Mastering digital libraries in the digital age

E-Discovery Tools and Applications in Modern Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 275-305

  Kasemsap, Kijpokin ^a  

^a SUAN SUNANDHA RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014159982     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0474-0.ch015     Document Type: Chapter

References (233)

1. Abbas, J., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Middle school children's use of the ARTEMIS Digital Library. Paper presented at the SecondACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2002), Portland, OR. doi:10.1145/544220.544239
2. Adams, A., & Blandford, A. (2004). The unseen and unacceptable face of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(2), 71-81. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0071-7
3. Ahmad, M., & Abawajy, J. H. (2014). Service level agreements for the digital library. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147, 237-243. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.166
4. Ahmed, H. M. S. (2010). Hybrid e-learning acceptance model: Learner perceptions. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(2), 313-346. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2010.00259.x
5. Apedoe, X. S., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). Inquiry-based learning and digital libraries in undergraduate science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5/6), 321-330. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9020-8
6. Arif, M., & Kanwal, S. (2009). Acceptance of digital library among female students and effects of limited access of digital library on their performance in research work: A case of International Islamic University. The International Information & Library Review, 41(1), 122-128. doi:10.1080/10572317. 2009.10762806
7. Bainbridge, D., Twidale, M. B., & Nichols, D. M. (2012). Interactive context-aware user-driven metadata correction in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 13(1), 17-32. doi:10.1007/s00799-012-0100-5
8. Barbuti, N., Ferilli, S., Redavid, D., & Caldarola, T. (2014). An integrated management system for multimedia digital library. Procedia Computer Science, 38, 128-132. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.10.021
9. Batjargal, B., Kimura, F., & Maeda, A. (2010). Providing universal access to Japanese humanities digital libraries: An approach to federated searching system using automatic metadata mapping. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C, 11(11), 837-843. doi:10.1631/jzus.C1001001
10. Beagle, D. (2000). Web-based learning environments: Do libraries matter? College & Research Libraries, 61(4), 367-379. doi:10.5860/crl.61.4.367
11. Beiers, H. (2000). Information architecture's potential contribution to an asynchronous learning environment. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies (IWALT 2000), Palmerston North, New Zealand.
12. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
13. Bertot, J. C., Snead, J. T., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2006). Functionality, usability and accessibility: Iterative user-centered assessment strategies for digital libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 7(1), 17-28. doi:10.1108/14678040610654828
14. Bezdushnyi, A. N., Zhizhchenko, A. B., Kulagin, M. V., & Serebryakov, V. A. (2000). Integrated information resource system of the Russian Academy of Sciences and a technology for developing digital libraries. Programming and Computer Software, 26(4), 177-185. doi:10.1007/BF02759466
15. Bhargava, B., & Annamalai, M. (2000). A communication framework for digital libraries. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 10(2/3), 205-236. doi:10.1023/A:1009666919156
16. Blandford, A., & Buchanan, G. (2002). Workshop report: Usability of digital libraries @JCDL'02. SIGIR Forum, 36(2), 83-89.
17. Bollen, J., & Luce, R. (2002). Evaluation of digital library impact and user communities by analysis of usage patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 8(6), 1-13. doi:10.1045/june2002-bollen
18. Bondarouk, T., & Ruël, H. (2010). Dynamics of e-learning: Theoretical and practical perspectives. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 149-154. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2010.00348.x
19. Borbinha, J. L. (2004). An approach to creating a national digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(1), 19-22. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0067-3
20. Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management: An International Journal, 35(3), 227-243. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00059-4
21. Borgman, C. L. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Borgman, C. L. (2006). What can studies of e-learning teach us about collaboration in e-research? Some findings from digital library studies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(4), 359-383. doi:10.1007/s10606-006-9024-1
23. Borgman, C. L., Smart, L. J., Millwood, K. A., Finley, J. R., Champeny, L., Gilliland, A. J., & Leazer, G. H. (2005). Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 636-657. doi:10.1002/asi.20154
24. Borgman, C. L., Wallis, J. C., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Little science confronts the data deluge: Habitat ecology, embedded sensor networks, and digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1/2), 17-30. doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0022-9
25. Budhu, M., & Coleman, A. (2002). The design and evaluation of interactivities in a digital library. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11), 1-19. doi:10.1045/november2002-coleman
26. Burford, S. (2014). A grounded theory of the practice of web information architecture in large organizations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(10), 2017-2034. doi:10.1002/asi.23098
27. Calvanese, D., Catarci, T., & Santucci, G. (2001). LAURIN: A distributed digital library of newspaper clippings. World Wide Web (Bussum), 4(1/2), 5-20. doi:10.1023/A:1012432527794
28. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Fox, E. A., & Ioannidis, Y. (2010). On digital library foundations. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11(1), 37-39. doi:10.1007/s00799-011-0063-y
29. Carter, D. S., & Janes, J. (2000). Unobtrusive data analysis of digital reference questions and service at the Internet Public Library: An exploratory study. Library Trends, 49(2), 251-265.
