A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students' performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 618-632

  Hsia, Lu Ho ^a   Huang, Iwen ^a   Hwang, Gwo Jen ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TAINAN   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; MOTIVATION; STUDENTS; TEACHING; WEBSITES;

EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS; JUNIOR HIGH STUDENTS; PEER ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE RATINGS; SUPPORTED LEARNING; WEB BASED LEARNING;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84923280984     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12248     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adair, G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: a reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 2, 334–345.
2. Apperley, T. H. (2013). The body of the gamer: game art and gestural excess. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 145–156.
3. Blumenfeld-Jones, D. & Liang, S. Y. (2007). Dance curriculum research. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 245–260). Dortrecht, NL: Springer. Part I.
4. Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/engageinassessment/Student_peer_assessment_-_Stephen_Bostock.pdf.
5. Bouzidi, L. & Jaillet, A. (2009). Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educational Technology & Society, 12, 4, 257–268.
6. Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H. & Lou, S. J. (2011). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education, 58, 1, 303–320.
7. Chang, H.-H. (1999). Creative drama theory and practice for teachers and leaders. Taibei: Chengzhang.
8. Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T. & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners' reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52, 2, 283–291.
9. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C. & Chen, N. S. (2009). An innovative approach for promoting information exchanges and sharing in a web 2.0-based learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17, 4, 311–323.
10. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C. & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55, 4, 1618–1627.
11. Clipa, O., Ignat, A. A. & Rusu, P. (2011). Relations of self-assessment accuracy with motivation level and metacognition abilities in pre-service teacher training. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 883–888.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
13. van Dinther, M., Dochy, F. & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6, 2, 95–108.
14. Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 3, 287–322.
15. Freeman, M. & McKenzie, J. (2002). SPARK—a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5, 551–569.
16. de Grez, L., Valcke, M. & Berings, L. (2010). Peer assessment of oral presentation skills. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2, 1776–1780.
17. Heitlinger, S. & Bryan-Kinns, N. (2013). Understanding performative behaviour within content-rich Digital Live Art. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 111–118.
18. Hobbs, R. (2006). Non-optimal uses of video in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 31, 1, 35–50.
19. Hsieh, S. W., Jang, Y. R., Hwang, G. J. & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students' reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57, 1, 1194–1201.
20. Hwang, G. J., Hung, C. M. & Chen, N. S. (2013). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62, 2, 129–145. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7.
21. Kwok, L. (2008). Students' perception of peer evaluation and teachers' role in seminar discussions. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 1, 84–97.
22. Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., Robert-Jan Simons, P. & Admiraal, W. (2009). Streaming video to enhance students' reflection in dance education. Computers & Education, 52, 1, 169–176.
23. Li, L., Liu, X. & Zhou, Y. (2012). Give and take: a re-analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology-facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 3, 376–384.
24. Lin, M. C. (2010). The construction of scoring rubrics for the performing art-using primary grade on “the content of drama creation & application” as example. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 18, 2, 113–154.
25. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 4, 420–432.
26. Lindinger, C., Mara, M., Obermaier, K., Aigner, R., Haring, R. & Pauser, V. (2013). The (St) Age of Participation: audience involvement in interactive performances. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 119–129.
27. Liu, C. C. & Tsai, C. M. (2005). Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 43e59.
28. Liu, E. Z. F. & Lin, S. S. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 6, 1122–1125.
29. Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S., Chiu, C. H. & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 3, 246–251.
30. Liu, N. F. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 3, 279–290.
31. Lladó, A. P., Soley, L. F., Sansbelló, R. M. F., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N. et al (2013). Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.860077.
32. Papadopoulos, P. M., Lagkas, T. D. & Demetriadis, S. N. (2012). How to improve the peer review method: free-selection vs assigned-pair protocol evaluated in a computer networking course. Computers & Education, 59, 2, 182–195.
33. Parsons, M. (2007). Art and metaphor, body and mind. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 533–542). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
34. Pérez, E. & Sánchez Coterón, L. (2013). Performance meets games: considering interaction strategies in game design. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 157–164.
35. Procee, H. (2006). Reflection in education: a Kantian epistemology. Educational Theory, 56, 3, 237–362.
36. Reed, A. & Phillips, A. (2013). Additive race: colorblind discourses of realism in performance capture technologies. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 130–144.
37. Sadler, P. & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on students learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1, 1–31.
38. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S. & Merriënboer, J. (2002). Peer-assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 5, 443–454.
39. Spence, J., Frohlich, D. & Andrews, S. (2013). Performative experience design: where autobiographical performance and human–computer interaction meet. Digital Creativity, 24, 2, 96–110.
40. Şerife, D. (2010). Teaching English vocabulary to young learners via drama. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2, 439–443.
41. Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: the missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33, 1, 57–69.
42. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 3, 249–276.
43. Topping, K. (2009). Peer-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 1, 20–27.
44. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I. & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 2, 149–169.
45. Tsai, C. C. & Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37, 293–310.
46. Tseng, S. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: a study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 4, 1161–1174.
47. Tseng, S. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college students' self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 3, 164–169.
48. Tsivitanidou, O. E., Zacharia, Z. C. & Hovardas, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students' unmediated peer assessment skills. Learning and Instruction, 21, 4, 506–519.
49. Wu, C. C. & Kao, H. C. (2008). Streaming videos in peer assessment to support training pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 1, 45–55.
50. Yang, Y. F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 4, 687–700.
51. Yang, Y. F. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 72–83.