Users' perceptions of university library websites: A unifying view

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 63-72

  Kim, Yong Mi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651378777     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adkins D., Esser L. Literature and technology skills for entry-level children's librarians: What employers want. Children and Libraries 2004, 2(3):14-21.
2. Applegate R. Faculty information assignments: A longitudinal examination of variations in survey results. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006, 32:355-363.
3. Atwong C., Taylor H. Integrating information literacy into business education: A successful case of faculty-librarian collaboration. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 2008, 13:433-448.
4. Borgman C., Smart L., Millwood K., Finley J., Champeny L., Gilliland A., et al. Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research: Implications for the design of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005, 56:636-657.
5. Bostick, S. (1992). The development and validation of the library anxiety scale. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
6. Bowers C., Chew B., Ford C., Smith C., Herrington C. Interdisciplinary synergy: A partnership between business and library faculty and its effects on students' information literacy. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 2009, 14:110-127.
7. Brown S.A., Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., Burkman J.R. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems 2002, 11:283-295.
8. Bull B. Exemplar sampling: Nonrandom methods of selecting a sample which characterizes a finite multivariate population. The American Statistician 2005, 59(2):166-172.
9. Burton-Jones A., Hubona G. Individual differences and usage behavior: Revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption. Database for Advances in Information Systems 2005, 36(2):58-77.
10. Byrne B. Testing for mulitigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling 2004, 11:272-300.
11. Carpenter J., Smith N. Discovering research resources: Researchers' use of libraries and other information sources. Cultural Trends 2001, 43:1-34.
12. Chao H. Assessing the quality of academic libraries on the Web: The development and testing of criteria. Library & Information Science Research 2002, 24:169-194.
13. Culley J., Healy D., Cudd K. Business students and the university library: An overlooked element in the business curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 1977, 2:292-296.
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1989, 13:319-340.
15. Davis F., Bogozzi R., Warshaw P. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1992, 22:1111-1132.
16. Dewald N. What do they tell their students? Business faculty acceptance of the Web and library databases for student research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005, 31:209-215.
17. Dudley L., Davis H., McGrady D. Using an investment project to develop professional competencies in introduction to financial accounting. Journal of Education for Business 2001, 125-131.
18. Finn B., Johnston P. Index use by engineering faculty and students. Georgia Library Quarterly 2004, 41(3):5-15.
19. Fister B., Gilbert J., Fry A. Aggregated interdisciplinary databases and the needs of undergraduate researchers. Libraries and the Academy 2008, 8:273-292.
20. Graham K. When the library becomes the largest computer lab on campus: Supporting productivity software in an academic environment. College & Research Libraries News 2003, 64:462-464.
21. Gross M., Latham D. Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research 2007, 29:332-353.
22. Guthrie K. What do faculty think of electronic resources? 2009, Retrieved from. http://www.cni.org/tfms/2004a.spring/presentations/CNI_Guthrie_What.ppt.
23. Haglund L., Olsson P. The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: A multiple case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, 34:52-59.
24. Harpel-Burke P. Library homepage design at medium-sized universities: A comparison to commercial homepages via Nielsen and Tahir. Library Homepage Design 2005, 21:193-208.
25. Hart R. The relationships between work roles and information gathering of the faculty at SUNY, College at Fredonia. Library & Information Science Research 1998, 20:161-385.
26. Heckathorn D. Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems 2002, 49:11-34.
27. Heim G., Meile L., Tease J., Glass J., Laher S., Rowan J., et al. Experiential learning in a management information systems course: Simulating IT consulting and CRM system procurement. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 15:428-463.
28. Heinrichs J., Lim J. Emerging requirements of computer related competencies for librarians. Library & Information Science Research 2009, 31:101-106.
29. Heinrichs J., Lim K.-S., Lim J.-S., Spangenberg M. Determining factors of academic library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:2325-2334.
30. Hemminger B., Lu K., Vaughan K., Adams S. Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:2205-2225.
31. Hernon P., Calvert P. E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research 2005, 27:377-404.
32. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., Wong W.M., Tam K.Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001-2002, 18:97-124.
33. Hsieh-Yee I. Student use of online catalogs and other information channels. College and Research Libraries 1996, 57:161-175.
34. Janes J.W. Other people's judgments: A comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45:160-171.
35. Jerabek J., Meyer L., Kordinak T. "Library anxiety" and "computer anxiety": Measures, validity, and research implications. Library & Information Science Research 2001, 23:277-289.
36. Jiao Q., Onwuegbuzie A. Identifying library anxiety through students' learning-modality preferences. Library Quarterly 1999, 69:202-216.
37. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of preadoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1999, 23:183-213.
