Parents' and Children's Acceptance of Skim Chocolate Milks Sweetened by Monk Fruit and Stevia Leaf Extracts

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2015, Pages S1083-S1092

  Li, X E ^a   Lopetcharat, K ^b   Drake, M A ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Nouveau Centric Co Ltd   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Chocolate milk; Natural nonnutritive sweetener; Power function; Priming; Sugar reduction

Indexed keywords

PLANT MEDICINAL PRODUCT; SUGAR INTAKE; SWEETENING AGENT;

ADULT; ANIMAL; CACAO; CHILD; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CUCURBITACEAE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; FOOD PREFERENCE; FRUIT; HUMAN; MALE; MILK; PARENT; PERCEPTION; PLANT LEAF; STEVIA; SUGAR INTAKE; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANIMALS; CACAO; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; CUCURBITACEAE; DIETARY SUCROSE; FEMALE; FOOD LABELING; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUIT; HUMANS; MALE; MILK; PARENTS; PERCEPTION; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT PREPARATIONS; STEVIA; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929132946     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12835     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anonymous. 2003. Tools for innovation: dairy foods for today's pre-teens. Available from: http://www.dairyfoods.com/articles/tools-for-innovation-dairy-foods-for-today-s-pre-teens. Accessed 2014 April 3.
2. Anonymous. 2013. Back to school with monk fruit juice-sweetened chocolate milk. Available from: http://berryondairy.blogspot.com/2013/08/back-to-school-with-monk-fruit-juice.html. Accessed 2014 January 3.
3. ASTM. E679-91. 1991 (Reapproved 1997). Standard practice for determination of odor and taste thresholds by forced-choice ascending concentration series method of limits. West Conschohocken, PA: ASTM. p 36-40.
4. Bayarri S, Carbonell I, Barrios EX, Costell E. 2011. Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products. Int Dairy J 21:111-8.
5. Bolini-Cardello HM, Da Silva MAPA, Damasio MH. 1999. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 54:119-30.
6. Bowers JA, Saadat MA, Whitten C. 2003. Effect of liking, information and, consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Qual Prefer 14:65-74.
7. Cho HY, Chung SJ, Kim HS, Kim KO. 2005. Effect of sensory characteristics and non-sensory factors on consumer liking of various canned tea products. J Food Sci 70:S532-8.
8. Chollet M, Gille D, Schmid A, Walther B, Piccinali P. 2013. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. J Dairy Sci 96:5501-11.
9. Christoph IB, Peter G, Rothe A, Salamon P, Weber SA, Weible D. 2011. School milk consumption in Germany-what are important product attributes for children and parents? EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty. ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
10. De Graaf C, Zandstra EH. 1999. Sweetness intensity and pleasantness in children, adolescents, and adults. Physiol Behav 67:513-20.
11. De Melo LLMM, Bolini HMA, Efraim P. 2007. Equisweet milk chocolates with intense sweeteners using time-intensity method. J Food Qual 30:1056-67.
12. Delgado C, Guinard J. 2011. How do consumer hedonic ratings for extra virgin olive oil relate to quality ratings by experts and descriptive analysis ratings? Food Qual Pref 22:213-25.
13. Drake MA, Civille GV. 2003. Flavor lexicons. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2:33-40.
14. Drake SL, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2011. Salty taste in dairy foods: can we reduce the salt? J Dairy Sci 94:636-45.
15. DuBois GE, Prakash I. 2012. Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 3:353-80.
16. Ennis DM, Rousseau B, Ennis JM. 2013. Tools and applications of sensory and consumer science. Richmond, Va.: The Institute of Perception. p 132.
17. TM on rheological and sensory characteristics of low-fat and whole milk set yoghurt. Int Dairy J 21:636-44.
18. Guinard JX. 2000. Sensory and consumer testing with children. Food Sci and Technol 11:273-83.
19. Hoag C. 2011. Flavored milk banned in LA schools. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/la-schoolsflavored-milk_n_877282.html?view=print&comm_ref=false. Accessed 2013 July 20.
20. Jervis SM, Lopectcharat K, Drake MA. 2012. Application of ethnography and conjoint analysis to determine key consumer attributes for latte-style coffee beverages. J Sens Stud 27:48-58.
21. Johnson RK, Frary C, Wang MQ. 2002. The nutritional consequences of flavored-milk consumption by school-aged children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 102:853-56.