30. Castelli, D., Pagano, P., & Thanos, C. (2004). OpenDLib: An infrastructure for new generation digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(1), 45-47. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0061-9
31. Catarci, T., Di Iorio, A., & Schaerf, M. (2014). The Sapienza Digital Library from the holistic vision to the actual implementation. Procedia Computer Science, 38, 4-11. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.10.002
32. Chen, C. M., & Chen, C. C. (2010). Problem-based learning supported by digital archives: Case study of Taiwan libraries' history digital libraries. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 5-28. doi:10.1108/02640471011005414
33. Chen, C. M., & Lin, S. T. (2014). Assessing effects of information architecture of digital libraries on supporting e-learning: A case study on the digital library of nature & culture. Computers & Education, 75, 92-102. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.006
34. Cheng, C. H., Wei, L. Y., & Chen, Y. H. (2011). A new e-learning achievement evaluation model based on rough set and similarity filter. Computational Intelligence, 27(2), 260-279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2011.00380.x
35. Cherry, J. M., & Duff, W. M. (2002). Studying digital library users over time: A follow-up survey of early Canadiana online. Information Research, 7(2), 1-20.
36. Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E. (2009). What qualifications and skills are important for digital librarian positions in academic libraries? A job advertisement analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(5), 457-467. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2009.06.003
37. Chowdhury, G. G. (2014). Sustainability of digital libraries: A conceptual model and a research framework. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 14(3/4), 181-195. doi:10.1007/s00799-014-0116-0
38. Chowdhury, G. G., & Chowdhury, S. (2003). Introduction to digital libraries. London, UK: Facet Publishing.
39. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Huang, S. X., & Wu, T. T. (2008). A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26(3), 303-317. doi:10.1108/02640470810879464
40. Cox, M. J. (2013). Formal to informal learning with IT: Research challenges and issues for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 85-105. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00483.x
41. Cunningham, S. J. (2011). Children in the physical collection: Implications for the digital library. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-10. doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801203
42. Dalkıran, Ö., Aker, I˙., Öztemiz, S., Taşkın, Z., & Tunç, S. K. (2014). Usability testing of digital libraries: The experience of EPrints. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147, 535-543. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.155
43. Dang, D. P., & Zhou, L. Z. (2006). A synchronization scheme for multimedia retrieval in digital libraries over cellular radio networks. Journal of Shanghai University [English Edition],10(5), 409-414. doi:10.1007/s11741-006-0082-x
44. Darányi, S., Wittek, P., & Dobreva, M. (2012). Using wavelet analysis for text categorization in digital libraries: A first experiment with Strathprints. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 12(1), 3-12. doi:10.1007/s00799-012-0079-y
45. Davies, J., Lytras, M. D., & Sheth, A. P. (2007). Semantic-web-based knowledge management. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(5), 14-16. doi:10.1109/MIC.2007.109
46. Davis, N. (2013). Transforming our conversation of information architecture with structure. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(5), 45-47. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390510
47. de la Chica, S., Ahmad, F., Sumner, T., Martin, J. H., & Butcher, K. (2008). Computational foundations for personalizing instruction with digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 9(1), 3-18. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0037-x
48. Diaz-Valenzuela, I., Martin-Bautista, M. J., Vila, M. A., & Campana, J. R. (2013). An automatic system for identifying authorities in digital libraries. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3994-4002. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.010
49. Dillon, A. (1999). Evaluating on TIME: A framework for the expert evaluation of digital library interface usability. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2(2/3), 170-177. doi:10.1007/s007990050045
50. Dillon, A., & Turnbull, D. (2005). Information architecture. In M. Drake (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 1-9). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
51. Dong, A., & Agogino, A. M. (2001). Design principles for the information architecture of a SMET education digital libraries.Paper presented at the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on DigitalLibraries (JCDL 2001), Roanoke, VA. doi:10.1145/379437.379699
52. Du, D. H. C., Chang, T. S., Hsieh, J., Shim, S., & Wang, Y. (2000). Two emerging serial storage interfaces for supporting digital libraries: Serial storage architecture (SSA) and fiber channel-arbitrated loop (FC-AL). Multimedia Tools and Applications, 10(2/3), 179-203. doi:10.1023/A:1009662702317
53. Fast, K. V., & Sedig, K. (2010). Interaction and the epistemic potential of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11(3), 169-207. doi:10.1007/s00799-011-0066-8
54. Ferran, N., Mor, E., & Minguillon, J. (2005). Towards personalization in digital libraries through ontologies. Library Management, 26(4/5), 206-217. doi:10.1108/01435120510596062
55. Ferrari, E., Adam, N. R., Atluri, V., Bertino, E., & Capuozzo, U. (2002). An authorization system for digital libraries. The VLDB Journal, 11(1), 58-67. doi:10.1007/s007780200063
56. Fleischmann, K. R. (2007). Digital libraries and human values: Human-computer interaction meets social informatics. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 1-17. doi:10.1002/meet.1450440229