38. Keeney R.L. The value of internet commerce to the consumer. Management Science 1999, 45:533-542.
39. Kim K. Information seeking on the Web: Effects of user and task variables. Library & Information Science Research 2001, 23:233-255.
40. Kim J. Task as a context of information seeking: An investigation of daily life tasks on the Web. Libri 2008, 58:172-181.
41. Kim Y.-M. Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1178-1191.
42. Kim Y.-M. The adoption of university library website resources: A multi-group analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(5):978-993.
43. Kim Y.-M., Abbas J. Adoption of library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010, 36(3):211-218.
44. King C., Frank S., Platt R. E-Commerce courses: Overview of nature and content. Journal of Education for Business 2001, 332-337.
45. Li Y. Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:275-291.
46. Li Y., Belkin N.J. A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing & Management 2008, 44:1822-1837.
47. Lin J., Chan H., Wei K. Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1338-1349.
48. Linde L., Bergstrom M. Impact of prior knowledge of informational content and organization on learning search principles in a database. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1988, 13:90-101.
49. Marchionini G., Dwiggins S., Katz A., Lin X. Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library & Information Science Research 1993, 15:35-69.
50. McKinney V., Yoon K., Zahedi F.M. The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research 2002, 13:296-315.
51. Meadow C.T., Wang J., Yuan W. A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995, 11:490-505.
52. Mellon C.A. Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries 1986, 47:160-165.
53. Moss G., Gunn R., Heller J. Some men like it black, some women like it pink: consumer implications of differences in male and female website design. Journal of Consumer Behavior 2006, 5:328-341.
54. Nadkarni S., Gupta R. A task-based model of perceived website complexity. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2007, 31:501-524.
55. Nov O., Ye C. Users' personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: the case for resistance to change. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:845-851.
56. Nov O., Ye C. Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60:1702-1708.
57. Oakes W. External validity and the use of real people as subjects. American Psychologist 1972, 27:959-962.
58. Palmer J. Website usability, design and performance criteria. Information Systems Research 2002, 13:150-167.
59. Park N., Roman R., Lee S., Chung J. User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Information Management 2009, 29:196-209.
60. Rutledge D.P., Maehler A. An assessment of library education contributions to business student learning: A case study. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 2003, 9(1):3-19.
61. Schaik P., Ling J. Design parameters of rating scales for Web sites. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2007, 14(1):1-35.
62. Schaupp L., Belanger F. A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2005, 6:95-111.
63. Scoyoc A., Cason C. The electronic academic library: Undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Libraries and the Academy 2006, 6(1):47-58.
64. Spink A., Greisdorf H., Bateman J. From highly relevant to not relevant: Examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management 1998, 34:599-621.
65. Tabatabai D., Shore B. How experts and novices search the Web. Library & Information Science Research 2005, 27:222-248.
66. Tarafdar M., Zhang J. Determinants of reach and loyalty: A study of website performance and implications for Website design. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2008, winter, 16-24.
67. Thompson B., Kyrillidou M., Cook C. Library users' service desires: A libqual + study. The Library Quarterly 2008, 78:1-18.
68. Thomsett-Scott B., May F. How may we help you? Online education faculty tell us what they need from libraries and librarians. Journal of Library Administration 2009, 49:111-135.
69. Tombros A., Ruthven I., Jose J. How users assess Web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005, 56:327-344.
70. Torkzadeh G., Dhillon G. Measuring factors that influence the success of Internet commerce. Information Systems Research 2002, 13:187-204.
71. Vakkari P. Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:602-612.
72. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 2000, 11:342-365.
73. Walker S., Reynolds L. Screen design for children's reading: Some key issues. Journal of Research in Reading 2000, 23:224-234.
74. Webster J., Ahuja J. Enhancing the design of web navigation systems: The influence of user disorientation on engagement and performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2006, 30:661-678.
75. White G.W. Academic subject specialist positions in the United States: A content analysis of announcements from 1990 through 1998. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1999, 25:372-382.
76. Whitmire E. The relationship between undergraduates' background characteristics and college experiences and their academic library use. College & Research Libraries 2002, 62:528-540.
77. Wildemuth B.M. The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 53:246-258.
78. Xie H. Evaluation of digital libraries: Criteria and problems from users' perspectives. Library & Information Science Research 2006, 28:433-452.
79. Yen B., Hu P., Wang M. Toward an analytical approach for effective Web site design: A framework for modeling, evaluation and enhancement. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications 2007, 6:159-170.
80. Yitzhaki M., Hammershlag G. Accessibility and use of information sources among computer scientists and software engineers in Israel: Academy versus industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55:832-842.