Case-mixing effects on children's word recognition: Lexical feedback and development

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 525-542

  Mayall, Kate ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0036545880     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000334     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, M.J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 133-176.
2. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575.
3. Backman, J., Bruck, M., Herbert, M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 114-133.
4. Besner, D. (1983). Basic decoding components in reading: Two dissociable feature extraction processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 429-438.
5. Besner, D. (1990). Does the reading system need a lexicon? In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Reading comprehension processes (pp. 73-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Besner, D., Davelaar, E., Alcott, D., & Parry, P. (1984). Wholistic reading of alphabetic print: Evidence from the FBM and the FBI. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading (pp. 121-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Besner, D., & Johnston, J.C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the interaction of visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical processes and representation (pp. 291-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Besner, D., & McCann, R.S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 201-219). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
9. Besner, D., & Smith, M.C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
10. Borowsky, R.,& Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 813-840.
11. Burt, J.S., & Hutchinson, B.J. (2000). Case-mixing effects on spelling recognition: The importance of test format. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 433-451.
12. Carroll, J.B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1973). The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-215). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
15. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 102-104.
17. Dickerson, J. (1999). Format distortion and word reading: The role of multiletter units. Neurocase, 5, 31-36.
18. Gilhooly, K.L., & Logie, R.H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395-427.
19. Hall, D.A., Humphreys, G.W., & Cooper, A.G. (2001). Neuropsychological evidence for case-specific reading: Multi-letter units in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 439-467.
20. Herdman, C.M., Chernecki, D., & Norris, D. (1999). Naming case alternated words. Memory and Cognition, 27, 254-266.
21. Humphreys, G.W., & Mayall, K.A. (2001). A peripheral reading deficit under conditions of diffuse visual attention. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 551-576.
22. Humphreys, G.W., Mayall, K.A., & Cooper, A.C.G. (2001). The PIG in sPrInG: Evidence for the formation of letter groups from the reading of buried words. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
24. Johnston, R., Anderson, M., & Duncan, L. (1991). Phonological and visual segmentation problems in poor readers. In M. Snowling & M.E. Thomson (Eds.), Dyslexia: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 154-164). London: Whurr.
25. Kinoshita, S. (1987). Case alternation effect: Two types of word recognition? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 701-720.
26. Kucera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
27. Marshall, J.C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175-199.
28. Masterson, J., Laxon, V., & Stuart, M. (1992). Beginning reading with phonology. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 1-12.
29. Mayall, K.A., & Humphreys, G.W. (1996). Case mixing and the task sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 278-294.
30. Mayall, K.A., Humphreys, G.W., Mechelli, A., Olson, A., & Price, C.J. (2001). The effects of case mixing on word recognition: Evidence from a PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 844-853.
31. Mayall, K.A., Humphreys, G.W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1275-1286.
32. McClelland, J.L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 80-91.
33. McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
34. Mechelli, A., Humphreys, G.W., Mayall, K.A., Olson, A., & Price, C.J. (2000). Differential effects of word length and visual contrast in the fusiform and lingual gyri during reading. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 1909-1913.
35. Mewhort, D.J.K., & Johns, E.E. (1988). Some tests of the interactive-activation model for word identification. Psychological Research, 50, 135-147.
36. Morton, J., & Patterson, K. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J.C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 91-118). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
37. Mozer, M.C. (1991). The perception of multiple objects: A connectionst approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., & Noel, R.W. (1984). Word shapes in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413-428.
39. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
40. Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: Reality and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 573-578.
41. Quinlan, P.T. (1992). Oxford Psycholinguistic Database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
43. Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Barnes, M.A., & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 383-404.
44. Seymour, P.H.K., & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 1-37.
45. Snowling, M., & Frith, U. (1981). The role of sound, shape and orthographic cues in early reading. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 83-87.
46. Stolz, J.A., & Neely, J.H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
47. Waters, G.S., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511-530.
48. Waters, G.S., Seidenberg, M., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 12, 293-305.
49. Whiteley, H.E., & Walker, P. (1994). The activation of multiletter units in visual word recognition. Visual Cognition, 1, 433-473.