Convenience Sampling for Acceptability and CATA Measurements May Provide Inaccurate Results: A Case Study with Fruit-Flavored Powdered beverages Tested in Argentina, Spain and U.S.A.

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 295-304

  Cardinal, Paula ^a   Zamora, Maria Clara ^b,c   Chambers, Edgar ^d   Carbonell Barrachina, Ángel ^e   Hough, Guillermo ^a  

^a Universidad Provincial del Sudoeste   (Argentina)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA ARGENTINA   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^d KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUIT JUICES;

ARTIFICIAL COLOR; BUENOS AIRES; CONSUMER SEGMENTS; FOOD SCIENCE; GENERALIZED LINEAR MODEL; GRAPE JUICE; MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; SENSORY ACCEPTABILITIES;

CITRUS FRUITS;

CITRUS X PARADISI; MALUS X DOMESTICA; PYRUS; VITACEAE;

EID: 84938966190     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12158     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Araneda, M., Hough, G. and Wittig De Penna, E. 2008. Current-status survival analysis methodology applied to estimating sensory shelf life of ready-to-eat lettuce (lactuta sativa). J. Sensory Studies 23, 162-170.
2. Ares, G., Deliza, R., Barreiro, C., Giménez, A., and Gámbaro, A. 2010. Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 417-426.
3. Ares, G., Tárrega A., Izquierdo, L. and Jaeger, S. 2014. Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Qual. Prefer. 31, 135-141.
4. ASTM INETERNATIONAL. 2014. Standard terminology relating to sensory evaluation of materials and products, E-253. Annual Book of Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohoken, PA.
5. Clausen, S. 1998. Applied correspondence analysis: An introduction. Sage University Paper Series mo Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-121. Oaks, CA.
6. Devereux, H.M., Jones, G.P., Mccormack, L. and Hunter, W.C. 2003. Consumer acceptability of low fat foods containing inulin and oligofructose. J. Food Sci. 68, 1850-1854.
7. Donadini, G., Fumi, M.D. and Porretta, S. 2013, Hedonic response to fish in preschoolers. J. Sensory Studies, 28, 282-296.
8. Dooley L., LEE Young-Seung and Meullenet J.F. 2010. The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 394-401.
9. Escoufier, R. and Robert, P. 1976. A unifying tool for linear multivariante statistical methods: The Rv-coefficient. Appl. Stat. 25, 257-265.
10. Giacalone D., Bredie Wender L.P. and Michael B.F. 2013. ''All-In-One Test'' (AI1): A rapid and easily applicable approach to consumer product testing. Food Qual. Prefer. 27, 108-119.
11. Hough, G., Wakeling, I., Mucci, A, Chambers IV, E., Méndez Gallardo, I. and Rangel Alves, L. 2006. Number of consumers necessary for sensory acceptability tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 522-526.
12. King, S.C., and Meilselman, H.L. 2010. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 168-177.
13. Le Roux B. and Rouanet H. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Sage, CA.
14. Lawlees H. and Heymann H. 2010. In Sensory evaluation of Food Principles and Practices, 2nd Ed., pp. 359-360, Springer, NY.
15. Lawless, L.J.R., Threlfall, R.T., Meullenet, J.-F. and Howard, L.R. (2013), Applying a mixture design for consumer optimization of black cherry, concord grape and pomegranate juice blends. J. Sensory Studies 28, 102-112
16. R, pp. 225-272, The Open University, New York.
17. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. and Carr, B. 2007. In Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th Ed., pp. 259-260, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
18. Meyners, M., Castura J. and Carr, T (2013). Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 30, 309-319.
19. Ng M., Chaya C. and Hort J. (2013). Beyond liking: Comparing the measurement of emotional response using EsSense Profile and consumer defined check-all-that-apply methodologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 28, 193-205.
20. østli, J., Esaiassen, M., Garitta, L., Nøstvold, B. and G. Hough . 2013. How fresh is fresh? Perceptions and experience when buying and consuming fresh cod fillets. Food Qual. Prefer. 27, 26-34.
21. Ramírez, G., Hough, G.E. and Contarini, A. 2001. Influence of temperature and light exposure on sensory shelf life of a commercial sunflower oil. J. Food Qual. 24, 195-204.
22. Ripoll, G., Blanco, M., Albertí, P., Panea, B., Joy, M. and Casasús, I. 2014. Effect of two Spanish breeds and diet on beef quality including consumer preferences. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 983-992.
23. Schlich, P. 1996. Defining and validating assessor compromises about product distances and attribute correlations. In Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, Ch. 9 (T. Naes and E. Risvik, eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
24. Siegel S. and Castellan N.J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Ch. 7, 2nd Ed., pp. 170-171, McGraw-Hill, NY.
25. Sosa, M., Martínez, C., Márquez, F. and Hough, G. 2008. Location and scale influence on sensory acceptability measurements among low income consumers. J. Sensory Studies 23, 707-719.
26. Varela P. and Ares G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Res. Int. 48, 893-908.
27. Varela P., Ares G., Giménez A. and Gámbaro A. 2010. Influence of brand information on consumers' expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 873-880.
28. Varela, P., Ares, G. and Fiszman, S. 2013, Texture and semantics: The conceptual structure in consumers' minds. J Sensory Studies 28, 194-204
29. Vidal, L., Barreiro, C., Gómez, B., Ares, G. and Giménez, A. 2013, Influence of information on consumers' evaluations using check-all-that-apply questions and sorting: A case study with milk desserts. J. Sensory Studies 28, 125-137.