Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 108, Issue , 2017, Pages 147-162

  Naujoks, Frederik ^a   Purucker, Christian ^a   Wiedemann, Katharina ^a   Neukum, Alexandra ^a   Wolter, Stefan ^b   Steiger, Reid ^b  

^a WIVW Center for Traffic Science   (Germany)

^b FORD WERKE GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Controllability; Lateral scenarios; Partial automation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROLLABILITY; STEERING; WHEELS;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVER PERFORMANCE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DRIVING SIMULATOR; INTERMEDIATE LEVEL; LATERAL SCENARIOS; PARTIAL AUTOMATION;

AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT;

ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH;

EID: 85028699543     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alm, H., Nilsson, L., The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27:5 (1995), 707–715.
2. Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F., The evolution of mental model: trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transp. Res. Part F 18 (2013), 47–57.
3. Blommer, M., Curry, R., Swaminathan, R., Tijerina, L., Talamonti, W., Kochhar, D., Driver brake vs: steer response to sudden forward collision scenario in manual and automated driving modes. Transp. Res. Part F 45 (2017), 93–101.
4. Casner, S.M., Hutchins, E.L., Norman, D., The challenges of partially automated driving. Commun. ACM 59:5 (2016), 70–77.
5. Cooper, P.J., Zheng, Y., Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. J. Safety Res. 33:3 (2002), 321–335.
6. Cooper, J.M., Vladisavljevic, I., Medeiros-Ward, N., Martin, P.T., Strayer, D.L., An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability. Hum. Factors 51:2 (2009), 261–268.
7. Damböck, D., Weissgerber, T., Kienle, M., Bengler, K., Requirements for cooperative vehicle guidance. IEEE, (eds.) 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC) (pp. 1656–1661), 2013, IEEE, The Hague, Netherlands.
8. Dogan, E., Rahal, M.-C., Deborne, R., Delhomme, P., Kemeny, A., Perrin, J., Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement. Transp. Res. Part F 46 (2017), 205–215.
9. Gasser, T., Westhoff, D., BASt-study: definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Paper Presented at the Workshop on the Future of Road Vehicle Automation, Irvine, CA, 2012.
10. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K., Take over! How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 57 (2013), 1938–1942.
11. Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K., Trust in automation–Before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 3025–3032.
12. Gold, C., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bellem, H., Jarosch, O., Testing scenarios for human factors research in level 3 automated vehicles. Stanton, N., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2017, Springer, Cham, 551–559.
13. Harbluk, J.L., Noy, Y.I., Trbovich, P.L., Eizenman, M., An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39:2 (2007), 372–379.
14. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J.F., Toenert, L., Effects of take-Over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. Paper Presented at the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, 2015.
15. Ho, C., Reed, N., Spence, C., Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Hum. Factors 49:6 (2007), 1107–1114.
16. Hoffmann, S., Buld, S., Darstellung und Evaluation eines Trainings zum Fahren in der Fahrsimulation. VDI-Berichte 1960 (2006), 113–132.
17. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M., Lai, F.C., Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transp. Res. Part C 30 (2013), 116–125.
18. König, M., Neumayr, L., Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car. Transp. Res. Part F 44 (2017), 42–52.
19. Körber, M., Schneider, W., Zimmermann, M., Vigilance, boredom proneness and detection time of a malfunction in partially automated driving. Paper Presented at the Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2015 International Conference on, 2015.
20. Kerschbaum, P., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K., Highly automated driving with a decoupled steering wheel. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58 (2014), 1686–1690.
21. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stimulus effects. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 69:7 (2007), 1117–1125.
22. Kircher, K., Larsson, A.F., Hultgren, J., Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15:1 (2014), 158–167.
23. Kramer, A.F., Cassavaugh, N., Horrey, W.J., Becic, E., Mayhugh, J.L., Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving. Hum. Factors 49:5 (2007), 935–949.
24. Larsson, A.F., Kircher, K., Andersson Hultgren, J., Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F 27B (2014), 229–237.
