A Dual Coding Theoretical Model of Decoding in Reading: Subsuming the Laberge and Samuels Model

Reading Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 465-496

  Sadoski, Mark ^a   McTigue, Erin M ^a   Paivio, Allan ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865274861     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2011.557330     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Carver, R. P. 1978. Toward a theory of reading comprehension and rauding. Reading Research Quarterly, 13: 8-63.
2. Carver, R. P. 1993. Merging the simple view of reading with rauding theory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25: 439-455.
3. Carver, R. P. 2000. The causes of high and low reading achievement, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. and Zeigler, J. 2001. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108: 204-256.
5. Gickling, E. E., Hargis, C. H. and Alexander, D. R. 1981. The function of imagery in sight word recognition among retarded and nonretarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16: 259-263.
6. Giesbrecht, B., Camblin, C. C. and Swaab, T. Y. 2004. Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14: 521-529.
7. Hargis, C. H. and Gickling, E. E. 1978. The function of imagery in word recognition development. Reading Teacher, 31: 870-874.
8. Hargis, C. H., Terhaar-Yonkers, M., Williams, P. C. and Reed, M. T. 1988. Repetition requirements for word recognition. Journal of Reading, 31: 320-327.
9. Harm, M. and Seidenberg, M. S. 2004. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111: 662-720.
10. Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E. and West, W. C. 1999. Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 721-742.
11. Holmes, J. A. 1970. "Theoretical models and processes of reading". In The substrata-factor theory of reading: Some experimental evidence, Edited by: Singer, H. and Ruddell, R. B. 187-197. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Holton, G. 1986. The advancement of science and its burdens, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hoover, W. A. and Gough, P. B. 1990. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2: 127-160.
14. Judson, H. F. 1980. The search for solutions, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15. Kieras, D. 1978. Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 85: 532-554.
16. Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kintsch, W. 2004. "The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction". In Theoretical models and processes ofx reading, 5th ed., Edited by: Ruddell, R. B. and Unrau, N. J. 1270-1328. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18. Kiraly, J. and Firlong, A. 1974. Teaching words to kindergarten children with picture, configuration, and initial sound cues in a prompting procedure. Journal of Educational Research, 67: 295-298.
19. Kolker, B. and Terwilliger, P. N. 1981. Sight vocabulary learning of first and second graders. Reading World, 20: 251-258.
20. Kounios, J. and Holcomb, P. J. 1994. Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 804-823.
21. LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S. J. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6: 293-323.
22. Laing, E. and Hulme, C. 1999. Phonological and semantic processes influence beginning readers' ability to learn to read words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73: 183-207.
23. Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Cognition, 21: 1-36.
24. Lupker, S. J. 1979. On the nature of perceptual information during letter perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 25: 303-312.
25. Maleske, R. T. 1995. Foundations for gathering and interpreting behavioral data, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26. McFalls, E. L., Schwanenflugel, P. J. and Stahl, S. A. 1996. Influence of word meaning on the acquisition of a reading vocabulary in second grade children. Reading and Writing, 8: 235-250.
27. Nelson, D. L. and Schreiber, T. A. 1992. Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31: 237-260.
28. Nash-Weber, B. 1975. "Representation and understanding". In The role of semantics in automatic speech understanding, Edited by: Bobrow, D. G. and Collins, A. 351-382. New York, NY: Academic Press.
29. Newell, A. 1973. "Visual information processing". In You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Prospective comments on the papers of this symposium, Edited by: Chase, W. G. 463-526. New York, NY: Academic Press.
30. Newell, A. 1990. Unified theories of cognition, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31. Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and verbal processes, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Paivio, A. 2007. Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Paivio, A. 2008. "Looking at reading comprehension through the lens of neuroscience". In Comprehension instruction (, 2nd ed., Edited by: Block, C. C. and Parris, S. R. 101-113. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. Paivio, A. 2010. Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 5: 205-230.
36. Paivio, A., Khan, M. and Begg, I. M. 2000. Concreteness and relational effects on recall of adjective-noun pairs. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54: 149-159.
37. Paivio, A. and Sadoski, M. 2011. Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on Elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35: 198-209.
38. Paivio, A., Walsh, M. and Bons, T. 1994. Concreteness and memory: When and Why?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 1196-1204.
