Six views of embodied cognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 625-636

  Wilson, Margaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ATTENTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECALL; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MENTAL RECALL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0037631686     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196322     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. ACRE, P. E. (1993). The symbolic worldview: Reply to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 61-69.
2. BADDELEY, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. BADDELEY, A., & HITCH, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 647-667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. BALLARD, D. H. (1996) On the function of visual representation. In K. A. Akins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 111-131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. BALLARD, D. H., HAYHOE, M. M., POOK, P. K., & RAO, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
6. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999a). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61-80.
7. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999b). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
8. BEER, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173-215.
9. BEER, R. D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4, 91-99.
10. BROOKS, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. Journal of Robotics & Automation, 2, 14-23.
11. BROOKS, R. (1991a). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 47, 139-160.
12. BROOKS, R. (1991b). New approaches to robotics. Science, 253, 1227-1232.
13. BROOKS, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new Al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. CHIEL, H., & BEER, R. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body, and environment. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 553-557.
15. CHURCHLAND, P. S., RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & SJENOWSKI, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch & J. L. Davis (Eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 23-60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. CLARK, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. CLARK, A. (1998) Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 506-517). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. CLARK, A., & CRUSH, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7, 5-16.
19. COHEN, N. J., EICHENBAUM, H., DEACEDO, B. S., & CORKIN, S. (1985). Different memory systems underlying acquisition of procedural and declarative knowledge. In D. S. Olton, E. Gamzu, & S. Corkin (Eds.), Memory dysfunctions: An integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 444, pp. 54-71). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
20. CRAIGHERO, L., FADIGA, L., UMILTÀ, C. A., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1996). Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport, 8, 347-349.
21. DENNETT, D. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22. DE WAAL, F. B. M. (2001). The ape and the sushi master: Cultural reflections by a primatologist. New York: Basic Books.
23. EPELBOIM, J. (1997). Deictic codes, embodiment of cognition, and the real world. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 746.
24. FARAH, M. J. (1995). The neural bases of mental imagery. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 963-975). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. FODOR, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. FRANKLIN, S. (1995). Artificial minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. GIBBS, R. W., BOGDANOVICH, J. M., SYKES, J. R., & BARR, D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 141-154.
28. GLENBERG, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
29. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
30. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
31. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
32. GOODWIN, C. J. (1999). A history of modern psychology. New York: Wiley.
33. GRAFTON, S. T., FADIGA, L., ARBIB, M. A., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage, 6, 231-236.
34. GREENO, J. G., & MOORE, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 49-59.
35. GRUSH, R. (1996). Emulation and cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
36. CRUSH, R. (1997). Yet another design for a brain? Review of Port and van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 233-242.
37. GRUSH, R. (1998). Perception, imagery, and the sensorimotor loop. www.pitt.edu/∼grush/papers/%21papers.html. English translation of: Wahrnehmung, Vorstellung und die sensomotorische Schleife. In F. Esken & H.-D. Heckmann (Eds.), Bewuβtsein und Repräsentation. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.
38. CRUSH, R. (1998). Perception, imagery, and the sensorimotor loop. www.pitt.edu/∼grush/papers/%21papers.html. English translation of: Wahrnehmung, Vorstellung und die sensomotorische Schleife. In F. Esken & H.-D. Heckmann (Eds.), Bewuβtsein und Repräsentation. Paderborn, Germany: Ferdinand Schöningh.
39. HUTCHINS, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. IVERSON, J. M., & GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. (1998). Why people gesture when they speak. Nature, 396, 228.
41. JEANNEROD, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. JOHNSTON, W. A., DARK, V. J., & JACOBY, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 3-11.
43. JUARRERO, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 508-529.
45. KEIL, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. KIRSH, D., & MAGLIO, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
47. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. KOSSLYN, S. M., PASCUAL-LEONE, A., FELICIAN, O., & CAMPOSANO, S. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. Science, 284, 167-170.
49. KRAUSS, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54-60.
50. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
52. LANGACKER, R. (1987, 1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar (2 vols.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
53. LEAKEY, R. (1994). The origin of humankind. New York: Basic Books.
54. MARKMAN, A. B., & DIETRICH, E. (2000). In defense of representation. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 138-171.
55. MATARIC, M. (1991). Navigating with a rat brain: A neurobiologically inspired model for robot spatial representation. In J.-A. Meyer & S. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animals (pp. 169-175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. MURATA, A., FADIGA, L., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., RAOS, V. & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226-2230.
57. OHLSSON, S. (1999). Anchoring language in reality: Observations on reference and representation. Discourse Processes, 28, 93-105.
58. O'REGAN, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
59. PARSONS, L. M., Fox, P. T., DOWNS, J. H., GLASS, T., HIRSCH, T. B., MARTIN, C. C., JERABEK, P. A., & LANCASTER, J. L. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375, 54-58.
60. PESSOA, L., THOMPSON, E., & NOË, A. (1998). Finding out about fillingin: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 723-802.
61. PFEIFER, R., & SCHEIER, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. PORT, R. F., & VAN GELDER, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. PRINZ, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. PUTNAM, H. (1970). Is semantics possible? In H. E. Kiefer & M. K. Munitz (Eds.), Language, belief and metaphysics (pp. 50-63). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
65. QUINN, R., & ESPENSCHIED, K. (1993). Control of a hexapod robot using a biologically inspired neural network. In R. Beer, R. Ritzman, & T. McKenna (Eds.), Biological neural networks in invertebrate neuroethology and robotics (pp. 365-381). San Diego: Academic Press.
66. REISBERG, D. (Ed.) (1992). Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. RIPS, L. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. SAITO, F., & FUKUDA, T. (1994). Two link robot brachiation with connectionist Q-learning. In D. Cliff (Ed.), From animals to animals 3 (pp. 309-314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
70. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
71. SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
72. SLATER, C. (1997). Conceptualizing a sunset ≠ using a sunset as a discriminative stimulus. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 37-38.
73. STEELS, L., & BROOKS, R. (1995). The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. STEIN, L. (1994). Imagination and situated cognition. Journal of Experimental Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 6, 393-407.
75. TALMY, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. I. Conceptual structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. THELEN, E., & SMITH, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. TOMASELLO, M. (1998). Cognitive linguistics. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 477-487). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
78. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830-846.
79. UEXKÜLL, J. VON (1934). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of modern concept (pp. 5-80). New York: International Universities Press.
80. ULEMAN, J., & BARGH, J. (EDS.) (1989). Unintended thought. New York: Guilford.
81. VAN GELDER, T., & PORT, R. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1-43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. VERA, A. H., & SIMON, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7-48.
83. WERTSCH, J. V. (1998). Mediated action. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 518-525). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
84. WILES, J., & DARTNALL, T. (1999). Perspectives on cognitive science: Theories, experiments, and foundations. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
85. WILSON, M. (2001a). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44-57.
86. WILSON, M. (2001b). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 543-553.
87. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (1997). A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 25, 313-320.
88. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (1998). A "word length effect" for sign language: Further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 584-590.
89. ZWAAN, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81-88.