Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 27, Issue PB, 2014, Pages 196-217

  De Winter, Joost C F ^a   Happee, Riender ^a   Martens, Marieke H ^b,c   Stanton, Neville A ^d  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Distraction; Driving simulator; Eye movements; Human factors; Levels of automation; Meta analysis; Nasa task load index; Psychophysiology; Secondary task

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; NASA; OBJECT DETECTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ATTENTION; DISTRACTION; DRIVING SIMULATOR; LEVELS OF AUTOMATION; LOAD INDEX; META ANALYSIS; SECONDARY TASKS;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL;

EID: 84915767380     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Acura (2014). http://www.acura.ca/mdx/technology. Retrieved from http://www.acura.ca/mdx/technology.
2. Adam, E. V. (1993). Fighter cockpits of the future. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Fort Worth, TX (pp. 318-323). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dasc.1993.283529.
3. Alecandri, E., & Moyer, M. J. (1992). Human factors and the automated highway system. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 36 (pp. 1064-1067).
4. Barfield, W., & Dingus, T. A. (1998). Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
5. Barnard, Y., & Lai, F. (2010). Spotting sheep in Yorkshire: Using eye-tracking for studying situation awareness in a driving simulator. In D. de Waard, A. Axelsson, M. Berglund, B. Peters, & C. Weikert (Eds.), Human Factors: A system view of human, technology, and organisation (pp. 249-261). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
6. Beach, A. (1870). The pneumatic tunnel under Broadway. New York Scientific American, 22, 154-156.
7. Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2013). The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 47-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006.
8. Beiker, S. A. (2012). Legal aspects of autonomous driving: The need for a legal infrastructure that permits autonomous driving in public to maximize safety and consumer benefit. Santa Clara Law Review, 52, 1145-1561.
9. Bekiaris, E., Petica, S., & Brookhuis, K. (1997). Driver needs and public acceptance regarding telematic in-vehicle emergency control aids. Paper presented at Mobility for Everyone. In 4th World congress on intelligent transport systems, Berlin, Germany (Paper No. 2077).
10. Bender, E., Landau, K., & Bruder, R. (2006). Driver reactions in response to automatic obstacle avoiding manoeuvres. In Proceedings of the 16th World Congress on Ergonomics. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
11. ∗Bjørkli, C. A., Jenssen, G. D., Moen, T., & Vaa, T. (2003). Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and driver performance: Effects on objective and subjective measures. Paper presented at the 10th world congress on intelligent transportation systems, Madrid, Spain (pp. 16-20).
12. Bloomfield, J. R., Christensen, J. M., Carroll, S. A., & Watson, G. S. (1996). The driver's response to decreasing vehicle separations during transitions into the automated lane (Technical Report No. FHWA-RD-95-107). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
13. BMW (2013). BMW ConnectedDrive from A to Z [Company website]. Retrieved from http://www.bmw.com/com/en/insights/technology/connecteddrive/2013/a-to-z/index.html.
14. Bond, C. F., Wiitala, W. L., & Richard, F. D. (2003). Meta-analysis of raw mean differences. Psychological Methods, 8, 406-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.406.
15. ∗Brook-Carter, N., Parkes, A. M., Burns, P., & Kersloot, T. (2002). An investigation of the effect of an urban adaptive cruise control (ACC) system on driving performance. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Chicago, IL.
16. Brookhuis, K. A., Van Driel, C. J., Hof, T., Van Arem, B., & Hoedemaeker, M. (2009). Driving with a congestion assistant; mental workload and acceptance. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 1019-1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.010.
17. Carsten, O. (2004). Driver assistance systems: Safe or unsafe. In T. Rothengatter & R. D. Huguenin (Eds.), Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 339-345). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.
18. Carsten, O., Lai, F. C., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semiautomated driving. Does it matter what aspects are automated? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 747-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812460246.
19. Cha, D. (2003). Driver workload comparisons among road sections of automated highway systems. In Proceedings of the Society of Automotive Engineers 2003 World Congress, Detroit, MI (Technical Paper 2003-01-0119). http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0119.
20. Cho, J. H., Nam, H. K., & Lee, W. S. (2006). Driver behavior with adaptive cruise control. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 7, 603-608.
