Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 27, Issue PB, 2014, Pages 218-228

  Strand, Niklas ^a,b   Nilsson, Josef ^a,c   Karlsson, I C MariAnne ^a,d   Nilsson, Lena ^a,b  

^a SAFER Vehicle and Traffic Safety Centre at Chalmers   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c SP TECHNICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

^d CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ACC; Automated driving; Automation failures; Driving performance; HMI; Out of the loop performance; Vehicle automation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; VEHICLE PERFORMANCE;

ACC; AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATION FAILURES; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; HMI; LOOP PERFORMANCE; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 84915811197     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779.
2. Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 747-761.
3. Carsten, O., & Nilsson, L. (2001). Safety assessment of driver assistance systems. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(3), 225-243.
4. De Waard, D., Van Der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., & Brookhuis, K. A. (1999). Driver behaviour in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transportation Human Factors, 1(1), 67-82.
5. Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the human factors society (pp. 97-101). Santa Monica, CA, US: Human Factors Society.
6. Endsley, M. R. (1999). Situation awareness and human error: Designing to support human performance. In Proceedings of the high consequence systems surety conference, Albuquerque, NM, US.
7. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37, 381-394.
8. Fischer, M., Sehammar, H., Ljung Aust, M., Nilsson, M., Lazic, N., & Weiefors, H. (2011). Advanced driving simulators as a tool in early development phases of new active safety functions. Advances in Transportation Studies an International Journal RSS2011, 171-182 [Special issue].
9. Flemisch, F., Schieben, A., Schoemig, N., Strauss, M., Lueke, S., & Heyden, A. (2011). Design of human computer interfaces for highly automated vehicles in the EU-project HAVEit. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. Context diversity (pp. 270-279). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
10. Goodrich, M. A., & Boer, E. R. (2000). Designing human-centered automation: Tradeoffs in collision avoidance system design. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1(1), 40-54.
11. IBM Corp. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics (Version 21.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
12. Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(2), 113-153.
13. Larsson, A. F. L. (2012). Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics, 43(3), 501-506.
14. Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38(2), 311-322.
15. Nilsson, J., Strand, N., Falcone, P., & Vinter, J. (2013). Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: Implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/IFIP 43rd international conference on dependable systems and networks workshops (DSN-W9).
16. Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(3), 381-410.
17. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced ''complacency''. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
18. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
19. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
20. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Parker, H. A. (2004). Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): Implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(2), 59-76.
21. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
22. Sheridan, T. B. (2002). Humans and automation: System design and research issues. Santa Monica, CA: Wiley.
23. Stanton, N. A., Chambers, P. R. G., & Piggott, J. (2001). Situational awareness and safety. Safety Science, 39(3), 189-204.
24. Stanton, N. A., & Young, M. S. (2005). Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, 48(10), 1294-1313.
25. Stanton, N. A., Young, M., & McCaulder, B. (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science, 27(2/3), 149-159.
26. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I.C.M., & Nilsson, L. (2011). Exploring end-user experiences: Self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems. In J. F. Krems (Ed.), Selected papers from the 2nd European conference on human centred design in ITS [special issue]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 5(2), 134-140.
27. Vogel, K. (2003). A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(3), 427-433.
28. Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., & Gelau, C. (2011). The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour - A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1134-1139.
29. VTI's driving simulators (n.d.). http://www.vti.se/en/research-areas/vehicle-technology/vtis-driving-simulators/ [13.09.13].
30. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.