Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction

Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-572

  Langacker, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Conceptual semantics; Conceptualization; Discourse; Grammar; Grammatical theory; Lexicon; Linguistic theory; Meaning; Mental construction; Symbolization

Indexed keywords

EID: 56449116724     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (217)

1. Achard, Michel. 1998. Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and Semantics of French Sentential Complements. Cognitive Linguistics Research 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53:285-311.
3. Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis, and Bert Cornillie (eds.) 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics Research 31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Barlow, Michael. 1992. A Situated Theory of Agreement. New York: Garland.
6. Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.) 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
7. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1992. Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists. Tutorial Essays in Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.
8. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577-660.
9. Bergen, Benjamin. 2005. Mental Simulation in Literal and Figurative Language Understanding. In Seana Coulson and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought, 255-278. Łódz' Studies in Language 11. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
10. Bhaskararao, Peri, and Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds.) 2004. Non-Nominative Subjects. Typological Studies in Language 60-61. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
11. Birner, Betty J. 1994. Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion. Language 70:233-259.
12. Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. The Atomization of Meaning. Language 41:555-573.
13. Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
14. Borkin, Ann. 1973. To Be and Not To Be. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9:44-56.
15. Brugman, Claudia. 1988. The Syntax and Semantics of HAVE and Its Complements. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Typological Studies in Language 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Bybee, Joan. 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition. Language 82: 711-733.
18. Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper (eds.) 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Typological Studies in Language 45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
20. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Janua Linguarum 4. The Hague:Mouton.
21. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Coates, Richard. 2006. Properhood. Language 82:356-382.
23. Collins, Allan M., and Elizabeth F. Loftus. 1975. A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82:407-428.
24. Cook, Kenneth W. 1988. A Cognitive Analysis of Grammatical Relations, Case, and Transitivity in Samoan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
25. Cook, Kenneth W. 1993a. A Cognitive Account of Samoan Case Marking and Cliticization. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 22:509-530.
26. Cook, Kenneth W. 1993b. A Cognitive Account of Samoan lavea and galo Verbs. In Richard A. Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, 567-592. Cognitive Linguistics Research 3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Cook, Kenneth W. 1999. Samoan as an Active Zone Language. In Leon de Stadler and Christoph Eyrich (eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, 391-405. Cognitive Linguistics Research 12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Dahlstrom, Amy. 1983. Agent-Patient Languages and Split Case Marking Systems. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 9:37-46.
32. Deane, Paul. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics Research 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17:463-489.
35. Diessel, Holger, and Michael Tomasello. 2001. The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12:97-141.
36. Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? Studies in Language 1:19-80.
38. Dowty, David. 2000. "The garden swarms with bees" and the Fallacy of "Argument Alternation". In Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock (eds.), Polysemy:Theoretical and Computational Approaches, 111-128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language 62:808-845.
40. Du Bois, John W. 1987. The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 63:805-855.
41. Elman, Jeffrey L., and James L. McClelland. 1984. Speech Perception as a Cognitive Process: The Interactive Activation Model. In Norman Lass (ed.), Speech and Language, vol. 10, 337-374. New York: Academic Press.
42. Epstein, Richard. 2001. The Definite Article, Accessibility, and the Construction of Discourse Referents. Cognitive Linguistics 12:333-378.
43. Evans, Vyvyan. 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press, and Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
44. Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mawhaw, N.J.: Erlbaum.
45. Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken (eds.) 2006. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.
46. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and London: Bradford.
47. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Eve Sweetser (eds.) 1996. Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22:133-187.
50. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
51. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The Case for Case. In Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1-88. New York: Holt.
52. Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.
53. Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. The Mechanisms of "Construction Grammar". Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14:35-55.
54. Fodor, Jerry A. 1979. The Language of Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
55. Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and London: Bradford.
56. Foley, W. A., and R. D. Van Valin Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Forrest, Linda B. 1996. Discourse Goals and Attentional Processes in Sentence Production: The Dynamic Construal of Events. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 149-161. Stanford:CSLI Publications.
58. Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness's Puzzles, Polysemy's Vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4:223-272.
59. Geeraerts, Dirk. (ed.) 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Cognitive Linguistics Research 34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Gentner, Dedre. 1981. Some Interesting Differences between Verbs and Nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory 4:161-178.
61. Gentner, Dedre. 1982. Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity versus Natural Patterning. In Stan Kuczaj (ed.), Language Development I:Syntax and Semantics, 301-334. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
62. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, and David Hargreaves. 1992. The Privilege of Primacy: Experimental Data and Cognitive Explanations. In Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, 83-116. Typological Studies in Language 22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction (2 volumes). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
64. Givón, Talmy. (ed.) 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Typological Studies in Language 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Goldsmith, John, and Erich Woisetschlaeger. 1982. The Logic of the English Progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13:79-89.