57. Fox, E. A., Akscyn, R. M., Furuta, R. K., & Leggett, J. J. (1995). Digital libraries. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 23-28. doi:10.1145/205323.205325
58. Fox, E. A., Gonçalves, M. A., McMillan, G., Eaton, J., Atkins, A., & Kipp, N. (2002). The networked digital library of theses and dissertations: Changes in the university community. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(2), 102-124. doi:10.1007/BF02940968
59. Fuchs, M., Muscogiuri, C., Niederée, C., & Hemmje, M. (2004). Digital libraries in knowledge management: An e-learning case study. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(1), 31-35. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0060-x
60. Fuhr, N., Hansen, P., Mabe, M., Micsik, A., & Sølvberg, I. (2001). Digital libraries: A generic classification and evaluation scheme. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, LNCS, 2163, 187-199). doi:10.1007/3-540-44796-2_17
61. Gahegan, M., Agrawal, R., Banchuen, T., & DiBiase, D. (2007). Building rich, semantic descriptions of learning activities to facilitate reuse in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1/2), 81-97. doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0021-x
62. Garcia-Crespo, A., Gomez-Berbis, J. M., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Garcia-Sanchez, F. (2011). Digital libraries and Web 3.0. The CallimachusDL approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1424-1430. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.046
63. Gardner, S., & Eng, S. (2005). What students want: Generation Y and the changing function of the academic library. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 405-420. doi:10.1353/pla.2005.0034
64. Garibay, C., Gutiérrez, H., & Figueroa, A. (2010). Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment (QFD) and the Kano model. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(2), 125-132. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.002
65. Ginger, K., & Goger, L. (2011). Evaluating the National Science Digital Library for learning application readiness. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-4. doi:10.1002/meet.2011.14504801034
66. Gonçalves, M. A., Fox, E. A., Watson, L. T., & Kipp, N. A. (2004). Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5S): A formal model for digital libraries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(2), 270-312. doi:10.1145/984321.984325
67. Gonçalves, M. A., Moreira, B. L., Fox, E. A., & Watson, L. T. (2007). What is a good digital library? A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing & Management: An International Journal, 43(5), 1416-1437. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.010
68. Greenstein, D., & Thorin, S. E. (2002). The digital library: A biography. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation.
69. Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: Managing the moments-of-truth in service competition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
70. Guns, R. (2013). Tracing the origins of the Semantic Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(10), 2173-2181. doi:10.1002/asi.22907
71. Haider, S. J. (2004). Coping with change: Issues facing university libraries in Pakistan. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(3), 229-236. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.02.005
72. Hendler, J. (2008). Web 3.0: Chicken farms on the Semantic Web. Computer, 41(1), 106-108. doi:10.1109/MC.2008.34
73. Heradio, R., Fernandez-Amoros, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users perceptions. Journal of Information Science, 38(3), 269-283. doi:10.1177/0165551512438359
74. Hernon, P., & Altman, E. (2010). Assessing service quality: Satisfying the expectations of library customers. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
75. Hernon, P., & Calvert, P. (2005). E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27(3), 377-404. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.04.005
76. Herrera-Viedma, E., & Lopez-Gijon, J. (2013). Libraries' social role in the information age. Science, 339(6126), 1382. doi:10.1126/science.339.6126.1382-a
77. Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W. M., & Tam, K. Y. (2001). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.
78. Hu, C. P., Hu, Y., & Yan, W. W. (2014). An empirical study of factors influencing user perception of university digital libraries in China. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3/4), 225-233. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.008
79. Ioannidis, Y. (2005). Digital libraries at a crossroads. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(4), 255-265. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0098-4
80. Isaac, A., Schlobach, S., Matthezing, H., & Zinn, K. (2008). Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies. Library Review, 57(3), 187-199. doi:10.1108/00242530810865475
81. Jankowska, M. A., Hertel, K., & Young, N. J. (2006). Improving library service quality to graduate students: LibQUAL + TM survey results in a practical setting. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1), 59-76. doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0005
82. Jeng, J. (2005). What is usability in the context of the digital library and how can it be measured? Information Technology and Libraries, 24(2), 47-56.
83. Jiang, Y., Zheng, H. T., Wang, X., Lu, B., & Wu, K. (2011). Affiliation disambiguation for constructing semantic digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1029-1041. doi:10.1002/asi.21538
84. Johnson, W. G. (2007). LibQUAL + and the community college. Community & Junior College Libraries, 14(2), 139-150. doi:10.1300/02763910802139405
85. Jones, E. A., & Courant, P. N. (2013). Killer serials: Did electronic journals really destroy the university press? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1002/meet.14505001080
86. Jones, G. J. F., & Lam-Adesina, A. M. (2002). An investigation of mixed-media information retrieval. Research and advanced technology for digital libraries. Paper presented at the Sixth European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2002), Rome, Italy.
87. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Investigating the structural relationships among organisational support, learning flow, learners' satisfaction and learning transfer in corporate e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 973-984. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01116.x
88. Kalinichenko, L. A., Skvortsov, N. A., Briukhov, D. O., Kravchenko, D. V., & Chaban, I. A. (2000). Designing personalized digital libraries over websites with semistructured data. Programming and Computer Software, 26(3), 123-133. doi:10.1007/BF02759311
89. Kapidakis, S., Terzis, S., & Sairamesh, J. (2000). A framework for performance monitoring, load balancing, adaptive timeouts and quality of service in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(1), 19-35. doi: 10.1007/s007990050008
90. Kasemsap, K. (2014a). The role of social networking in global business environments. In P. Smith & T. Cockburn (Eds.), Impact of emerging digital technologies on leadership in global business (pp. 183-201). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6134-9.ch010
91. Kasemsap, K. (2014b). The role of social media in the knowledge-based organizations. In I. Lee (Ed.), Integrating social media into business practice, applications, management, and models (pp. 254-275). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6182-0.ch013
92. Kasemsap, K. (2015a). The role of radio frequency identification in modern Libraries. In S. Thanuskodi (Ed.), Handbook of research on inventive digital tools for collection management and development in modern libraries (pp. 361-385). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8178-1.ch021
93. Kasemsap, K. (2015b). The role of cloud computing adoption in global business. In V. Chang, R. Walters, & G. Wills (Eds.), Delivery and adoption of cloud computing services in contemporary organizations (pp. 26-55). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8210-8.ch002
94. Kasemsap, K. (2016a). The roles of knowledge management and organizational innovation in global business. In G. Jamil, J. Poças-Rascão, F. Ribeiro, & A. Malheiro da Silva (Eds.), Handbook of research on information architecture and management in modern organizations (pp. 130-153). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8637-3.ch006
95. Kasemsap, K. (2016b). The roles of e-learning, organizational learning, and knowledge management in the learning organizations. In E. Railean, G. Walker, A. Elçi, & L. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of research on applied learning theory and design in modern education (pp. 786-816). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9634-1.ch039
96. Kasemsap, K. (2016c). Examining the roles of virtual team and information technology in global business. In C. Graham (Ed.), Strategic management and leadership for systems development in virtual spaces (pp. 1-21). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9688-4.ch001
97. Kassim, A. R. C., & Kochtanek, T. R. (2003). Designing, implementing, and evaluating an educational digital library resource. Online Information Review, 27(3), 160-168. doi:10.1108/14684520310481427
98. Kaur, K., & Diljit, S. (2012). Modelling web-based library service quality. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 184-196. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2012.02.005
99. Kim, H., & Choi, C. (2000). XML how it will be applied to digital library systems. The Electronic Library, 18(3), 183-189. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005354
100. Kim, Y. M. (2011). Users' perceptions of university library websites: A unifying view. Library & Information Science Research, 33(1), 63-72. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.04.007
101. Kiran, K., & Diljit, S. (2012). Modelling web-based library service quality. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 184-196. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2012.02.005
102. Kodali, N., Farkas, C., & Wijesekera, D. (2004). An authorization model for multimedia digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(3), 139-155. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0080-1
103. Kogalovsky, M. R. (2000). Systematization of information resources collections in digital libraries. Programming and Computer Software, 26(3), 140-155. doi:10.1007/BF02759313
104. Kogalovsky, M. R. (2002). Digital libraries: Ongoing development. Programming and Computer Software, 28(4), 185-188. doi:10.1023/A:1016365232234
105. Kogalovsky, M. R., & Novikov, B. A. (2000). Digital libraries as a new class of information systems. Programming and Computer Software, 26(3), 119-122. doi:10.1007/BF02759310
106. Koohang, A., & Ondracek, J. (2005). Users' views about the usability of digital libraries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 407-423. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00472.x
107. Koutrika, G., & Ioannidis, Y. (2004). Rule-based query personalization in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(1), 60-63. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0068-2
108. Kruk, S. R., Decker, S., & Zieborak, L. (2005). JeromeDL: Adding Semantic Web technologies to digital libraries.Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2005), Copenhagen, Denmark. doi:10.1007/11546924_70
109. Kuhlthau, C. (1997). Learning in digital libraries: An information search process approach. Library Trends, 45(4), 708-724.