21. Collet, C., Petit, C., Champely, S., & Dittmar, A. (2003). Assessing workload through physiological measurements in bus drivers using an automated system during docking. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45, 539-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.4.539.27082.
22. Comte, S. L. (2000). New systems: New behaviour? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3, 95-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(00)00019-x.
23. Daimler (2013). DISTRONIC PLUS: Warns and assists the driver [Company website]. Retrieved from http://www.daimler.com/dccom/0-5-1210218-1-1210321-1-0-0-1210228-0-0-135-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0.html.
24. ∗Damböck, D., Weiinnodatabetagerber, T., Kienle, M., & Bengler, K. (2013). Requirements for cooperative vehicle guidance. In Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands (pp. 1656-1661). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2013.6728467.
25. Davis, J., Animashaun, A., Schoenherr, E., & McDowell, K. (2008). Evaluation of semi-autonomous convoy driving. Journal of Field Robotics, 25, 880-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rob.20263.
26. ∗De Waard, D., Van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1999). Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the Automated Highway System. Transportation Human Factors, 1, 67-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sthf0101-7.
27. Desmond, P. A. (1997). Fatigue and stress in driving performance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Dundee, UK.
28. ∗De Winter, J. C. F., Stanton, N. A., Price, J. S., & Mistry, H. (2014). The frustrated driver: An overlooked dimension of driving automation. Unpublished manuscript.
29. De Winter, J. C. F., Zadpoor, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2014). The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study. Scientometrics, 98, 1547-1565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2.
30. De Vos, A. P., Theeuwes, J., Hoekstra, W., & Coëmet, M. J. (1997). Behavioral aspects of Automated Vehicle Guidance (AVG): Relationship between headway and driver comfort. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1573, 17-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1573-03.
31. DeMers, R. E., Meisner, J. W., Frazzini, R., Funk, H. B., Plocher, T., Krueze, F., Williston, R. B. (1995). Malfunction management activity area report for AHS health management precursor system analysis (Report No. FHWA-RD-95-047). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
32. Desmond, P. A., Hancock, P. A., & Monette, J. (1998). Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance. Transportation Research Board, 1628, 8-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1628-02.
33. Dozza, M. (2012). What factors influence drivers' response time for evasive maneuvers in real traffic? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 58, 299-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.003.
34. Dragutinovic, N., Brookhuis, K. A., Hagenzieker, M. P., & Marchau, V. A. W. J. (2005). Behavioural effects of Advanced Cruise Control use - A meta-analytic approach. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 5, 267-280.
35. Eick, E. M., & Debus, G. (2005). Adaptation effects in an automated car following scenario. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application (pp. 243-255). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.
36. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 32 (pp. 97-101).
37. Fancher, P., Ervin, R., Sayer, J., Hagan, M., Bogard, S., Bareket, Z., Haugan, J. (1998). Intelligent cruise control field operational test. Final report (Report No. DOT HS 808 849). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
38. Farber, E. I. (1999). Comments on ''Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the Automated Highway System". Transportation Human Factors, 1, 83-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sthf0101-8.
39. Fenton, R. E. (1970). Automatic vehicle guidance and control-A state of the art survey. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 19, 153-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/t-vt.1970.23443.
40. Ferdinand, A. O., & Menachemi, N. (2014). Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 104, e39-e48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301750.
41. Flach, J. M. (1995). Situation awareness: Proceed with caution. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 149-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049480.
42. Fleming, B. (2012). New automotive electronics technologies. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 7, 4-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mvt.2012.2218144.
43. ∗Flemisch, F. O., Kelsch, J., Löper, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J., & Heesen, M. (2008). Cooperative control and active interfaces for vehicle assistance and automation. Paper presented at FISITA World Automotive Congress, Munich, Germany (Paper No. F2008-02-045). Retrieved from http://elib-v3.dlr.de/57618/1/FISITA2008-DLR-FlemischEtAl-CooperativeControl.pdf.
44. ∗Flemisch, F., Kaussner, A., Petermann, I., Schieben, A., & Schöming, N. (2011). HAVE-IT. Highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport. Validation of concept on optimum task repartition (Deliverable D.33.6). Regensburg, Germany: Continental Automotive GmbH.