22. Kim MK, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2013. Influence of packaging information on consumer liking of chocolate milk. J Dairy Sci 96:4843-56.
23. Kohda H, Kasai R, Yamasaki K, Murakami K, Tanaka O. 1976. New sweet diterpene glucosides from Stevia rebaudiana. Phytochemistry 15:981-83.
24. Kroll BJ. 1990. Evaluating rating scales for sensory testing with children. Food Technol 44:78-80, 82, 84, and 86.
25. Krutulyte R, Grunert KG, Scholderer J, Lähteenmäki L, Hagemann KS, Elgaard P, Nielsen B, Graverholt JP. 2011. Perceived fit of different combinations of carriers and functional ingredients and its effect on purchase intention. Food Qual Pref 22:11-6.
26. Leksrisompong P, Gerard P, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2012. Bitter taste inhibiting agents for whey protein hydrolysate and whey protein hydrolysate beverages. J Food Sci 77:S282-7.
27. Li XE, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2014. Extrinsic attributes that influence parents' purchase of chocolate milk for their children. J Food Sci 79:S1407-15.
28. Li XE, Lopetcharat K, Qiu Y, Drake MA. 2015. Sugar reduction of skim chocolate milk and viability of alternative sweetening through lactose hydrolysis. J Dairy Sci. 98:1455-66.
29. Li XE, Drake MA. 2015. Sensory perception, nutritional role, and challenges of flavored milk for children and adults. J Food Sci. 80:R665-70.
30. Liem DG, Mars M, De Graaf C. 2004. Consistency of sensory testing with 4- and 5-year-old children. Food Qual Pref 15:541-8.
31. Meena MK, Arora S, Shendurse AM, Sharma V, Wadhwa BK, Singh AK. 2012. Formulation optimization of a whey lemon beverage using a blend of the sweeteners aspartame and saccharin. Int J Dairy Technol 65:146-51.
32. Meilgaard MM, Civille GV, Carr BT. 1999. Selection and training of panel members. In: Sensory evaluation techniques. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press. p 135-83.
33. De Melo LLMM, Bolinia HMA, Efraim P. 2009. Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Qual Prefer 20:138-43.
34. Morais EC, Morais AR, Cruz AG, Bolini HM. 2014. Development of chocolate dairy dessert with addition of prebiotics and replacement of sucrose with different high-intensity sweeteners. J Dairy Sci 97:2600-09.
35. Mori EE, Yotsuyanagi K, Dohi CT. 1994. Sucrose and stevioside sweetness evaluation by using the time-intensity sensory technique. Col Inst Tecnol Aliment 24:137-48.
36. Mosettig E, Nes WR. 1955. Stevioside. II. The structure of the aglucon. J Org Chem 20:884-99.
37. Murphy MM, Douglass JS, Johnson RK, Spence LA. 2008. Drinking flavored or plain milk is positively associated with nutrient intake and is not associated with adverse effects on weight status in US children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 108:631-9.
38. Narayanan P, Chinnasamy B, Jin L, Clark S. 2014. Use of just-about-right scales and penalty analysis to determine appropriate concentrations of stevia sweeteners for vanilla yogurt. J Dairy Sci 97:3262-72.
39. Orme BK. 2014. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 3rd ed. Chapter 3, Glendale, Calif.: Research Publishers. p 19-22.
40. Osornio MML, Hough G. 2010. Comparing 3-point versus 9-point just-about right scales for determining the optimum concentration of sweetness in a beverage. J Sens Stud 25:1-17.
41. Patterson J, Saidel M. 2009. The removal of flavored milk in schools results in a Reduction in total milk purchases in all grades, K-12. J Am Diet Assoc 109:A97 (abstr.).
42. Pawar RS, Krynitsky AJ, Rader JI. 2013. Sweeteners from plants-with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4397-407.
43. Pinheiro MVS, Oliveira MN, Penna ALB, Tamime AY. 2005. The effect of different sweeteners in low-calorie yogurts-a review. Int J Dairy Technol 58:193-9.
44. Popper R, Kroll JJ. 2005. Conducting sensory research with children. J Sens Stud 20:75-87.
45. Prakash I, DuBois GE, Clos JF, Wilkens KL, Fosdick LE. 2008. Development of rebiana, a natural non-caloric sweetener. Food Chem Toxicol 46(Suppl. 7S):75-82.
46. Quann EE, Adams D. 2013. Impact on milk consumption and nutrient intakes from eliminating flavored milk in elementary schools. Nutr Today 48:127-34.
47. Reis RC, Minim VPR, Bolini HMA, Dias BRP, Minim LA, Ceresino EB. 2011. Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. J Food Qual 34:163-70.
48. Thompson JL, Lopetcharat K, Drake MA. 2007. Preferences for commercial strawberry drinkable yogurts among African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic consumers in the United States. J Dairy Sci 90:4974-87.
49. Zhang W, Gruen IU. 2013. Determination of ideal sweeteners concentration and sweetness equivalence of selected natural sweeteners in a whey protein beverage application. Inst Food Technol 163-18 (abstr.).