Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry

Food Research International

Volumn 104, Issue , 2018, Pages 39-47

  Santeramo, F G ^a   Carlucci, D ^b   De Devitiis, B ^a   Seccia, A ^a   Stasi, A ^a   Viscecchia, R ^a   Nardone, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Diet; Fruits and vegetable; Functional food; Meat; Nanotechnology; Seafood

Indexed keywords

FOOD SUPPLY; FRUITS; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MEATS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SUPPLY CHAINS; VEGETABLES;

CONSUMERS' PREFERENCES; EMERGING TRENDS; FOOD INNOVATIONS; FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; GLOBAL DYNAMICS; RESEARCH AGENDA; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SEAFOOD;

NUTRITION;

ANIMAL; CATERING SERVICE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EUROPE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD INDUSTRY; FRUIT; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; HEALTHY DIET; HUMAN; MEAT; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; SEA FOOD; VEGETABLE;

ANIMALS; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; EUROPE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD SUPPLY; FRUIT; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; HEALTHY DIET; HUMANS; MEAT; NUTRITIVE VALUE; SEAFOOD; VEGETABLES;

EID: 85032881246     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: 18737145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Albersmeier, F., Schulze, H., Jahn, G., Spiller, A., The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing. Food Control 20:10 (2009), 927–935.
2. Artés, F., Gomez, P., Aguayo, E., Escalona, V., Artés-Hernandez, F., Sustainable sanitation techniques for keeping quality and safety of fresh-cut plant commodities. Postharvest Biology and Technology 51:3 (2009), 287–296.
3. Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Bosnea, L., Migration of substances from food packaging materials to foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 44:2 (2004), 63–76.
4. Aston, L.M., Smith, J.N., Powles, J.W., Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: A modelling study. BMJ Open 2 (2012), 1–9.
5. Austgulen, M.H., Environmentally sustainable meat consumption: An analysis of the Norwegian public debate. Journal of Consumer Policy 37:1 (2014), 45–66.
6. Bäckström, A., Pirttilä-Backman, A.-M., Tuorila, H., Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite 43 (2004), 75–83.
7. Barrena, R., García, T., Sánchez, M., Analysis of personal and cultural values as key determinants of novel food acceptance. Application to an ethnic product. Appetite 87 (2015), 205–214.
8. Barrena, R., Sánchez, M., Neophobia, personal consumer values and novel food acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 27:1 (2013), 72–84.
9. Barrett, C.B., Food security and food assistance programs. Handbook of Agricultural Economics 2 (2002), 2103–2190.
10. Barrett, C.B., Measuring food insecurity. Science 327:5967 (2010), 825–828.
11. Baselice, A., Colantuoni, F., Lass, D.A., Nardone, G., Stasi, A., Trends in EU consumers' attitude towards fresh-cut fruit and vegetables. Food Quality and Preference 59 (2017), 87–96.
12. Baselice, A., De Devitiis, B., Nardone, G., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., Italian consumers' perception towards insect food with a neuromarketing approach. 53th SIDEA Congress, Bolzano 22–26 September 2016, 2016.
13. Bechtold, K.-B., Abdulai, A., Combining attitudinal statements with choice experiments to analyze preference heterogeneity for functional dairy products. Food Policy 47 (2014), 97–106.
14. Bellemare, M.F., Rising food prices, food price volatility, and social unrest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97:1 (2015), 1–21.
15. Bieberstein, A., Roosen, J., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., Vandermoere, F., Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packaging in France and Germany. European Review of Agricultural Economics 40:1 (2013), 73–94.
16. Bimbo, F., Bonanno, A., Nocella, G., Viscecchia, R., Nardone, G., De Devitiis, B., Carlucci, D., Consumers' acceptance and preferences for nutrition-modified and functional dairy products: A systematic review. Appetite 113 (2017), 141–154.
17. Bitzios, M., Fraser, I., Haddock-Fraser, J., Functional ingredients and food choice: Results from a dual-mode study employing means-end-chain analysis and a choice experiment. Food Policy 36:5 (2011), 715–725.
18. Bleiel, J., Functional foods from the perspective of the consumer: How to make it a success?. International Dairy Journal 20:4 (2010), 303–306.
19. Buckley, M., Cowan, C., McCarthy, M., The convenience food market in Great Britain: Convenience food lifestyle (CFL) segments. Appetite 49:3 (2007), 600–617.
