Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stimulus effects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1117-1125

  Kiesel, Andrea ^a   Miller, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148987238     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193949     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & BALOTA, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science, 2, 153-157.
2. BALOTA, D. A., & ABRAMS, R. A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1289-1302.
3. BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1970). Can we see and hear at the same time? Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation and reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 33, 21-35.
4. BERNSTEIN, I. H., ROSE, R., & ASHE, V. (1970). Preparatory state effect in intersensory facilitation. Psychonomic Science, 19, 113-114.
5. BERTELSON, P., & TISSEYRE, F. (1969). The time course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals. Acta Psychologica, 30, 145-154.
6. CORBALLIS, M. C. (2002). Hemispheric interactions in simple reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 40, 423-434.
7. DIEDERICH, A., & COLONIUS, H. (2004). Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: Effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1388-1404.
8. DOYLE, M. C., & SNOWDEN, R. J. (2001). Identification of visual stimuli is improved by accompanying auditory stimuli: The role of eye movements and sound location. Perception, 30, 795-810.
9. DUFFT, C., & ULRICH, R. (1999). Intersensorische Erleichterung: Auch visuelle Begleitreize können die Reaktionszeit verkürzen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 46, 16-27.
10. FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, D., & POSNER, M. I. (1997). Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting. Neuropsychologia, 35, 477-486.
11. GIRAY, M., & ULRICH, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1278-1291.
12. GONDAN, M., NIEDERHAUS, B., RÖSLER, F., & RÖDER, B. (2005). Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 713-726.
13. HACKLEY, S. A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction time task. Nature, 391, 786-788.
14. HACKLEY, S. A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321-329.
15. HACKLEY, S. A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27-45.
16. HERSHENSON, M. (1962). Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 289-293.
17. KEUSS, P. J., VAN DER ZEE, F., & VAN DEN BREE, M. B. (1990). Auditory accessory effects on visual processing. Acta Psychologica, 75, 41-54.
18. KIESEL, A., MILLER, J., & ULRICH, R. (2007). Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 539-551.
19. MATTES, S., ULRICH, R., & MILLER, J. (1997). Effects of response probability on response force in simple RT. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 405-420.
20. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
21. MILLER, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 331-343.
22. MILLER, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 160-169.
23. MILLER, J., FRANZ, V., & ULRICH, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 107-119.
24. MILLER, J., & VAN NES, F. (2007). Effects of response task and accessory stimuli on redundancy gain: Tests of the hemispheric coactivation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 829-344.
25. MORDKOFF, J. T., & MILLER, J. (1993). Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 527-535.
26. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
27. NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1971). Non-aging foreperiods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 35, 316-327.
28. NAKANO, Y. (1997). Intersensory facilitation in a go/no-go and a choice reaction time task. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 56, 14-21.
29. NAKANO, Y. (2002). Transient and sustained effects of an auditory accessory stimulus in a visual go/no go task. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 95, 599-605.
30. NICKERSON, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparatory enhancement. Psychological Review, 80, 489-509.
31. NIEMI, P., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
32. POSNER, M. I., NISSEN, M. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
33. SANDERS, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction process. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. SCHMIDT, R. A., GIELEN, S. C., & VAN DEN HEUVEL, P. J. (1984). The locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 57, 145-164.
35. SCHRÖGER, E., & WIDMANN, A. (1998). Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiological Research, 35, 755-759.
36. SHAMS, L., KAMITANI, Y., & SHIMOJO, S. (2000). What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788.
37. STAHL, J., & RAMMSAYER, T. H. (2005). Accessory stimulation in the time course of visuomotor information processing: Stimulus intensity effects on reaction time and response force. Acta Psychologica, 120, 1-18.
38. STEIN, B. E., LONDON, N., WILKINSON, L. K., & PRICE, D. D. (1996). Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 497-506.
39. TODD, J. W. (1912). Reaction time to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology, 1-65.
40. ULRICH, R., & MATTES, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 972-990.
41. ULRICH, R., MATTES, S., & MILLER, J. (1999). Donder's assumption of pure insertion: An evaluation on the basis of response dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 102, 43-75.
42. ULRICH, R., MILLER, J., & SCHRÖTER, H. (2007). Testing the race model inequality: An algorithm and computer programs. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 291-302.
43. ULRICH, R., RINKENAUER, G., & MILLER, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 915-928.
44. ZEIGLER, B. L., GRAHAM, F. K., & HACKLEY, S. A. (2001). Cross-modal warning effects on reflexive and voluntary reactions. Psychophysiology, 38, 903-911.