CPMs: A kinesthetic comprehension strategy

Reading Teacher

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 460-470

  Block, Cathy Collins ^a   Parris, Sheri R ^b   Whiteley, Cinnamon S ^c  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c Darnestown Elementary School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149149097     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.61.6.3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Banikowski, A.K. (1999). Strategies to enhance memory based on brain-research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(2), 1-16.
2. Bjorklund, D.F., & de Marchena, M.R. (1984). Developmental shifts in the basis of organization in memory: The role of associative versus categorical relatedness in children's free recall. Child Development, 55, 952-962.
3. Block, C.C. (2001). A case for exemplary classroom instruction: Especially for students who come to school without the precursors for literacy success. In T. Shanahan and F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 49th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, (pp. 421-439). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
4. Block, C.C., Gambrell, L., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Block, C.C., & Mangieri, J.N. (1996). Reason to read: Thinking strategies for life through literature (Vols. 1, 2, & 3). Boston: Pearson.
6. Block, C.C., & Mangieri, J.N. (2003). Exemplary literacy teachers: Promoting success for all children in grades K-5. New York: Guilford.
7. Block, C.C., Oakar, M., & Hurt, N. (2002). The expertise of literacy teachers: A continuum from preschool through grade 5. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 178-206.
8. Block, C.C., Parris, S.R., Reed, K.L., Whiteley, C.S., & Cleveland, M.D. (in press). Learning environments that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology.
9. Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
10. Block, C.C., Rodgers, L.L, & Johnson, R.B. (2004). Comprehension process instruction: Creating reading success in grades K-3. New York: Guilford.
11. Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M.Z., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 579-591.
12. Chall, J.S., Jacobs, V., & Baldwin, L (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Collins, M.F. (2005). ESL preschoolers' English vocabulary acquisition from storybook reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 406-408.
14. Dole, J.A. (2000). Explicit and implicit instruction in comprehension. In B.M. Taylor, M.F. Graves, & P. Van Den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 52-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16. Giedd, J.N. (2003). The anatomy of mentalization: A view from developmental neuroimaging. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 67, 132-142.
17. Guthrie, J.T., Cox, K.E., Knowles, K.T., Buehl, M., Mazzoni, S.A., & Fasulo, L. (2000). Building toward coherent instruction. In L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, & J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 209-236). New York: Guilford.
18. Hacker, D.J., & Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 699-718.
19. Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A.D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children's language development. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1302-1318.
20. Kragler, S., Walker, C.A., & Martin, L.E. (2005). Strategy instruction in primary content textbooks. The Reading Teacher, 59, 254-261.
21. Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Mackey, M. (1997). Good-enough reading: Momentum and accuracy in the reading of complex fiction. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 428-458.
23. Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 229-241.
24. Morrison, R.G., Krawczyk, D.C., Holyoak, K.J., Hummel, J.E., Chow, T.W., Miller, B.L., et al. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 260-271.
25. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2005). The nation's report card. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
26. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Section 1, Participation in education: Language minority school-age children. The condition of education 2006 (NCES No. 2006071). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/ 2006071_1.pdf
27. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature of reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
29. Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
30. Paris, S.G. (1986). Teaching children to guide their reading and learning. In T.E. Raphael (Ed.), The contexts of school-based literacy (pp.115-130). New York: Random House.
31. Pearson, P.D., & Duke, N.K. (2002). Comprehension instruction in the primary grades. In CC Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 247-258). New York: Guilford.
32. Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.
33. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echeverria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159-191.
35. Raphael, T.E., & Au, K.H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. The Reading Teacher, 59, 206-221.
36. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E.T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 463-484.
37. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125.
38. Swaab, T.Y., Baynes, K., & Knight, R.T. (2002). Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 99-103.
39. Viadero, D. (2005, September 7). Classroom gestures studied for effects on learning. Education Week, 25, 2.
40. Wilkinson, K.M. (2006). Fast mapping and vocabulary expansion. Worcester, MA: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center.