20. Caparros Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Francis, F., Edible insects acceptance by Belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. Journal of Sensory Studies 29:1 (2014), 14–20.
21. Caracciolo, F., Santeramo, F.G., Price trends and income inequalities: Will Sub-Saharan Africa reduce the gap?. African Development Review 25:1 (2013), 42–54.
22. Cardello, A.V., Schutz, H.G., Lesher, L.L., Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 8:1 (2007), 73–83.
23. Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Nardone, G., Santeramo, F.G., Certification Labels vs Convenience Formats: What drives the market in aquaculture products?. Marine Resource Economics 32:3 (2017), 295–310.
24. Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., Nardone, G., Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite 84 (2015), 212–227.
25. Cassady, D., Jetter, K.M., Culp, J., Is price a barrier to eating more fruits and vegetables for low-income families?. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107:11 (2007), 1909–1915.
26. Chen, M.F., Lin, Y.P., Cheng, T.J., Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan. Technovation 33:2 (2013), 88–96.
27. Clonan, A., Wilson, P., Swift, J.A., Leibovici, D.G., Holdsworth, M., Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: Impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability. Public Health Nutrition 18:13 (2015), 2446–2456.
28. Coles, D., Frewer, L.J., Nanotechnology applied to European food production–A review of ethical and regulatory issues. Trends in Food Science & Technology 34:1 (2013), 32–43.
29. Cook, A.J., Fairweather, J.R., Intentions of New Zealanders to purchase lamb or beef made using nanotechnology. British Food Journal 109:9 (2007), 675–688.
30. Corcoran, K., Bernués, A., Manrique, E., Pacchioli, T., Baines, R., Boutonnet, J.P., Current consumer attitudes towards lamb and beef in Europe. Options Méditerranéennes A46 (2001), 75–79.
31. Cox, D.N., Evans, G., Lease, H.J., The influence of information and beliefs about technology on the acceptance of novel food technologies: A conjoint study of farmed prawn concepts. Food Quality and Preference 18:5 (2007), 813–823.
32. Dasgupta, N., Ranjan, S., Mundekkad, D., Ramalingam, C., Shanker, R., Kumar, A., Nanotechnology in agro-food: From field to plate. Food Research International 69 (2015), 381–400.
33. de Boer, M., McCarthy, M., Cowan, C., Ryan, I., The influence of lifestyle characteristics and beliefs about convenience food on the demand for convenience foods in the Irish market. Food Quality and Preference 15:2 (2004), 155–165.
34. Deliza, R., Rosenthal, A., Silva, A.L.S., Consumer attitude towards information on non conventional technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14:1 (2003), 43–49.
35. Debucquet, G., Cornet, J., Adam, I., Cardinal, M., Perception of oyster-based products by French consumers. The effect of processing and role of social representations. Appetite 59:3 (2012), 844–852.
36. Dovey, T.M., Staples, P.A., Gibson, E.L., Halford, J.C., Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: A review. Appetite 50:2 (2008), 181–193.
37. European Commission, Facts and figures on the Common Fisheries Policy – 2014 edition. 2014, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
38. European Regulation, Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients. Official Journal of the European Communities 40 (1997), 1–7.
39. FAO, The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges. 2014, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
40. FAO, Statistical pocketbook. World food and agriculture. 2015, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
41. Farshchi, P., Sadrnezhaad, S.K., Nejad, N.M., Mahmoodi, M., Abadi, L.I.G., Nanotechnology in the public eye: The case of Iran, as a developing country. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13:8 (2011), 3511–3519.
42. Fernqvist, F., Ekelund, L., Credence and the effect on consumer liking food – A review. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 340–353.
43. Fiszman, S., Carrillo, E., Varela, P., Consumer perception of carriers of a satiating compound. Influence of front-of-package images and weight loss related information. Food Research International 78 (2015), 88–95.
44. Flight, I., Leppard, P., Cox, D.N., Food neophobia and associations with cultural diversity and socio-economic status amongst rural and urban Australian adolescents. Appetite 41:1 (2003), 51–59.
45. Fonner, R., Sylvia, G., Willingness to pay for multiple seafood labels in a niche market. Marine Resource Economics 30:1 (2014), 51–70.
46. Font-i-Furnols, M., Guerrero, L., Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science 98:3 (2014), 361–371.
47. Font-i-Furnols, M., Realini, C., Montossi, F., Sañudo, C., Campo, M.M., Oliver, M.A., Guerrero, L., Consumer's purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Quality and Preference 22:5 (2011), 443–451.