110. Kyrillidou, M., & Giersch, S. (2005). Developing the DigiQUAL protocol for digital library evaluation. Paper presented at the Fifth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2005), Denver, CO. doi:10.1145/1065385.1065426
111. Lanagan, J., & Smeaton, A. F. (2012). Video digital libraries: Contributive and decentralized. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 12(4), 159-178. doi:10.1007/s00799-012-0078-z
112. Lane, F. C., Anderson, B., Ponce, H. F., & Natesan, P. (2012). Factorial invariance of LibQUAL + ® as a measure of library service quality over time. Library & Information Science Research, 34(1), 22-30. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2011.07.004
113. Lee, L. Z. (2001). Growing a national learning environment and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education: Current issues and opportunities for the NSDL program. D-Lib Magazine, 7(3), 65-73. doi: 10.1045/march2001-zia
114. Leidig, J. P., & Fox, E. A. (2014). Intelligent digital libraries and tailored services. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 43(3), 463-480. doi:10.1007/s10844-014-0342-3
115. Lesk, M. (2005). Understanding digital libraries. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
116. Li, H., Lee, W. C., Sivasubramaniam, A., & Giles, C. L. (2008). Workload analysis for scientific literature digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 9(2), 139-149. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0043-z
117. Li, Y., Duan, Y., Fu, Z., & Alford, P. (2012). An empirical study on behavioural intention to reuse e-learning systems in rural China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 933-948. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01261.x
118. Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2011). A comparative study of digital library use: Factors, perceived influences, and satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 230-236. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.015
119. Lovasz, A. E., Lovasz, E. R., & Gruescu, C. M. (2014). Digital library of mechanisms. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163, 85-91. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.290
120. Lu, J., & Callan, J. (2006). Full-text federated search of text-based digital libraries in peer-to-peer networks. Information Retrieval, 9(4), 477-498. doi:10.1007/s10791-006-6388-2
121. Lynch, C., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1995, May 18-19). Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda. Paper presented at the Information Infrastructure Technology and Applications (IITA) Digital Libraries Workshop, Reston, VA.
122. Lytras, M. D., Damiani, E., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2008). Web 2.0: The business model. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
123. Lytras, M. D., & Garcia, R. (2008). Semantic Web applications: A framework for industry and business exploitation - What is needed for the adoption of the Semantic Web from the market and industry. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(1), 93-108. doi:10.1504/IJKL.2008.019739
124. MacDonald, C. M. (2013). Learning and teaching information architecture: The current state of IA education. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(1), 28-35. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720400109
125. Marchionini, G. (2000). Evaluating digital libraries: A longitudinal and multifaceted view. Library Trends, 49(2), 304-333.
126. Marchionini, G., & Maurer, H. (1995). The roles of digital libraries in teaching and learning. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 67-75. doi:10.1145/205323.205345
127. Marinković, V., Senić, V., Kocić, M., & Šapić, S. (2013). Investigating the impact of SERVQUAL dimensions on customer satisfaction: The lessons learnt from Serbian travel agencies. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(2), 184-196. doi:10.1002/jtr.884
128. Marshall, B. B., Chen, H., Shen, R., & Fox, E. A. (2006). Moving digital libraries into the student learning space: The GetSmart experience. ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 2(1), 1-20.
129. Marshall, S. (2012). Improving the quality of e-learning: Lessons from the eMM. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 65-78. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00443.x
130. Masoumi, D., & Lindström, B. (2012). Quality in e-learning: A framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 27-41. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00440.x
131. Maxwell, S., & Mucklow, J. (2012). E-learning initiatives to support prescribing. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 74(4), 621-631. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04300.x
132. McCollin, C., Ograjenšek, I., Göb, R., & Ahlemeyer-Stubbe, A. (2011). SERVQUAL and the process improvement challenge. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 27(5), 705-717. doi:10.1002/qre.1234
133. McCray, A. T., & Gallagher, M. E. (2001). Principles for digital library development. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 49-54. doi:10.1145/374308.374339
134. McKay, D., Shukla, P., Hunt, R., & Cunningham, S. J. (2004). Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: Three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(4), 283-297. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0088-6
135. Meghini, C., Spyratos, N., Sugibuchi, T., & Yang, J. (2014). A model for digital libraries and its translation to RDF. Journal on Data Semantics, 3(2), 107-139. doi:10.1007/s13740-013-0029-x
136. Meghini, C., Spyratos, N., & Yang, J. (2010). A data model for digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11(1), 41-56. doi:10.1007/s00799-011-0064-x
137. Meyyappan, N., Foo, S., & Chowdhury, G. G. (2004). Design and evaluation of a task-based digital library for the academic community. The Journal of Documentation, 60(4), 449-475. doi:10.1108/00220410410548162
