Student use of automated essay evaluation technology during revision

Journal of Writing Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 149-175

  Moore, Noreen S ^a   MacArthur, Charles A ^b  

^a WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated essay evaluation; Revision; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974663029     PISSN: 20301006     EISSN: 22943307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.05     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Attali, Y. (2004). Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA April 12-16.
2. Attali, Y. (2013). Validity and reliability of automated essay score. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 181-198). New York: Routledge.
3. Bardine, B., Bardine, B., & Deegan, E. (2000). Beyond the red pen: Clarifying our role in the response process. English Journal, 90(1), 94-101.
4. Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222-234). New York, NY: Guilford.
5. Deane, P. (2013). On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct. Assessing Writing 18: 7-24.
6. Dikli, S. (2010). The nature of automated essay scoring feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 99-134.
7. Elliot, S. (2003). IntelliMetric: From here to validity. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: Across-disciplinary perspective (pp. 71-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
8. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481-506.
9. Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., Dooley, S. (2005). Summary Street®: Computer support for comprehension and writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(1), 53-80.
10. Graham, S., Hebert, M., Harris, K.R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523-547.
11. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
12. Keith, T. Z. (2003). Validity and automated essay scoring systems. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 147-168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44, 250-266.
14. Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Does automated feedback help students to write? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42, 173-196.
15. Kukich, K. (2000, September/October). Beyond Automated Essay Scoring. In M. A. Hearst (Ed.), The debate on automated essay grading IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27-31.
16. Lai, Y. (2010). Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 432-454.
17. Landauer, T.K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P.W. (2003). Automated scoring and annotation of essays with the Intelligent Essay Assessor. In M.D. Shermis & J.C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 87-112). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
18. MacArthur, C. A. (2000). New tools for writing: Assistive technology for students with writing difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 85-100.
19. MacArthur, C.A. (2007). Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision. In S. Graham, C.A. MacArthur, and J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best Practices in Writing Instruction (pp. 141-163). New York: Guilford Press.
20. MacArthur, C. A. (2015). Instruction in evaluation and revision. In MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research, 2nd Ed. (272-287). New York: Guilford.
21. MacArthur, C. A. (2012). Evaluation and revision processes in writing. In Berninger, V. W. (Ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology, (pp. 461-483). London: Psychology Press.
22. MacArthur, C.A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behaviors among students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61-73.
23. Page, E. (2003). Project Essay Grade: PEG. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 43-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Prior, P. (2003). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What Writing Does and How it Does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Scharber, C., Dexter, S., Riedel, E. (2008). Students' experiences with an automated essay scorer. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 7(1), 1-45.
26. Schultz, M.T. (2013). The IntelliMetric Automated Essay Scoring Engine-A review and an application to Chinese essay scoring. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 89-98). New York: Routledge.
27. Shermis, M.D. & Burstein, J. (2003). Introduction. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. xiii-xvi). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J., & Leacock, C. (2006). Applications of computers in assessment and analysis of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 403-416). New York: Guilford.
29. Shermis, M.D., Burstein, J., Bursky. (2013). Introduction to automated essay evaluation. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
30. Shermis, M.D., & Burstein, J. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation: Current applications and new directions. New York: Routledge.
31. Shermis, M. D., Wilson Garvan, C., & Diao, Y. (2008). The impact of automated essay scoring on writing outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York, NY.
32. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.C. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.
33. Troia, G. A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 324-336). New York, NY: Guilford.
34. U. S. Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary, Implementation and Support Unit. (2012a). Race to the Top assessment: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers year one report. Washington, DC: Author. Downloaded from: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-assessment/performance.html
35. U. S. Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary, Implementation and Support Unit. (2012b). Race to the Top assessment: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium year one report. Washington, DC: Author. Downloaded from: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-assessment/performance.html
36. Vantage Learning (2008). MY Access! School Edition [Software]. Available from http://www.vantagelearning.com/products/my-access-school-edition/
37. Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 333-362.
38. Whithaus, C. (2013). Foreward. In M.D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Handbook of automated essay evaluation: Current applications and new directions (pp. vii-ix). New York: Routledge.
39. Wilson, J., Olinghouse, N. Andrada, G.N. (2014). Does automated feedback improve writing? Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal. 12 (1), 93-118.