Elementary students as active agents in their learning: an empirical study of the connections between assessment practices and student metacognition

Australian Educational Researcher

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 65-85

  Braund, Heather ^a   DeLuca, Christopher ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment as learning; Assessment for learning; Classroom assessment; Elementary education; Formative assessment; Metacognition; Self regulation; Student agency

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042499740     PISSN: 03116999     EISSN: 22105328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13384-018-0265-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Airasian, P. W. (1997). Classroom assessment (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33–46.
4. Baker, L. (2010). Metacognition. International of Encyclopedia Education (3rd ed., pp. 204–210). Oxford: Elsevier.
5. Ben-David, A., & Orion, N. (2013). Teachers’ voices on integrating metacognition into science education. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 3161–3193.
6. Bingham, G., Holbrook, T., & Meyers, L. E. (2010). Using self-assessments in elementary classrooms. Phi Delta Kappa International, 91(5), 59–61.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
8. Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In R. W. Taylor (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means: The 68th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Evaluation, Part II (pp. 26–50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood. New York: NY Guilford.
10. Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. (2012). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, 2, 347–365.
11. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self- regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249.
12. Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166.
13. Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
14. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.
15. Ehrlinger, J., Mitchum, A. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 94–100.
16. Fisher, R. (2013). Creative dialogue: Talk for thinking in the classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.
17. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
18. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Fleer, M. (2015). Developing an assessment pedagogy: the tensions and struggles in re-theorising assessment from a cultural–historical perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 224–246.
20. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
21. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity?. Washington, D.C: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
22. Hudesman, B. J., Crosby, S., Flugman, B., Issac, S., Everson, H., & Clay, D. B. (2013). Using formative assessment and metacognition to improve student achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 37(1), 2–13.
23. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
24. King, M. (2003). The effects of formative assessment on student self-regulation, motivational beliefs, and achievement in elementary science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
25. Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s Reasoning and the Mind (pp. 30–326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
26. Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 173–194.
27. Lombaerts, K., Braak, J. Van, & Athanasou, J. (2009). Development of the self-regulated learning teacher belief scale. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 79–96.
28. Martin, C., Polly, D., & Kissel, B. (2017). Exploring the impact of written reflections on learning in the elementary mathematics classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 110, 538–553.
29. McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2009). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(April), 39–45.
30. Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2015). Developing young adolescents’ self-regulation by means of formative assessment: A theoretical perspective. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1071233.
31. Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., et al. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Neitzel, C., & Connor, L. (2017). Messages from the Milieu: Classroom instruction and context influences on elementary school students’ self-regulated learning behaviors. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31(4), 548–560.
33. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.
34. Papleontiou-Louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30.
35. Patton, M. Q. (2016). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 250–284). San Diego: Academic Press.
37. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(10), 1–13.
38. Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Self-evaluation in Grade 11 mathematics: Effects on achievement and student beliefs about ability. In D. McDougall (Ed.), OISE papers on mathematical education (pp. 71–86). Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
39. Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6, 107–132.
40. Ross, P., Tronson, D., & Ritchie, R. (2005). Modelling photosynthesis to increase conceptual understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 84–88.
41. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
42. Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 114–121.
43. Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382.
44. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (Vol. I, pp. 39–83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
46. Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 245–277.
47. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
48. Thomas, G. P. (2011). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 131–144). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
49. Tunstall, P. & Gipps, C. (1996) Feedback and formative assessment: children’s perceptions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
50. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., & Jameson, H. (2009). Play, cognition and self-regulation: What exactly are children learning when they learn through play? Educational & Child Psychology, 26(2), 40–52.
51. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49–65.
52. Willis, J. (2010). Assessment for learning as a participative pedagogy. Assessment Matters, 2, 65–84.
53. Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition Learning, 5, 269–288.
54. Wylie, C. E., & Lyon, C. J. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 140–160.
55. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self- regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86.
56. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
58. Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705–722). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169.
60. Zohar, A., & Peled, B. (2008). The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18, 337–353.