48. Freshfel, Consumption monitor. European Fresh Produce Association. Retrieved from http://www.freshfel.org/asp/what_we_do/consumption_monitor.asp, 2014.
49. Frewer, L.J., Bergmann, K., Brennan, M., Lion, R., Meertens, R., Rowe, G., Vereijken, C.M.J.L., Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology 22:8 (2011), 442–456.
50. GajdosKljusuric, J., Cacic, J., Misir, A., Cacic, D., Geographical region as a factor influencing consumers' perception of functional food case of Croatia. British Food Journal 117:3 (2015), 1017–1031.
51. Gereffi, G., Lee, J., Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management 48:3 (2012), 24–32.
52. Gracia, A., de-Magistris, T., Preferences for lamb meat: A choice experiment for Spanish consumers. Meat Science 95:2 (2013), 396–402.
53. Griffiths, J.C., Abernethy, D.R., Schuber, S., Williams, R.L., Functional food ingredient quality: Opportunities to improve public health by compendial standardization. Journal of Functional Foods 1:1 (2009), 128–130.
54. Grunert, K.G., Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science 74 (2006), 149–160.
55. Guàrdia, M.D., Guerrero, L., Gelabert, J., Gou, P., Arnau, J., Consumer attitude towards sodium reduction in meat products and acceptability of fermented sausages with reduced sodium content. Meat Science 73:3 (2006), 484–490.
56. Guenther, P.M., Jensen, H.H., Batres-Marquez, S.P., Chen, C., Sociodemographic, knowledge, and attitudinal factors related to meat consumption in the United States. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 105 (2005), 1266–1274.
57. Guerrero, L., Claret, A., Bernardo, J., Mauri, M., Comaposada, J., Arnau, J., Consumers' acceptability and expectations towards meat products without added sodium chloride. 9th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. 4–8 September, Toronto, Canada, 2011.
58. Hamerman, E.J., Cooking and disgust sensitivity influence preference for attending insect-based food events. Appetite 96 (2016), 319–326.
59. Hammoudi, A., Hoffmann, R., Surry, Y., Food safety standards and agri-food supply chains: An introductory overview. European Review of Agricultural Economics 36:4 (2009), 469–478.
60. Handford, C.E., Dean, M., Henchion, M., Spence, M., Elliott, C.T., Campbell, K., Implications of nanotechnology for the agri-food industry: Opportunities, benefits and risks. Trends in Food Science & Technology 40:2 (2014), 226–241.
61. Heise, H., Theuvsen, L., What do consumers think about farm animal welfare in modern agriculture? Attitudes and shopping behavior. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2017, 1–22.
62. Hobbs, D.A., Ashouri, A., George, T.W., Lovegrove, J.A., Methven, L., The consumer acceptance of novel vegetable-enriched bread products as a potential vehicle to increase vegetable consumption. Food Research International 58 (2014), 15–22.
63. Hocquette, J.-F., Mainsant, P., Daudin, J.-D., Cassar-Malek, I., Rémond, D., Doreau, M., Picard, B., La viande du future serat-elle produite in vitro?. INRA Productions Animales 26 (2013), 363–374.
64. Huggett, A.C., Conzelmann, C., EU regulation on novel foods: Consequences for the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology 8:5 (1997), 133–139.
65. Hung, Y., de Kok, T.M., Verbeke, W., Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Science 121 (2016), 119–126.
66. Hur, J., Jang, S.S., Anticipated guilt and pleasure in a healthy food consumption context. International Journal of Hospitality Management 48 (2015), 113–123.
67. Jacques, P.F., Tucker, K.L., Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease?. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73 (2001), 1–2.
68. Jaeger, S.R., Rose, J.M., Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality and Preference 19:6 (2008), 539–564.
69. James, J.B., Ngarmsak, T., Rolle, R.S., Processing of fresh-cut tropical fruits and vegetables: A technical guide. RAP Publication (FAO) eng no. 2010/16, 2010.
70. Jezewska-Zychowicz, M., Krolak, M., Do consumers' attitudes towards food technologies and motives of food choice influence willingness to eat cereal products fortified with fibre?. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences 65:4 (2015), 281–292.
71. Kaur, N., Singh, D.P., Deciphering the consumer behaviour facets of functional foods: A literature review. Appetite 112 (2017), 167–187.