45. Foley, J. P., Young, R., Angell, L., & Domeyer, J. E. (2013). Towards operationalizing driver distraction. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Bolton Landing, NY (pp. 57-63). Retrieved from http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2013/Papers/010-Foley-0.pdf.
46. Fotsch, P. M. (2001). The building of a superhighway: Future at the New York World's Fair. Cultural Critique, 48, 65-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cul.2001.0033.
47. ∗Freitag, K., Nilsson, J., Segelström, F., Stoltz, J., Wentzel, J., & A˚berg, K. (2004). Inverkan av Intelligent Cruise Control pa˚ trafiksäkerheten [Effects of Intelligent Cruise Control on road safety]. Retrieved from https://www.ida.liu.se/~729G55/projektrapporter/rapporter-04/grupp7.pdf.
48. Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37, 461-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003.
49. ∗Funke, G., Matthews, G., Warm, J. S., & Emo, A. K. (2007). Vehicle automation: A remedy for driver stress? Ergonomics, 50, 1302-1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130701318830.
50. Gasser, T. M., & Westhoff, D. (2012). BASt-study: Definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Presentation at the Workshop on the Future of Road Vehicle Automation, Irvine, CA. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/Automation/presentations/Gasser.pdf.
51. Geddes, N. B. (1940). Magic motorways. Random House.
52. Gehanno, J-F., Rolin, L., & Darmoni, S. (2013). Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-7.
53. Gempton, N., Skalistis, S., Furness, J., Shaikh, S., & Petrovic, D. (2013). Autonomous control in military logistics vehicles: Trust and safety analysis. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. Applications and services (pp. 253-262). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39354-9-28.
54. Glancy, D. J. (2012). Privacy in autonomous vehicles. Santa Clara Law Review, 52, 1171-1561.
55. Godthelp, J. (1984). Studies of human vehicle control (Doctoral dissertation). TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
56. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA (pp. 1938-1942). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433.
57. Gold, C., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2014). Influence of automated brake application on take-over situations in highly automated driving scenarios. Maastricht, The Netherlands: FISITA 2014 World Automotive Congress.
58. Goodall, N. J. (2014a). Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Retrieved from http://people.virginia.edu/~njg2q/ethics.pdf.
59. Goodall, N. J. (2014b). Vehicle automation and the duty to act. In 21st World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Detroit, MI.
60. Gouy, M., Diels, C., Reed, N., Stevens, A., & Burnett, G. (2013). Do drivers reduce their headway to a lead vehicle because of the presence of platoons in traffic? A conformity study conducted within a simulator. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 7, 230-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2012.0156.
61. Gouy, M., Wiedemann, K., Stevens, A., Brunett, G., & Reed, N. (2014). Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers' longitudinal control? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 264-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.003.
62. Green, P. (1999). Estimating compliance with the 15-second rule for driver-interface usability and safety. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 43 (pp. 987-991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193129904301809.
63. Gugerty, L. (2011). Situation awareness in driving. In J. Lee, M. Rizzo, D. Fischer, & J. Caird (Eds.), Handbook for driving simulation in engineering, medicine and psychology (pp. 19-265-19-272). Boca Roca, FL: CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b10836-20.
64. Hancock, P. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1992). Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS). Journal of Safety Research, 23, 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(92)90001-p.
65. Hand, D. J. (1996). Statistics and the theory of measurement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 159, 445-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2983326.
66. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland Press. Retrieved from http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX/downloads/NASA-TLXChapter.pdf.
67. Harzing, A. W. (2011). The publish or perish book: A guide to the software. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research.
68. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.486.
69. ∗Hoedemaeker, D. M. (1999). Driving with intelligent vehicles - Driving behaviour with Adaptive Cruise Control and the acceptance by individual drivers (Doctoral dissertation, TRAIL thesis series nr 99/6, Delft University Press, Delft). Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:1fb5010f-7f4f-43ad-a06f-fb97c5cb6d63/.
70. ∗Hoedemaeker, D. M., & Kopf, M. (2001). Visual sampling behaviour when driving with adaptive cruise control. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Vision in Vehicles. Brisbane, Australia (pp. 19-22).
71. Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2014). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (No. 14-4502). Retrieved from http://www.danielledai.com/academic/howard-dai-selfdrivingcars.pdf.
