Sensory perception as a basis of food acceptance and consumption

Consumer-Led Food Product Development

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 34-65

  Tuorila, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34648850400     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781845693381.1.34     Document Type: Chapter

References (125)

1. Alimohammadi H., Silver W.L. Chemesthesis: hot and cold mechanisms. Chemosense 2002, 4(2):1-9.
2. Amoore J.E. Molecular Basis of Odor 1970, Charles C Thomas, Springfield.
3. Arvola A., Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familar cheeses: the effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite 1999, 32:113-126.
4. Bäckström A., PirttilÄ-Backman A.-M., Tuorila H. Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite 2004, 43:75-83.
5. Barylko-Pikielna N., Matuszewska I., Jeruszka M., Kozlowska K., Brzozowska A., Roszkowski W. Discriminability and appropriateness of category scaling versus ranking methods to study sensory preferences in elderly. Food Qual Pref 2004, 15:167-175.
6. Bellisle F. Glutamate and the UMAMI taste: sensory, metabolic, nutritional and behavioural considerations. A review of the literature published in the last 10 years. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1999, 23:423-438.
7. Birch L.L. Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr 1999, 19:41-62.
8. Bower J.A., Saadat M.A., Whitten C. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Qual Pref 2003, 14:65-74.
9. Breslin P.A.S., Beauchamp G.K. Suppression of bitterness by sodium: variation among bitter taste stimuli. Chem Senses 1995, 20:609-623.
10. Buck L., Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 1991, 65:175-187.
11. Cain W.S. Odor identification by males and females: predictions vs. performance. Chem Senses 1982, 7:129-142.
12. Cantin I., Dube L. Attitudinal moderation of correlations between food liking and consumption. Appetite 1999, 32:367-381.
13. Cardello A.V. The role of human senses in food acceptance. Food Choice, Acceptance, and Consumption 1996, 1-82. Blackie, London. H.L. Meiselman, H.J.H. Macfie (Eds.).
14. Cardello A.V. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: effects on product liking. Appetite 2003, 40:217-233.
15. Cardello A.V., Maller O. Relationships between food preferences and food acceptance ratings. J Food Sci 1982, 47:1553-1557. 1561.
16. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G. Numerical scale-point locations for constructing the LAM (labeled affective magnitude) scale. J Sens Stud 2004, 19:341-346.
17. Cardello A.V., Maller O., Masor H.B., Dubose C., Edelman B. Role of consumer expectancies in the acceptance of novel foods. J Food Sci 1985, 50:1707-1718.
18. Cardello A.V., Bell R., Kramer M.F. Attitudes of consumers toward military and other institutional foods. Food Qual Pref 1996, 7:7-20.
19. Christensen C.M. Food texture perception. Adv Food Res 1984, 29:159-199.
20. Conner M.T., Booth D.A., Clifton V.J., Griffiths R.P. Individualized optimization of the salt content of white bread for acceptability. J Food Sci 1988, 53:549-554.
21. Cook D.J., Hollowood T.A., Linforth R.S.T., Taylor A.J. Oral shear stress predicts flavour perception in viscous solutions. Chem Senses 2003, 28:11-23.
22. Cubero-Castillo E., Noble A.C. Relationship of 6-n-propylthiouracil status to bitterness sensitivity. Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity 2004, 105-116. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B.J. Tepper (Eds.).
23. Daillant B., Issanchou S. Most preferred level of sugar: rapid measure and consumption test. J Sens Stud 1991, 6:131-144.
24. Dalton P., Doolittle N., Nagata H., Breslin P.A.S. The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nature Neurosci 2000, 3:431-432.
25. De Araujo I.E., Rolls E.T., Velazco M.I., Margot C., Cayeux I. Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing. Neuron 2005, 46:671-679.
26. De Castro J.M., Bellisle F., Dalix A.-M., Pearcey S.M. Palatability and intake relationships in free-living humans: characterization and independence of influence in North Americans. Physiol Behav 2000, 70:343-350.
27. De Graaf C., Van Staveren W., Burema J. Psychophysical and psychohedonic functions of four common food flavours in elderly subjects. Chem Senses 1996, 21:293-302.
28. De Graaf C., Kramer F.M., Meiselman H.L., Lesher L.L., Baker-Fulco C., Hirsch E.S., Warber J. Food acceptability in field studies with US army men and women: relationship with food intake and food choice after repeated exposures. Appetite 2005, 44:23-31.
29. De Wijk R.A., Cain W.S. Odor quality: discrimination versus free and cued identification. Percept Psychophys 1994, 56:12-18.
30. Diehl J.M. Fragebögen zur Erfassung ernährungs- und gewichtsbezogener Einstellungen und Verhaltensweisen (Questionnaires for the assessment of eating- and weight-related attitudes and behaviors) 2006, Department of Psychology, University of Giessen, Giessen.