72. Kehlbacher, A., Bennett, R., Balcome, K., Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling. Food Policy 37 (2012), 627–633.
73. Khan, R.S., Grigor, J.V., Win, A.G., Boland, M., Differentiating aspects of product innovation processes in the food industry. British Food Journal 116:8 (2014), 1346–1368.
74. King, D.E., Mainous, A.G., Carnemolla, M., Everett, C.J., Adherence to healthy lifestyle habits in US adults, 1988–2006. The American Journal of Medicine 122:6 (2009), 528–534.
75. Koutsimanis, G., Getter, K., Behe, B., Harte, J., Almenar, E., Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produce. Appetite 59:2 (2012), 270–280.
76. Kraus, A., Factors influencing the decisions to buy and consume functional food. British Food Journal 117:6 (2015), 1622–1636.
77. Kristensen, L., Støier, S., Würtz, J., Hinrichsen, L., Trends in meat science and technology: The future looks bright, but the journey will be long. Meat Science 98:3 (2014), 322–329.
78. Lahteenmaki, L., Claiming health in food products. Food Quality and Preference 27:2 (2013), 196–201.
79. Laureati, M., Bergamaschi, V., Pagliarini, E., School-based intervention with children. Peer-modeling, reward and repeated exposure reduce food neophobia and increase liking of fruits and vegetables. Appetite 83 (2014), 26–32.
80. Le Goff, G., Delarue, J., Non-verbal evaluation of acceptance of insect-based products using a simple and holistic analysis of facial expressions. Food Quality and Preference 56 (2016), 285–293.
81. Leroy, J.L., Ruel, M., Frongillo, E.A., Harris, J., Ballard, T.J., Measuring the food access dimension of food security a critical review and mapping of indicators. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 36:2 (2015), 167–195.
82. Liljenstolpe, C., Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness 24 (2008), 67–84.
83. Loizou, E., Michailidis, A., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Investigating the drivers that influence the adoption of differentiated food products: The case of a Greek urban area. British Food Journal 115:7 (2013), 917–935.
84. Magnuson, B., Munro, I., Abbot, P., Baldwin, N., Lopez-Garcia, R., Ly, K., Socolovsky, S., Review of the regulation and safety assessment of food substances in various countries and jurisdictions. Food Additives & Contaminants, Part A 30:7 (2013), 1147–1220.
85. Marino, R., Albenzio, M., Della Malva, A., Muscio, A., Sevi, A., Nutritional propertiesand consumer evaluation of donkey bresaola and salami: Comparison with conventional products. Meat Science 101 (2015), 19–24.
86. Marino, R., della Malva, A., Seccia, A., Caroprese, M., Sevi, A., Albenzio, M., Consumers' expectations and acceptability for low saturated fat “salami”: Healthiness or taste?. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97:11 (2017), 3515–3521.
87. Matin, A.H., Goddard, E., Vandermoere, F., Blanchemanche, S., Bieberstein, A., Marette, S., Roosen, J., Do environmental attitudes and food technology neophobia affect perceptions of the benefits of nanotechnology?. International Journal of Consumer Studies 36:2 (2012), 149–157.
88. Mattson, J., Helmerson, H., Food product development. A consumer-led text analytic approach to generate preference tructures. British Food Journal 109:3 (2007), 246–259.
89. Mazzocchi, M., Traill, W.B., Shogren, J.F., Fat economics. 2009, Oxford University Press, New York.
90. Meade, B., Rosen, S., International Food Security Assessment, 2013–2023, GFA-24, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service, June 2013. 2013.
91. Mellentin, J., Failures in functional foods and beverages. 2014, New Nutrition Business, London, UK.
92. Miller, M.F., Carr, M.A., Ramsey, C.B., Crockett, K.L., Hoover, L.C., Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. Journal of Animal Science 79:12 (2001), 3062–3068.
93. Muchenje, V., Mukumbo, F.E., Introduction to the special issue Food and Nutrition Security: Can science and good governance deliver dinner?. Food Research International 76 (2015), 879–881.
94. Mustonen, S., Rantanen, R., Tuorila, H., Effect of sensory education on school children's food perception: A 2-year follow-up study. Food Quality and Preference 20:3 (2009), 230–240.
95. Nordin, S., Broman, D.A., Garvill, J., Nyroos, M., Gender differences in factors affecting rejection of food in healthy young Swedish adults. Appetite 43:3 (2004), 295–301.