72. Jacoby, C. C., & Schuster, S. K. (1997). Issues of automated vehicles operating in mixed traffic. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation System 1997. Boston, MA (pp. 607-612). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itsc.1997.660543.
73. Jamson, A. H., Merat, N., Carsten, O. M., & Lai, F. C. (2013). Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 30, 116-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008.
74. Inagaki, T., & Sheridan, T. B. (2012). Authority and responsibility in human-machine systems: Probability theoretic validation of machine-initiated trading of authority. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0193-4.
75. Kassner, A., Muhrer, E., Baumann, M., Vollrath, M., Minin, L., Megard, C., Heers, R. (2011). Integrated human modelling and simulation to support human error risk analysis of partially autonomous driver assistance systems. Knowledge-base of driving without and with PADAS (Attachment to Deliverable D1.3). Retrieved from http://www.transport-research.info/Upload/Documents/201301/20130111-120721-21035-ISI-PADAS-D1.3=KnowledgeBase-Contents.pdf.
76. Kircher, K., Larsson, A., & Hultgren, J. A. (2014). Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15, 158-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tits.2013.2277725.
77. Kondo, S., Asanuma, N., Ishida, S., Ikegaya, M., & Tanaka, J. (1999). Evaluation of driver assistance system. In Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Toronto, Canada.
78. Krause, M., Yilmaz, L., & Bengler, K. (2014). Comparison of real and simulated driving for a static driving simulator. In T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, & T. Marek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014. Kraków, Poland (pp. 2868-2879).
79. Kuo, Y. L. (2006). (MSc thesis). Retrieved from: http://thesis.lib.ncu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/view-etd?URN=93323112.
80. Lank, C., Haberstroh, M., & Wille, M. (2011). Interaction of human, machine, and environment in automated driving systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2243, 138-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2243-16.
81. Larburu, M., Sanchez, J., & Rodriguez, D. J. (2010). Safe road trains for environment: Human factors' aspects in dual mode transport systems. In Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Busan, Korea.
82. Larsson, A. F. (2012). Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 501-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.005.
83. Larsson, A. F., Kircher, K., & Hultgren, J. A. (2014). Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.008.
84. Lee, J. D., McGehee, D. V., Brown, T. L., & Marshall, D. (2006). Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1980, 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1980-09.
85. Lee, W. S., Sung, D. H., Lee, J. Y., Kim. Y. S., & Cho, J. H. (2007). Driving simulation for evaluation of driver assistance systems and driving management systems. In Driving Simulation Conference. North America. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
86. Levitan, L., & Bloomfield, J. (1996). Drivers' activities and information needs in an automated highway system (Report No. FHWA-RD-96-066). Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office.
87. Levitan, L., Golembiewski, G., & Bloomfield, J. R. (1998). Human factors issues for automated highway systems. Journal of Intelligent Transportation System, 4, 21-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10248079808903735.
88. Lewis-Evans, B., De Waard, D., & Brookhuis, K. A. (2010). That's close enough-A threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1926-1933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.014.
89. Lin, T. W., Hwang, S. L., Su, J. M., & Chen, W. H. (2008). The effects of in-vehicle tasks and time-gap selection while reclaiming control from adaptive cruise control (ACC) with bus simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1164-1170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.12.009.
90. Lin, T. W., Hwang, S. L., & Green, P. A. (2009). Effects of time-gap settings of adaptive cruise control (ACC) on driving performance and subjective acceptance in a bus driving simulator. Safety Science, 47, 620-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.08.004.
91. Lincoln (2014). Lincoln MKS technology features. Retrieved from: http://www.lincoln.com/cars/mks/features/FeatureCategory4.
92. Llaneras, R. E., Salinger, J., & Green, C. A. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers' allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design. Bolton Landing, NY (pp. 92-98).
93. Ma, R., & Kaber, D. B. (2005). Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 939-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002.
94. ∗Ma, R. (2006). The effects of in-vehicle automation and reliability on driver situation awareness and trust (Doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4155/1/etd.pdf.
