Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 27, Issue PB, 2014, Pages 229-237

  Larsson, Annika F L ^a   Kircher, Katja ^b   Hultgren, Jonas Andersson ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ACC; Active steering; Adaptive cruise control; ADAS; Automation; Delegating control; Experienced users; Simulator

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); SIMULATORS;

ACC; ACTIVE STEERING; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC); ADAS; AUTOMATIC STEERING; EXPERIENCED USERS; LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCES; POTENTIAL HAZARDS;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL;

EID: 84915813258     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aust, M. L., Engström, J., & Viström, M. (2013). Effects of forward collision warning and repeated event exposure on emergency braking. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.010.
2. Broen, N. L., & Chiang, D. P. (1996). Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40(18), 900-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193129604001807.
3. Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, a. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 747-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812460246.
4. Dijksterhuis, C., Stuiver, A., Mulder, B., Brookhuis, K. A., & De Waard, D. (2012). An adaptive driver support system: User experiences and driving performance in a simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 772-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720811430502.
5. Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2000). A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 395-410. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10764102.
6. Flemisch, F. O., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J., & Heesen, M. (2008). Cooperative control and active Interfaces for vehicle assistance and automation. FISITA World automotive congress. Munich.
7. Funke, G. J. (2007). The effects of automation and workload on driver performance, subjective workload, and mood. University of Cincinnati.
8. Hoedemaeker, M. (2000). Driving behaviour with ACC and the acceptance by individual drivers. In IEEE intelligent transportation systems conference proceedings (pp. 506-509).
9. Kircher, K., Larsson, A., & Hultgren, J. A. (2014). Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(1), 158-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2013.2277725.
10. Larsson, A. F. L. (2012). Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics, 43(3), 501-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.005.
11. Martens, M. H. (2004). Stimuli fixation and manual response as a function of expectancies. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(3), 410-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.3.410.50402.
12. Merat, N., & Jamson, A. H. (2009). How do drivers behave in a highly automated car? In Proceedings of the fifth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (pp. 514-521). Big Sky, MT.
13. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(2), 59-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.001.
14. Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., Walker, G. H., Turner, H., & Randle, S. (2001). Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5 (3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503-5.
15. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, M. I., & Nilsson, L. (2011). Exploring end-user experiences: Self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems. Transport Systems, IET (pp. 134-140). Selected papers from the 2nd European Conference on Human Centered Design in ITS.
16. Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., & Gelau, C. (2011). The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour - A driving simulator study. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 43 (3), 1134-1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.023.
17. Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(3), 365-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497709.
18. Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2007). Back to the future: Brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics, 50(1), 46-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130600980789.