96. Olmedilla-Alonso, B., Jimenez-Colmenero, F., Sanchez-Muniz, F.J., Development and assessment of healthy properties of meat and meat products designed as functional foods. Meat Science 95 (2013), 919–930.
97. Otsuka, K., Food insecurity, income inequality, and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture. Agricultural Economics 44:s1 (2013), 7–18.
98. Ozen, A.E., Bibiloni, M., Pons, A., Tur, J.A., Consumption of functional foods in Europe; a systematic review. Nutrición Hospitalaria 29:3 (2014), 470–478.
99. Pan, A., Sun, Q., Bernstein, A.M., Schulze, M.B., Manson, J.E., Stampfer, M.J., Hu, F.B., Red meat consumption and mortality: Results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Archives of Internal Medicine 172:7 (2012), 555–563.
100. Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., Macnaughton, S., Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365:1554 (2010), 3065–3081.
101. Pathakoti, K., Manubolu, M., Hwang, H.M., Nanostructures: Current uses and future applications in food science. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 25:2 (2017, April), 245–253.
102. Peters-Texeira, A., Badrie, N., Consumers' perception of food packaging in Trinidad, West Indies and its related impact on food choices. International Journal of Consumer Studies 29:6 (2005), 508–514.
103. Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., Scholderer, J., Brunsø, K., Olsen, S.O., European consumers' use of and trust in information sources about fish. Food Quality and Preference 18:8 (2007), 1050–1063.
104. Pilone, V., Stasi, A., Baselice, A., Quality preferences and pricing of fresh-cut salads in Italy: New evidence from market data. British Food Journal 119:7 (2017), 1473–1486.
105. Pliner, P., Loewen, E.R., Temperament and food neophobia in children and their mothers. Appetite 28 (1997), 239–254.
106. Pliner, P., Loewen, R., The effects of manipulated arousal on children's willingness to taste novel foods. Physiology & Behavior 76:4 (2002), 551–558.
107. Pollard, J., Kirk, S.F.L., Cade, J.E., Factors affecting food choice in relation to fruit and vegetable intake: A review. Nutrition Research Reviews 15:2 (2002), 373–388.
108. Rabobank International, Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/www.agf.nl/ContentPages/682927373.pdf, 2010.
109. Rabobank International, Retrieved from http://www.freshconveniencecongress.com/resources/documents/1308561709cindyvanrijswick.pdf, 2011.
110. Ragaert, P., Verbeke, W., Devlieghere, F., Debevere, J., Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Quality and Preference 15:3 (2004), 259–270.
111. Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Chakraborty, A.R., Samuel, S.M., Ramalingam, C., Shanker, R., Kumar, A., Nanoscience and nanotechnologies in food industries: Opportunities and research trends. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16(6), 2014, 2464.
112. Rortveit, A.W., Olsen, S.O., Combining the role of convenience and consideration set size in explaining fish consumption in Norway. Appetite 52:2 (2009), 313–317.
113. Rortveit, A.W., Olsen, S.O., The role of consideration set size in explaining fish consumption. Appetite 49:1 (2007), 214–222.
114. Rossi, M., Cubadda, F., Dini, L., Terranova, M.L., Aureli, F., Sorbo, A., Passeri, D., Scientific basis of nanotechnology, implications for the food sector and future trends. Trends in Food Science & Technology 40:2 (2014), 127–148.
115. Rumpold, B.A., Schlüter, O.K., Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 17 (2013), 1–11.
116. Santeramo, F.G., On the composite indicators for food security: Decisions matter!. Food Reviews International 31:1 (2015), 63–73.
117. Santeramo, F.G., Food security composite indices: Implications for policy and practice. Development in Practice 25:4 (2015), 594–600.
118. Santeramo, F.G., Price transmission in the European tomatoes and cauliflowers sectors. Agribusiness 31:3 (2015), 399–413.
119. Santeramo, F.G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Nardone, G., Viscecchia, R., On consumption patterns in oyster markets: The role of attitudes. Marine Policy 79:5 (2017), 54–61.
120. Santeramo, F.G., Lamonaca, E., Contò, F., Stasi, A., Nardone, G., Drivers of grain price volatility: A cursory critical review. Agricultural Economics, 2017 (in press).
121. Santeramo, F.G., Shabnam, N., The income-elasticity of calories, macro-and micro-nutrients: What is the literature telling us?. Food Research International 76 (2015), 932–937.
