Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 36, Issue , 2014, Pages 135-143

  Zorn, Shari ^a   Alcaire, Florencia ^a   Vidal, Leticia ^a   Giménez, Ana ^a   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Orange juice; Sensory characterization; Stevia; Sucralose; TDS; Thaumatin

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899703006     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albert A., Salvador A., Schlich P., Fiszman S. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:111-118.
2. Ayya N., Lawless H.T. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. Chemical Senses 1992, 17:245-259.
3. Bassoli A., Merlini L. Sweeteners | intensive. Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition 2003, 5688-5695. Academic Press, Oxford. 2nd ed. B. Caballero (Ed.).
4. Bruzzone F., Ares G., Giménez A. Temporal aspects of yoghurt texture perception. International Dairy Journal 2013, 29:124-134.
5. Caballero B. Sucrose: Dietary sucrose and disease. Encyclopedia of human nutrition 2013, 231-233. Academic Press, Waltham. 3rd ed. B. Caballero (Ed.).
6. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Netto R.R., Castro W.F., Faria J.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Research International 2013, 54:1670-1679.
7. Cadena R.S., Vidal L., Ares G., Varela P. Dynamic sensory descriptive methodologies time-intensity and temporal dominance of sensations. Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling 2014, 333-364. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
8. Cardoso J.M.P., Bolini H.M.A. Descriptive profile of peach nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 2008, 23:804-816.
9. Dinnella C., Masi C., Naes T., Monteleone E. A new approach in TDS data analysis: A case study on sweetened coffee. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:33-46.
10. Dinnella C., Masi C., Zoboli G., Monteleone E. Sensory functionality of extra-virgin olive oil in vegetable foods assessed by temporal dominance of sensations and descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:141-150.
11. DuBois G.E. Nonnutritive sweeteners. The search for sucrose mimics. Annual reports in medicinal chemistry 1982, Vol. 17:323-332. Academic Press.
12. DuBois G.E., Prakash I. Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Annual Reviews of Food Science and Technology 2012, 3:353-380.
13. Gibbs B.F., Alli I., Mulligan C. Sweet and taste-modifying proteins: A review. Nutrition Research 1996, 16:1619-1630.
14. Glória M.B.A. Sweeteners | others. Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition 2003, 5695-5702. Academic Press, Oxford. 2nd ed. B. Caballero (Ed.).
15. ISO Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO Standard 8589 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. ISO Sensory analysis-General guidance for the selection, training, and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors. ISO Standard 8586:2012 2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. Kinghorn A.D., Chin Y.-W., Pan L., Jia Z. Natural products as sweeteners and sweetness modifiers. Comprehensive natural products II 2010, 269-315. Elsevier, Oxford. H.-W. Liu, L. Mander (Eds.).
18. Köster E.P. The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:359-373.
19. Köster E.P., Couronne T., Léon F., Lévy C., Marcelino A.S. Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurements: A conceptual exploration. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 14:165-176.
20. Labbe A., Schlich P., Pineau N., Gilbert F., Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:216-221.
21. Larson-Powers N., Pagborn R.M. Paired comparisons and time-intensity measurements of the sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing sucrose or synthetic sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 1978, 43:41-48.
22. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, (pp. 179-202), Springer, New York.
23. Lustig R.H., Schmidt L.A., Brindis C.D. The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 2012, 482:27-29.
24. Meillon S., Urbano C., Schlich P. Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:490-499.
25. Palazzo A.B., Carvalho M.A.R., Efraim P., Bolini H.M.A. The determination of isosweetness concentrations of sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame as sucrose substitutes in new diet chocolate formulations using the time-intensity analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:291-297.
26. Paulsen M.T., Naes T., Ueland O., Rukke E., Hersleth M. Preference mapping of salmon-sauce combinations: The influence of temporal properties. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:120-127.
27. Pawar R.S., Krynitsky A.J., Rader J.I. Sweeteners from plants-with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2013, 405:4397-4407.
28. Pineau, N. (2013). Extension of TDS to multi-bite evaluation. In 10th Pangborn sensory science symposium, 11-15th August 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
29. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonnière C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
30. Pinheiro A.C.M., Nunes C.A., Vietoris V. Sensomaker: A tool for sensorial characterization of food products. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2013, 37:199-201.
31. Popkin B.M., Nielsen S.J. Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Obesity Research 2003, 11:1325-1332.
32. Portmann M.O., Kilcast D. Descriptive profiles of synergistic mixtures of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:221-229.
33. Prakash I., DuBois G.E., Clos J.F., Wilkens K.L., Fosdick L.E. Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2008, 46:S75-S82.
34. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
35. Schiffman S.S., Sattely-Miller E.A., Bishay I.E. Time to maximum sweetness intensity of binary and ternary blends of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:405-415.
36. Schlich, P., Urbano, C., & Visalli, M. (2013). Multi-bites or multi-sips TDS with untrained subjects: A live demonstration on chocolates. In 10th Pangborn sensory science symposium, 11-15th August 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
37. Stein L.G., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
38. Vandeputte, A., Romans, J., Pineau, N., & Lenfant, F. (2011). Innovative methods to assess the evolution of the sensory characteristics during the tasting of a full product portion (several bites). In 9th Pangborn sensory science symposium, 4-8th September 2011, Toronto, Canada.
39. Witty M. Thaumatin II - A palatability protein. Trends in Biotechnology 1990, 8:113-116.
40. Yebra-Biurrun M.C. Sweeteners. Encyclopedia of analytical science 2005, 562-572. Elsevier, Oxford. 2nd ed. P. Worsfold, A. Townshend, C. Poole (Eds.).
41. Zandstra E.H., Weegels M.F., Van Spronsen A.A., Klerk M. Scoring or boring? Predicting boredom through repeated in-home consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:549-555.