Ethos Versus Persona: Self-representation in written discourse

Written Communication

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 384-410

  Cherry, Roger D ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845532545     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088398015003009     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abrams, M. H. (1958). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. New York: W. W. Norton.
2. Andersen, K., & Clevenger, T., Jr. (1953). A summary of experimental research in ethos. Speech Monographs, 30, 59-78.
3. Aristotle. (1925). The Nicomachean ethics (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Aristotle. (1926). The "art" of rhetoric (J. H. Freese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Aristotle. (1954). Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). New York: Random House.
6. Aristotle. (1962). Nicomachean ethics (M. Ostwald, Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
7. Ball, P. M. (1964). Sincerity: The rise and fall of a critical term. Modern Language Review, 59, 1-11.
8. Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-14.
9. Black, E. (1970). The second persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56, 109-19.
10. Booth, W. C. (1961). The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Brinton, A. (1983). Quintilian, Plato, and the vir bonus. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 16, 167-184.
12. Bruffee, K. A. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
13. Campbell, P. N. (1975). The personae of scientific discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 391-405.
14. Cherniss, H. (1943). The biographical fashion in literary criticism. University of California Publications in Classical Philology, 12, 279-291.
15. Cicero. (1939). Orator (H. M. Hubbell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Cicero. (1942). De oratore (E. W. Sutton & H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Clifford, J. L. (1965). The eighteenth century. Modern Language Newsletter, 3, 89-153.
18. Corbett, E. P. J. (1981). A rhetorician looks at technical writing. In J. C. Mathes & T. E. Pinelli (Eds.), Technical communication: Perspectives for the eighties (pp. 213-218). Washington, DC: NASA.
19. Corts, T. E. (1968). The derivation of ethos. Speech Monographs, 35, 201-202.
20. Craig, C. P. (1981). The accusator as amicus: An original Roman tactic of ethical argumentation. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 111, 31-37.
21. Crutwell, P. (1959/1960). Makers and persons. Hudson Review, 12, 487-507.
22. Davie, D. (1968). On sincerity: From Wordsworth to Ginsberg. Encounter, 31, 61-66.
23. Ede, L. (1984). Audience: An introduction to research. College Composition and Communication, 35, 140-154.
24. Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171.
25. Efron, A. (1966). Unfilled statement in The concept of the persona in satire: A symposium. Satire Newsletter, 3, 100-108.
26. Ehrenpreis, I. (1963). Personae. In C. Camden (Ed.), Restoration and eighteenth-century literature: Studies in honor of Alan Dugald McKillop (pp. 25-37). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Elbow, P. (1987). Closing my eyes as I speak: An argument for ignoring audience. College English, 49, 50-69.
28. Elliott, R. C. (1982). The literary persona. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Enos, R. L., & McClaran, J. (1978). Audience and image in Ciceronian Rome: Creation and constraints of the vir bonus personality. Central States Speech Journal, 29, 98-106.
30. Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3, 275-296.
31. Faigley, L., Cherry, R. D., Jolliffe, D. A., & Skinner, A. M. (1985). Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Feinberg, L. (1966). Untitled statement in The concept of the persona in satire: A symposium. Satire Newsletter, 3, 108-111.
33. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21-32.
34. Friedman, N. (1955). Point of view in fiction: The development of a critical concept. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 70, 1160-1184.
35. Gerber, J. C. (1967). Literature: Our untamable discipline. College English, 28, 351-358.
36. Gibson, W. (1969). Persona: A style study for readers and writers. New York: Random House.
37. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Grant, W. L. (1943). Cicero on the moral character of the orator. Classical Journal, 38, 472-478.
39. Halloran, S. M. (1982). Aristotle's concept of ethos, or if not his somebody else's. Rhetoric Review, 1, 58-63.
40. Higher, G. (1974). Masks and faces in satire. Hermes, 102, 321-337.
41. Hoetker, J., & Brossell, G. (1986). A procedure for writing content-fair essay examination topics for large-scale writing assessments. College Composition and Communication, 37, 328-335.