122. Santeramo, F.G., von Cramon-Taubadel, S., On perishability and vertical price transmission: Empirical evidences from Italy. Bio-based and Applied Economics 5:2 (2016), 199–214.
123. Schnettler, B., Crisóstomo, G., Sepúlveda, J., Mora, M., Lobos, G., Miranda, H., Grunert, K.G., Food neophobia, nanotechnology and satisfaction with life. Appetite 69 (2013), 71–79.
124. Schnettler, B., Miranda, H., Lobos, G., Sepulveda, J., Orellana, L., Mora, M., Willingness to purchase functional foods according to their benefits: Consumer profiles in Southern Chile. British Food Journal 117:5 (2015), 1453–1473.
125. Schoonjans, R., Chaudhry, Q., The importance of metrology and standardization of nanomaterials for food industry and regulatory authorities in Europe. Mansfield, E., Kaiser, D.L., Fujita, D., Van de Voorde, M., (eds.) Metrology and standardization of nanotechnology: Protocols and industrial innovations, 2017, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
126. Seccia, A., Santeramo, F.G., Nardone, G., Trade competitiveness in table grapes: A global view. Outlook on AGRICULTURE 44:2 (2015), 127–134.
127. Siro, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., Lugasi, A., Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—A review. Appetite 51:3 (2008), 456–467.
128. Tan, H.S.G., Fischer, A.R., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L.P.A., van Trijp, H.C., Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 42 (2015), 78–89.
129. Troy, D.J., Kerry, J.P., Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Science 86:1 (2010), 214–226.
130. Tuorila, H., Lähteenmäki, L., Pohjalainen, L., Lotti, L., Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 12:1 (2001), 29–37.
131. Urala, N., Lähteenmäki, L., Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutrition & Food Science 33:4 (2003), 148–158.
132. Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., Vantomme, P., Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security (No. 171). 2013, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United nations (FAO).
133. Van Kleef, E., van Trijp, H.C.M., Luning, P., Functional foods: Health claim-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite, 44, 2005, 299e308.
134. Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R.M., Canavari, M., Ricke, S.C., Organic meat marketing. Ricke, S.C., Van Loo, E.J., Johnson, M.G., O'Bryan, C.A., (eds.) Organic meat production and processing, 2012, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 67–85.
135. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Public and consumer policies for higher welfare food products: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27:1 (2014), 153–171.
136. Vanhonacker, F., Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., European consumer perceptions and barriers for fresh, frozen, preserved and ready-meal fish products. British Food Journal 115:4 (2013), 508–525.
137. Verbeke, W., Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 147–155.
138. Verbeke, W., Roosen, J., Market differentiation potential of country-of-origin, quality and traceability labeling. Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 10:1 (2009), 20–35.
139. Verbeke, W., Vermeir, I., Brunso, K., Consumer evaluation of fish quality as basis for fish market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 18:4 (2007), 651–661.
140. Verbeke, W., Pérez-Cueto, F.J., de Barcellos, M.D., Krystallis, A., Grunert, K.G., European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science 84:2 (2010), 284–292.
141. Viscecchia, R., De Devitiis, B., Carlucci, D., Nardone, G., Santeramo, F.G., On consumers' acceptance of nanotechnologies. Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2018 (in press).
142. von Germeten, J.P., Hirsch, S., Pre-sliced or do it yourself?–Determinants of schoolchildren's acceptance of convenience fruits and vegetables. Food Quality and Preference 44 (2015), 1–11.
143. Vranken, L., Avermaete, T., Petalios, D., Mathijs, E., Curbing global meat consumption: Emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition. Environmental Science & Policy 39 (2014), 95–106.
144. Wingensiefen, S., Maschkowski, G., Höllmer, J.P., Simons, J., Hartmann, M., Schulobstprogramm in NRW: Analyse der Umsetzung, Evaluation und IdentifizierungzentralerErfolgsfaktoren. Schriftenreihe des Lehr-und Forschungsschwerpunktes “Umweltverträgliche und StandortgerechteLandwirtschaft”, 2012, ForschungsberichtNr. 171. LandwirtschaftlicheFakultät der derUniversität Bonn.
145. World Health Organization, Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a joint WH. 2003.
146. World Health Organization, WHO European Action Plan for Food and Nutrition 2007/2012. 2008.
147. Zhou, D., Yu, X., Calorie elasticities with income dynamics: Evidence from the literature. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 37:4 (2015), 575–601.