, L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: the influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7.
43. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “delayed-JOL effect”. Psychological Science, 2(4), 267–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9280.1991.Tb00147.X.
44. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7–28.
45. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6.
46. Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 3–31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4.
47. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2007). Improving students' self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326022.
48. Renner, C. H., & Renner, M. J. (2001). But i thought i knew that: using confidence estimation as a debiasing technique to improve classroom performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200101/02)15:1<23::aid-acp681>3.0.co;2-j.
49. Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021705.
50. Rinne, L. F., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2014). Knowing right from wrong in mental arithmetic judgments: calibration of confidence predicts the development of accuracy. PloS One, 9(7), e98663. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098663.
51. Roebers, C. M. (2014). Children's deliberate memory development: the contribution of strategies and metacognitive processes. In P. J. Bauer, & R. Fivush (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook on the Development of Children's Memory, Volume I/II, (pp. 865 – 894). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
52. Roebers, C. M., Krebs, S. S., & Roderer, T. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring and control in elementary school children: their interrelations and their role for test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.003.
53. Roebers, C. M., Moga, N., & Schneider, W. (2001). The role of accuracy motivation on children's and adults' event recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2577.
54. Salles, A., Ais, J., Semelman, M., Sigman, M., & Calero, C. I. (2016). The metacognitive abilities of children and adults. Cognitive Development, 40, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.08.009.
55. Schneider, W. (1998). Performance prediction in young children: effects of skill, metacognition and wishful thinking. Developmental Science, 1(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00044.
56. Schneider, W., & Löffler, E. (2016). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. In J. Dunlosky, & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metamemory, (pp. 491 – 518). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57. Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3.
58. Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2009). Memory as a self-protective mechanism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00220.x.
59. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66.
60. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C., & Eggen, T. J. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students' learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881.
61. Van Loon, M., de Bruin, A., Leppink, J., & Roebers, C. (2017). Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.008.
62. Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.005.
63. Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.397.
64. Zamary, A., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2016). How accurately can students evaluate the quality of self-generated examples of declarative concepts? Not well, and feedback does not help. Learning and Instruction, 46, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.002.