25. Larsson, P., Johansson, E., Söderman, M., Thompson, D., Interaction design for communicating system state and capabilities during automated highway driving. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2784–2791.
26. Larsson, A.F., Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Appl. Ergon. 43:3 (2012), 501–506.
27. Lee, J., McGehee, D., Brown, T., Marshall, D., Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transp. Res. Rec. 1980 (2006), 49–56.
28. Llaneras, R.E., Salinger, J., Green, C.A., Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. Paper Presented at the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Bolton Landing, NY, 2013.
29. Louw, T., Merat, N., Jamson, H., Engaging with highly automated driving: to be or not to be in the loop?. Paper Presented at the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Salt Lake City, UT, 2015.
30. Marberger, C., Mielenz, H., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bengler, K., Wandtner, B., Understanding and applying the concept of driver availability in automated driving. Stanton, N., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2017, Springer, Cham, 595–605.
31. May, J.F., Baldwin, C.L., Driver fatigue: the importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transp. Res. Part F 12:3 (2009), 218–224.
32. Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., Bauer, W., Take-over requests for automated driving. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2867–2873.
33. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors 54:5 (2012), 762–771.
34. Metz, B., Landau, A., Just, M., Frequency of secondary tasks in driving?Results from naturalistic driving data. Saf. Sci. 68 (2014), 195–203.
35. Miller, J., Franz, V., Ulrich, R., Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Percept. Psychophys. 61:1 (1999), 107–119.
36. Mok, B., Johns, M., Lee, K.J., Miller, D., Sirkin, D., Ive, P., et al. Emergency, automation off: unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. IEEE, (eds.) 8th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015, IEEE, The Hague, Nehtherlands, 2458–2464.
37. NHTSA, Visual-manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-vehicle Electronic Devices. 2012 (Notice in the Federal Register, 77).
38. NHTSA, Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. 2013, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
39. Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., Specificity and timing of advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. Butz, A., Koch, M., Schlichter, J., (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2014 − Workshopband, 2014, De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, 229–238.
40. Naujoks, F., Totzke, I., Behavioral adaptation caused by predictive warning systems–The case of congestion tail warnings. Transp. Res. Part F 26 (2014), 49–61.
41. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., Neukum, A., The effect of urgency of take-Over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Ahram, T., Karowski, W., Marek, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, 7, 2014, AHFE Conference, Krakau, 2099–2106.
42. Naujoks, F., Grattenthaler, H., Neukum, A., Weidl, G., Petrich, D., Effectiveness of advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 9:6 (2015), 606–617.
43. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A., Wolter, S., Steiger, R., Controllability of Partially Automated Driving functions–Does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel?. Transp. Res. Part F 35 (2015), 185–198.
44. Naujoks, F., Kiesel, A., Neukum, A., Cooperative warning systems: the impact of false and unnecessary alarms on drivers’ compliance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 162–175.
45. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A., Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation–Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transp. Res. Part F 38 (2016), 67–82.
46. Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. Stanton, N., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2017, Springer, Cham, 525–537.
47. Naujoks, F., Frühzeitige Fahrerinformationen zur Konfliktvermeidung bei urbanen Verkehrskonflikten − Gestaltung und Absicherung. 2015, University of Würzburg, Würzburg.
48. Neukum, A., Krüger, H.-P., Fahrerreaktionen bei Lenksystemstürungen–Untersuchungsmethodik und Bewertungskriterien. VDI-Berichte 1791 (2003), 297–318.
49. Neukum, A., Lübbeke, T., Krüger, H., Mayser, C., Steinle, J., ACC-Stop&Go: Fahrerverhalten an funktionalen Systemgrenzen. Maurer, M., Stiller, C., (eds.) 5. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme-FAS, 2008, fmrt, Karlsruhe, 141–150.
50. Neukum, A., Naujoks, F., Kappes, S., Wey, T., Kontrollierbarkeit unerwarteter Eingriffe eines Bremsassistenzsystems aus Perspektive des Folgeverkehrs. Färber, B., Dietmayer, K., Bengler, K., Maurer, M., Stiller, C., Winner, H., (eds.) 9. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme −FAS 2014, 2014, Uni-DAS e.V, Darmstadt, 115–126.