95. Malta, L., Aust, M. L., Faber, F., Metz, B., Saint Pierre, G., Benmimoun, M., & Schäfer, R. (2012). European large-scale field operational tests on in-vehicle systems. Final results: Impacts on traffic safety (EUROFOT Deliverable D6.4). Aachen, Germany: Ford Forschungszentrum Aachen GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/download/library/deliverables/eurofotsp620121121v11dld64-final-results-impacts-on-traffic-safety.pdf.
96. Marcus, G. (2012). (November 27). Moral machines. The New Yorker.
97. ∗Martens, M. H., Wilschut, E. S., & Pauwelussen, J. (2008). Semi-autonomous driving: Do drivers still respond to unexpected events? In Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems and ITS America's 2008 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.
98. Mayser, C., Piechulla, W., Weiss, K. E., & König, W. (2003). Driver workload monitoring. In Proceedings of the Internationale Ergonomie-Konferenz der GfA, ISOES und FEES. München, Germany (pp. 7-9).
99. McCauley, M. E., & Miller, J. C. (1997). Issues pertaining to the driver's role in automated highway systems (AHS): vigilance, supervisory control, and workload transition (Final Report under contract DTFH-94-C-00067). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
100. ∗McDowell, K., Nunez, P., Hutchins, S., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2008). Secure mobility and the autonomous driver. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 688-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tro.2008.924261.
101. Merat, N., & Jamson, A. H. (2009). How do drivers behave in a highly automated car. In Proceedings of the 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Big Sky, MT (pp. 514-521).
102. Merat, N., Jamson, H., Lai, F., & Carsten, O. (2010). Automated driving, secondary task performance and situation awareness. In D. de Waard, A. Axelsson, M. Berglund, B. Peters, & C. Weikert (Eds.), Human Factors: A system view of human, technology, and organisation (pp. 41-53). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
103. Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F. C., & Carsten, O. (2012). Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 762-771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812442087.
104. Merat, N., & Lee, J. D. (2012). Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 681-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812461374.
105. Merat, N., Jamson, A. H., Lai, F., Daly, M., & Carsten, O. M. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.006.
106. Michon, J. A. (Ed.). (1993). Generic intelligent driver support. A comprehensive report on GIDS. London: Taylor & Francis.
107. National Automated Highway System Consortium (NAHSC), (1998). C3 Interim Report: Phase 1 October 1996 to March 1998. Troy, MI, USA: National Automated Highway System Consortium.
108. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), (2012). Visual-manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Distraction-NPFG-02162012.pdf.
109. Neale, V. L., & Dingus, T. A. (1998). Commentaries in: Human Factors issues for automated highway systems (AHS). Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 4, 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10248079808903740.
110. Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., Saxby, D., & Langheim, L. (2010). Simulator methodologies for investigating fatigue and stress in the automated vehicle. Advances in Transportation Studies, 2010 Special Issue.
111. Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., Saxby, D., & Langheim, L. (2011). Individual differences and automation choice in simulated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 55 (pp. 1563-1567). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551326.
112. Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., Langheim, L., & Saxby, D. (2012). Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 734-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720811423261.
113. ∗Nilsson, L. (1995). Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. In Proceedings of Steps Forward. Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress. Yokohama, Japan (pp. 1254-1259).
114. ∗Nilsson, L., & Na˚bo, A. (1996). Evaluation of application 3: Intelligent cruise control simulator experiment. (Report No. 266). Linköping, Sweden: VTI Särtryck.
115. Nilsson, L. (2005). Automated driving does not work without the involvement of the driver. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application (pp. 293-301). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.
116. Nilsson, J., Strand, N., Falcone, P., & Vinter, J. (2013). Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: Implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop. Budapest, Hungary (pp. 1-10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dsnw.2013.6615531.
117. Nirschl, G., & Kopf, M. (1997). Untersuchung des Zusammenwirkens zwischen dem Fahrer und einem ACC-System in Grenzsituationen. VDI Berichte, 1317, 119-148.
118. Norman, D. A. (1990). The 'problem' with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 327, 585-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0101.
119. Nowakowski, C., O'Connell, J., Shladover, S. E., & Cody, D. (2010). Cooperative adaptive cruise control: Driver acceptance of following gap settings less than one second. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 54 (pp. 2033-2037). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/e578852012-003.