138. Moreira, B. L., Gonçalves, M. A., Laender, A. H. F., & Fox, E. A. (2009). Automatic evaluation of digital libraries with 5SQual. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 102-123. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.003
139. Muhammad, A., & Kanwal, S. (2009). Acceptance of digital library among female students and effects of limited access of digital library on their performance in research work: A case of International Islamic University. The International Information & Library Review, 41(3), 122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2009.07.003
140. Ngimwa, P., & Adams, A. (2013). The different roles of "Design Process Champions" for digital libraries in African higher education. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 13(3/4), 119-133. doi:10.1007/s00799-013-0104-9
141. Nguyen, S. H., & Chowdhury, G. (2013). Interpreting the knowledge map of digital library research (1990-2010). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6), 1235-1258. doi:10.1002/asi.22830
142. Nicholson, S. (2005). Digital library archaeology: A conceptual framework for understanding library use through artifact-based evaluation. The Library Quarterly, 75(4), 496-520. doi:10.1086/502788
143. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
144. Osborn, W., & Hinze, A. (2014). TIP-tree: A spatial index for traversing locations in context-aware mobile access to digital libraries. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 15, 26-47. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.12.002
145. Ossiannilsson, E., & Landgren, L. (2012). Quality in e-learning: A conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 42-51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00439.x
146. Parandjuk, J. C. (2010). Using information architecture to evaluate digital libraries. The Reference Librarian, 51(2), 124-134. doi:10.1080/02763870903579737
147. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50. doi:10.2307/1251430
148. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multi-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00084-3
149. Perez, I. J., Cabrerizo, F. J., Morente-Molinera, J. A., Urena, R., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). Reaching consensus in digital libraries: A linguistic approach. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 449-458. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.289
150. Plum, T., Franklin, B., Kyrillidou, M., Roebuck, G., & Davis, M. (2010). Measuring the impact of networked electronic resources: Developing an assessment infrastructure for libraries, state, and other types of consortia. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 184-198. doi:10.1108/14678041011064098
151. Pomerantz, J., Abbas, J., & Mostafa, J. (2009). Teaching digital library concepts using digital library applications. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 10(1), 1-13. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0049-6
152. Pons, D., Hilera, J. R., Fernandez, L., & Pages, C. (2015). Managing the quality of e-learning resources in repositories. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(4), 477-488. doi:10.1002/cae.21619
153. Prasad, A. R. D., & Madalli, D. P. (2008). Faceted infrastructure for semantic digital libraries. Library Review, 57(3), 225-234. doi:10.1108/00242530810865493
154. Qian-yi, G., Faisal, A., & Tamara, S. (2005). Resource discovery in distributed digital libraries through visual knowledge navigation. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 6(11), 1306-1311. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1306
155. Raju, J. (2014). Knowledge and skills for the digital era academic library. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(2), 163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.007
156. Renda, M., & Straccia, U. (2005). A personalized collaborative digital library environment: A model and an application. Information Processing & Management: An International Journal, 41(1), 5-21. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.04.007
157. Resmini, A. (2012). Information architecture in the age of complexity. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(1), 9-13. doi:10.1002/bult.2012.1720390104
158. Rezgui, A., Bouguettaya, A., & Eltoweissy, M. (2004). SemWebDL: A privacy-preserving Semantic Web infrastructure for digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(3), 171-184. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0081-0
159. Richardson, W. R., Srinivasan, V., & Fox, E. A. (2008). Knowledge discovery in digital libraries of electronic theses and dissertations: An NDLTD case study. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 9(2), 163-171. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0046-9
160. Ross, L., & Sennyey, P. (2008). The library is dead, long live the library! The practice of academic librarianship and the digital revolution. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(2), 145-152. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.12.006
161. Ross, S., & Hedstrom, M. (2005). Preservation research and sustainable digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(4), 317-324. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0099-3
162. Saeednia, S. (2000). How to maintain both privacy and authentication in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2(4), 251-258. doi:10.1007/s007990050003
163. San-xing, C., Rody, K. R., & Jian-bo, L. (2005). Enhancing the usage pattern mining performance with temporal segmentation of QPop increment in digital libraries. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 6(11), 1290-1296. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1290
164. Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital library evaluation: Toward an evolution of concepts. Library Trends, 49(2), 350-369.
165. Saracevic, T. (2004). Evaluation of digital libraries: An overview. Paper presented at the DELOS Workshop on the Evaluation of Digital Libraries, Padova, Italy.
166. Saracevic, T., & Covi, L. (2000). Challenges for digital library evaluation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 341-350.