68. Gorbet, Larry. 1977. Headless Relatives in the Southwest: Are They Related? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 3:270-278.
69. Grady, Joe, Sarah Taub, and Pamela Morgan. 1996. Primitive and Compound Metaphors. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 177-187. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
70. Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals Are Topics. Language 54:564-589.
71. Haiman, John. 1980. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias. Lingua 50:329-357.
72. Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Hampe, Beate (ed.) 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics Research 29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
74. Harder, Peter. 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 87. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
75. Harris, Catherine L. 1998. Psycholinguistic Studies of Entrenchment. In Jean-Pierre Koenig (ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, 55-70. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
76. Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Hawkins, John. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.
78. Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
80. Herring, Susan C. 1989. Verbless Presentation and the Discourse Basis of Ergativity. In Bradley Music, Randolph Graczyk, and Caroline Wiltshire (eds.), Parasession on Language in Context, 123-137. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
81. Holmqvist, Kenneth. 1993. Implementing Cognitive Semantics. Lund:Department of Cognitive Science, Lund University.
82. Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56:251-299.
83. Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Hudson, Richard A. 1988. Coordination and Grammatical Relations. Journal of Linguistics 24:303-342.
85. Hudson, Richard A. 1989. Gapping and Grammatical Relations. Journal of Linguistics 25:57-94.
86. Hudson, Richard A. 1992. Review of Ronald W. Langacker, Concept, Image, and Symbol:The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 28:506-509.
87. Huffman, Alan. 1997. The Categories of Grammar: French lui and le. Studies in Language Companion Series 30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Current Studies in Linguistics 8. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
89. Jackendoff, Ray. 1994. Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature. New York:Basic Books.
90. Janssen, Theo. 1995. Deixis from a Cognitive Point of View. In Ellen Contini-Morava and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), Meaning as Explanation:Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory, 245-270. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
91. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92. Keenan, Edward L. 1984. Semantic Correlates of the Ergative/Absolutive Distinction. Linguistics 22:197-223.
93. Kellogg, Margaret Kimberly. 1994. Conceptual Mechanisms Underlying Noun and Verb Categorization: Evidence from Paraphasia. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20:300-309.
94. Keenan, Edward L. 1996. Neurolinguistic Evidence of Some Conceptual Properties of Nouns and Verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
95. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Typological Studies in Language 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
96. Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A Relational Grammar of Kinyarwanda. University of California Publications in Linguistics 91. Berkeley: University of California Press.
97. Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, 143-173. The Hague: Mouton.
98. Kirsner, Robert S. 1993. From Meaning to Message in Two Theories:Cognitive and Saussurean Views of the Modern Dutch Demonstratives. In Richard A. Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, 81-114. Cognitive Linguistics Research 3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
99. Kirsner, Robert S., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. The Role of Pragmatic Inference in Semantics: A Study of Sensory Verb Complements in English. Glossa 10:200-240.
100. Klaiman, M. H. 1981. Toward a Universal Semantics of Indirect Subject Constructions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 7:123-135.
101. Kosslyn, Stephen Michael. 1980. Image and Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
102. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
104. Lakoff, George. 1986. Frame Semantic Control of the Coordinate Structure Constraint. In Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley, and Karl-Erik McCullough (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 152-167. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
105. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
106. Lakoff, George. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1:39-74.
107. Lakoff, George. 1996. Sorry, I'm Not Myself Today: The Metaphor System for Conceptualizing the Self. In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, 91-123. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
108. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
109. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
110. Lakoff, George, and Rafael E. Núñez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From:How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
111. Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
112. Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
113. Langacker, Ronald W. 1968. Language and Its Structure: Some Fundamental Linguistic Concepts. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
114. Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command. In David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English, 160-186. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
115. Langacker, Ronald W. 1982. Space Grammar, Analysability, and the English Passive. Language 58:22-80.
116. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [cited as FCG1]
117. Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics Research 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [cited as CIS]
118. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [cited as FCG2]
119. Langacker, Ronald W. 1993. Universals of Construal. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19:447-463.
120. Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Possession and Possessive Constructions. In John R. Taylor and Robert E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, 51-79. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 82. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
121. Langacker, Ronald W. 1997. Generics and Habituals. In Angeliki Athanasiadou and René Dirven (eds.), On Conditionals Again, 191-222. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
122. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999a. Grammar and Conceptualization. Cognitive Linguistics Research 14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [cited as GC]
123. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999b. Virtual Reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(2):77-103.