120. Noy, Y. I., Vredenburgh, A., Hornick, R., Savaglio, B., Mortimer, R. G., Olsen, R., Spangler, J. R. (2000). Mock trial: Human Factors contributions to litigation involving adaptive cruise control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 44 (pp. 398-398). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120004403408.
121. Oberholtzer, J., Yee, S., Green, P. A., Eoh, H., Nguyen, L., & Schweitzer, J. (2007). Frequency of distracting tasks people do while driving: An analysis of the ACAS FOT data (Technical Report No. UMTRI-2006-17). Ann Arbor, MI: Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI).
122. Omae, M., Hashimoto, N., Sugamoto, T., & Shimizu, H. (2005). Measurement of driver's reaction time to failure of steering controller during automatic driving. Review of Automotive Engineering, 26, 213-215.
123. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39, 230-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886.
124. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 140-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/155534308x284417.
125. Park, J., Sung, D., & Lee, W. S. (2006). A driving simulator study on adaptive cruise control failure. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference SICEICASE. Busan, South Korea (pp. 2138-2141). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sice.2006.315566.
126. Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., & Mergl, Ch. (2013). Wie lange braucht der Fahrer? Eine Analyse zu Übernahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt. Tagung Fahrerassistenz: Der Weg zum automatischen Fahren, November 2013, München.
127. ∗Peters, B. (2001). Adaptation evaluation: An adaptive cruise control system used by drivers with lower limb disabilities. IATSS Research, 25, 51-60.
128. Piccinini, G. B., Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., Manzini, C., Rodrigues, C. M., & Leitão, M. (2013). Drivers' hand positions on the steering wheel while using Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and driving without the system. In D. de Waard, K. Brookhuis, R. Wiczorek, F. di Nocera, R. Brouwer, P. Barham, C. Weikert, A. Kluge, W. Gerbino, & A. Toffetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2013 Annual Conference. Torino, Italy (pp. 207-216). Retrieved from http://www.hfes-europe.org/books/proceedings2013/Piccinini.pdf.
129. Pohl, J., & Ekmark, J. (2003). A lane keeping assist system for passenger cars-design aspects of the user interface. In Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Nagoya, Japan.
130. Quintana, E. (2008). The ethics and legal implications of military unmanned vehicles (Occasional paper). London, UK: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies.
131. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., & Bengler, K. (in press). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois.
132. Rajaonah, B., Tricot, N., Anceaux, F., & Millot, P. (2008). The role of intervening variables in driver-ACC cooperation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 185-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.09.002.
133. Rogers, M., Zhang, Y., Kaber, D., Liang, Y., & Gangakhedkar, S. (2011). The effects of visual and cognitive distraction on driver situation awareness. In D. Harris (Ed.), Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 186-195). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8-21.
134. ∗Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7, 59-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.001.
135. Saffarian, M., De Winter, J. C. F., & Happee, R. (2012). Automated driving: Human-factors issues and design solutions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 56 (pp. 2296-2300). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561483.
136. ∗Saffarian, M., Happee, R., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2012). Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following. Ergonomics, 55, 971-985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.691993.
137. Salinger, J. (2012). Human factors for limited-ability autonomous driving systems. Presented at the Transportation Research Board Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, Irvine, CA. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/Automation/presentations/Salinger.pdf.
138. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1991). Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0101-4.
139. ∗Saxby, D. J., Matthews, G., Warm, J. S., Hitchcock, E. M., & Neubauer, C. (2013). Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: Discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034386.
140. Sayer, J. R., Mefford, M. L., Shirkey, K., & Lantz, J. (2005). Driver distraction: A naturalistic observation of secondary behaviors with the use of driver assistance systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Rockport, Maine (pp. 262-268).
141. ∗Schermers, G., Malone, K. M., & Van Arem, B. (2004). Dutch Evaluation of Chauffeur Assistant (DECA): Traffic flow effects of implementation in the heavy goods vehicles sector. ITS World Congress, Nagoya, Aichi.
142. Schieben, A., Flemish, F., Martens, M., Wilschut, E., Rambaldini, A., Tofetti, A., Turi, G., Arduino, C., Merat, N., & Jamson, H. (2008). Test results of HMI in use on cars and with simulators (CityMobil Deliverable 3.2.2), EU DG Research.
