The role of information on consumer sensory, hedonic and wellbeing perception of sugar-reduced products: Case study with orange/pomegranate juice

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 62, Issue , 2017, Pages 227-236

  Reis, Felipe ^a   Alcaire, Florencia ^c   Deliza, Rosires ^b   Ares, Gastón ^c  

^a FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA AGROINDÚSTRIA DE ALIMENTOS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Consumer perception; Monk fruit extract; Stevia; Sucralose

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021234115     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. AIJN, Liquid fruit, market report. 2014, European Fruit Association http://aijn.org/files/default/aijn2014-full.pdf.
2. Ampuero, O., Vila, N., Consumer perception of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing 23 (2006), 100–112.
3. Andersen, B.V., Hyldig, G., Consumers’ view on determinants to food satisfaction. A qualitative approach. Appetite 95 (2015), 9–16.
4. Ares, G., de Saldamando, L., Giménez, A., Claret, A., Cunha, L.M., Guerrero, L., et al. Consumers’ associations with wellbeing in a food-related context: A cross-cultural study. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 304–315.
5. Ares, G., Deliza, R., Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectation of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 930–937.
6. Ares, G., Giménez, A., Vidal, L., Zhou, Y., Krystallis, A., Tsalis, G., et al. Do we all perceive food-related wellbeing in the same way? Results from an exploratory cross-cultural study. Food Quality and Preference 52 (2016), 62–73.
7. Ares, G., Reis, F., Oliveira, D., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., et al. Recommendations for use of balanced presentation order of terms in CATA questions. Food Quality and Preference 46 (2015), 137–141.
8. Bialkova, S., Sasse, L., Fenko, A., The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice. Appetite 96 (2016), 38–46.
9. Brazilian Association of Citrus Exporters, Statistics of consumption. Available at: http://www.citrusbr.com/en/statistics/?ins=01, 2017 Last accessed February 19th, 2017.
10. Cadoret, M., Husson, F., Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 106–115.
11. Cardinal, P., Zamora, M.C., Chambers, E., Carbonell Barrachina, Á., Hough, G., Convenience sampling for acceptability and CATA measurements may provide inaccurate results: A case study with fruit-flavored powdered beverages tested in Argentina, Spain and U.S.A. Journal of Sensory Studies 30 (2015), 295–304.
12. Cardoso, J.M.P., Bolini, H.M.A., Descriptive profile of peach nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 23 (2008), 804–816.
13. Carocho, M., Barreiro, M.F., Morales, P., Ferreira, I.C.F.R., Adding molecules to Food, pros and cons: a review of synthetic and natural food additives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 13 (2014), 377–399.
14. Carocho, M., Morales, P., Ferreria, I.C.F.R., Natural food additives: Quo vadis?. Trends in Food Science and Technology 45 (2015), 284–295.
15. Carrillo, E., Varela, P., Fiszman, S., Effects of food package information and sensory characteristics on the perception of healthiness and the acceptability of enriched biscuits. Food Research International 48 (2012), 209–216.
16. Core Team, R., R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
17. Deliza, R., MacFie, H.J.H., The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11 (1996), 103–128.
18. Deliza, R., Macfie, H., Hedderley, D., Use of computer-generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations. Journal of Sensory Studies 18 (2003), 465–486.
19. DuBois, G.E., Prakash, I., Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 3 (2012), 353–380.
20. Dutra, M.B.L., Bolini, H.M.A., Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners. Food Science and Technology 33 (2013), 612–618.
21. Fenko, A., Kersten, L., Bialkova, S., Overcoming consumer scepticism toward food labels: The role of multisensory perception. Food Quality and Preference 48 (2016), 81–92.
22. Ferrari, G., Maresca, P., Ciccarone, R., The application of high hydrostatic pressure for the stabilization of functional foods: Pomegranate juice. Journal of Food Engineering 100 (2010), 245–253.
23. Food Standards Agency, Front-of-pack traffic light signpost labelling. Technical guidance. Issue 2. 2007, Food Standards Agency, London.
