Preferences for lamb meat: A choice experiment for Spanish consumers

Meat Science

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 396-402

  Gracia, Azucena ^a   De Magistris, Tiziana ^a  

^a Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2   (Spain)

Author keywords

Lamb; Latent class; Ojinegra from Teruel; Ternasco; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

LAMB; LATENT CLASS; OJINEGRA FROM TERUEL; TERNASCO; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EXPERIMENTS;

MEATS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; DIET; DOMESTIC SHEEP; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPAIN; TASTE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; DIET; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SHEEP, DOMESTIC; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPAIN; TASTE; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84878723030     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Balcombe K., Fraser I. A general treatment of "don't know" responses from choice experiments. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2011, 38(2):171-191.
2. Barreiro-Hurlé J., Colombo S., Cantos-Villar E. Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for resveratrol-enriched quality red-wine. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(4):360-371.
3. Barreiro-Hurlé J., Gracia A., De Magistris T. Using latent classes to determine consumer heterogeneity in nutritional label valuation. Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C 2009, 5(3):178-193.
4. Bernabeu R., Tendero A. Diferencias en las preferencias de los consumidores de carne de cordero. Distribución y Consumo 2004, 73:101-107.
5. Bernabéu R., Tendero A. Preference structure for lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study. Meat Science 2005, 71:464-470.
6. Bernués A., Olaizola A., Corcoran K. Extrinsic attributes of red meat as indicators of quality in Europe: An application for market segmentation. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:265-276.
7. Bernués A., Ripoll G., Panea B. Consumer segmentation based on convenience orientation and attitudes towards quality attributes of lamb meat. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:211-220.
8. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(4):421-446.
9. Burton M., Pearse D. Consumer attitudes towards genetic modification, functional foods, and microorganisms: A choice modeling experiment for beer. AgBioforum 2002, 5(2):51-58.
10. Burton M., Rigby D., Young T., James S. Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2001, 28(4):479-498.
11. Cortiñas M., Chocarro R., Elorz M., Villanueva M.L. La importancia del atributo origen en la elección de productos agroalimentarios. El caso del espárrago de Navarra. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 2007, 7(13):57-90.
12. Font i Furnols M., Realini C., Montossi F., Sañudo C., Campo M., Oliver M.A. Consumer's purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:443-451.
13. Font i Furnols M., San Julián R., Guerrero L., Sañudo C., Campo M.M., Olleta J.L., Oliver M.A., Cañeque V., Álvarez I., Díaz M.T., Branscheid W., Wicke M., Nute G.R., Montossi F. Acceptability of lamb meat from different producing systems and ageing time to German, Spanish and British consumers. Meat Science 2006, 72(3):545-554.
14. Gao Z., Schroeder T.C. Effects of label information on consumer willingness-to-pay for food attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 91(3):795-809.
15. Greene W., Hensher D.A. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2003, 37(8):681-698.
16. Grunert K.G., Brunsø K., Bredahl L., Bech A.C. Food-related lifestyle: A segmentation approach to European food consumers. Food, people and society: A European perspective of consumers' food choices 2001, 211-230. Springer Verlag, London. L.J. Frewer, E. Risvik, H.N.J. Schifferstein, R. Von Alvensleben (Eds.).
17. Hersleth M., Hæs T., Rødbotten M., Lind V., Monteleone E. Lamb meat - Importance of origin and grazing system for Italian and Norwegian consumers. Meat Science 2012, 90(4):899-907.
18. Hu W., Batte M.T., Woods T., Ernst S. Consumer preferences for local production and other value-added label claims for a processed food product. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2012, 39(3):489-510.
19. Hu W., Hunnemeyer A., Veeman M., Adamowicz W., Srivastava L. Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2004, 31(3):389-408.
20. Hu W., Woods T., Bastin S. Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for blueberry products with nonconventional attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2009, 41(1):47-60.
21. Hynes S., Hanley N., Scarpa R. Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 90(4):1011-1027.
22. IAEST (Instituto Aragonés de Estadística) Datos básicos de Aragón 2010.
23. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística) Revisión del Padrón Municipal 2011 Available at. http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&file=pcaxis&path=%2Ft20%2Fe245%2Fp04%2F%2Fa2011.
24. Jaeger S.R., Rose J.M. Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:539-564.
25. James S., Burton M. Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2003, 47(4):501-518.
26. James J.S., Rickard B.J., Rossman W.J. Product differentiation and market segmentation in applesauce: Using a choice experiment to assess the value of organic, local and nutrition attributes. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2009, 38(3):357-370.
27. Kaye-Blake W., Bicknell K., Saunders C. Process versus product: What determines consumer demand for genetically modified apples?. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2005, 46(4):413-427.
28. Kontoleon A., Yabe M. Market segmentation analysis of preferences for GM derived animal foods in the UK. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2006, 4. (article 8).
29. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74(2):132-157.
30. Liljenstolpe C. Demand for value-added pork in Sweden: A latent class model approach. Agribusiness 2011, 27:129-146.
31. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications 2000, Cambrigde University Press, Cambridge.
32. Louviere J.J., Street D. Stated-preference methods. Handbook of transport modelling 2000, Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands. D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button (Eds.).
33. Mcfadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics: Economic theory and mathematical economics social psychology 1974, 252. Academic Press, New York.
34. Menapace L., Colson G., Grebitus C., Facendola M. Consumers' preferences for geographical origin labels: Evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2011, 38(2):193-212.
35. Nilsson T., Foster K., Lusk J.L. Marketing opportunities for certified pork chops. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 54:567-583.
36. Pouta E., Heikkilä J., Forsman-Hugg S., Isoniemi M., Mäkelä J. Consumer choice of broiler meat: The effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:539-546.
37. Rigby D., Burton M. Preference heterogeneity and GM food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 32(2):269-288.
38. Sánchez M., Sanjuán A., Akl G. Diferencias en las preferencias de los consumidores de distintos tipos de cordero y ternera con distintivos de calidad. ITEA 2001, 22(1):248-250.
39. Sánchez M., Sanjuán A., Akl G. El distintivo de calidad como indicador de seguridad alimenticia en carne de vacuno y cordero. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 2001, 1(1):77-94.
40. Scarpa R., Del Giudice T. Market segmentation via mixed logit: Extra-virgin olive oil in urban Italy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2004, 2. (article 7).
41. Scarpa R., Philippidis G., Spalatro F. Product-country image and preference heterogeneity for Mediterranean food products: A discrete choice framework. Agribusiness 2005, 21(3):329-349.
42. Street D.J., Burgess L. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
43. Street D., Burgess L., Louviere J. Quick and easy sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiment. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2005, 22:459-470.
44. Swait J. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retail and Consumer Services 1994, 1(2):77-89.
45. Tonsor G.T. Consumer inferences of food safety and quality. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2011, 38(2):213-235.
46. Verbeke W., Viaene J. Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:437-445.