Digital library evaluation: Toward an evolution of concepts

Library Trends

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 350-369

  Saracevic, Tefko ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034257333     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arms, W. Y. (2000). Digital libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Beagrie, N., & Greenstein, D. (1998). Managing digital collection: Arts and Humanities Data Service (AHDS) policies, standards and practices: Evaluation criteria for evaluation. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://ahds.ac.uk/public/srg.html#criteria.
3. Bishop, A. P. (1998). Measuring access, use, and success in digital libraries. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/bishop.html.
4. Bishop, A. P. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 255-279.
5. Bonn, M. S.; Lougee, W. P.; Mackie-Mason, J. K.; &. Riveros, J. F. (1999). A report on the PEAK experiment: Context and design. D-Lib Magazine, 5(6). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june99/06bonn.html.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 227-243.
8. Buttenfield, B. (1999). Usability evaluation of digital libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 17(3/4), 39-59.
9. Cornell University. (1999). MESL technical report. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://cidc.library.cornell.edu/gateway.htm.
10. Digital Library Federation. (1999, April 21). A working definition of digital library. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.clir.org/diglib/dldefinition.htm.
11. Digital Library Federation (1999, September 17). DLF Home. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.clir.org/diglib/oldhome.htm.
12. Hill, L. L.; Carver, L.; Larsgaard, M.; Dolin, R.; Smith, T. R.; Frew, J.; & Rae, M. A. (2000). Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3), 246-259.
13. Jones, M. L. W.; Gay, G. K.; & Rieger R. H. (1999). Project Soup: Comparing evaluations of digital collection efforts. D-Lib Magazine, 5(11). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november99/lljones.html.
14. Kilker. J., & Gay, G. (1998). The social construction of a digital library: A case study examining implications for evaluation. Information Technology and Libraries, 17(2), 60-70.
15. Lancaster, F. W. (1993). If you want to evaluate your library . . . (2d ed.). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
16. Lesk, M. E. (1997). Practical digital libraries: Books, bytes, and bucks. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
17. Licklider, J. C. R. (1965). Libraries of the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Mackie-Mason, J. K.; Riveros, J. F.; Bonn, M. S.; & Lougee, W. P. (1999). A Report on the PEAK experiment: Usage and economic behavior. D-Lib Magazine, 5(7/8). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july99/mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html.
19. Marchionini, G., & Crane, G. (1994). Evaluating hypermedia and learning: Methods and results from the Perseus Project. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(1), 5-34.
20. Marchionini, G.; Plaisant, C.; & Komlodi, A. (in press). The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. In A. Bishop, B. Buttenfield, & N. VanHouse (Eds.), Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://ils.unc.edu/~march/revision.pdf.
21. Okerson, A. (1999). Electronic collections development. Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.yale.edu/~okerson/ecd.html.
22. Rusbridge, C. (1998). Towards the hybrid library. D-Lib Magazine, 6(7/8). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/rusbridge/07rusbridge.html.
23. Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1997). Studying the value of library and information services. I. Establishing a theoretical framework. II. Methodology and taxonomy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 527-542, 543-563.
24. Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063.
25. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3d ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
26. Su, L. T. (1992). Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 28(4), 503-516.
27. Wiseman, N.; Rusbridge, C.; & Griffin, S. M. (1999). The joint NSF/JISC International Digital Libraries Initiative. D-Lib Magazine, 5(6). Retrieved September 29, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june99/06wiseman.htm.