Embodied relations are encoded in language

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 838-844

  Louwerse, Max M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 50949126397     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.838     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BENOR, S. B., & LEVY, R. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 82, 233-278.
2. BERGEN, B. K., LINDSAY, S., MATLOCK, T., & NARAYANAN, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 733-764.
3. BRANTS, T., & FRANZ, A. (2006). Web IT 5-gram Version 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. COOPER, W. E., & ROSS, J. R. (1975). World order. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San, & T. J. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 63-111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
5. GIVÓN, T. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. GREENBERG, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of grammar (pp. 73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. KADEN, S. E., WAPNER, S., & WERNER, H. (1955). Studies in physiognomic perception: II. Effect of directional dynamics of pictured objects and of words on the position of the apparent horizon. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 39, 61-70.
8. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
9. LANDAUER, T. K., MCNAMARA, D. S., DENNIS, S., & KINTSCH, W. (EDS.) (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
11. LORCH, R. F., JR., & MYERS, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comparison of three different methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149-157.
12. LOUWERSE, M. M. (2007). Iconicity in amodal symbolic representations. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 107-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. LOUWERSE, M. M., CAI, Z., HU, X., VENTURA, M., & JEUNIAUX, P. (2006). Cognitively inspired natural-language based knowledge representations: Further explorations of latent semantic analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 15, 1021-1040.
14. LOUWERSE, M. M., & JEUNIAUX, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 309-326). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. NUNNALLY, J. C., & BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. PECHER, D., & ZWAAN, R. A. (EDS.) (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. RICHTER, T. (2006). What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes, 41, 221-250.
18. SEIDENBERG, M. S., MACDONALD, M. C., & SAFFRAN, J. R. (2002). Does grammar start where statistics stop? Science, 298, 553-554.
19. ŠETIĆ, M., & DOMIJAN, D. (2007). The influence of vertical spatial orientation on property verification. Language & Cognitive Processes, 22, 297-312.
20. SPIVEY, M. J., & GENG, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65, 235-241.
21. ZWAAN, R. A., & YAXLEY, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 954-958.