167. Seadle, M., & Greifeneder, E. (2007). Defining a digital library. Library Hi Tech, 25(2), 169-173. doi:10.1108/07378830710754938
168. Serrano-Guerrero, J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Olivas, J. A., Cerezo, A., & Romero, F. P. (2011). A Google wave-based fuzzy recommender system to disseminate information in University Digital Libraries 2.0. Information Sciences, 181(9), 1503-1516. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.012
169. Sharifabadi, S. R. (2006). How digital libraries can support e-learning. The Electronic Library, 24(3), 389-401. doi:10.1108/02640470610671231
170. Sheeja, N. K. (2010). Undergraduate students' perceptions of digital library: A case study. The International Information & Library Review, 42(3), 149-153. doi:10.1080/10572317.2010.10762859
171. Shi, X., & Levy, S. (2005). A theory-guided approach to library services assessment. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 266-277. doi:10.5860/crl.66.3.266
172. Shuva, N. Z. (2012). Building digital libraries in Bangladesh: A developing country perspective. The International Information & Library Review, 44(3), 132-146. doi:10.1080/10572317.2012.10762924
173. Smeaton, A. F., & Callan, J. (2005). Personalisation and recommender systems in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(4), 299-308. doi:10.1007/s00799-004-0100-1
174. Snead, J. T., Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2005). Developing multi-method, iterative, and user-centered evaluation strategies for digital libraries: Functionality, usability, and accessibility.Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2005), Charlotte, NC. doi:10.1002/meet.14504201161
175. Stelmaszewska, H., & Blandford, A. (2004). From physical to digital: A case study of computer scientists' behaviour in physical libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4(2), 82-92. doi:10.1007/s00799-003-0072-6
176. Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., Paramythis, A., & Nikolaou, C. (2000). User interaction in digital libraries: Coping with diversity through adaptation. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3(2), 185-205. doi:10.1007/s007999900020
177. Sumner, T., & Marlino, M. (2004). Digital libraries and educational practice: A case for new models. Paper presented at the Fourth ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2004), Tucson, AZ. doi:10.1145/996350.996389
178. Sun, J., & Yuan, B. Z. (2012). Development and characteristic of digital library as a library branch. IERI Procedia, 2, 12-17. doi:10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.044
179. Surla, S. M. (2007). An information architecture approach to building a much better digital libraries. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 33(6), 41-43. doi:10.1002/bult.2007.1720330612
180. Tammaro, A. M. (2008). User perceptions of digital libraries: A case study in Italy. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 9(2), 130-137. doi:10.1108/14678040810906835
181. Tan, W., Chen, S., Li, J., Li, L., Wang, T., & Hu, X. (2014). A trust evaluation model for e-learning systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(3), 353-365. doi:10.1002/sres.2283
182. Tani, A., Candela, L., & Castelli, D. (2013). Dealing with metadata quality: The legacy of digital library efforts. Information Processing & Management: An International Journal, 49(6), 1194-1205. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2013.05.003
183. Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., Ackerman, M. S., & Karger, D. R. (2004). The perfect search engine is not enough: A study of orienteering behaviour in directed search.Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), Vienna, Austria. doi:10.1145/985692.985745
184. Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Peis, E., Sanz, R., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). A quality based recommender system to disseminate information in a university digital library. Information Sciences, 261, 52-69. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.10.036
185. Thompson, B., Cook, C., & Kyrillidou, M. (2006). Using localized survey items to augment standardized benchmarking measures: A LibQUAL+(TM) study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2), 219-230. doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0029
186. Thompson, B., Kyrillidou, M., & Cook, C. (2008). Library users' service desires: A LibQUAL + study. The Library Quarterly, 78(1), 1-18. doi:10.1086/523907
187. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., & Tam, K. Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215-242. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(02)91024-4
188. Tramullas, J., Sánchez-Casabón, A. I., & Garrido-Picazo, P. (2013). An evaluation based on the digital library user: An experience with greenstone software. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 167-174. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.037
189. Tsakonas, G., Mitrelis, A., Papachristopoulos, L., & Papatheodorou, C. (2013). An exploration of the digital library evaluation literature based on an ontological representation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1914-1926. doi:10.1002/asi.22900
190. Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2011). An ontological representation of the digital library evaluation domain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1577-1593. doi:10.1002/asi.21559
191. Vamshi, A., & Raj, R. (2005). Towards a self healing information system for digital libraries. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 6(11), 1221-1228. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1221
192. Vossen, G., Lytras, M., & Koudas, N. (2007). Editorial: Revisiting the (machine) Semantic Web: The missing layers for the human Semantic Web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(2), 145-148. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2007.30
193. Warren, P. (2006). Knowledge management and the Semantic Web: From scenario to technology. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(1), 53-59. doi:10.1109/MIS.2006.12
194. Wiederhold, G. (1995). Digital libraries, value, and productivity. Communications of the ACM, 38(4), 85-96. doi:10.1145/205323.205347
195. Wilson, A. (2012). Effective professional development for e-learning: What do the managers think? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 892-900. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01248.x
196. Witten, I. H., Bainbridge, D., & Nichols, D. (2009). How to build a digital library. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
197. Wright, M., Sumner, T., Moore, R., & Koch, T. (2007). Connecting digital libraries to eScience: The future of scientific scholarship. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1/2), 1-4. doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0030-9
198. Xie, H. I. (2006). Evaluation of digital libraries: Criteria and problems from users' perspectives. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 433-452. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2006.06.002