24. Gibson, E.L., Brunstrom, J.M., Learned influences on appetite, food choice, and intake: Evidence in human beings. Kirkham, T.C., Cooper, S.J., (eds.) Appetite and body weight, 2007, Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 271–300.
25. Hawley, K.L., Roberto, C.A., Bragg, M.A., Liu, P.J., Schwartz, M.B., Brownell, K.D., The science on front-of-package food label. Public Health Nutrition 16 (2012), 430–439.
26. Hein, K.A., Hamid, N., Jaeger, S.R., Delahunty, C.M., Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings. Food Quality and Preference, 2010, 410–416.
27. Hesketh, K., Waters, E., Green, J., Salmon, L., Williams, J., Healthy eating, activity and obesity prevention: A qualitative study of parent and child perceptions in Australia. Health Promotion International 20 (2005), 19–26.
28. Hodgkins, C., Barnett, J., Wasowicz-Kirylo, G., Stysko-Kunkowska, M., Gulcan, Y., Kustepeli, Y., et al. Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: A consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Appetite 59 (2012), 806–817.
29. Johnson, R.K., Appel, L.J., Brands, M., Howard, B.V., Lefevre, M., Lustig, R.H., et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 120, 2009 1011–20.
30. Kearns, C.E., Schmidt, L.A., Glantz, S.A., Sugar industry and coronary heart disease research. A historical analysis of internal industry documents. 2016, JAMA Internal Medicine 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5394.
31. King, S.C., Meiselman, H.L., Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 168–177.
32. King, S.C., Snow, J., Meiselman, H.L., Sainsbury, J., Carr, B.T., McCafferty, D., et al. Development of a questionnaire to measure consumer wellness associated with foods: The WellSense Profile™. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 82–94.
33. Koppel, K., Chambers, E. IV, Development and application of a lexicon to describe the flavor of pomegranate juice. Journal of Sensory Studies 25 (2010), 819–837.
34. Köster, E.P., Diversity in the determinants of food choice. A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 20:2 (2009), 70–82.
35. Lähteenmäki, L., Claiming health in food products. Food Quality and Preference 27 (2013), 196–201.
36. Lähteenmäki, L., Lampila, P., Grunert, K., Boztug, Y., Ueland, Ø., Åström, A., et al. Impact of health-related claims on the perception of other product attributes. Food Policy 35 (2010), 230–239.
37. Lê, S., Josse, J., Husson, F., FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25 (2008), 1–18.
38. Levis, P., Chambers, E. IV, Influence of healthy concepts and product acceptance: A study with plain potato chips. Journal of Food Products Marketing 3:4 (1996), 45–63.
39. Li, X.E., Lopetcharat, K., Drake, M.A., Parents’ and children's acceptance of skim chocolate milks sweetened by monk fruit and stevia leaf extracts. Journal of Food Science 80 (2015), 1083–1092.
40. Liem, D.G., Aydin, N.T., Zandstra, E.H., Effects of health labels on expected and actual taste perception of soup. Food Quality and Preference 25 (2012), 192–197.
41. Luckow, T., Delahunty, C., Which juice is healthier? A consumer study of probiotic non-dairy juice drinks. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004), 751–759.
42. Ma, Y., He, F.J., Yin, Y., Hashem, K.M., McGregor, G.A., Gradual reduction of sugar in soft drinks without substitution as a strategy to reduce overweight, obesity, and type 2 diabetes: A modelling study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 4 (2016), 105–114.
43. MacGregor, G.A., Hashem, K.M., Action on sugar—lessons from UK salt reduction programme. The Lancet 383 (2014), 929–931.
44. Markey, O., Lovegrove, J.A., Methven, L., Sensory profiles and consumer acceptability of a range of sugar-reduced products on the UK market. Food Research International 72 (2015), 133–139.
45. McMahon, A.T., O'Shea, J., Tapsell, L., Williams, P., What do the terms wellness and wellbeing mean in dietary practice: An exploratory qualitative study examining women's perceptions. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 27 (2014), 401–410.
46. McMahon, A., Williams, P., Tapsell, L.C., Reviewing the meanings of wellbeing and wellness and their implications for food choice. Perspectives in Public Health 130 (2010), 282–286.