39. Paulson, E. J. and Goodman, K. S. 1999. Influential studies in eye-movement research. Reading Online, [electronic journal of the International Reading Association]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.readingonline.org/research/eyemove.html
40. Rafal, R. T. and Robertson, L. 1995. "The cognitive neurosciences". In The neurology of visual attention, Edited by: Gazzaniga, M. 625-648. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Rayner, K. 1997. Understanding eye movements in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1: 317-339.
42. Richmond, M. and McNinch, G. 1977. Word learning: Concrete vs. abstract acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45: 292-294.
43. Rumelhart, D. E. 1977. "Attention and performance VI". In Toward an interactive model of reading, Edited by: Dornic, S. 573-603. New York, NY: Academic Press.
44. Sadoski, M. 1992. Imagination, cognition, and persona. Rhetoric Review, 10: 266-278.
45. Sadoski, M. 2003. "Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, orthography, and morphology". In The role of orthography in a dual coding theory of reading, Edited by: Joshi, R. M., Leong, C. K. and Kaczmarek, B. L. J. 67-81. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
46. Sadoski, M. 2005. A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21: 221-238.
47. Sadoski, M. 2008. "Dual coding theory: Reading comprehension and beyond". In Comprehension instruction (, 2nd ed., Edited by: Block, C. C. and Parris, S. R. 38-49. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T. and Avila, E. 1995. Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context availability?. Reading Research Quarterly, 30: 278-288.
49. Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., Stricker, A. G. and Burdenski, T. K. 2003. New findings for concreteness and imagery effects in written composition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16: 443-453.
50. Sadoski, M., Kealy, W. A., Goetz, E. T. and Paivio, A. 1997. Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89: 518-526.
51. Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. 1994. "A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension". In Theoretical models and processes of reading(, 4th ed., Edited by: Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R. and Singer, H. 582-601. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
52. Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. 2001. Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. 2004. A dual coding theoretical model of reading, Edited by: Ruddell, R. B. and Unrau, N. J. 1329-1362. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
54. Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A. 2007. Toward a unified theory of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11: 337-356.
55. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A. and Goetz, E. T. 1991. A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26: 463-484.
56. Sadoski, M., Willson, V., Holcomb, A. and Boulware-Gooden, R. 2005. Verbal and nonverbal predictors of spelling performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36: 461-478.
57. Samuels, S. J. 1977. "Reading problems: A multidisciplinary perspective". In Introduction to theoretical models of reading, Edited by: Otto, W., Peters, C. and Peters, N. 7-41. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
58. Samuels, S. J. 1994. "Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited". In Theoretical models and processes of reading(, 5th ed., Edited by: Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R. and Singer, H. 816-837. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
59. Samuels, S. J. 2004. "Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited". In Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th ed., Edited by: Ruddell, R. B. and Unrau, N. J. 1127-1148. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
60. Samuels, S. J. 2006a. Looking backward: Reflections on a career in reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 38: 327-344.
61. Samuels, S. J. 2006b. "What research has to say about reading fluency". In Toward a model of reading fluency, Edited by: Samuels, S. J. and Farstrup, A. 24-46. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
62. Samuels, S. J. and LaBerge, D. 1983. "Reading research revisited". In A critique of A theory of automaticity in reading: Looking back: A retrospective analysis of the LaBerge-Samuels Reading Model, Edited by: Gentile, L. M., Kamil, M. L. and Blanchard, J. S. 39-55. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
63. Schwanenflugel, P. J. and Shoben, E. J. 1983. Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9: 82-102.
64. Seidenberg, M. S. 2005. Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14: 238-242.
65. Shibahara, N., Zorzi, M., Hill, M. P., Wydell, T. and Butterworth, B. 2003. Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A: 263-286.
66. Terwilliger, P. N. and Kolker, B. S. 1982. The effects of learning confusable words on subsequent learning of high or low imagery words. Reading World, 21: 286-292.
67. Van Dalen, D. B. 1979. Understanding educational research: An introduction (, 3rd ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
68. van der Veur, B. W. 1975. Imagery rating of 1,000 frequently used words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67: 44-56.
69. Wolpert, E. M. 1972. Length, imagery values, and word recognition. Reading Teacher, 26: 180-186.
70. Yore, L. and Ollila, L. 1985. Cognitive development, sex, and abstractness in grade one word recognition. Journal of Educational Research, 78: 242-247.