31. Distel H., Hudson R. Judgement of odor intensity is influenced by subjects' knowledge of the odor source. Chem Senses 2001, 26:247-251.
32. Distel H., Ayabe-Kanamura S., Martinez-Gomez M., Schicker I., Kobayakawa T., Saito S., Hudson R. Perception of everyday odors - correlation between inten- sity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses 1999, 24:191-199.
33. Drake B. Sensory texture/rheological properties: a polyglot list. J Texture Stud 1989, 20:1-27.
34. Drewnowski A. 6-n-Propylthiouracil sensitivity, food choices, and food consumption. Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity 2004, 179-193. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B. Tepper (Eds.).
35. Drewnowski A., Hann C. Food preferences and reported frequencies of food consumption as predictors of current diet in young women. Am J Clin Nutr 1999, 70:28-36.
36. Dubois D., Rouby C. Names and categories for odours: the veridical label. Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition 2002, 47-66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, A. Holley (Eds.).
37. Dubose C.N., Cardello A.V., Maller O. Effects of colorants and flavorants on identification, perceived flavor intensity, and hedonic quality of fruit-flavored beverages and cake. J Food Sci 1980, 45:1393-1415.
38. Duffy V.B., Lucchina L.A., Bartoshuk L.M. Genetic variation in taste: potential biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk?. Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity 2004, 195-228. Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B. Tepper (Eds.).
39. Ellis B.H. Preference testing methodology - part 1. Food Technol 1967, 22(5):49-56.
40. Firestein S. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 2001, 413:211-218.
41. Fischer R., Griffin F., England S., Garn S.M. Taste thresholds and food dislikes. Nature 1961, 191:1328.
42. Fisher C., Scott T.R. Food Flavours: Biology and Chemistry 1997, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
43. Glanville E.V., Kaplan A.R. Food preference and sensitivity of taste for bitter compounds. Nature 1965, 205:851-853.
44. Gottfried J.A., Dolan R.J. The nose smells what the eye sees: crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron 2003, 39:375-386.
45. Green B.G. Psychophysical measurement of oral chemesthesis. Methods in Chemosensory Research 2002, 3-19. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. S.A. Simon, M.A.L. Nicolelis (Eds.).
46. Green B.G., Dalton P., Cowart B., Shaffer G., Rankin K., Higgins J. Evaluating the "Labeled Magnitude Scale" for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 1996, 21:323-334.
47. Advances in Sweeteners 1996, Blackie, London. H. Grenby (Ed.).
48. Guinard J.X. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Trends Food Sci Technol 2001, 11:273-283.
49. Guinard J.-X., Hong D.Y., Zoumas-Morse C., Budwig C., Russell G.F. Chemo-reception and perception of the bitterness of isohumulones. Physol Behav 1994, 56:1257-1263.
50. Guinard J.X., Smiciklas-Wright H., Marty C., Abu-Sabha R., Soucy I., Taylor-Davis S., Wright C. Acceptability of fat-modified foods in a population of older adults: contrast between sensory preference and purchase intent. Food Qual Pref 1996, 7:21-28.
51. Guinard J.X., Sechevich P.J., Meaker K., Jonnalagadda S.S., Kris-Etherton P. Sensory responses to fat are not affected by varying dietary energy intake from fat and saturated fat over ranges common in the American diet. J Am Diet Assoc 1999, 99:690-696.
52. Hartwig P., Mcdaniel M.R. Flavor characteristics of lactic, malic, citric, and acetic acids at various pH levels. J Food Sci 1995, 60:384-388.
53. Hellemann U., Tuorila H. Pleasantness ratings and consumption of open sandwiches with varying NaCl and acid contents. Appetite 1991, 17:229-238.
54. Huotilainen A., Tuorila H. Social representation of new foods has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust. Food Qual Pref 2005, 16:565-572.
55. Jones L.V., Peryam D.R., Thurstone L.L. Development of a scale for measuring soldiers' food preferences. Food Res 1955, 20:512-520.
56. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H. Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: effects of gender, involvement and health concern. Food Qual Pref 1999, 10:83-91.
57. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Qual Pref 1996, 7:87-94.
58. Kim U.-K., Jorgenson E., Coon H., Leppert M., Risch N., Drayna D. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 2003, 299:1221-1225.
59. Koskinen S., Kälviäinen N., Tuorila H. Flavor enchancement as a tool for increasing pleasantness and intake of a snack product among the elderly. Appetite 2003, 41:87-96.
60. Koskinen S., Nenonen A., Tuorila H. Intakes of cold cuts in the elderly are predicted by olfaction and mood, but not by flavor type or intensity of the products. Physiol Behav 2005, 85:314-323.
61. Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Attitudes towards sweetness as predictors of liking and use of various sweet foods. Ecol Food Nutr 1994, 31:161-170.
62. Lange C., Rousseau F., Issanchou S. Expectation, liking and purchase behavior under economical constraint. Food Qual Pref 1999, 10:31-39.
63. Larsson M. Odor memory: a memory systems approach. Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition 2002, 231-245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, A. Holley (Eds.).
64. Laurila E., Lähteenmäki L., Rita H., Tuorila H. Pleasantness in relation to difference threshold of NaCl in mashed potato. Food Qual Pref 1996, 7:225-228.
65. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices 1999, Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD.
66. Lindemann B. Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature 2001, 413:219-225.
67. Livermore A., Laing D.G. The influence of odor type on the discrimination and identification of odorants in multicomponent odor mixtures. Physiol Behav 1998, 65:311-320.
68. Loken B. Consumer psychology: categorization, inference, affect, and persuasion. Annu Rev Psychol 2006, 57:453-485.
69. Lucas F., Bellisle F. The measurement of food preferences in humans - do taste-and-spit tests predict consumption?. Physiol Behav 1987, 39:739-743.
70. Lugaz O., Pillias A.-M., Faurion A. A new specific ageusia: some humans cannot taste L-glutamate. Chem Senses 2002, 27:105-115.
71. Maga J.A. Compound structure versus bitter taste. Bitterness in Foods and Beverages 1990, 35-48. Elsevier, New York. R.L. Rouseff (Ed.).
72. Malnic B., Godfrey P.A., Buck L.B. The human olfactory receptor gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:2584-2589.
73. Mattes R.D. Physiologic responses to sensory stimulation by food: nutritional implications. J Am Diet Assoc 1997, 97:406-413.
74. Mattes R.D. The taste for salt in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1997, 65:692S-697S. (Suppl).
75. Mcclure S.M., Li J., Tomlin D., Cypert K.S., Montague L.M., Montague P.R. Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 2004, 44:379-387.
76. Monteleone E., Condelli N., Dinnella C., Bertuccioli M. Prediction of perceived astringency induced by phenolic compounds. Food Qual Pref 2004, 15:761-769.
77. Morrot G., Brochet F., Dubourdieu D. The color of odors. Brain and Language 2001, 79:309-320.
78. Moscovici S. The phenomenon of social representations. Social Representations 1984, 3-69. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.M. Farr, S. Moscovici (Eds.).
79. Parr W., White G., Heatherbell D.A. The nose knows: influence of colour on perception of wine aroma. J Wine Res 2003, 14:79-101.
80. Patterson R.E., Pietinen P. Assessment of nutritional status in individuals and populations. Public Health Nutrition 2004, 66-82. Blackwell, Oxford. M.J. Gibney, B.M. Margetts, J.M. Kearney, L. Arab (Eds.).
81. Pelchat M.L., Pliner P. "Try it. You'll like it." Effects of information on willingness to try novel foods. Appetite 1995, 24:153-166.
82. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite: J Intake Res 1982, 3:283-290.
83. Pliner P., Hobden K. Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia for edible substances. Appetite 1992, 19:105-120.
84. Prescott J., Stevenson R.J. Pungency in food perception and preference. Food Rev Int 1995, 11:665-698.
85. Genetic Variation in Taste Sensitivity 2004, Marcel Dekker, New York. J. Prescott, B.J. Tepper (Eds.).
86. Prescott J., Norris L., Kunst M., Kim S. Estimating a "consumer rejection threshold" for cork taint in white wine. Food Qual Pref 2005, 16:345-349.
87. Ratner R.K., Kahn B.E., Kahneman D. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J Cons Res 1999, 26:1-15.
88. Roininen K., Tuorila H. Health and taste attitudes in the prediction of use frequency and choice between less healthy and more healthy snacks. Food Qual Pref 1999, 10:357-365.
89. Roininen K., Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 1999, 33:71-88.
90. Roininen K., Fillion L., Kilcast D., Lähteenmäki L. Exploring difficult textural properties of fruit and vegetables for the elderly in Finland and the United Kingdom. Food Qual Pref 2004, 15:517-530.
91. Rolls E.T. Taste, olfactory, and food texture processing in the brain, and the control of food intake. Physiol Behav 2005, 85:45-56.
92. Rouby C., Bensafi M. Is there a hedonic dimension to odors?. Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition 2002, 140-159. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, A. Holley (Eds.).
93. Rozin P. Human food selection: the interaction of biology, culture and individual experience. The Psychobiology of Human Food Selection 1982, 225-254. Ellis Horwood, Chichester. L.M. Barker (Ed.).