124. Langacker, Ronald W. 1999c. Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise. In Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology, 13-59. Cognitive Linguistics Research 15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
125. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001a. The English Present Tense. English Language and Linguistics 5:251-271.
126. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001b. Viewing and Experiential Reporting in Cognitive Grammar. In Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Linguagem e cognição: A perspectiva da linguística cognitiva, 19-49. Braga: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística and Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga.
127. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001c. What WH Means. In Alan Cienki, Barbara J. Luka, and Michael B. Smith (eds.), Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure, 137-152. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
128. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001d. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12:143-188.
129. Langacker, Ronald W. 2004a. Aspects of the Grammar of Finite Clauses. In Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, Culture and Mind, 535-577. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
130. Langacker, Ronald W. 2004b. Possession, Location, and Existence. In Augusto Soares da Silva, Amadeu Torres, and Miguel Gonçalves (eds.), Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudios de linguística cognitiva (2 volumes), vol. 1, 85-120. Coimbra: Almedina.
131. Langacker, Ronald W. 2005a. Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning. In Diane Pecher and Rolf A. Zwaan (eds.), Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, 164-197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
132. Langacker, Ronald W. 2005b. Construction Grammars: Cognitive, Radical, and Less So. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, 101-159. Cognitive Linguistics Research 32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
133. Langacker, Ronald W. 2006. On the Continuous Debate about Discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17:107-151.
134. Langacker, Ronald W. 2007. Constructing the Meanings of Personal Pronouns. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction, 171-187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
135. Langacker, Ronald W. Forthcoming. On the Subject of Impersonals.
136. Lee, David. 2001. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
137. Levinson, Stephen C. 1997. From Outer to Inner Space: Linguistic Categories and Non-Linguistic Thinking. In Jan Nuyts and Eric Pederson (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, 13-45. Language, Culture and Cognition 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 457-489. New York: Academic Press.
139. Lindner, Susan. 1982. What Goes Up Doesn't Necessarily Come Down: The Ins and Outs of Opposites. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 18:305-323.
140. MacWhinney, Brian. 1987. The Competition Model. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, 249-308. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
141. Maldonado, Ricardo. 1988. Energetic Reflexives in Spanish. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14:153-165.
142. Maldonado, Ricardo. 1999. A media voz: Problemas conceptuales del clítico se. Publicaciones del Centro de Lingüística Hispánica 46. Mexico City:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas.
143. Manney, Linda Joyce. 2000. Middle Voice in Modern Greek: Meaning and Function of an Inflectional Category. Studies in Language Companion Series 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
144. Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
145. Matlock, Teenie. 2004. The Conceptual Motivation of Fictive Motion. In Günter Radden and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, 221-248. Cognitive Linguistics Research 28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
146. Matlock, Teenie, Michael Ramscar, and Lera Boroditsky. 2004. The Experiential Basis of Motion Language. In Augusto Soares da Silva, Amadeu Torres, and Miguel Gonçalves (eds.), Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudios de linguística cognitiva (2 volumes), vol. 2, 43-57. Coimbra: Almedina.
147. Matsumoto, Yo. 1996a. Subjective Motion and English and Japanese Verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7:183-226.
148. Matsumoto, Yo. 1996b. How Abstract Is Subjective Motion? A Comparison of Coverage Path Expressions and Access Path Expressions. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 359-373. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
149. Matsumoto, Yo. 1996c. Subjective-Change Expressions in Japanese and Their Cognitive and Linguistic Bases. In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, 124-156. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
150. McLendon, Sally. 1978. Ergativity, Case, and Transitivity in Eastern Pomo. International Journal of American Linguistics 44:1-9.
151. McNeill David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
152. Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/Agentive Case Marking and Its Motivation. Language 67:510-546.
153. Newman, John. 1996. Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Cognitive Linguistics Research 7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
154. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1983. Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Its Possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
155. Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2005. Conceptual Blending and the Interpretation of Relatives: A Case Study from Greek. Cognitive Linguistics 16:169-206.
156. Palmer, F. R. 1981. Semantics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
157. Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4:157-189.
158. Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 284-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
159. Regier, Terry. 1996. The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and London:Bradford.
160. Reid, Wallis. 1991. Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation. London: Longman.
161. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
162. Rice, Sally. 1987a. Towards a Cognitive Model of Transitivity. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
163. Rice, Sally. 1987b. Towards a Transitive Prototype: Evidence from Some Atypical English Passives. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13:422-434.