143. Schieben, A., Temme, G., Köster, F., & Flemisch, F. (2011). How to interact with a highly automated vehicle-generic interaction design schemes and test results of a usability assessment. In D. de Waard, N. Gérard, L. Onnasch, R. Wiczorek, & D. Manzey (Eds.), Human Centred Automation (pp. 251-266). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
144. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.515.
145. Seiniger, P., Westhoff, D., Fahrenkrog, F., & Zlocki, A. (2011). Interactive. Accident avoidance by active intervention for intelligent vehciles. Legal aspects (Deliverable D7.3). Aachen, Germany: Ford Research & Advanced Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.transport-research.info/Upload/Documents/201210/20121024-135222-97170-interactIVe-SP7-20110802v12-DL-D7.3-Legal-Aspects.pdf.
146. Seppelt, B. D., & Lee, J. D. (2007). Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 192-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.10.001.
147. Shariff, S. Z., Bejaimal, S. A., Sontrop, J. M., Iansavichus, A. V., Haynes, R. B., Weir, M. A., et al. (2013). Retrieving clinical evidence: A comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2624.
148. Sheridan, T. B. (1970). Big brother as driver: New demands and problems for the man at the wheel. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 12, 95-101.
149. Sheridan, T. B. (2004). Humans and automation: System design and research issues. Santa Monica: Wiley.
150. Shladover, S. E. (1995). Review of the state of development of advanced vehicle control systems (AVCS). Vehicle System Dynamics, 24, 551-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00423119508969108.
151. Shladover, S. E. (1998). Why we should develop a truly automated highway system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1651, 66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1651-10.
152. Siebert, F. W., Oehl, M., & Pfister, H. R. (2014). The influence of time headway on subjective driver states in adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25, 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.005.
153. Skottke, E. M., Debus, G., Wang, L., & Huestegge, L. (in press). Carryover effects of highly automated convoy driving on subsequent manual driving performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720814524594.
154. Smith, B. W. (2013). SAE levels of driving automation. Retrieved from http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/loda.
155. Spiessl, W., & Mangold, M. (2010). ALCT-a methodical approach toward evaluating the influence of secondary tasks during automated driving. In Proceedings of the European Conference. Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport Systems. Berlin, Germany (pp. 379-388).
156. ∗Stanton, N. A., Young, M., & McCaulder, B. (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science, 27, 149-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00054-4.
157. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2000). A proposed psychological model of driving automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1, 315-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220052399131.
158. ∗Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., Walker, G. H., Turner, H., & Randle, S. (2001). Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327566ijce0503-5.
159. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48, 1294-1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130500252990.
160. Stanton, N. A., Dunoyer, A., & Leatherland, A. (2011). Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 592-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.016.
161. Sterling, B. S., Perala, C. H., & Blaske, S. F. (2007). Workload and stress of crews operating future manned vehicles (No. ARL-TR-4023). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research & Engineering Directorate.
162. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I. C., & Nilsson, L. (2014). Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 218-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.005.
163. Szalma, J. L., Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., Dember, W. N., Weiler, E. M., Meier, A., et al. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46, 219-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.2.219.37334.
164. Takada, Y., & Shimoyama, O. (2001). Evaluation of driving-assistance systems based on drivers' workload. In: McGehee, D.V., Lee, J.D., Rizzo, M., Holeton, K., & Lopes, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment Training and Vehicle Design. Aspen, CO (pp. 208-213). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
165. Takano, W., & Kobayashi, T. (2004). A study of evaluation for driver's mental workload while driving heavy duty vehicle with ACC including EBS brake control. In Proceedings of the JSAE Annual Congress (No. 5-04).
166. ∗Tango, F., Minin, L., Aras, R., & Pietquin, O. (2011). Automation effects on driver's behaviour when integrating a PADAS and a distraction classifier. In V. G. Duffy (Ed.), Digital human modeling (pp. 503-512). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21799-9-56.
167. Thompson, L. K., & Tönnis, M. (2007). Facing diversity when designing and evaluating driver support systems. In R. N. Pikaar, E. A. P. Koningsveld, & P. J. M. Settels (Eds.), Meeting diversity in ergonomics (pp. 289-308). Elsevier Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-008045373-6/50018-0.