51. Nilsson, J., Strand, N., Falcone, P., Vinter, J., Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance. IEEE, (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W), 2013, IEEE, Budapest, 1–10.
52. Park, J., Sung, D., Lee, W.-S., A driving simulator study on adaptive cruise control failure. IEEE, (eds.) Proceedings of the International SICE-ICASE Joint Conference, 2006, IEEE, Busan, 2138–2141.
53. Parkes, A., Hooijmeijer, V., Driver situation awareness and carphone use. Proceedings of the 1 St Human-Centered Transportation Simulation Conference, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 2001.
54. Payre, W., Cestac, J., Dang, N.-T., Vienne, F., Delhomme, P., Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car. Transp. Res. Part F 46 (2016), 216–227.
55. Pfleging, B., Rang, M., Broy, N., Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia 91–99, New York: ACM, 2016.
56. Piccinini, G.F.B., Rodrigues, C.M., Leitão, M., Simões, A., Reaction to a critical situation during driving with adaptive cruise control for users and non-users of the system. Saf. Sci. 72 (2015), 116–126.
57. Purucker, C., Rüger, F., Schneider, N., Neukum, A., Färber, B., Comparing the perception of critical longitudinal distances between dynamic driving simulation, test track and vehicle in the loop. Ahram, T., Karowski, W., Marek, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, 2014, AHFE Conference, Krakow, 2089–2098.
58. Rüger, F., Purucker, C., Schneider, N., Neukum, A., Färber, B., Validierung von Engstellenszenarien und Querdynamik im dynamischen Fahrsimulator und Vehicle in the Loop. Färber, B., Dietmayer, K., Bengler, K., Maurer, M., Stiller, C., Winner, H., (eds.) 9. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme −FAS2014, 2014, Uni-DAS e.V, Darmstadt, 137–146.
59. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K., How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58 (2014), 2063–2067.
60. Rajaonah, B., Anceaux, F., Vienne, F., Trust and the use of adaptive cruise control: a study of a cut-in situation. Cognit. Technol. Work 8:2 (2006), 146–155.
61. Recarte, M.A., Nunes, L.M., Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl., 6(1), 2000, 31.
62. Saxby, D.J., Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., Hitchcock, E.M., Neubauer, C., Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl., 19(4), 2013, 287.
63. Schömig, N., Hargutt, V., Neukum, A., Petermann-Stock, I., Othersen, I., The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 6652–6659.
64. Schömig, N., Schoch, S., Neukum, N., Schumacher, M., Wandtner, B., Simulatorstudien zur Ablenkungswirkung fahrfremder Tätigkeiten (Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Reihe Mensch und Sicherheit, Heft M253). 2015, Carl Schünemann Verlag, Bremen.
65. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., Public Opinion About Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, the US, the UK, and Australia. 2014, UMTRI, Michigan.
66. Spiessl, W., Hussmann, H., Assessing error recognition in automated driving. IET Intel. Transp. Syst. 5:2 (2011), 103–111.
67. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., Walker, G.H., Turner, H., Randle, S., Automating the driver's control tasks. Int. J. Cognit. Ergon. 5:3 (2001), 221–236.
68. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I.M., Nilsson, L., Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transp. Res. Part F 27 (2014), 218–228.
69. Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., Johnston, W.A., Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl., 9(1), 2003, 23.
70. Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., Gelau, C., The influence of Cruise Control and Adaptive Cruise Control on driving behaviour–A driving simulator study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43:3 (2011), 1134–1139.
71. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M., Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 11–18, Nottingham, UK: ACM, 2015.
72. Wiedemann, K., Schömig, N., Mai, C., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., Drivers' monitoring behaviour and interaction with non-driving related tasks during driving with different automation levels. 6th AHFE Conference, Las Vegas, USA, 2015.
73. Wulf, F., Zeeb, K., Rimini-Doring, M., Arnon, M., Gauterin, F., Effects of human-machine interaction mechanisms on situation awareness in partly automated driving. Paper Presented at the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), 2013.
74. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics 50:1 (2007), 46–58.
75. Zarife, R., Integrative Warning Concept for Multiple Driver Assistance Systems. 2014, University of Würzburg, Würzburg.
76. de Winter, J., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F 27B (2014), 196–217.
77. van den Beukel, A.P., van der Voort, M.C., Eger, A.O., Supporting the changing driver's task: exploration of interface designs for supervision and intervention in automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F 43 (2016), 279–301.