47. Meiselman, H.L., The future in sensory/consumer research: Ellipsis. evolving to a better science. Food Quality and Preference 27 (2013), 208–214.
48. Meiselman, H.L., Quality of life, wellbeing and wellness: Measuring subjective health for foods and other products. Food Quality and Preference 54 (2016), 101–109.
49. Melo, L.L.M.M., Bolini, H.M.A., Efraim, P., Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 138–143.
50. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Randomization of CATA attributes: Should attribute lists be allocated to assessors or to samples?. Food Quality and Preference 48 (2016), 210–215.
51. Ministerio de Salud Pública, Decreto 117/06. 2006, Ministerio de Salud Pública, Montevideo, Uruguay.
52. Nørgaard, M.K., Brunsø, K., Families‟ use of nutritional information on food labels. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 597–606.
53. Pawar, R.S., Krynitsky, A.J., Rader, J.I., Sweeteners from plants—with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 405 (2013), 4397–4407.
54. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2016), 165–179.
55. Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R.W., Hoyer, W.D., The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing 70 (2006), 170–184.
56. Reis, F., Andrade, J., Deliza, R., Ares, G., Comparison of two methodologies for estimating equivalent sweet concentration of high-intensity sweeteners with untrained assessors: Case study with orange/pomegranate juice. Journal of Sensory Studies 31 (2016), 341–347.
57. Schifferstein, H.N.J., Fenko, A., Desmet, P.M.A., Labbe, D., Martin, N., Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience. Food Quality and Preference 27 (2013), 18–25.
58. Schouteten, J.J., de Steur, H., de Pelsmaeker, S., Lagast, S., de Bourdeaudhuij, I., Gellycnk, X., Impact of health labels on flavor perception and emotional profiling: A consumer study on cheese. Nutrients 7 (2015), 10251–10268.
59. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2014). Draft Carbohydrates and Health report. Scientific consultation: 26 June to 1 September 2014. Available from: http://www.sacn.gov.uk/reports_position_statements/reports/scientific_consultation_draft_sacn_carbohydrates_and_health_report_-_june_2014.html (Accessed 10th August 2016).
60. Stubenitsky, K., Aaron, J.I., Catt, S.L., Mela, D.J., Effect of information and extended use on the acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 10 (1999), 367–376.
61. TeMorenga, L., Mallard, S., Mann, J., Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ, 346, 2013, e7492.
62. Tuorila, H., Sensory perception as a basis of food acceptance and consumption. MacFie, H.J.H., (eds.) Consumer-led food product development, 2007, Woodhead Publishing limited, Cambridge, 34–59.
63. Tuorila, H., Meiselman, H.L., Bell, R., Cardello, A.V., Johnson, W., Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 23 (1994), 231–246.
64. van Raaij, J., Hendriksen, M., Verhagen, H., Potential for improvement of population diet through reformulation of commonly eaten foods. Public Health Nutrition 12:3 (2009), 325–330.
65. Vázquez, M.B., Curia, A., Hough, G., Sensory descriptive analysis, sensory acceptability and expectation studies on biscuits with reduced added salt and increased fiber. Journal of Sensory Studies 24 (2009), 498–511.
66. Verbeke, W., Scholderer, J., Lähteenmäki, L., Consumer appeal of nutrition and health claims in three existing product concepts. Appetite 52:3 (2009), 684–692.
67. Vidal, L., Barreiro, C., Gómez, B., Ares, G., Giménez, A., Influence of information on consumers’ evaluation using check-all-that-apply questions and sorting: A case study with milk desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies 28 (2013), 125–137.
68. Vio, F., & Uauy, R. (2007). Case Study #9-5. The Sugar Controversy. In: P. Pinstrup-Andersen & F. Cheng (Eds.), Food Policy for Developing Countries: Case Studies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
69. Wessels, C.R., Johnston, R.J., Donath, H., Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: The influence of species, certifier and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 5 (1999), 1084–1089.
70. World Health Organization and Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2003). WHO/FAO joint expert consultation on diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: World Health Organization.
71. Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 36 (2014), 135–143.