Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 30, Issue , 2013, Pages 116-125

  Jamson, A Hamish ^a   Merat, Natasha ^a   Carsten, Oliver M J ^a   Lai, Frank C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive behaviour; Driver behaviour; Driving simulator; Vehicle automation; Vehicle control

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURE; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; ENTERTAINMENT; FEEDBACK; MANUAL CONTROL; VEHICLES;

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOUR; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; DRIVING SIMULATOR; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS; VEHICLE CONTROL;

STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AUTOMATION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

EID: 84875762913     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Atchley P., Chan M. Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation. Human Factors 2011, 53(1):3-12.
2. Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation. Automatica 1983, 19(6):775-779.
3. Boer, E.R., Hoedemaeker, M., 1998. Modelling driver behavior with different degrees of automation: a hierarchical decision framework of interacting mental models. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Valenciennes, France, 14-16th December 1998.
4. Carbaugh J., Godbole D.N., Sengupta R. Safety and capacity analysis of automated and manual highway systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 1998, 6(1):69-99.
5. Department for Transport, 2003. Traffic Signs Manual 2003, Road Markings. Published for the Department for Transport under Licence from the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office (Chapter 5).
6. Desmond P.A., Hancock P.A., Monette J.L. Fatigue and automation-induced impairments in simulated driving performance. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1628:8-14.
7. Dinges, D.F., Grace, R., 1998. PERCLOS: A Valid Psychophysiological Measure of Alertness as Assessed by Psychomotor Vigilance. http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/pdfs/tb98-006.pdf.
8. Endsley M.R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 1995, 37(1):32-64.
9. Goodrich M.A., Boer E.R. Model-based human-centered task automation: a case study in ACC system design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 2003, 33(3):325-336.
10. Hancock P.A., Parasurmaran R. Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle highway systems. Journal of Safety Research 1992, 23(4):181-198.
11. Hancock P.A., Verwey W.B. Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1997, 29(4):495-506.
12. Ioannou, P., Xu, Z., Eckert, S., Clemons, D., Sieja, T., 1993. Intelligent cruise control: theory and experiment. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Antonio, Texas, December 1993, pp. 1885-1890.
13. Lal S., Craig A. A critical review of psychophysiology of driver fatigue. Biological Psychology 2001, 55:173-194.
14. Ma R., Kaber D.B. Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2005, 35(10):939-953.
15. Matthews M.L., Bryant D.J., Webb R.D., Harbluk J.L. Model for situation awareness and driving. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1779:26-32.
16. Michon J.A. A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do?. Human Behavior and Traffic Safety 1985, 485-520. Plenum Press, New York. L. Evans, R.C. Schwing (Eds.).
17. Minderhoud M.M., Bovy P.H.L. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2001, 33(1):89-97.
18. Miura T. Coping with situational demands: a study of eye movements and peripheral vision performance. Vision in Vehicles-II 1986, Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.G. Gale, I.D. Brown, C.M. Haselgrave, P. Smith, S.H. Taylor (Eds.).
19. Nilsson, L., 1995. Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. In: Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 3, Yokohama, pp. 1254-1259.
20. Nagel K., Schreckenberg M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de Physique I France 1992, 2(12):2221-2229.
21. Norman D.A. The problem of automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not over-automation. Human Factors in Hazardous Situations 1990, Clarendon Press, Oxford. D.E. Broadbent, A.D. Baddeley, J.T. Reason (Eds.).
22. Parasuraman R., Riley V. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 1997, 39(2):230-253.
23. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., 2000. A model of types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30(3), 286-297.
24. Rudin-Brown C.M., Parker H.A. Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control: implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2004, 7(2):59-76.
25. Saxby, D.J., Matthews, G., Hitchcock, E.M., Warm, J.S., Funke, G.J., Gantzer, T., 2008. Effects of active and passive fatigue on performance using a driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 1237-1241.
26. Seppelt B.D., Lee J.D. Making adaptive cruise control limits visible. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 2007, 65(3):192-205.
27. Sharp R.S., Casanova D., Symonds P. A mathematical model for driver steering control with design, tuning and performance results. Vehicle System Dynamics 2000, 33(5):289-326.
28. Stanton N.A., Marsden P. From Fly-By-Wire to Drive-By-Wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science 1996, 24(1):35-49.
29. Stanton N.A., Young M.S., McCaulder B. Drive-By-Wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science 1997, 27(2/3):149-159.
30. Stanton N.A., Young M.S., Walker G.H., Turner H., Randle S. Automating the driver's control tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 2001, 5(3):221-236.
31. Stanton N.A., Young M.S. Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 2005, 48(10):1294-1313.
32. Toffetti A., Wilschut E.S., Martens M.H., Schieben A., Rambaldini A., Merat N., Flemisch F. Citymobil: human factor issues regarding highly automated vehicles on eLane. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2110:1-8.
33. Victor T.W., Harbluk J.L., Engström J. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2005, 8(2):167-190.
34. Verwey W.B. On-line driver workload estimation: effects of road situation and age on secondary task measures. Ergonomics 2000, 43(2):187-209.
35. Ward N.J. Automation of task processed: an example of intelligent transportation systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 2000, 10(4):395-408.
36. Wierwille, W.W., Ellsworth, L.A., Wreggit, S.S., Fairbanks, R.J., Kirn, C.L., 1994. Research on Vehicle-based Driver Status/Performance Monitoring: Development, Validation and Refinement of Algorithms for Detection of Driver Drowsiness. Final Report (DOT HS 808 247). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
37. Wright, S., Ward, N., Cohn, A., 2002. Enhanced presence in driving simulators using autonomous traffic with virtual personalities. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11(6), 578-590.
38. Young M.S., Stanton N.A. Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 2004, 47(9):1014-1035.
39. Young M.S., Stanton N.A. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics 2007, 50(1):46-58.