Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 106-115

  Cadoret, Marine ^a   Husson, François ^a  

^a AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Confidence ellipses; Napping; Product description; QDA; Sorting task; Truncated total bootstrap

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867596367     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abdi H., Valentin D., Chollet S., Chrea C. Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:627-640.
2. Abdi H., Valentin D. Some new and easy ways to describe, compare, and evaluate products and assessors. New trends in sensory evaluation of food and non-food products 2007, 5-18. Vietnam National University-Ho chi Minh City Publishing House, Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam). D.Z. Nguyen, D. Valentin, L. Pelletier (Eds.).
3. Cadoret M., Lê S., Pagès J. A factorial approach for sorting task data (FAST). Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:410-417.
4. Cadoret M., Lê S., Pagès J. Statistical analysis of hierarchical sorting data. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:96-105.
5. Carroll J.D., Chang J.J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalisation of 'Eckart-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika 1970, 35:283-319.
6. Chateau, F., & Lebart, L. (1996). Assessing sample variability in the visualization techniques related to principal component analysis: Bootstrap and alternative simulation methods. In Alberto Prats (Ed.), Proceedings de COMPSTAT. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.
7. Courcoux P., Qannari E.M., Taylor Y., Buck D., Greenhoff K. Taxonomic free sorting. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 23:30-35.
8. Cousin, M., Penven, M., Toularhoat, M., Philippe, M., Cadoret, M., & Lê, S. (2008). Confrontation of products spaces based on consumers' spontaneous data and experts' conventional profile. Application to the sensory evaluation of 12 luxury fragrances. In 10th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry, Belgium.
9. Dairou V., Sieffermann J.-M. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile. Journal of Food Science 2002, 67:826-834.
10. Dehlholm C., Brockhoff P.B., Bredie W.L.P. Confidence ellipses: A variation based on parametric bootstrapping applicable on multiple factor analysis results for rapid graphical evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:278-280.
11. Dehlholm C., Brockhoff P.B., Meinert L., Aaslyng M.D., Bredie W.L.P. Rapid descriptive sensory methods - Comparison of free multiple sorting, partial napping, napping, flash profiling and conventional profiling. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:267-277.
12. Delarue J., Siefferman J.-M. Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the flavor of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(4):383-392.
13. Efron B. Boostrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 1979, 7:1-26.
14. Escofier B., Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples 2008, Dunod.
15. Escoufier Y. L'analyse conjointe de plusieurs matrices de données. Biométrie et Temps 1980, 59-76. Société Française de Biométrie, Paris. M. Jolivet (Ed.).
16. Gazano, G., Ballay, S., Eladan, N., & Sieffermann, J.M. (2005). Flash Profile and fragrance research: Using the words of the naive consumers to better grasp the perfume's universe. In ESOMAR Fragrance Research Conference, 15-17 May, 2005, New York.
17. Gower J.C. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 1975, 40:33-50.
18. Husson F., Le Dien S., Pagès J. Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(3):245-250.
19. Husson, F., & Cadoret, M. (2012). Confidence ellipses in holistic approaches. In 12th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry, Paris.
20. Josse J., Husson F. Selecting the number of components in PCA using cross-validation approximations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2012, 56:1869-1879.
21. Krzanowski W.J. Principles of multivariate analysis; a user's perspective 2000, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
22. Lavit C., Escoufier Y., Sabatier R., Traissac P. The ACT (STATIS) method. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 1994, 18:97-119.
23. Lawless H. Exploration of fragrance categories and ambiguous odors using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Chemical Senses 1989, 14(3):349-360.
24. Lê S., Husson F. SensoMineR: A package for sensory data analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 2008, 23(1):14-25.
25. Lebart L. Which bootstrap for principal axes methods? Selected contributions in data analysis and classification 2007, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
26. Pagès J. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis; application to the study of ten white from the Loire valley. Food quality and preference 2005, 16:642-649.
27. Pagès J., Cadoret M., Lê S. The sorted napping: a new holistic approach in sensory evaluation. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:637-658.
28. Qannari E.M., Cariou V., Teillet E., Schlich P. SORT-CC: A procedure for the statistical treatment of free sorting. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(3):302-308.
29. Santosa M., Abdi H., Guinard J.-X. A modified sorting task to investigate consumer perceptions of extra virgin olive oils. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:881-892.
30. Smilde A.K., Kiers H.A., Bijlsma S., Rubingh C.M., van Erk M.J. Matrix correlations for high-dimensional data: the modified RV-coefficient. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(3):401-405.
31. Stone H., Sidel J., Oliver S., Woosley A., Singleton R.C. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technology 1976, 28(11):24-34.
32. Williams A.A., Langron S.P. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1984, 35:558-568.