A meta-analysis on the impact of grades and comments on academic motivation and achievement: a case for written feedback

Educational Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2021, Pages 922-947

  Koenka, Alison C ^a   Linnenbrink Garcia, Lisa ^a   Moshontz, Hannah ^a   Atkinson, Kayla M ^a   Sanchez, Carmen E ^a   Cooper, Harris ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement; assessment; Grades; motivation; written feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074610267     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1659939     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ames, C., (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
2. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C., (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22 (3), 269–298. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0926
3. Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Yough, M. S., & Gimbert, B. G., (2010). Value-added models of assessment: Implications for motivation and accountability. Educational Psychologist, 45 (2), 123–137. doi: 10.1080/00461521003703045
4. Bandura, A., (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
5. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M., (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 213–238. doi: 10.2307/1170535
6. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C., (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85 (2), 89–99. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818
7. Baumert, J., & Demmrich, A., (2001). Test motivation in the assessment of student skills: The effects of incentives on motivation and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16 (3), 441–462. doi: 10.1007/BF03173192
8. Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V., (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10 (1), 99–117. doi: 10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x
9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R., (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
10. Butler, R., (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (4), 474–482. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
11. Butler, R., (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
12. Butler, R., (2006). Are mastery and ability goals both adaptive? Evaluation, initial goal construction and the quality of task engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (3), 595–611. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52319
13. Butler, R., & Nisan, M., (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (3), 210–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.210
14. Cohen, J., (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cooper, H., (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
16. Crooks, T. J., (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58 (4), 438–481. doi: 10.3102/00346543058004438
17. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R., (2000a). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95 (449), 89–98. doi: 10.2307/2669529
18. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R., (2000b). Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics, 56 (2), 455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
19. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A., (2009). Self-theories and motivation: Students’ beliefs about intelligence. In K. R., Wentzel & A., Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 123–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A., (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1), 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
21. Eccles, J., & Roeser, R., (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R., Lerner & L., Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
22. Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D., (1993). The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48 (2), 90–101.
23. Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L., (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (2), 162–173. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.77.2.162
24. Grubbs, F. E., (1950). Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21 (1), 27–58. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729885
25. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E., (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34 (3), 269–290. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.785384
26. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
27. Hattie, J., (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A., (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
29. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A., (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
30. Krampen, G., (1987). Differential effects of teacher comments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (2), 137–146. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.137
31. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Patall, E. A., (2015). Motivation. In L., Corno & E. M., Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 91–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Lipnevich, A., & Smith, J., (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333. doi: 10.1037/a00177841
33. Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K., (2017). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L., Brown & L. R., Harris (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). New York: Routledge.
34. Maehr, M., & Zusho, A., (2009). Achievement goal theory. In K. R., Wentzel & D. B., Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77–104). New York, NY: Routledge.
35. McMillan, J. H., (2013). Why we need research on classroom assessment. In J. H., McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 3–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Natriello, G., (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22 (2), 155–175. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2202_4
37. Page, E. B., (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49 (4), 173–181. doi: 10.1037/h0041940
38. Page, E. B., (1992). Is the world an orderly place? A review of teacher comments and student achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60 (2), 161–181. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1991.10806588
39. Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A., & Thomas, K., (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.002
40. Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., Jun, M. C., (2015). Achievement emotions in higher education: A diary study exploring emotions across an assessment event. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42 (1), 82–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.05.002
41. Pintrich, P. R., (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
42. Poorthuis, A. M., Juvonen, J., Thomaes, S., Denissen, J. J., Orobio de Castro, B., & Van Aken, M. A., (2015). Do grades shape students’ school engagement? The psychological consequences of report card grades at the beginning of secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 (3), 842–854. doi: 10.1037/edu0000002
43. Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F., (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (3), 683–700. doi: 10.1037/a0023911
44. Pulfrey, C., Darnon, C., & Butera, F., (2013). Autonomy and task performance: Explaining the impact of grades on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (1), 39–57. doi: 10.1037/a0029376
45. Rosenberg, M. S., (2005). The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59 (2), 464–468.
46. Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A., (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51 (2), 146–163.
47. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
49. Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. L., & Pintrich, P., (2014). Motivation in education. Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Schute, V. J., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 153–189. doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795
51. Souchal, C., Toczek, M., Darnon, C., Smeding, A., Butera, F., & Martinot, D., (2014). Assessing does not mean threatening: The purpose of assessment as a key determinant of girls’ and boys’ performance in a science class. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (1), 125–136. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12012
52. Starkey, K. T., (1971). The effect of teacher comments on attitude toward and achievement in secondary mathematics classes: An experimental study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
53. Stewart, L. G., & White, M. A., (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades, and student performance: What do we really know? Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (4), 488–500. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.68.4.488
54. Weiner, B., (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92 (4), 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
55. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J., (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30 (1), 1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
56. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S., (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
57. Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., & Lewis, C., (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences., Journal of Educational Measurement, 39 (1), 1–37.
58. Wollenschläger, M., Hattie, J., Machts, N., Möller, J., & Harms, U., (2016). What makes rubrics effective in teacher-feedback? Transparency of learning goals is not enough. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003