Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing: Second edition

Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-155

  Sadoski, Mark ^a   Paivio, Allan ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061717346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203801932     Document Type: Book

References (323)

1. Abramson, M., & Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophsics, 59, 1059-1068.
2. Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 2, 203-231.
3. Alesandrini, K. L. (1985). Imagery research with adults: Implications for education. In A. A. Sheikh, & K. S. Sheikh (Eds), Imagery in education (pp. 199-221). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing Co.
4. Alexander, J. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2008). Reading voices and hearing text: Talker-specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance: 34, 446-459.
5. Anderson, R. C. (1974). Concretization and sentence learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 179-183.
6. Anderson, R. C., Goetz, E. T., Pichert, H. M., & Halff, H. M. (1977). Two faces of the conceptual peg hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 142-149.
7. Anderson, R. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1972). Imagery and prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 242-243.
8. Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 690-724). New York: Longman.
9. Avila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379-395.
10. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577- 660.
11. Bates, T. C., Castles, A., Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Coltheart, M., Martin, N. (2007). Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: A unified genetic dual route model. Reading and Writing, 20, 147-171.
12. Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationships between text quality and the writing process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 415-428.
13. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Worthy, J. (1995). Giving text a voice can improve students' understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 220-238.
14. Bell, N. (1986). Visualizing and verbalizing for language comprehension and thinking. Paso Robles, CA: Academy of Reading Publications.
15. Bell, N. (2007). Visualizing and verbalizing for language comprehension and thinking (2nd ed). San Luis Obispo, CA: Gander Publishing.
16. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25, 166-195.
17. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 905-917.
18. Black, J. B., Turner, T. J., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Spatial reference points in language comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 187-198.
19. Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., & Whiteley, C. S. (2008). CPMs: A kinesthetic comprehension strategy. Reading Teacher, 61, 460-470.
20. Bredo, E. (2000). Reconsidering constructivism: The relevance of George Herbert Mead's interactionism. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 127-157). Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Brennan, S., & Robinson, G. L. (1998). 4 approaches to comprehension instruction for students with literacy problems at the high school level. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 12-19.
22. Brewer, W. F. (1977). Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 5, 673-678.
23. Briggs, C. F. (2000). Literacy, reading, and writing in the medieval West. Journal of Medieval History, 26, 397-420.
24. Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Broudy, H. S., & Palmer, J. R. (1965). Exemplars of teaching method. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
26. Bruce, D. L. (2008). Visualizing literacy: Building bridges with media. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 264-282.
27. Brumberger, E. R. (2003a). The rhetoric of typography: The awareness and impact of typeface appropriateness. Technical Communication, 50, 224-231.
28. Brumberger, E. R. (2003b). The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication, 50, 206-223.
29. Bryant, M. M. (1993). History of the English language. In New Webster's dictionary and thesaurus of the English language (pp. xi-xviii). Danbury, CT: Lexicon Publications, Inc.
30. Bundgaard, P. F. (2006). Principles of linguistic composition below and beyond the clause: Elements of a semantic combinatorial system. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14, 501-525.
31. Bundy, M. W. (1927). The theory of imagination in classical and medieval thought. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
32. Caldwell, J., & Leslie, L. (2010). Thinking aloud in expository text: Processes and outcomes. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 308-340.
33. Caplan, H. (trans.) (1954). Rhetorica Ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Carruthers, M. J. (1990). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Carruthers, P. (2011). Creative action in mind. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 437-461.
36. Chafe, W. L. (1977). The recall and verbalization of past experience. In R. W. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 215-246). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
37. Cherry, R. (1998). Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication, 15, 384-410.
38. Choi, S., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent for learning English as a second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 441-446.
39. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
41. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Cohen, L., Martinaud, O. Lemer, C. Lehéricy, S., Samson, V. Obadia, M., Slachevsky, A., & Dehaene, S. (2003). Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: Anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1313- 1333.
43. Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 352-392.
44. Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1153-1171.