94. Rozin P., Vollmecke T.A. Food likes and dislikes. Annu Rev Nutr 1986, 6:433-456.
95. Rozin P., Nemeroff C., Horowitz M., Gordon B., Voet W. The borders of the self: contamination sensititivity and potency of the body apertures and other body parts. J Res Pers 1995, 29:318-340.
96. Saper C.B., Chou T., Elmquist J.K. The need to feed: homeostatic and hedonic control of eating. Neuron 2002, 36:199-211.
97. Schiffman S.S., Mcelroy A.E., Erickson R.P. The range of taste quality of sodium salts. Physiol Behav 1980, 24:217-224.
98. Schutz H.G., Cardello A.V. A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. J Sens Stud 2001, 16:117-159.
99. Scott K. Taste recognition: food for thought. Neuron 2005, 48:455-464.
100. Settle R.G., Meehan K., Williams G.R., Doty R.L., Sisley A.C. Chemosensory properties of sour tastants. Physiol Behav 1986, 36:619-623.
101. Shepherd R., Farleigh C.A. Sensory assessment of foods and the role of sensory attributes in determining food choice. Handbook of the Psychophysiology of Human Eating 1989, 25-56. Wiley, New York. R. Shepherd (Ed.).
102. Shepherd R., Farleigh C.A., Wharf S.G. Effect of quantity consumed on measures of liking for salt concentrations in soup. J Sens Stud 1991, 6:227-238.
103. Small D.M., Prescott J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 2005, 166:345-357.
104. Small D.M., Gregory M.D., Mak Y.E., Gitelman D., Mesulam M.M., Parrish T. Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation. Neuron 2003, 39:701-711.
105. Spillane W.J. Molecular structure and sweet taste. Advances in Sweeteners 1996, 1-25. Blackie, London. T.H. Grenby (Ed.).
106. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effects of repeated exposure and health-related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
107. Steptoe A., Pollard T.M., Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25:267-284.
108. Stunkard A.J., Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. J Psychonom Res 1985, 29:71-83.
109. Suprenant A., Butzke C.E. Implications of odor threshold variations on sensory quality control of cork stoppers 1996, 70-74.
110. Szczesniak A.S. Classification of textural characteristics. J Food Sci 1963, 28:385-389.
111. Tanimura S., Mattes R.D. Relationships between bitter taste sensitivity and consumption of bitter substances. J Sens Stud 1993, 8:31-41.
112. Tepper B.J. Effects of slight color variation on consumer acceptance of orange juice. J Sens Stud 1993, 8:145-154.
113. Tuorila H. Selection of milks with varying fat contents and related overall liking, attitudes, norms and intentions. Appetite 1987, 8:1-14.
114. Tuorila H., Cardello A.V. Consumer responses to an off-flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual Pref 2002, 13:561-569.
115. Tuorila H., Meiselman H., Bell R., Cardello A.V., Johnson W. Role of sensory and cognitive information in the enhancement of certainty and liking for novel and familiar foods. Appetite 1994, 23:231-246.
116. Tuorila H., Andersson Å, Martikainen A., Salovaara H. Effect of product formula, information and consumer characteristics on the acceptance of a new snack food. Food Qual Pref 1998, 9:313-320.
117. Tuorila H., Kramer F.M., Engell D. The choice of fat-free vs. regular-fat fudge: the effects of liking for the alternative and the restraint status. Appetite 2001, 37:27-32.
118. Tuorila H., Huotilainen A., Lähteenmäki L., Ollila S., Tuomi-Nurmi S., Urala N. Comparison of affective rating scales and their relationship to variables reflecting food consumption. Food Qual Pref 2007, in press.
119. Van Der Klaauw N.J., Smith D.V. Taste quality profiles for fifteen organic and inorganic salts. Physiol Behav 1995, 58:295-306.
120. Vickers Z., Mullan L., Holton E. Impact of differences in taste test ratings on the consumption of milk in both laboratory and food service setting. J Sens Stud 1999, 14:249-262.
121. Wansink B., Park S.B. At the movies: how external cues and perceived taste impact consumption volume. Food Qual Pref 2001, 12:69-74.
122. Wardle J., Guthrie C.A., Sanderson S., Rapoport L. Development of the children's eating behaviour questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 2001, 42:963-970.
123. Zellner D.A. How foods get be liked: some general mechanisms and some special cases. The Hedonics of Taste 1991, 199-217. Laurence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. R.C. Bolles (Ed.).
124. Zellner D.A., Kern B.B., Parker S. Prediction for the good: subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast. Appetite 2002, 38:175-180.
125. Zou Z., Buck L.B. Combinatorial effects of olfactory mixes in olfactory cortex. Science 2006, 311:1477-1481.