42. Jaeger, W. (1945). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.) (G. Higher, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Johnson, N. (1984). Ethos and the aims of rhetoric. In R. J. Connors, L. S. Ede, & A. A. Lunsford (Eds.), Essays on classical rhetoric and modern discourse (pp. 98-114). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44. Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Kroll, B. (1984). Writing for readers: Three perspectives on audience. College Composition and Communication, 35, 172-185.
46. Leff, M. C. (1978). In search of Ariadne's thread: A review of the recent literature on rhetorical theory. Central States Speech Journal, 29, 73-91.
47. Lloyd-Jones, R. (1977). Primary trait scoring. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing (pp. 33-66). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
48. Long, R. C. (1980). Writer-audience relationships: Analysis or invention? College Composition and Communication, 31, 221-226.
49. Mack, M. (1982). The muse of satire. In M. Mack (Ed.), Collected in himself: Essays critical, biographical, and bibliographical on Pope and some of his contemporaries (pp. 55-64). Newark: University of Delaware Press.
50. MacKendrick, P. (1948). Cicero's ideal orator: Truth and propaganda. Classical Journal, 43, 339-347.
51. McCroskey, J., & Young, T. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24-34.
52. McKeon, Z. K. (1982). Novels and arguments: Inventing rhetorical criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Mellon, J. C. (1975). National assessment and the teaching of English. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
54. Miller, A. B. (1974). Aristotle on habit (ε̌θo) and character (ηθo): Implications for the Rhetoric. Speech Monographs, 41, 309-316.
55. Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610-617.
56. Minot, W. (1981). Response to Russell C. Long, "Writer-audience relationships: Analysis or invention?" College Composition and Communication, 32, 335-337.
57. Myers, G. (1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2, 219-245.
58. Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (1982). Writing in a non-academic setting. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 201-223.
59. Odell, L., Goswami, D., Herrington, A., & Quick, D. (1983). Studying writing in nonacademic settings. In P. V. Anderson, R. J. Brockmann, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication (pp. 17-40). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
60. Ong, W. J. (1975). The writer's audience is always a fiction. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 90, 9-21.
61. Overington, M. A. (1977). The scientific community as audience: Toward a rhetorical analysis of science. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10, 143-164.
62. Park, D. B. (1986). Analyzing audience. College Composition and Communication, 37, 478-488.
63. Park, D. B. (1982). The meanings of "audience." College English, 44, 247-257.
64. Romilly, J. de. (1958). Eunoia in Isocrates or the political importance of creating good will. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 78, 92-101.
65. Rosenthal, P. I. (1966). The concept of ethos and the structure of persuasion. Speech Monographs, 33, 114-126.
66. Roth, R. G. (1987). The evolving audience: Alternatives to audience accommodation. College Composition and Communication, 38, 47-55.
67. Sattler, W. M. (1941). Conceptions of ethos in rhetoric. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northwestern University.
68. Sattler, W. M. (1947). Conceptions of ethos in ancient rhetoric. Speech Monographs, 14, 55-65.
69. Self, L. (1979). Rhetoric and phronesis: The Aristotelian ideal. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 12, 130-145.
70. Tillyard, E. M. W., & Lewis, C. S. (1939). The personal heresy: A controversy. London: Oxford University Press.
71. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72. Trilling, L. (1972). Sincerity and authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Vatz, R. E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 154-161.
74. Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., & Beardsley, M. C. (1967). The intentional fallacy. In The verbal icon. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
75. Wright, G. T. (1960). The poet in the poem: The personae of Eliot, Yeats, and Pound. Berkeley: University of California Press.
76. Yoos, G. (1979). A revision of the concept of ethical appeal. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 12, 41-58.
77. Ziman, J. (1968). Public knowledge: The social dimension of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.