45. Corkill, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 33-67.
46. Corkill, A. J., Glover, J. A., & Bruning, R. H. (1988). Advance organizers: Concrete vs. abstract. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 76-81.
47. Covino, W. A. (1994). Magic, rhetoric, and literacy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
48. Crowley, S. (1993). Modern rhetoric and memory. In J. F. Reynolds (Ed.), Rhetorical memory and delivery: Classical concepts for contemporary composition and communication (pp. 31-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Daneman, M., & Newson, M. (1992). Assessing the importance of subvocalization during nornal silent reading. Reading and Writing, 4, 55-77.
50. Davies, W. J. F. (1974). Teaching reading in early England. New York: Barnes & Noble.
51. De Beni, R., & Moe, A. (2003). Presentation modality effects in studying passages with imagery or rehearsal. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 10, 975-980.
52. de Vega, M., Robertson, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., Kaschak, M. P., & Rinck, M. (2004). On doing two things at once: Temporal constraints on actions in language comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1033-1043.
53. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Cell, 15, 254-262.
54. Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution a l'étude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des differentes variétés de cécité-verbale [A contribution to the anatomical-pathological and clinical study of different varieties of word blindness]. Mémoires Societé Biologique, 4, 61-90.
55. Denis, M. (1984). Imagery and prose: A critical review of research on adults and children. Text, 4, 381-401.
56. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
57. Dhond, R. P., Witzel, T., Dale, A. M., & Halgren, E. (2007). Spatiotemporal cortical dynamics underlying abstract and concrete word reading. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 355-362.
58. Drake, S. M. (2002). Guided imagery and education: Theory, practice and experience. Journal of Mental Imagery, 27, 94-132.
59. Durrell, D. D., & Murphy, H. A. (1963). Boston University research studies in reading. Journal of Education, 146, 1-53.
60. Edfeldt, A. W. (1960). Silent speech and silent reading. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Ehri, L. C. (1978). Beginning reading from a psycholinguistic perspective: Amalgamation of word identities. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The development of the reading process (IRA monograph No. 3, pp. 1-33). Newark, DE: International reading Association.
62. Ehri, L. C. (1998). Research on learning to read and spell: A personal-historical perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 97-114.
63. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167-188.
64. Ehri, L. C., Deffner, N. D., & Wilce, L. S. (1984). Pictorial mnemonics for phonics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 880-893.
65. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 26-40.
66. Engel, H. (2005). Memory book: A Benny Cooperman mystery. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
67. Enkvist, N. E. (1978). Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence. In J.-O. Ostman (Ed.), Reports on text linguistics: Semantics and cohesion (pp. 109-128). Abo, Finland: Publications of the Research Institute of the Abo Akademi Foundation.
68. Epelbaum, S., Pinel, P., Gaillard, R., Delmaire, C., Perrin, M., Dupont, S., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2008). Pure alexia as a disconnection syndrome: New diffusion evidence for an old concept. Cortex, 44, 962-974.
69. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429-448.
70. Fernald, G. M. (1943). Remedial techniques in basic school subjects. New York: McGraw-Hill.
71. Filik, R., & Barber, E. (2011). Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader's regional accent. PLoS One, 6, e25728, 1-5.
72. Fillmore, C. J. (1977). The case for case reopened. In P. Cole, & J. M. Sadock (Eds), Syntax and semantics (vol. 8) Grammatical relations (pp. 59-81). New York: Academic Press.
73. Fillmore, C. J. (1984). Lexical semantics and text semantics. In J. E. Copeland (Ed.), New directions in linguistics and semiotics (pp. 123-147). Houston, TX: Rice University Studies.
74. Fillmore, C. J., & Kay, P. (1983). Final report to NIE: Text semantic analysis of reading comprehension tests. Washington DC: National Institute of Education Grant No. G-790121.