164. Riemer, Nick. 2005. The Semantics of Polysemy: Reading Meaning in English and Warlpiri. Cognitive Linguistics Research 30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
165. Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of Categorization. In Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27-47. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.
166. Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Published as Ross 1986.]
167. Ross, John R. 1986. Infinite Syntax! Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
168. Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany:State University of New York Press.
169. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50:696-735.
170. Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Read at Your Own Risk: Syntactic and Semantic Horrors You Can Find in Your Medicine Chest. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 10:599-607.
171. Schachter, Paul. 1976. The Subject in Philippine Languages: Topic, Actor, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above? In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 491-518. New York: Academic Press.
172. Schachter, Paul. 1977. Reference-Related and Role-Related Properties of Subjects. In Peter Cole and Jerry M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 279-306. New York: Academic Press.
173. Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
174. Sethuraman, Nitya. 2002. The Acquisition of Verbs and Argument Structure Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
175. Shepard, Roger N. 1978. The Mental Image. American Psychologist 33:125-137.
176. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language 61:821-848.
177. Smith, Michael B. 1993. Aspects of German Clause Structure from a Cognitive Grammar Perspective. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 22:601-638.
178. Sweetser, Eve. 1982. Root and Epistemic Modals: Causality in Two Worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8:484-507.
179. Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
180. Sweetser, Eve. 1997. Role and Individual Interpretations of Change Predicates. In Jan Nuyts and Eric Pederson (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, 116-136. Language, Culture and Cognition 1. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
181. Sweetser, Eve. 1999. Compositionality and Blending: Semantic Composition in a Cognitively Realistic Framework. In Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology, 129-162. Cognitive Linguistics Research 15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
182. Takahashi, Kiyoko. 2000. Expressions of Emanation Fictive Motion Events in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
183. Talmy, Leonard. 1988a. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science 12:49-100.
184. Talmy, Leonard. 1988b. The Relation of Grammar to Cognition. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 165-205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
185. Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17:480-519.
186. Talmy, Leonard. 1996. Fictive Motion in Language and "Ception". In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space, 211-276. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and London: Bradford.
187. Talmy, Leonard. 2000a. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, and London: Bradford.
188. Talmy, Leonard. 2000b. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
189. Taylor, John R. 1996. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon.
190. Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
191. Taylor, John R. 2004. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press/Clarendon.
192. Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. "Object Complements" and Conversation:Towards a Realistic Account. Studies in Language 26:125-164.
193. Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
194. Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
195. Tomlin, Russell S. 1995. Focal Attention, Voice, and Word Order. In Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan (eds.), Word Order in Discourse, 517-554. Typological Studies in Language 30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
196. Tomlin, Russell S. 1997. Mapping Conceptual Representations into Linguistic Representations: The Role of Attention in Grammar. In Jan Nuyts and Eric Pederson (eds.), Language and Conceptualization, 162-189. Language, Culture and Cognition 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
197. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1982. From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. In Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
198. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1988. Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14:406-416.
199. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65:31-55.
200. Tuggy, David. 1993. Ambiguity, Polysemy, and Vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4:273-290.
201. Tuggy, David. 2003a. The Nawatl Verb ki_sa: A Case Study in Polysemy. In Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven, and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, 323-362. Cognitive Linguistics Research 23. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
202. Tuggy, David. 2003b. Abrelatas and Scarecrow Nouns: Exocentric Verb-Noun Compounds as Illustrations of Basic Principles of Cognitive Grammar. International Journal of English Studies 3(2):25-61.
203. Turner, Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
204. Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
205. Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2007. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Longman.
206. Vandeloise, Claude. 1991. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
207. van Hoek, Karen. 1995. Conceptual Reference Points: A Cognitive Grammar Account of Pronominal Anaphora Constraints. Language 71:310-340.
208. van Hoek, Karen. 1997. Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
209. Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. 2002. Grammatical Relations in Active Systems:The Case of Guaraní. Functions of Language 9:133-167.
210. Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
211. Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
212. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. Oats and Wheat: The Fallacy of Arbitrariness. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 311-342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
213. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Studies in Language Companion Series 18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
214. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1995. Dictionaries vs. Encyclopaedias: How to Draw the Line. In Philip W. Davis (ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, 289-315. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
215. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
216. Woodbury, Anthony C. 1977. Greenlandic Eskimo, Ergativity, and Relational Grammar. In Peter Cole and Jerry M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 307-336. New York: Academic Press.
217. Zubin, David A., and Klaus-Michael Köpcke. 1986. Gender and Folk Taxonomy: The Indexical Relation between Grammatical and Lexical Categorization. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization, 139-180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.