168. Thorpe, C., Jochem, T., & Pomerleau, D. (1997). The 1997 automated highway free agent demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation System. Boston, MA (pp. 496-501). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itsc.1997.660524.
169. ∗Törnros, J., Nilsson, L., Ostlund, J., & Kircher, A. (2002). Effects of ACC on driver behaviour, workload and acceptance in relation to minimum time headway. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Washington, DC.
170. Toyota (2013). 2013 Lexus LS Advanced Active Safety Features/2013 Consumer Electronics Show. Retrieved from http://www.toyota.com/esq/pdf/The%202013%20LS%20Advanced%20Active%20Safety%20(2).pdf.
171. Underwood, S. E. (1992). Delphi forecast and analysis of intelligent vehicle-highway systems through 1991: Delphi II (IVHS Technical Report 92-17). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
172. United Nations (1968). Convention on road traffic. Done at Vienna on 8 November 1968. Amendment 1. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/crt1968e.pdf.
173. ∗Uyttendaele, A. J., & Terken, J. M. B. (2014). Mental workload of ITS systems for car following on driver mental workload. Unpublished manuscript.
174. Van den Beukel, A. P., & Van der Voort, M. C. (2013). The influence of time-criticality on situation awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving. In 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation System, 2013. The Hague, The Netherlands (pp. 2000-2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2013.6728523.
175. ∗Van der Hulst, M., Rothengatter, J. A., & Heino, A. (1996). Effectiveness of distance-keeping support systems. In Handbook International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology (pp. 179-184). Valencia: INTRAS.
176. Van Driel, C. J. G., & Van Arem, B. (2006). Impacts of a congestion assistant on driving behaviour, workload and acceptance: Results from a driving simulator study. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, Centre for Transport Studies.
177. Verne, J. (1996). Paris in the twentieth century. Del Rey/Ballantine Books.
178. Verplank, W. L. (1977). Is there an optimal work-load in manual control? (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.
179. Victor, T. W., Harbluk, J. L., & Engström, J. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, 167-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.014.
180. ∗Vollrath, M., Briest, S., & Oeltze, K. (2010). Auswirkungen des Fahrens mit Tempomat und ACC auf das Fahrerverhalten (Fahrzeugtechnik Heft F 74). Braunschweig: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR).
181. Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., & Gelau, C. (2011). The influence of Cruise Control and Adaptive Cruise Control on driving behaviour - A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1134-1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.023.
182. Volvo (2004). Final report: Phase II driver survey report: Volvo intelligent vehicle initiative field operational test. U.S. Department of Transportation Washington DC. Retrieved from http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts-te/14122-files/14122.pdf.
183. Volvo (2013) (July 5). Volvo Car Group reveals world-class safety and support features that will be introduced in the all-new XC90 in 2014 [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/49875/volvo-cars-reveals-world-class-safety-and-support-features-to-be-introduced-in-the-all-new-xc90-in-2.
184. Ward, N. J., Fairclough, S., & Humphreys, M. (1995). The effect of task automatisation in the automotive context: A field study of an Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Experimental analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness. Daytona Beach, FL.
185. Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 433-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872008x312152.
186. Watanabe, T., Kishimoto, N., Hayafune, K., Yamada, K., & Maede, N. (1995). Development of an intelligent cruise control system. Presented at Steps Forward. Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress. Yokohama, Japan (pp. 1229-1235).
187. Wille, M., Röwenstrunk, M., & Debus, G. (2007). Konvoi: Electronically coupled truck-convoy. In D. de Waard, F. O. Flemisch, B. Lorenz, H. Oberheid, & K. A. Brookhuis (Eds.), Human Factors for assistance and automation (pp. 243). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.
188. Young, K. L., Salmon, P. M., & Cornelissen, M. (2012). Missing links? The effects of distraction on driver situation awareness. Safety Science, 56, 36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.004.
189. ∗Young, M. S. (2000). Attention, automaticity, and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southampton, UK.
190. Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2002). Malleable attentional resources theory: A new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 365-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497709.
191. ∗Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2004). Taking the load off: Investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics, 47, 1014-1035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001686348.
192. ∗Young, M. S., & Stanton, N. A. (2007). What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload. Ergonomics, 50, 1324-1339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130701318855.