75. Fries, C. C. (1962). Linguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
76. Gambrell, L. B. (1982). Induced mental imagery and the text prediction performance of first and third graders. In J. A. Niles, & L. A. Harris (Eds), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 131-135). Thirty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
77. Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehensionmonitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454-464.
78. Gambrell, L. B., & Jawitz, P. B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children's story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 264-276.
79. Gambrell, L., & Koskinen, P. S. (2002). Imagery: A strategy for enhancing comprehension. In C. C. Block, & M. Pressley (Eds). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 305-318). New York: Guilford Press.
80. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interaction between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
81. Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3-13). New York: Cambridge University Press.
82. Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161-176). New York: Cambridge University Press.
83. Gibson, W. (1969). Persona: A style study for readers and writers. New York: Random House.
84. Giesen, C., & Peeck, J. (1984). Effects of imagery instruction on reading and retaining a literary text. Journal of Mental Imagery, 8, 79-90.
85. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What is memory for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
86. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
87. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
88. Goetz, E. T., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension. In R. J. Kreuz, & M. S. MacNealy (Eds), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 221-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
89. Goetz, E. T., Sadoski, M., Stricker, A. G., White, T. S., & Wang, Z. (2007). The role of imagery in the production of written definitions. Reading Psychology, 28, 241-256.
90. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 664-674.
91. Goodman, K. S. (2005). Making sense of written language: A lifelong journey. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 1-24.
92. Goolsby, R., McTigue, E., & Sadoski, M. (2010, December). Imagination in story response of middle school readers: Relationship between imagery, emotion, and structural importance. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Fort Worth, Texas.
93. Gray, W. S., Artley, A. S., Arbuthnot, M. H., & Gray, L. (1951). Guidebook to accompany the three preprimers. New York: Scott, Foresman.
94. Green, J. A. (1969). The educational ideas of Pestalozzi. New York: Greenwood Press.
95. Grendler, P. F. (1989). Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and learning, 1300-1600. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
96. Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
97. Gyselinck, V., De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Mondoloni, A. (2007). Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model. Psychological Research, 71, 373-382.
98. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
99. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder-Arnold.
100. Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 299-306.
101. Hatch, J. A., Hill, C. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1993). When the messenger is the message: Readers' impressions of writers' personalities. Written Communication, 10, 569-598.
102. Heilman, K. M., Coenen, A., & Kluger, B. (2008). Progressive asymmetric apraxic agraphia. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology, 21, 14-17.
103. Heller, J. (1977). Reeling in Catch-22. In L. R. Obst (Ed.), The sixties (pp. 50-52). New York: Random House/Rolling Stone Press.
104. Hermann, D. J., & Chaffin, R. (Eds) (1988). Memory in historical perspective: The literature before Ebbinghaus. New York: Springer-Verlag.
105. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English.
106. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1995). Teaching writing as reflective practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
107. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 721-742.
108. Huang, H. W., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Imagine that! ERPs provide evidence for distinct hemispheric contributions to the processing of concrete and abstract concepts. NeuroImage, 40, 1116-1123.
109. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan. (Reprinted 1968, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
110. Hruby, G. G. (2001). Sociological, postmodern, and new realism perspectives on social constructivism: Implications for literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 48-62.
111. Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1993). Imagery's role in creativity and discovery. In B. Roskos- Ewoldsen, M. J. Intons-Peterson, & R. E. Anderson (Eds), Imagery, creativity, and discovery: A cognitive perspective (pp. 1-37). New York: North-Holland.
112. Jacob, S. H. (1976). Contexts and images in reading. Reading World, 15, 167-175.
113. Jampole, E. S., Konopak, B. C., Readence, J. E., & Moser, E. B. (1991). Using mental imagery to enhance gifted elementary students' creative writing. Reading Psychology, 12, 183-197.
114. Johnson, C. (1904). Old-time schools and school-books. New York: Macmillan. (Reprinted 1963, Glouster, MA: Peter Smith).
115. Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/ poor comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 772-782.
116. Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory training approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 229-242.