199. Xie, H. I. (2008). Users' evaluation of digital libraries (DLs): Their uses, their criteria, and their assessment. Information Processing & Management: An International Journal, 44(3), 1346-1373. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.003
200. Xie, I., & Cool, C. (2009). Understanding help seeking within the context of searching digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 477-494. doi:10.1002/asi.20988
201. Xie, I., & Stevenson, J. A. (2014). Functions of twitter in digital libraries. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-4. doi:10.1002/meet.2014.14505101117
202. Yang, S. C. (2001). An interpretive and situated approach to an evaluation of Perseus digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), 1210-1223. doi:10.1002/asi.1188
203. Yuan, J., Wei, B. G., Wang, L. D., Lu, W. M., & Zhuang, Y. T. (2010). CMSOF: A structured data organization framework for scanned Chinese medicine books in digital libraries. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C, 11(11), 882-892. doi:10.1631/jzus.C1001007
204. Yue-ting, Z. (2005). Digital libraries: A testbed for multimedia technology. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 6(11), 1201-1203. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1201
205. Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Zhu, L., & Qiao, X. (2014). A synergetic mechanism for digital library service in mobile and cloud computing environment. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(8), 1845-1854. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0798-8
206. Zhang, Y. (2010). Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 88-110. doi:10.1002/asi.21220
207. Zhao, X. D., Bai, C. H., & Hui, Y. V. (2002). An empirical assessment and application of SERVQUAL in a Mainland Chinese department store. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 13(2), 241-254. doi:10.1080/09544120120102478
208. Albertson, D. (2010). Influences of users' familiarity with visual search topics on interactive video digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2490-2502. doi:10.1002/asi.21413
209. Andro, M., Asselin, E., & Maisonneuve, M. (2012). Digital libraries: Comparison of 10 software. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 36(3/4), 79-83. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2012.05.002
210. Booker, L. D., Detlor, B., & Serenko, A. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of online library resources by business students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2503-2520. doi:10.1002/asi.22723
211. Chen, J., Knudson, R., & Namgoong, M. (2014). An investigation of effective and efficient multilingual information access to digital collections. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-3. doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101096
212. Copeland, A. J. (2011). Analysis of public library users' digital preservation practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1288-1300. doi:10.1002/asi.21553
213. Coughlin, D. M., Campbell, M. C., & Jansen, B. J. (2013). Measuring the value of library content collections. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-13. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001047
214. Cox, A. M., & Corrall, S. (2013). Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1526-1542. doi:10.1002/asi.22847
215. Fenlon, K., Senseney, M., Green, H., Bhattacharyya, S., Willis, C., & Downie, J. S. (2014). Scholarbuilt collections: A study of user requirements for research in large-scale digital libraries. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-10. doi:10.1002/meet.2014.14505101047
216. Gourlay, L., Lanclos, D. M., & Oliver, M. (2015). Sociomaterial texts, spaces and devices: Questioning "digital dualism" in library and study practices. Higher Education Quarterly, 69(3), 263-278. doi:10.1111/hequ.12075
217. Ho, S. M., Bieber, M., Song, M., & Zhang, X. (2013). Seeking beyond with IntegraL: A user study of sense-making enabled by anchor-based virtual integration of library systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1927-1945. doi:10.1002/asi.22904
218. Huang, C., & Xie, I. (2011). Help feature interactions in digital libraries: Influence of learning styles. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801040
219. Jehong, H. (2011). An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 35(2/3), 45-60. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2011.03.018
220. Kim, Y. M., & Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 211-218. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003
221. Kostkova, P., & Madle, G. (2013). What impact do healthcare digital libraries have? An evaluation of national resource of infection control at the point of care using the Impact-ED framework. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 13(2), 77-90. doi:10.1007/s00799-012-0101-4
222. Mahmood, K., & Richardson, J. V. (2011). Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: A survey of ARL library websites. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45(4), 365-375. doi:10.1108/00330331111182085
223. Mairaj, M. I., & Naseer, M. M. (2013). Library services and user satisfaction in developing countries: A case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 30(4), 318-326. doi:10.1111/hir.12038
224. Mak, B. (2014). Archaeology of a digitization. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1515-1526. doi:10.1002/asi.23061
225. Martin, K., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Are e-books replacing print books? Tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1016-1028. doi:10.1002/asi.22801
226. Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. (2015). Analyzing the interaction patterns in a faceted search interface. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 1030-1047. doi:10.1002/asi.23227
227. Oh, S., Choi, W., & Valisa, S. (2013). The sonzogno digital library project. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1002/meet.14505001138
228. Sinn, D., & Soares, N. (2014). Historians' use of digital archival collections: The web, historical scholarship, and archival research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(9), 1794-1809. doi:10.1002/asi.23091
229. Tang, J., Fong, A. C. M., Wang, B., & Zhang, J. (2012). A unified probabilistic framework for name disambiguation in digital library. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24(6), 975-987. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2011.13
230. Vasileiou, M., Rowley, J., & Hartley, R. (2013). Metadata and providing access to e-books. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 518-528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01315.x
231. Vinagre, M. H., Leonor, G. P., & Paula, O. (2011). Revisiting digital libraries quality: A multiple-item scale approach. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 12(3), 214-236. doi:10.1108/14678041111196677
232. Zavalina, O. L. (2014). Exploring the role of scale: Comparative analysis of digital library user searching. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-4. doi:10.1002/meet.2014.14505101120
233. Ziemba, L., Cornejo, C., & Beck, H. W. (2011). A water conservation digital libraries using ontologies. The Electronic Library, 29(2), 200-211. doi:10.1108/02640471111125168