Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 410-416

  Hein, Karen A ^a   Hamid, Nazimah ^a   Jaeger, Sara R ^b   Delahunty, Conor M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Consumer; Context; Discrimination; Evoked; Hedonic rating; Laboratory; Sensory

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 75449116706     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Belk R.W. Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 2 (1975) 157-164
2. Bell R., and Meiselman H.L. Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability and selection of foods. Appetite 22 (1994) 11-24
3. Boutrolle I., Arranz D., Rogeaux M., and Delarue J. Comparing central location test and home use test results: Application of a new criterion. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005) 704-713
4. Boutrolle I., Delarue J., Arranz D., Rogeaux M., and Köster E. Central location test vs. home use test: Contrasting results depending on product type. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007) 490-499
5. Frandsen L.W., Dijksterhuis G.B., Brockhoff P., Nielsen J.H., and Martens M. Subtle differences in milk: Comparison of an analytical and an affective test. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 515-526
6. Frandsen L.W., Dijksterhuis G.B., Brockhoff P., Nielsen J.H., and Martens M. Feelings as a basis for discrimination: Comparison of a modified authenticity test with the same-different test for slightly different types of milk. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007) 97-105
7. Hansen T. Understanding consumer perception of food quality: The cases of shrimps and cheese. British Food Journal 107 (2005) 500-525
8. Hersleth M., Mevik B.H., Naes T., and Guinard J.X. Effect of contextual factors on liking for wine - Use of robust design methodology. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 615-622
9. Jaeger S.R., and Meiselman H.L. Perceptions of meal convenience: The case of at-home evening meals. Appetite 42 (2004) 317-325
10. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 359-373
11. Köster E.P. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009) 70-82
12. Kozlowska K., Jeruszka M., Matuszewska I., Roszkowski W., Barylko-Pikielna N., and Brzozowska A. Hedonic tests in different locations as predictors of apple juice consumption at home in elderly and young subjects. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003) 653-661
13. Labbe D., Gilbert F., Antille N., and Martin N. Sensory determinants of refreshing. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009) 100-109
14. Lawless H.T., and Heymann H. Acceptance and preference testing. Sensory evaluation of food, principles and practices (1998), Aspen, Gaithersburg 430-479
15. Lyman B. Food meanings. A psychology of food (1989), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 125-138
16. MacFie H.J.H., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., and Vallis L. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 4 (1989) 129-148
17. McEwan J.A. A comparative study of three product acceptability trials. Food Quality and Preference 8 (1997) 183-190
18. McEwan J.A., and Colwill J.S. The sensory assessment of the thirst-quenching characteristics of drinks. Food Quality and Preference 7 (1995) 101-111
19. Meilgaard M., Civille G.V., and Carr B.T. Affective tests: Consumer tests and in-house panel acceptance tests (1999), CRC Press, Boca Raton pp. 231-254
20. Peryman D.R., and Pilgrim F.J. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology 11 (1957) 9-14
21. Petit C., and Sieffermann J.M. Testing consumer preference for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence?. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007) 161-172
22. Pound C., Duizer L., and McDowell K. Improved consumer product development. Part one. Is a laboratory necessary to assess consumer opinion?. British Food Journal 102 (2000) 810-820
23. Qiu C., and Yeung C.W.M. Mood and comparative judgement: Does mood influence everything and finally nothing?. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (2008) 658-669
24. Runkel P.J., and McGrath J.E. Experimental simulations. Research on human behavior: A systematic guide to method (1972), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York 96-103
25. Schwarz N., and Clore G. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1983) 513-523
26. Stone H., and Sidel J.L. Affective testing. Sensory evaluation practices (2004), Elsevier, San Diego 247-277