117. Just, M. A., Newman, S. D., Keller, T. A., McKelney, A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2004). Imagery in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21, 112-124.
118. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
119. Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.), (pp. 1270-1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
120. Klausmeier, H. J., Ghatala, E. S., & Frayer, D. (1974). Conceptual learning and development: A cognitive view. New York: Academic Press.
121. Klee, H., & Eysenck, M. W. (1973). Comprehension of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 522-529.
122. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
123. Kosslyn, S. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
124. Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 804-823.
125. Kraemer, D. J. M., Rosenberg, L. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3792- 3798.
126. Krafnick, A. J., Flowers, D. L., Napoliello, E. M., & Eden, G. F. (2011). Gray matter volume changes following reading intervention in dyslexic children. NeuroImage, 57, 733-741.
127. Krasny, K. A., & Sadoski, M. (2008). Mental imagery and affect in English/French bilingual readers: A cross-linguistic perspective. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 64, 399-428.
128. Krasny, K. A., Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2007). A response to McVee, Dunsmore, & Gavelek's "Schema Theory Revisited." Review of Educational Research, 77, 239-244.
129. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
130. Kulhavy, R. W., & Swenson, I. (1975). Imagery instructions and the comprehension of text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 45, 47-51.
131. Kurby, C. A., Magliano, J. P., & Rapp, D. N. (2009). Those voices in your head: Activation of auditory images during reading. Cognition, 112, 457-461.
132. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
133. Lakoff G. (1987). The death of dead metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 143-147.
134. Lakoff G. (1993). Contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202-251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
135. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
136. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
137. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
138. Laurie, S. S. (1972). John Amos Comenius. New York: Lenox Hill.
139. Lee, C. H. (2009). Testing the role of phonology in reading: Focus on sentence processing. Journal of Psycholonguistic Research, 38, 333-344.
140. Lee, C, I., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and ambiguity. Brain and Language, 104, 145-158.
141. Leff, A. P., Spitsyana, G., Plant, G. T., & Wise, R. J. S. (2006). Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 77, 1004-1007.
142. Lench, H., Flores, S. A., & Bench, S. W. (2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 834-855.
143. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
144. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. Unrau (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
145. Leu, D. J., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Henry, L., Reinking, D. (2008). Research on instruction and assessment in the new literacies of online reading comprehension. In C. C. Block, & S. R. Parris (Eds), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.) (pp. 321-346). New York: Guilford Press.
146. Levin, J. R. (1985). Educational applications of mnemonic pictures: Possibilities beyond your wildest imagination. In A. A. Sheikh, & K. S. Sheikh (Eds), Imagery in education: Imagery in the educational process (pp. 63-87). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
147. Levin, J. R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year report card. Elementary School Journal, 94, 235-244.
148. Levy, J. (1985). Right brain, left brain: Fact and fiction. Psychology Today, 38-44.
149. Lewis, C. S. (1954). English literature in the sixteenth century excluding drama. Oxford: Clarendon.
150. Lewis, C. S. (1966). It all began with a picture.... In W. Hooper (Ed.), Of other worlds: Essays and stories (p.42). New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
151. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
152. Liu, Y., Xiang, J., Wang, Y., Vannest, J. J., Byars, A. W., & Rose, D. F. (2008). Spatial and frequency differences of neuromagnetic activities in processing concrete and abstract words. Brain Topography, 20, 123-129.
153. Loftus, E. F. (2004). Memories of things unseen. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 145-147.
154. Lohmann, R. I. (2010). Introduction: The anthropology of creations. Anthropological Forum, 20, 215-234.
155. Long, S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1985). Effects of awareness and practice in mental imagery on creative writing of gifted children. In J. A. Niles, & R. V. Lalik (Eds), Issues in literacy: A research perspective. Thirty-fourth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 381-385). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
156. Long, S. A., Winograd, P. A., & Bridge, C. A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on reports of imagery during and after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 353-372.
157. Louwerse, M. M. (2008). Embodied representations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 838-844.
158. Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96-104.
