Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 46, Issue , 2017, Pages 205-215

  Dogan, Ebru ^a   Rahal, Mohamed Cherif ^a   Deborne, Renaud ^b   Delhomme, Patricia ^c   Kemeny, Andras ^b   Perrin, Jérôme ^b  

^a VEDECOM   (France)

^b RENAULT   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Driver behavior; Takeover; Transition of control; Vehicle automation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; VEHICLES;

ANTICIPATION; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; TAKEOVER; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS; VEHICLE LATERAL CONTROL;

STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 85014449926     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bainbridge, L., Ironies of automation. Automatica 19 (1983), 775–779.
2. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: Hands and feet free but not ‘mind’ free driving. Ergonomics 62 (2014), 505–514.
3. Barnard, Y., Lai, F., Spotting sheep in Yorkshire: Using eye-tracking for studying situation awareness in a driving simulator. de Waard, D., Axelsson, A., Berglund, M., Peters, B., Weikert, C., (eds.) Human factors: A system view of human, technology, and organisation, 2010, Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 249–261.
4. Carsten, O., Lai, F.C., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Control task substitution in semi-automated driving. Does it matter what aspects are automated?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 747–761.
5. Damböck, D., Farid, M., Tönert, L., & Bengler K. (2012). Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Autofahren. 5. Tagung Fahrerassistenz 2012, München. Germany. Retrieved from: < https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1142102/1142102.pdf>.
6. De Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27:Part B (2014), 196–217.
7. Deborne, R., Khouri-Silva, S., & Kemeny, A. (2014). Steering wheel torque rendering: Measure of driver discrimination capabilities. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0447, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0447.
8. Dogan, E., Deborne, R., Delhomme, P., Kemeny, A., & Jonville, P. (2014). Evaluating the shift of control between driver and vehicle at high automation at low speed: The role of anticipation. In Proceedings of the 5th Transport Research Arena, Paris.
9. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37 (1995), 32–64.
10. Endsley, M., Kaber, D., Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics 42 (1999), 462–492.
11. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O., The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37 (1995), 381–394.
12. European Commission Study Report (2010). SMART 2010/0064: Definition of necessary vehicle and infrastructure systems for Automated Driving, 1-111. Version 1.2.
13. Flemisch, F., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R., Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-mode and conduct-by-wire. Ergonomics 3 (2014), 343–360.
14. Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., Beller, J., Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: Authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. International Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work 14 (2012), 3–18.
15. Gasser, T. M. & Westhoff, D. (2012). BASt-study: Definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Retrieved from: < http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/Automation/presentations/Gasser.pdf>.
16. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). ‘‘Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 57th annual meeting. San Diego, CA (pp. 1938–1942).
17. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M., Lai, F.C., Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 30 (2013), 116–125.
18. Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R., The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (2004), 113–153.
19. Kemeny, A., Panerai, F., Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003), 31–37.
20. Llaneras, R. E., Salinger, J., & Green, C. A. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In Proceedings of the 7th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design. Bolton Landing, NY (pp. 92–98).
21. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 762–771.
22. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M., Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 26 (2014), 1–9.
23. Michon, J.A., A critical review of driver behavior models: What do we know, what should we do?. Evans, L.A., Sching, R.C., (eds.) Human behaviour and traffic safety, 1985, Plenum Press, New York, 487–525.
24. Moray, N., Monitoring, complacency, scepticism and eutectic behaviour. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 31 (2003), 175–178.
25. Mulder, M., Abbink, D.A., Boer, E.R., Sharing control with haptics: Seamless driver support from manual to automatic control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 786–798.
26. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicle. Retrieved from: http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/U.S.+Department+of+Transportation+Releases+Policy+on+Automated+Vehicle+Development, 2013.
27. Parasuraman, R., Menzey, D.H., Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52 (2010), 381–410.
28. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans 30 (2000), 286–297.
29. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorentz, L., Farid, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 58th annual meeting. Chicago, Illinois.
30. Ruscio, D., Ciceri, M.R., Biassoni, F., How does a collision warning system shape a drivers brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking. Accident Analysis and Prevention 77 (2015), 72–81.
31. Schömig, N., Metz, B., Krüger, H.P., Anticipatory and control processes in the interaction with secondary tasks while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 14 (2011), 525–538.
32. Society of Automotive Engineers (2016). J3016: (R) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (pp. 1–30).
33. Zeeb, K., Buschner, A., Schrauf, M., What determines the take-over time: An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 78 (2015), 212–221.