159. Luiten, J., Ames, W., & Ackerson, G. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 211- 218.
160. MacAllister, A. T. (1954). Introduction. In Dante Alighieri, The inferno (J. Ciardi, trans.). New York: Mentor Books.
161. Maes, A. (1997). Referent ontology and centering in discourse. Journal of Semantics, 14, 207-235.
162. Marks, D. F. (1997). Paivio, Allan Urho. In N. Sheehy, A. J. Chapman, & W. A. Conroy (Eds), Biographical dictionary of psychology (pp. 432-434). New York: Routledge.
163. Marmolejo-Ramos, F., de Juan, M. R. E., Gygax, P., Madden, C. J., & Roa, S. M. (2009). Reading between the lines: The activation of background knowledge during text comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 77-107.
164. Marschark, M., Katz, A. N., & Paivio, A. (1983). Dimensions of metaphor. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 17-40.
165. Martin, A. (2006). Shades of Dejerine: Forging a link between the visual word form area and reading. Neuron, 50, 173-175.
166. Martin, S. (2002, December 14). You just get on with it. Globe and Mail, p. R13.
167. Mathews, M. M. (1966). Teaching to read: Historically considered. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
168. Mayer, R. E. (1983). Can you repeat that? Qualitative and quantitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 40-49.
169. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
170. Maywall, K. (2002). Case-mixing effects on children's word recognition: Lexical feedback and development. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 525-542.
171. McCallum, R. D., & Moore, S. (1999). Not all imagery is created equal: The role of imagery in the comprehension of main ideas in exposition. Reading Psychology, 20, 21-60.
172. McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene. S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293-299.
173. McDermott, K. B., & Chan, J. C. (2006). Effects of repetition on memory for pragmatic inferences. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1273-1284.
174. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
175. Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Denis, M., & Mazoyer, B. (1998). Cortical anatomy of mental imagery of concrete nouns based on their dictionary definition. NeuroReport, 9, 803- 809.
176. Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37-58.
177. Miller, A. I. (1984). Imagery in scientific thought: Creating 20th century physics. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
178. Miller, H. (1994). Sites of inspiration: Where writing is embodied in image and emotion. In A. G. Brand, & R. L. Graves (Eds), Presence of mind: Writing and the domain beyond the cognitive (pp. 113-124). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
179. Miller S. M., & McVee, M. B. (Eds) (2012). Multimedia composing in classrooms: Learning and teaching in the digital world. New York: Routledge.
180. Milner, B. (1961). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272-277.
181. Mima, T., Oluwatimilehin, T., Hiraoka, T., and Hallett, M. (2001). Transient interhemispheric neuronal synchrony correlates with object recognition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 3942-3948.
182. Minogue, J., & Jones, G. M. (2006). Haptics in education: Exploring an untapped sensory modality. Review of Educational Research, 76, 317-348.
183. Montessori, M. (1967). The absorbent mind. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
184. Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstead, & H. Bouma (Eds), Processing of visible language (Vol. 1, pp. 259-268). New York: Plenum Press.
185. Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
186. Murphy, J. J. (1990). Quintilian's influence on the teaching of speaking and writing in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. In R. L. Enos (Ed.), Oral and written communication: Historical approaches (pp. 158-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
187. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2004). Vocabulary processes. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 574-593). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
188. Nash-Webber, B. (1975). The role of semantics in automatic speech understanding. In D. G. Bobrow, & A. Collins (Eds), Representation and understanding (pp. 351-382). New York: Academic Press.
189. National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
190. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
191. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413-448.
192. Osgood, C. E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
193. Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 32-38.
194. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (Reprinted 1979, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
195. Paivio A. (1972). Symbolic and sensory modalities of memory. In M. E. Meyer (Ed.). The third Western symposium on learning: Cognitive learning (pp. 109-136). Bellingham, WA: Western Washington State College.
196. Paivio, A. (1973). Psychophysiological correlates of imagery. In F. J. McGuigan, & R. Schoonover (Eds), The psychophysiology of thinking (pp. 263-295). New York: Academic Press.
197. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
198. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
199. Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
200. Paivio, A. (2008). Looking at reading comprehension through the lens of neuroscience. In C. C. Block, & S. R. Parris (Eds), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.) (pp. 101-113). New York: Guilford Press.
201. Paivio. A. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 205-230.
202. Paivio, A., & Begg, I. (1981). The psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
203. Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1986). The role of topic and vehicle imagery in metaphor comprehension. Communication and Cognition, 19, 367-388.
204. Paivio, A., & Ernest, C. (1971). Imagery ability and visual perception of verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 429-432.
205. Paivio, A., & O'Neill, B. J. (1970). Visual recognition thresholds and dimensions of word meaning. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 273-275.
206. Paivio, A., & Sadoski, M. (2011). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on Elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35, 198-209.
207. Paivio, A., & Simpson, H. M. (1968). Magnitude and latency of the pupillary response during an imagery task as a function of stimulus abstractness and imagery ability. Psychonomic Science, 12, 45-46.
208. Paivio, A., & te Linde, J. (1982). Imagery, memory, and the brain. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 243-272.
209. Paivio, A., & Walsh, M. (1993). Psychological processes in metaphor comprehension and memory. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 307-328). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
210. Paivio, A., & Yuille, J. C. (1969). Changes in associative strategies and paired-associate learning over trials as a function of word imagery and type of learning set. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 458-463.
211. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. P. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness norms for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76 (1, Part 2), 1-25.
212. Palmiero, M., Belardinelli, M. O., Nardo, D., Sestieri, C., Di Matteo, R., D'Ausilio, A., & Romani, G. L. (2009). Mental imagery generation in different modalities activates sensory-motor areas. Cognitive Process, 10 (supplement 2), S268-S271.
213. Parkes, M. B. (1993). Pause and effect: An introduction to the history of punctuation in the West. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
214. Pecher, D., van Dantzig, S., Zwaan, R. A., & Zeelenberg, R. (2009). Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1108-1114.
215. Petrucci, A. (1995). Writers and readers in medieval Italy: Studies in the history of written culture (C. A. Radding, trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
216. Phillips, D. C. (2000). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 1-16). Ninety-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
217. Pressley, G. M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355-359.
218. Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children's learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 585-622.
219. Quintilian, M. F. (1921). Institutio Oratoria (H. E. Butler, trans.). New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
220. Rasinski, T. V. (1985). Picture this: Using imagery as a reading comprehension strategy. Reading Horizons, 25, 280-288.
221. Rayner, K (2009). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1-10.
222. Reese, H. W. (1970). Introduction to imagery in children's learning: Symposium. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 383-384.
223. Reynolds, A., & Paivio, A. (1968). Cognitive and emotional determinants of speech. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 22, 164-175.
224. Richardson, A. (1994). Individual differences in imaging: Their measurement, origins, and consequences. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
225. Rodriguez, M., & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 385-412.
226. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
227. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
228. Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 175-191.
229. Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. (2011). Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders' memory for vocabulary words and their spellings. Reading and Writing, 24, 921-950.
230. Roux, F. E., Dufor, O., Giussani, C., Wamain, Y., Draper, L., Longcamp, M., & Démonet., J. F. (2009). The graphemic/motor frontal area Exner's area revisited. Annals of Neurology, 66, 537-545.
231. Royer, J. M., & Cable, G. W. (1975). Facilitated learning in connected discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 116-123.
232. Royer, J. M., & Cable, G. W. (1976). Illustrations, analogies, and facilitative transfer in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 205-209.
233. Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau N. J. (Eds) (2004). Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
234. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 573-603). New York: Academic Press.
235. Sadoski, M. (1983). An exploratory study of the relationships between reported imagery and the comprehension and recall of a story. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 110-123.
236. Sadoski, M. (1985). The natural use of imagery in story comprehension and recall: Replication and extension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 658-667.
237. Sadoski, M. (1992). Imagination, cognition, and persona. Rhetoric Review, 10, 266-278.
238. Sadoski, M. (1998). Mental imagery in reading: A sampler of some significant studies. Reading Online [electronic journal of the International Reading Association]. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/research/Sadoski.html
239. Sadoski, M. (1999). Theoretical, empirical, and practical considerations in designing informational text. Document Design, 1, 25-34.
240. Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 263-281.
241. Sadoski, M. (2002). Dual coding theory and reading poetic text. Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 78-83.
242. Sadoski, M. (2003). The role of orthography in a dual coding theory of reading. In R. M. Joshi, C. K. Leong, & B. L. J. Kaczmarek (Eds), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, orthography, and morphology (pp. 67-81). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
243. Sadoski, M. (2004). Conceptual foundations of teaching reading. New York: Guilford Press.
244. Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.
245. Sadoski, M. (2008). Dual coding theory: Reading comprehension and beyond. In C.C. Block, & S. R. Parris (Eds), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (2nd ed.) (pp. 38-49). New York: Guilford Press.
246. Sadoski, M., & Goetz, E. T. (1985). Relationships between affect, imagery, and importance ratings for segments of a story. In J. A. Niles, & R. Lalik (Eds), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 180-185). Thirty-fourth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
247. Sadoski, M., & Goetz, E. T. (1998). Concreteness effects and syntactic modification in written composition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 341-352.
248. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Avila, E. (1995). Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context availability? Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 278-288.
249. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993a). A causal model of sentence recall: Effects of familiarity, concreteness, comprehensibility, and interestingness. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 5-16.
250. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993b). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291-304.
251. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Kangiser, S. (1988). Imagination in story response: Relationships between imagery, affect, and structural importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 320-336.
252. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., Olivarez, A., Lee, S., & Roberts, N. M. (1990). Imagination in story reading: The role of imagery, verbal recall, story analysis, and processing levels. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 55-70.
253. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85-95.
254. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., Stricker, A. G., & Burdenski, T. K., Jr. (2003). New findings for concreteness and imagery effects in written composition. Reading and Writing, 16, 443-453.
255. Sadoski, M., Kealy, W. A., Goetz, E. T., & Paivio, A. (1997). Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 518-526.
256. Sadoski, M., McTigue, E. M., & Paivio, A. (2012). A dual coding theoretical model of decoding in reading: Subsuming the LaBerge and Samuels model. Reading Psychology, 33, 465-496.
257. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 582-601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
258. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
259. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1329-1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
260. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2007). Toward a unified theory of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 337-356.
261. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E. T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 463-484.
262. Sadoski, M., & Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256- 272.
263. Sadoski, M., & Willson, V. L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 137-154.
264. Saenger, P. (2000). Spaces between words: The origins of silent reading. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
265. Sakurai, Y. (2004). Varieties of alexia from fusiform, posterior inferior temporal and posterior occipital gyrus lesions. Behavioral Neurology, 15, 35-50.
266. Samuels, S. J. (2004). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau (Eds), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1127-1148). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
267. Saussure, F. de. (1974). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.; C. Bally, & A. Sechehaye, Eds). Glasgow: Fontana. (Original work published in 1915).
268. Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2009). Comparing mental imagery across sensory modalities. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 28, 371-388.
269. Schnotz, W. (2002). Toward an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101-120.
270. Schwartz, N. H., Ellsworth, L. S., Graham, L., & Knight, B. (1998). Accessing prior knowledge to remember text: A comparison of advance organizers and maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 65-89.
271. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-586.
272. Shams, L, & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 411-417.
273. Shapiro A., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the keyword method of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 9, 129-146.
274. Shaw, G. (2008). The multisensory image and emotion in poetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 175-178.
275. Shepard, R. N. (1978). Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Randhawa, & W. E. Coffman (Eds), Visual learning, thinking, and communication (pp. 133-189). New York: Academic Press.
276. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
277. Shmidman, A., & Ehri, L. (2010). Embedded picture mnemonics to learn letters. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 159-182.
278. Shuster, G. N. (1979). Introduction. In The confessions of St. Augustine (J. G. Pilkington, trans.). Norwalk, CT: Easton Press.
279. Singer, H., & Ruddell, R. B. (1970). Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
280. Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71, 133-169.
281. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
282. Smith, N. B. (2002). American reading instruction (special edition). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
283. Soloman, K. O., Medin, D. L., & Lynch, E. (1999). Concepts do more than categorize. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 99-104.
284. Speidel, G. E., & Troy, M. E. (1985). The ebb and flow of mental imagery in education. In A. A. Sheikh, & K. S. Sheikh (Eds), Imagery in education: Imagery in the educational process (pp. 11-38). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
285. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity, and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3-23.
286. Spivey, N. N. (1987). Construing constructivism: Reading research in the United States. Poetics, 16, 169-192.
287. Spivey, N. N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
288. Spurgeon, C. F. E. (1935). Shakespeare's imagery and what it tells us. New York: Cambridge University Press.
289. Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Constructivism in reading education. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 259-274.
290. Steingart, S. K., & Glock, M. D. (1979). Imagery and the recall of connected discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 66-83.
291. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1140- 1154.
292. Summit, J. (2008). Memory's library: Medieval books in early modern England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
293. Suzuki, N. S. (1985). Imagery research with children: Implications for education. In A. A. Sheikh, & K. S. Sheikh (Eds), Imagery in education: Imagery in the educational process (pp. 179-198). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
294. Sweller J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
295. Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1-86.
296. Tirre, W. C., Manelis, L., & Leicht, K. L. (1979). The effects of imaginal and verbal strategies on prose comprehension by adults. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 99-106.
297. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
298. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. W. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
299. Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In E. Tulving, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 33-43). New York: Oxford University Press.
300. van den Broek, Rohleder, L., & Narvaez, D. (1996). Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In R. J. Kruez, & M. S. MacNealy (Eds), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 179-200). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
301. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
302. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process, and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293-301.
303. Vincent, J. (2007). Writing and coding: Assisting writers to cross the modes. Language and Education, 21, 141-157.
304. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
305. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
306. Wade, S. E. (2001). Research on importance and interest: Implications for curriculum development and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 243-261.
307. Wade, S. E., Buxton, W. M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine readertext interest. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 194-216.
308. Watson, J. B. (1928). The ways of behaviorism. New York: Harper and Brothers.
309. Welcome, S. E., Paivio, A., McRae, K., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). An electrophysiological study of task demands on concreteness effects: Evidence for dual coding theory. Journal of Experimental Brain Research, 212, 347-358.
310. West, W. C., O'Rourke, T. B., Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Event related brain potentials and language comprehension: A cognitive neuroscience approach to the study of intellectual functioning. In S. Soraci, & W. J. McIlvane (Eds), Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning (pp. 133-168). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
311. Wharton, W. P. (1980). Higher imagery and the readability of college history texts. Journal of Mental Imagery, 4, 129-147.
312. Willems, R. E., Clevis, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Add a picture for suspense: Neural correlates of the interaction between language and visual information in the perception of fear. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 404-416.
313. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.
314. Wittrock, M. C. (1977). Generative processes in memory. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), The human brain (pp. 153-184). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
315. Wyra, M., Lawson, M. J., & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of biderectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17, 360-371.
316. Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A. (2005). Language in context: Emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. NeuroImage, 25, 1002-1015.
317. Yates, F. A. (1966). The art of memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
318. Yeh, W., & Barsalou, L. W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 349-384.
319. Yuille, J. C., & Paivio, A. (1969). Abstractness and recall of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 467-471.
320. Zholkovsky, A. (1984). Themes and texts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
321. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of language and motivation, 44, (pp. 35-62). New York: Academic Press.
322. Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Eds), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224-245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
323. Zwaan, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic-relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 954-958.